<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
; j( {" Z$ g, A1 M0 _& s4 M但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:( @0 y) G7 {5 s& o, o; n" e* V2 j' e4 u& _
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
5 e5 t5 I& Y- H* P0 a( z+ G& F
I agree you points that it could be illegal  t" e; }7 o& A5 r2 `. h6 C
but that is still a "gray area"
  a9 J2 E, d! X% t3 Y: j# ~' fwhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair" d8 A- k( a. h" f/ h' _6 e
% ~1 F4 ]! w' z  l: n
anyway, I want to say that is
3 n! q6 s8 n5 r: E- o# X2 Nwho is supposed to be protected by laws
2 U: r3 C  `$ v! l7 Fcreators?
. n' S9 X. A3 P  @1 o. Ibut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
  Z2 D1 z2 f  n# s8 h+ Vlet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.1 t* N  h7 }( j, O5 s
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those% W, }, z/ a& x8 E8 P
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:  K4 p8 ~; L' A5 E; d
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
3 y8 T$ v7 P" r) i3 G( Q) |我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
! m/ |1 R2 g# e" F
7 |% w3 C+ o% t1 B% l我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
8 K) |' o# H5 t& O+ I
唔係喎!! w5 G* h7 |+ z+ W, V; ^8 }: H7 p
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!+ e' v; Q6 u  |( w: E
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!) F. Z+ U; [. ?; w
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!9 P5 m  d# x/ `& X, ]/ h& X2 H
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
0 F& F( V; {# g( r一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
5 n4 Y/ T) ^0 L3 @) p0 r! A2 E4 Fdun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......1 P# v# C/ D7 y1 L9 w: U
if so bad, dun download la, right?1 ~6 {8 X8 K  i
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
! t( B% k7 F2 U; l2 p4 b) \1 T0 Hbut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct1 V( f, a8 I( j: U2 r! s
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
0 G, w' Y4 a/ G% e* p+ ^/ lso what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
& o# j& n) d1 n" ^& `4 t* pusing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
: o" \( s' f: P+ m! E& Swhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!' i6 O5 [& @" E
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!- p- j* @8 Q* A
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~7 f% L" l( {0 j! s$ N0 X. `6 e
政府想比下馬威0的人~~" u; Z# t/ Q+ ^% ?/ u
錢就一定罰7 k3 p8 Y( k2 g
未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,
. r, S) Q; [: P: G唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?; J7 P/ `* N+ R7 _3 ]2 K
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
3 E5 |# Q  o! K& x- h9 e1 e7 Y7 Y到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。