<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)7 ]6 ~6 S. r3 V; m
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
+ V6 M, @2 u" _" ~8 N大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
8 u8 f& p; b" G, M7 DI agree you points that it could be illegal* ~, Y/ Q5 i% g( P
but that is still a "gray area": K3 w; ^6 [; i; a5 F
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair# y1 v4 s+ V- d) v2 l, {+ _

9 ?8 g( w6 f5 u6 eanyway, I want to say that is
' _% O; B. p3 z. q3 O; Rwho is supposed to be protected by laws
4 @* F3 g- a3 O, B. ccreators?
/ g0 |  P+ k6 Y( T' Xbut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
# Y; G0 x$ m: D( B5 Ilet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.8 V- c9 ]$ g" k
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those' b+ b4 `' Z' [  T& w. U
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:3 L3 F3 P% N7 f. G2 \& ^
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
% q6 r2 ?$ g: C, ^0 w7 i# |我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:5 H/ q/ O, k% \1 a6 n) {5 `7 u

" s4 W( G' g% x' M/ M2 Q/ y- a我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
7 ~: B  ?$ l# {: i! }
唔係喎!
. k3 P7 ?1 ?; g  y5 V& q$ j% U- m古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!# n4 P) M+ N; V( o$ h5 {
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
9 }" y! V5 Z' ^2 B3 K$ w佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
0 J  F/ |! s! f, m; ^5 U- H就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事! a% @! r5 Q! E$ ~5 {8 \  n9 ]& R8 S
一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
( V2 w5 ?5 K/ n+ K/ G' tdun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
! o& T( z9 C9 v6 y0 N) J+ Cif so bad, dun download la, right?
5 h, ~9 C; v) t- G6 Ii am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^4 R$ [: a/ Q, K: ?2 m% O
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct7 E4 m$ E; o- W0 z6 Q( @# \: Y
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la5 S" R9 w7 R- n5 D/ R
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
- M& @" q5 R( |+ e2 pusing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
* y+ I4 B1 N. ^" F7 c9 A. h1 i, rwhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!, ?9 V4 F8 V( q2 i5 @
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!* s7 M; k0 d$ p* m  k
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~( b) X! `& C5 u
政府想比下馬威0的人~~
5 m) p# \# S- N4 _& B: _錢就一定罰
+ E4 G3 y5 E2 u( `& M未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,$ t+ q2 n  Q8 n( a9 |
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
- X5 h0 G; R$ S/ J8 l; F佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?" M0 S5 i( j1 e8 K  R
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。