<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
6 ]+ }/ P* ]4 p1 O3 ^$ A+ n但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:/ Y, E) ]6 [( V0 j' Z; S, e
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
* ~" u; ^$ H4 u0 _  u! Q' `
I agree you points that it could be illegal$ }  n8 P: I% s0 Y2 u4 r8 r
but that is still a "gray area"
' H. w# d+ f( a# X; O% Gwhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
; u5 M$ ]+ U' l3 J& f% }) {  J: d- ?4 h5 s5 s0 i9 A
anyway, I want to say that is+ n0 s  S/ q# i1 P) ?0 f
who is supposed to be protected by laws
1 I6 I8 g, [: M+ Q( Z5 K+ w" {: [creators?
- o& ~! b( ^4 p8 z9 G1 lbut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market+ S" j* h: k6 N: U8 p
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.8 [1 p- `* Q. U8 x! i
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those
6 t1 T: c, ^( h* k- s9 x- J, LWhy nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:9 [. o9 v) m" J# g% j# W
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
1 ~1 n. d) o, A' {) C- T9 t8 H我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
6 B3 @6 N  g9 @+ r5 V* l2 h2 @) l4 R) P. L& U- u* d
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
- a0 g: l; k! |4 N  |" \) ]唔係喎!
8 W6 s* {2 K' I4 q古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
8 d, T+ [- i; e! V* e6 `$ A9 Q) [我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!$ K0 U* o! r& ^0 t
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!1 ^$ c% ~% r/ M, r1 Z2 N
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事5 X# ?& A9 v4 N, d: I+ f- y
一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!: t: [4 a  V$ T
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face......., `4 Z% ^- f& O/ @( S/ N1 @
if so bad, dun download la, right?3 W$ X3 j5 U8 _1 n3 Y
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
( s: L7 x1 t7 I& dbut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct8 w' b; _. b* M4 X' v% ^
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la4 n; P1 D: E* l* z
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
5 ]4 L/ U9 b  S" Q3 A4 nusing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema........." u. \6 K! q/ O% n
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
0 f7 }) J2 G8 K- uso, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!# D& a* T+ P6 @2 d& e' V
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~/ `& h* n* a  y7 e: ?
政府想比下馬威0的人~~7 m5 G# C+ G  z: ^* M+ t9 Z6 I9 Y; E
錢就一定罰
9 o; ~. x5 Y% |$ N# t$ n7 Z未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,' O+ \0 n1 c* q& k$ a/ ?$ |
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
1 O; p+ G0 s/ h- Q+ w佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
( O! W% P( }1 X( ]; W5 o) N4 F到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。