<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大): ~% v6 Q5 z9 `) I
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:; B7 K+ d4 X0 ~
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
5 ]( N8 I' k7 M% C7 a- u
I agree you points that it could be illegal
0 o, {) E/ L. K  i% k; R3 ]( Tbut that is still a "gray area"& O/ g0 [0 x2 G6 S9 _4 B7 i! V
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair5 A4 F& F! y$ g3 D& \+ |6 M

+ V6 J- [/ o: s/ \* xanyway, I want to say that is, P: ?/ c- [  h# V% @' C2 h
who is supposed to be protected by laws
- N# o9 o- b$ L2 Y4 pcreators?5 a; B8 u: j0 J8 d& @& X4 k
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
( U9 F9 d  Q( E$ _5 j; d0 K. h& Ulet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.. Q$ _. I9 z6 A; {& k
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those
! ]( P0 |* g7 D/ N7 fWhy nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
! {9 P5 k, s1 Q- \3 G2 {% G其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
- ^5 ]  G9 O5 B3 ?/ c4 }) z! X3 ?6 @
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
, v% Y6 l0 x/ s/ s( V& \
' \9 h# g" j. E我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
0 ~- G2 B! i' M8 X唔係喎!. x7 ]& k6 e6 I5 e
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
! q9 n+ [7 B& I- e: D我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
4 ?5 H8 T, e+ F. O& ^3 i佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
3 Q2 i. `5 Y% K- y' d就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
  I( E" t( c+ ]' _3 P0 _9 u一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
' I' v* d% S/ `* Q2 sdun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face......./ l1 d  b+ h" m8 t2 ?2 V
if so bad, dun download la, right?
8 R; x7 X: o! mi am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^8 [1 A$ x: k6 U, D
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct$ i, `+ _* T/ X9 k
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la4 _3 g4 p+ G3 b4 M* ~
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society; L, b$ j2 U4 v1 u# _
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........+ F4 A$ p/ Y) l) ?% F$ c2 j
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!; X  j! b: I$ g) j! a
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!9 Y5 [6 ^) O% y. u
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~5 b7 N# d* H* E! z( Y/ k; }2 ?+ }9 b
政府想比下馬威0的人~~$ [& E" H( _# k
錢就一定罰
; e- K1 S0 W5 ~: P未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,) ]6 D- U9 `2 H: ~- Y! Q
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
$ K9 v7 O, A8 S6 \佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
% A* \/ \& Y7 `, ~0 w到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。