<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大). H; H+ G! }- l) C' U2 T1 y. m
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
% l9 h' N; r8 L7 _0 O! R大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
$ L- b) k" A6 T( O) y/ w2 _$ EI agree you points that it could be illegal
" ]; Z( d6 G& F# |4 u( jbut that is still a "gray area"% T" X) \9 C5 J. a1 |$ E
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
$ O/ V. x: r9 f1 z* O8 Q% F  V- Z
3 a" c, d0 h# L3 t! Y% }anyway, I want to say that is
# n8 x/ D- N/ e6 G- l# Twho is supposed to be protected by laws" d" o. U- d4 z. W% \3 a6 u9 U
creators?
, ?; d0 R7 P2 Y5 c3 ?, b# h; kbut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market5 V. J% f. y4 V# i
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.' C+ O" U# P' `7 q! b* h5 m
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those
  H5 N2 H, R, |) p7 q. z  iWhy nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
' M0 I4 e/ j; N其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
+ T3 C% v* ^  U# v我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:2 i% f1 r) ^' w% b2 ?* E6 E

* A. D: t$ m9 R1 v/ H我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
" ?4 ^! F$ y! V# F% d- n% v
唔係喎!
0 I! q2 c* `! h5 D3 {5 i$ c古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!1 P8 d# I' N0 w% \9 H: d
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
1 M7 A) d: U' @: R佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
, }  m0 V0 Q" v( N1 u. W就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
2 i. P# C4 T2 W0 W一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
9 o! m  a/ u! t9 ]dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
! b& C$ Y  R. u) aif so bad, dun download la, right?
% a: `. Y, m- H. s4 i5 Wi am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^3 F: A3 k4 ^8 ~  H4 r8 O
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct$ D+ f+ U3 d5 g. F0 y
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la9 U! X4 F+ M: @
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
5 ~( @/ Y$ B! ?4 d" b: z' m8 @1 Nusing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
9 s" J4 {4 O0 @5 J/ _' T2 U& F: Jwhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
2 O4 \9 s6 p0 n8 w' z* I% j3 ^so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!: M* S& G' k: S3 P/ N/ _! Z
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~/ ?6 r0 |. r9 w
政府想比下馬威0的人~~
8 w9 [+ c+ ]% b" r& p- |錢就一定罰
# [( ?, @* u) k$ z未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,
. p4 ]% C/ g# h3 y: S唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
( [! w7 @& g+ x) l9 I, n佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
2 R" i4 p- g, Q8 {到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。