<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)2 B/ i7 E6 a* j. _
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:5 ?& s  {6 W2 y5 u0 g. j
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
8 d& j) I! X% \5 H6 _
I agree you points that it could be illegal2 l8 H2 r; f3 N+ }
but that is still a "gray area"8 `. J7 M& m! |
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair# J- K  m# T5 ~+ D
- Z9 b1 c* a* {# L& C; @
anyway, I want to say that is% G% O' O9 z6 `$ q) J5 M& d: I+ P
who is supposed to be protected by laws
+ Y1 ]' c6 h# r9 ~* [' ycreators?
) f  u( P) I& F) Zbut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market$ J) H- C$ g  N4 W; D& i
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.: \( x. H9 Z2 p" r
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those
8 D" S2 o. C3 c. OWhy nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:, N% w- Y- N: x, `, t  V
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
! j. T, ^7 c9 O3 W& G" A我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:0 M* p' {" @! {: Z  ^* }8 \6 w

& ?! K! Y' H8 N+ }$ O我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
" f* M3 `+ s8 V6 |唔係喎!# T5 u! \' ^! c( z& C
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
/ K* N& r# u* v8 k3 T- f' v3 L我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!0 ]- E3 x% W$ K0 C$ t" @: A
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
$ L0 m1 t* F$ N" z4 J4 `& o( a就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事( O% [6 j% \/ d  p' u0 f
一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
! L* O( U# Q5 l9 p% g5 J6 adun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
# g0 v8 l0 K/ [( l% Uif so bad, dun download la, right?
6 t  P9 i# o; h& q3 `! si am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^0 I! {! Y! J- i) t& l+ v/ M
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct
+ b3 C% n+ U% {; Hno need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
  A% @7 P! k/ S/ zso what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
5 a: U* C0 R( K: n; b5 vusing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........9 e& X8 l) S7 s: W
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!; n0 X; k% n( x' i
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!1 j. a3 \, B7 S9 J7 F5 g
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
' y! P: X) U9 H. P8 ~  }政府想比下馬威0的人~~
8 x. _' U4 F  O% l6 Q& S錢就一定罰
" Y/ q" t1 V1 M/ P8 N未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,
9 e/ Z4 v' q" |# L5 _% q唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?, o/ ?2 R2 z; V2 x& G2 }: V! L7 S
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
$ l8 N5 l& i/ m7 x8 T到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。