<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
) z2 ~! u) E, R( {: S$ h但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
( R3 z" b4 M4 q. S大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
( v5 a6 a4 f" o. ~0 g8 n. O, {I agree you points that it could be illegal, A' i3 f/ i9 _6 Y
but that is still a "gray area"8 u2 P/ X" x, W% m
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair& C; t7 q9 z& n2 ^
5 H) D5 j" c. ?: ~9 C% L$ f
anyway, I want to say that is: Z# f2 Y0 K4 c, e" k
who is supposed to be protected by laws
  ]% J3 i( ], S! l' zcreators?$ p1 p2 K( U9 O- ?, a
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
  [3 P4 v% t+ ]( f7 L. jlet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
0 {2 D8 {+ p- D5 G( cwhen we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those3 L& R: \9 K! C! P
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:8 N" b% @8 M% \- L' @- Q
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
: \1 F& {; }5 @+ r我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
9 V( y+ [' }* ^# A
6 b% s9 t- s4 J; V! [我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
# u2 m1 D+ O: W# [% i6 z# w7 F& u/ ]# D
唔係喎!
2 ^4 x. n6 \7 T% h# i古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
6 a6 G; O( l1 _* C) i4 D我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
# ]. @/ [! m, M3 U# j5 M% }$ f+ L% l佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
, g3 E9 x1 ^5 K; h- I( Q/ A就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事9 t6 I* A; b9 {7 V2 ~1 G! I
一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
' U7 D9 g6 {. o! h& M9 Pdun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
% {" R3 G$ G4 n/ y( o$ M# kif so bad, dun download la, right?. c# T2 D" p3 n3 S
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
2 h. }* N! d" q/ |+ Hbut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct; w: V& W* E* Q' E/ m9 L
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
% M' {8 g& D6 Q1 {so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society( }1 H1 S1 u/ `8 U3 {  p
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........- V- ]5 Y& d  k/ H+ d+ z
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!, e4 e; A  l  c" V4 |: x; }$ @0 ^
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!! N: a1 z: b% E; A
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~$ F- Y& o" C# k* ~2 G
政府想比下馬威0的人~~
( ?$ ^1 u/ x; \5 R錢就一定罰
+ h: M8 ^/ F1 O0 \, [8 _未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,
: r! r7 m9 W- G4 B) |) f4 ?唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?. F8 ]% @( `/ u: Z% V
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?( G9 N+ |& w3 ^. E* x1 u
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。