史艷文2

雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大): T% i: O4 ]9 {0 m# f$ q
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!

F.king

Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
/ J6 i  @& y; S) s* n" Q4 V4 j8 T/ ~" ?4 A大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...

* g1 m1 U% @) I) u6 v" e% Q
I agree you points that it could be illegal2 L" n- Y) f- `2 I8 C5 G
but that is still a "gray area", B  @" b( U/ A- e! }
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
. z' h1 v5 U# Z5 a- N
' G% A8 m/ w5 k* N6 ]( _! _7 _2 Lanyway, I want to say that is1 l6 I  a/ H/ @( @9 a# t
who is supposed to be protected by laws
5 u" o+ \) c5 O+ X& P; `creators?
( C# u" b( t; U2 b( Gbut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
0 R( E! J) ]2 t% t. `let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.# o! Q$ A1 W$ I: t5 M. S, D: e. A
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those6 O' H0 i& w: S: N5 h2 x" ^3 s
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???

junob04

Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:. k8 m. m$ G* e8 M+ v
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=

- h/ m; h# s3 N1 E$ Q( D2 O( ~我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!

HansChan

Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
5 v) s) @, c3 R& O) K! J# t
2 W( U6 M, r" m9 U% U' J我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!

7 ?( q, I' q7 X, M8 T
唔係喎!
% M8 e5 a' p# g  ]古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
1 |- I; Y8 R8 ~) x1 U$ y; K我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!+ F+ h" o0 l3 j$ L8 l  y* Y
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
0 d; _: }5 }9 L/ b4 F% A6 g$ s就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!

大家樂1234

希望佢無事
# g, a1 I+ Z' h) n: X* u  C一有先例以後就死嚕

jason williams

honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
5 w4 j2 ?8 X( y7 K7 f2 _; a9 ydun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......' \' g9 J$ w8 q! x! o
if so bad, dun download la, right?
8 Z, X6 ?! v* `; ]; qi am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
! }; s* I4 n$ R. T' w% T# P+ ybut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct' `# ^' @$ j& W& {; U4 L+ Q0 z
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la$ a% g) F! ?( g! y  P0 [8 ^' |
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
/ i7 s) Y$ ?8 o' T& h- `3 z) rusing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
( ^0 @- y; E5 B( O  K) uwhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!0 j! f6 V1 c0 [/ f/ f" b; q2 V
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^

coolyiceman

罰款,冇留案底!
$ g9 R0 w4 D* v) M. _4 R9 `佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
  ]( ^6 H. U0 y政府想比下馬威0的人~~! F( b, P- ~# i, {% `
錢就一定罰" ?1 h9 s" A$ f
未必要坐牢~~

HansChan

如果真係判佢有罪,
# ~9 l8 Q' Q# n5 R# X唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
5 D+ H/ q0 s! m8 k2 D9 p& q佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
6 {# m$ u) S  p2 e1 l9 l5 C9 w到時有冇人幫佢呢?!

EV4886

最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...

@bcc@

冇事!!!!!:cool: