<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)/ C/ j8 \! o( p2 ?, i
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:, I- n# G6 `) p' p6 A) o. n  r1 k
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
1 T% O) N# s9 f. E: W- J1 g5 E3 f. d* z7 KI agree you points that it could be illegal
* D* K: z/ Q) e! tbut that is still a "gray area"
5 m$ i. h5 [' z2 rwhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair& b  R* J9 k9 h% c8 B# y& @8 [" E/ V

( h2 X2 i) `0 r* @" W. V* D. w" hanyway, I want to say that is
0 J' X( L% {' rwho is supposed to be protected by laws
4 u, C1 Q3 `- Y4 o/ kcreators?
6 x, L6 P; M1 U. C# Bbut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
- E1 v. ?6 k3 w+ Xlet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
1 w/ G" l8 t. |# f- @$ j& Rwhen we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those! }7 ^7 t  w" Q
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:2 h6 j. u5 B5 \/ K( C3 W
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
" I- C+ r, W$ `/ V4 a  O1 K
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:7 d  ^% t# C9 v) `2 b# [- O

& k3 G0 b! o. b  \7 c# C* d1 l我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
5 W; C3 G5 m4 E# N8 ]
唔係喎!, \4 n" w2 ~1 K2 B' p% {3 i
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!) U: Y$ V8 x5 |# f4 b
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
& R! }# i3 Z  C* _1 b+ Y9 Z佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!1 I' O5 q$ U% ~' ~
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
4 c% f% h: [' {2 \; {' q) D5 L( B一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
! F( S. L9 T" A3 @: \dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......9 o5 C! l, ?/ W3 p
if so bad, dun download la, right?+ T7 H9 H4 b7 J
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^6 I# n; e) D2 M6 \/ q5 b
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct  G' W. G4 h% v
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la7 X& e7 g0 _' S. w! q) p
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society9 E& p0 G+ l3 o
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
8 E' a% `9 Y- ?7 s8 ]why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!1 y$ z$ L  |  V  o) m
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!' l5 U1 p; R( d/ Q; u, {
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~4 A8 [+ z3 F% v! A) c
政府想比下馬威0的人~~- m, m' x* l: N9 j- C: H
錢就一定罰4 H. q: v" t! F0 R5 M
未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,4 X& D% E3 n6 [7 I4 T
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?  B6 v2 d& D  ?" s
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?! d# [+ e5 e- g  d* e, w
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。