<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)7 ~" g2 ]; W. {: L' r- G
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:. O7 ^" I8 P4 l' z
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
3 k: W! X7 h6 i; N
I agree you points that it could be illegal% \6 g' b9 A7 q4 s5 Q5 E
but that is still a "gray area". i: K) ?% L1 u+ ?, b
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
8 H# h( _- L) u) a8 D) E4 s9 `7 a5 n: [# _# o6 N
anyway, I want to say that is: S, I/ k% b' V' }% ~
who is supposed to be protected by laws  E& z6 v' z. ^. z) p
creators?
. q* H1 z$ i  i4 B7 y  |2 j- Lbut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
$ r6 X( p1 a# S" X$ v# F6 nlet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.! t$ ?/ @' B  f( h8 h
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those' i. \0 Y) m6 l: S/ n* Y
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:- S# k  b  m: V" r6 K4 C# `/ [
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
/ B. M# t* ]7 c% ?4 O3 j2 ^3 H
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
5 x: G+ x) {) I$ R2 [- H
4 C# ]( Q* H* T4 K我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
. K: E: T5 v8 A* `$ J: W
唔係喎!2 u3 B1 H5 Z$ u: {) S7 D% h$ z% D
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!1 a( a, O) G/ f3 R: M8 E
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
, e* B) n1 a! E8 X+ L3 j佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
& k& C2 V. J7 P2 Z2 m就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
3 p0 a; r. ]' b! g& g- L$ A一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
) h& l% ]+ i7 g5 K) bdun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
8 L+ @* Q7 |9 K; @3 sif so bad, dun download la, right?% O4 x* x* I  J0 V* u+ Q
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^/ }% y4 M4 P. t! y
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct+ S+ ^' c9 |' o/ g$ T6 Z0 ?
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
4 a4 _) p- K  f6 k( \so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
1 i- B/ T! p9 D, n/ v0 {6 lusing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........& A+ W% l& E8 J  p- y7 p
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
- a# m% v3 t7 L% r- lso, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!% u5 l1 h( n& ?2 n4 F& C
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
: w: y  k/ s) g, V政府想比下馬威0的人~~4 i! n( V/ c4 z9 G$ C! N
錢就一定罰$ U& R2 v% e6 O
未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,
7 q+ x  i3 G, l  f唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?- s, C! N& Y9 ]/ \6 I# T
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
, D. n. k" }) E6 s  F# x! ~% m* K到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。