<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)4 }6 p& }. Z8 c9 q  e& b
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:* q7 n1 m' }& r* v$ `& @' E8 h2 v
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
3 S- I7 b( ~+ D- x, F! E' _I agree you points that it could be illegal
* w  b4 [8 X6 I. [8 ~$ X( S, f3 Ybut that is still a "gray area"4 R# z, Y3 c* G# Q; Z
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
7 a- F; Y  Q8 R2 K9 D- |/ I. j7 k9 r
anyway, I want to say that is8 ]3 @) v1 s& O1 k9 S1 s: I6 d0 K2 I
who is supposed to be protected by laws7 ?9 b$ }8 r* ~( s- Q
creators?' u2 c: e& z" S6 h; J% |  [% s
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market; J- x; M0 ~% ^9 H2 K8 C
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
0 c# @9 k4 }4 g* Y# q% qwhen we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those
) X2 I' ]& Q6 `" @' b. O  ZWhy nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:% L; j* x9 s% v6 A1 E5 t
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
' E! y1 s5 ]& G. x4 }& c( p
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
; h# b) }9 B" H* a
  ^. D& ]0 V" e, L6 ?6 y我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
* ^6 q! V; |& ^6 c$ `唔係喎!
: v% C& c& z. p3 ]# R* I5 v" l古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
/ S+ D) _6 g0 S/ @# N! p我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!; `8 B# u& ]/ y
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
: V' q  j5 m; F  l, o" z就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事. ], ~6 e& U# H+ ]
一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!0 n3 p0 `: v. y. R3 i6 V
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......% o5 I4 n% Y, r5 T
if so bad, dun download la, right?8 |# P- n- w% k+ C8 S
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^  T) R$ }4 K+ ~6 j! j
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct4 r  m* g9 Z1 V% v$ d! F
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
; w0 t( [' u5 ~1 G, h% gso what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society# F- P; Q% o* z) n
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
, x' Z+ O5 u2 t: U. m& [/ R2 Mwhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
2 [  N' K' E! X' zso, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!; Z! L3 b5 b8 J% K* d
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~/ V: R: J8 ~; O/ C* Z
政府想比下馬威0的人~~
' @  \# ~9 ]. s. U錢就一定罰, m' S# N& ]. x7 k' w, e
未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,
6 M5 b& U) `+ M/ y* M( L唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
6 W! t" c3 N0 B( H佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?4 l1 E4 q" A7 ~" w
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。