<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)0 {! f! q' r* m: I4 R- Z0 r- p/ o. |
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
# _" `/ D: r0 C- \4 A大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
' F- D' X& K, nI agree you points that it could be illegal+ u# \8 J" t0 C$ l; d6 {) m
but that is still a "gray area"/ ]' s, p, I5 v) U$ |
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair. `; p2 a/ W7 t' Q2 P+ u8 f
+ R3 b5 z+ w, j, k/ P0 W; t, j
anyway, I want to say that is
0 b2 y- I$ ]% Z$ y0 J$ D, H0 h4 _who is supposed to be protected by laws8 E, T, u+ h, A5 C9 R- i/ S
creators?& N. t2 p! l1 Z- ~
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
- v4 h8 [: T) Y  vlet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.8 C2 c; ]/ v) d3 U3 L% x9 A3 ?5 C
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those
: m, t" y: d  w+ n/ X8 s7 }- G; ZWhy nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
1 f7 L3 U% y6 e6 P- E! X; k其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
4 ~. y# l: k) g' i
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:" W% v: w1 |5 Y, H. Q" G
0 B8 o3 p5 P- O: |  n2 ], }, {$ c
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
- _. b. A3 F0 f& B8 n# |唔係喎!! t4 w1 x9 i+ \- V0 p# L
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
! N4 Q1 d+ S3 l2 u' y+ P我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
" e" T& {7 _8 v佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!7 \/ }# p* B4 P* W- w/ I
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
. |9 Y2 D9 O# ~一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!& ^  Y7 w2 {7 m* h
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......+ H5 ^$ i6 M- E/ i. }
if so bad, dun download la, right?# L% r. n$ Q# J  z7 O; ^( t* [
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
1 ?" ~& M! v' K" j$ Y$ Hbut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct
; }& R$ H! g+ G6 Y$ |no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
1 M/ ?$ b! e) Aso what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
7 Y3 ^  \! H- @8 y8 D8 ?using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema........., C, A7 `/ f* p! L+ |+ e/ P% ]
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
6 O  m3 H- j. X4 Oso, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!! }9 A1 L  g2 b2 G2 [
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
3 k& S) `4 `& d) q' S% l1 {政府想比下馬威0的人~~
% d$ ?  f( A! q  C4 b錢就一定罰6 [. [* [. X) k2 {7 _2 Y
未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,
% E; y+ G/ }3 S. H( H% i1 l唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
9 G# M  Y; a- _3 d佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?8 ~- o: {2 i; C, F: U
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。