<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
2 J/ x& i# `7 N但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
5 |1 G  e9 J& H4 w( r/ q大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
! s, F, |8 B9 P0 t3 {I agree you points that it could be illegal6 v7 e' f! X' o) B' h: R( @
but that is still a "gray area"
* r6 M$ B9 f! L8 ?whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair: R; A7 c; x% K- A8 x5 ]
5 v- B0 @, T2 p/ E# `
anyway, I want to say that is" r' s" K3 @7 N: Q
who is supposed to be protected by laws
4 Q) m0 r2 N  F/ d; Zcreators?1 A4 M; q# Q, f
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market: v! E( ?1 i) H$ W
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
% W" s; Z6 N# L% j" v0 ?5 Cwhen we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those
$ B2 A% U9 X/ Q! D" lWhy nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:1 c; T% w- p# c+ d+ ?& P
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
! N* @" J5 d. ]8 S0 |
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
& j- V6 u  N1 q4 U9 \. n: ~4 h
+ f. z( {. S* O3 `我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
- s. L% E  w. S1 w: W, c
唔係喎!+ _) O7 ?! O. N9 S6 _
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
3 a7 L5 L7 l5 s( r# Z我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!  U/ o+ a( ~, [6 Z) z/ j: l
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!) A1 d+ ?5 O1 r
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
& ]) @7 N" O/ l" i% w% J8 }) t4 o一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!3 a3 T" e5 ]; y0 a
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
. ?8 H8 C( B4 T- o/ a: Iif so bad, dun download la, right?* \! G2 d) H0 K& J
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
4 t7 C2 t! Z/ S; d6 Kbut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct, u8 M- |* Q4 ^% Q
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la, g( n/ _, J4 a! f! X
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
$ D3 {  a8 C* Yusing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema........., ~8 S2 Q3 i) l6 x
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
6 D" K# s) `5 [4 i8 t) w$ }2 yso, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!: o! a& x0 m/ @
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
! T/ a/ [+ {, ^) M& X9 ^政府想比下馬威0的人~~
+ z% o% n% D3 G% a錢就一定罰( {7 b. P5 G; f% [
未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,8 m  E* U" G+ x8 }) B: X
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?1 x, {$ h9 v) n; N4 n* }
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?  K% P6 _+ w9 M$ {3 \1 [" E
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。