<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)0 R) R& K/ Y- W9 K4 U
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
+ r' k# p6 |+ `  [' M  C大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
8 I, q' K0 Z# u: d. T
I agree you points that it could be illegal, g. W, [+ L* B- C5 Q# {% v8 n, \
but that is still a "gray area"$ Y% P. D. k. b4 |5 @, G; A
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair3 n7 s2 ~/ x; Y; E1 h! o; U

; F+ e0 ^6 S0 R! i$ h  F- x8 ranyway, I want to say that is
: Z# E" v2 Z" d, T1 K) dwho is supposed to be protected by laws
4 F- ?4 v' \; }8 L+ m$ ^3 ccreators?" e- K. t9 N  G2 A: \, X* ?$ O
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
, P8 l+ N  D; a: l( ]- _let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
( Z8 V6 N! `# l$ Y: x3 G! ^, G0 Cwhen we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those/ b$ Y! X8 t* b
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
. e* a, D2 k3 e7 {0 @/ X  G  v% d其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
/ f. V( |$ T- n4 Q( F, d我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
& R5 E6 x8 ?. F6 M9 G& Z; L% e4 C6 G: j1 f! z  c- G, h
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
# D1 S/ F2 _/ S. ]) R唔係喎!
* m! M/ F0 L% n$ z2 G" B古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
7 B0 e: D( Z4 D, ~0 K我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!+ B1 K2 ^* G; ]3 H7 T( X# u" |2 b
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!- s, O$ [' z1 M# |8 \
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
9 _8 ~5 E- B  [/ T# j: @% `1 J, H一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
; ~2 `) X7 Y8 Odun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......* r6 j! _9 M# |
if so bad, dun download la, right?" t' `5 E. t; t" ^; x% J$ X# I
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
6 z. U8 [3 a* x$ P. ]! qbut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct
* G" e# R) \8 Y- S" C3 tno need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la4 z0 a, g/ o' F+ c2 T
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society- T6 H3 r5 y# }! }8 ^
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
% L1 b& g0 E# _" h& w. ^6 s5 lwhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!$ [! n1 @" k0 V0 s
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!
2 o* N! D- |- F! ~8 V佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
, N' D' ?+ |0 J6 H政府想比下馬威0的人~~
- N+ f: p. r" B/ I錢就一定罰
1 ~& u9 H) c0 i" _, O* `未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,8 B/ }; Q0 O, r* m9 a
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?5 F+ w8 j6 p* U# o) ^  G
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?: \) \2 _9 W9 T0 i( n
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。