<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)7 r" `3 o  t  d0 A! \1 u1 z
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
0 n3 M2 J) r9 Q- f* c5 `3 H大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
$ u5 k5 U4 ]7 z& K2 X+ |5 ?I agree you points that it could be illegal. _: x2 i% _/ y. i0 Y0 |
but that is still a "gray area"- F9 k$ W& ?% T3 U5 x
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
- ^; M2 ?1 j: `% R3 m# T) `
' `9 ]/ r! J" c5 q, s1 d! T8 t7 Ganyway, I want to say that is
1 Y" E( M3 P' w3 Ywho is supposed to be protected by laws8 _3 F2 F: Z* `/ a1 S5 u+ |
creators?
' P0 V7 E; P; ?but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market: e+ Z5 X+ G6 E* I" S
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.4 i5 X0 X3 o6 K7 O
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those6 l$ ?, v! i" @5 G
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
' |, E( T8 [* m2 Y8 q其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
: ]! L# o% ?8 X. \0 g' [我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
' b$ Z7 n- Y9 r! \' k6 x* U' _
$ d' ^: d, k& G  A我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
+ B1 j4 R: |6 x9 o; L# y4 D
唔係喎!
/ x$ P$ ]0 {* f) d4 B古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!# t% q( C- m$ h. C
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
: Y! q# [8 c' h: X& e8 f佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!" a5 M5 p* C5 b& @6 s3 R9 {7 n
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
/ ^  Q- e5 n' J- |5 A. u; D一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
- H( x/ A* b! T) P( h3 b1 qdun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......0 d& F3 }$ S% K
if so bad, dun download la, right?& o/ v% r% }( s) [" t
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^% `1 h/ i5 _3 `/ b: y) }/ ?
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct  n6 G  \3 _0 u, M
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
1 Q& k5 G9 }2 u! N  L  {" \9 aso what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
+ u5 {3 x# a& ?; b; P$ ausing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
2 {  ~8 v" h( J3 jwhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
- t7 z- C8 h3 j8 ?1 tso, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!
  u+ S/ }7 D$ t( a  P' U- e佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
/ O( I+ ?, C2 J7 Y/ _0 B政府想比下馬威0的人~~
+ C1 K- E& R: i9 {錢就一定罰
2 ]5 e6 F6 F$ h: q未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,
8 R" q0 ]$ e4 c1 L7 m* Q3 n唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?2 I/ `7 M: }8 T5 P
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?3 y" z1 t% M4 l& d) D9 u( @
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。