<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)3 k. {: ~# a# T+ D! D) ]9 g
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:- y$ k+ Z" A& n
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
2 ~. l) v: q  j% J, L/ M
I agree you points that it could be illegal& e" B, M5 J2 D7 L: |( |
but that is still a "gray area"
; d& H; c# n$ |, e9 nwhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
( L" u& R) A/ x3 d2 @& \2 F8 F; W8 O7 r' _4 ?9 \5 r/ D' R% S' M
anyway, I want to say that is
( Z3 _" Q4 i; I, }) g) v" Fwho is supposed to be protected by laws
$ S) @7 w3 e4 m! F% m, ]; B7 `creators?% A% ^" f: p" ?& r+ a: t3 b' Y; @; j
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
) L0 c/ P3 H1 y( g& [0 `! ?let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
; j' x( s$ I5 x1 l9 _when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those
. p: Q/ e' G8 y; o6 q3 tWhy nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:$ k, h, D2 I4 o3 v6 X
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
( J, j+ ?: F6 q- y
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
2 J! ?2 z# L, [8 O. W; ~. w! e) u- ~) t1 M3 ~+ ^' A; g
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
5 @+ `, A) q; X* R# }
唔係喎!1 c% ^( Y# \/ ~# s4 m- Y
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!- s2 @5 f/ m6 r( K
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
# l9 V4 Z5 p+ D4 y6 e( _$ k$ O佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
; d& j, K: }# |( m3 `就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
  ~8 B1 c3 P' c/ e. v5 M1 {4 b) `一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
# P( D% A0 Y: Q* x/ Ndun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
+ ~3 E: j6 M3 Bif so bad, dun download la, right?
9 `& y2 k* p1 S, T: S+ Di am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^) K% J# K8 {6 N* N
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct' C7 s- Z) u3 m, C
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la8 E  X# W" `/ J$ F: r  |; P) O
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
6 K! ]" q, T7 N( T' b5 j+ xusing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........* `$ }) J  o% ~0 B& m
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!) d3 b. ~# y  x# \& B9 |& d/ [# G1 u
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!, x  o% i/ P# w7 P
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~, p: {, u! v8 z
政府想比下馬威0的人~~
' f! j% i1 c- D錢就一定罰
! q! p- `+ w- J9 P+ L( @: T! s未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,
8 D! \3 ^, Y7 n% v) O/ T唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?' d3 r6 D- d+ c: O3 K& L/ N, c8 [& m6 `
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
7 _+ i1 g% H0 C+ R到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。