<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
, K% c0 Y/ K9 C/ q. n+ Q2 t% V3 m但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:% I& F/ |7 o1 b% D" c7 U
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
  \8 q7 S  n5 q( f% y' O0 V% GI agree you points that it could be illegal: ]7 d, i+ c. \* E
but that is still a "gray area"
  O/ d/ H% @5 u: ~6 S" `# `+ iwhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair9 d% C% E% w" E: m" U  Y3 _
& c# y$ D4 X" H' h) R& h) @
anyway, I want to say that is
' A( F, d& z) O. n' q: |who is supposed to be protected by laws( ^7 p( i6 ]- C" `: G( H2 q
creators?
) U6 E: w% {" ]( m9 U; Lbut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
# m7 Q' C) r8 T* t2 w" olet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.9 |7 C; h( I7 H1 l+ z8 Y+ d
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those. D8 @! S7 h, B+ H
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
) |' a  r* C3 _1 F4 [6 {5 b, b其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
! I, d/ F5 h: T$ s2 I/ ^9 z我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
! Y; C( p% P! |0 K7 P' v! x- C' V# V3 @5 H. T3 `+ E% Z
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
7 @8 s1 P! q) c  B  `唔係喎!, @8 k4 c" ~5 E2 d8 P3 ~4 R5 f9 Y
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
; W$ x0 R2 n/ U5 m* T: i  U, f我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
1 y1 e! `- o- T佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!6 j8 E) ~3 R+ A2 D6 o6 F# N
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
  ^0 v( V6 F- O; o1 A% E一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!: t) D/ Z9 u. C/ L# P0 D
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
2 \% M% ?* Z' M; S. }1 u9 fif so bad, dun download la, right?
5 u, \6 l5 o1 s$ i; `. r2 Y# F2 ~$ di am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
( a& ]8 u' i& f6 S# @: @/ ibut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct
0 ?0 W3 J5 [, ?, a( v" U9 `no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la' J8 e( i( F1 a) r- Z1 z5 u- @, j
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society( q/ @* c' S6 `1 s' Z6 X/ p( C! Q
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
% ~  I: Y+ Z  P# pwhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!: D6 A$ f, \, J8 x
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!8 {8 h# U$ m+ E7 r' k0 l0 D
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
: z% i! g" t2 {7 v: \政府想比下馬威0的人~~
' h8 \" @: f9 j' T5 X8 e/ J錢就一定罰, b% h' z" m5 z6 m
未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,
5 t+ C4 \) U1 x3 `3 [0 F; b  f唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
3 b4 o; U; T% N, [佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?3 m0 H# Z8 M4 o, T5 A
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。