<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
! W% K8 L: v: C# i9 P但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
3 ^1 D, x1 G+ Q0 ~, r大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
5 J: S6 N$ m* q8 k' u- `I agree you points that it could be illegal
0 H9 w) H' x. E9 b' v# N/ t; e! ~but that is still a "gray area"
2 ?7 D. A" Z! {/ {9 mwhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
( `. ?1 B% G3 W/ m2 B" D' q' v' a# I( O
anyway, I want to say that is* \' [5 B8 O  E
who is supposed to be protected by laws/ y0 S" C- z3 ]3 g' _' s! f6 ~
creators?
( M* Q8 V; V' r: N9 }but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
1 ?/ G0 K/ w1 U6 R3 x1 o8 m# Clet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
3 i, R* s( a0 c  _- C/ z6 T: mwhen we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those2 F/ L0 |8 R0 X. Y) S
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:, L6 E) K6 ^9 |' h* ^) j
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
% e$ ^0 e6 _% p1 a7 N  o) [& a
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:2 l* H# u$ g/ Z+ z1 c

3 u4 j+ @" s& ^6 x* f6 p我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
6 y, i3 s! `- L/ ]唔係喎!( B$ S4 l0 `/ l4 o
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!$ u6 h; v+ j7 g, @
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!! q4 M! b' o. _9 I! z( {
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!6 ~: R: r2 `2 C! ?9 P  ]  B
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
3 x4 ?  {3 W, C! |) \一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!6 w$ V3 A% a) o9 S. o0 b
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......; l4 o( Q( ]- o2 ^9 S
if so bad, dun download la, right?
. w$ |1 P8 ]/ A* n! L$ r: ]i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^# L8 {; {* p0 ]# s% w% w& }
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct
- ~! Y- g! w  Z+ b/ ?* h4 O7 V( wno need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
  Q% t. w: w$ ^! L! Hso what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society7 f4 a/ z5 e+ S4 q0 Q% c6 N
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
* S4 O3 q3 E7 W8 w6 y& |why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
4 w) d0 X4 y2 @6 e8 Lso, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!4 W6 y- p2 O) b7 _
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
2 @- j0 ^+ e( W8 K: C1 u/ ]: v政府想比下馬威0的人~~7 m& f. ]' D; J) J: Q
錢就一定罰
" e  S, X; a* {未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,
  S% A8 d6 e6 S0 |" ^9 Q" q唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
* U  d; n2 G9 W佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
. f" Y9 `" ]- U8 y9 M' v到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。