<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)0 j1 U; ~* B! |/ i' I  j$ F
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:% ~( R* b  S0 y
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
. ^/ A2 Y' \5 _+ K, lI agree you points that it could be illegal% f& Y, a- O7 ?8 n) j
but that is still a "gray area"7 J, P- x6 E" l; Y2 l- b" O# g
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair: A& s- U& k6 d# b

- e* ]- s  g9 W3 H& J5 Hanyway, I want to say that is/ q1 L1 t) i$ i$ h
who is supposed to be protected by laws
! f8 A6 w* P! ocreators?
4 [1 |( W2 t  o) Cbut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
- U/ k* k. s9 t, p" J0 Klet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.. w; m' V# n4 J5 Y5 k) l
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those
, f5 e7 z# q9 sWhy nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:; O5 l& l0 D6 _; w, Z, }" A/ e
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
  Z5 y! C: L4 u7 Q. ?我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:) s. s: k, o8 P( N

/ i4 D$ Y* ~5 f3 Q- d% e我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
: K& z% W& a- C2 s+ I" r( P唔係喎!
, k. O5 P$ e/ ?) S8 q$ R& n古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!1 q0 c* x! I! j* e# F3 U( }
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!# t' ~; n$ x- r1 U3 o; ~
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!7 G  O3 i) L6 o
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
5 w6 G. J0 ?' D( {" g6 ]5 ^一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!) a1 V5 r$ d$ ?" M, |( r3 u
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......5 i  ]8 ~& f! h. _, C
if so bad, dun download la, right?6 M# J7 F* w1 p2 n: Y! L# C3 f
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^+ ~$ [. q; n. f! e+ K2 q, C- g
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct
+ n3 H: c+ L1 Z$ lno need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la# [! f) c; U1 S. s% U
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society5 c) q3 Y* C8 w# x0 {9 \
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
2 I3 M0 I- {0 t" ^) j# ?+ I4 b0 vwhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!( o3 K8 o+ M' q& q- v
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!
3 B8 U* m& ]# Z$ S$ u9 N佢又唔係殺人放火~~~6 n) v! [2 A! _# l
政府想比下馬威0的人~~
- Z1 r6 T" f; `- O4 U錢就一定罰; \! a0 w$ _* C1 z4 u; g1 |
未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,
" f! w( x! T, R7 M/ v唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
) l" R( [% i1 W9 j2 u2 ?1 U佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?$ _  c( a( r* x
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。