<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
' q3 E$ d2 W* G* }$ J' p. _2 H但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
# f7 G8 \2 a% ^7 T1 K大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
3 T+ h7 J3 O! `& F; a0 U! j- @, uI agree you points that it could be illegal. y# `# m3 N( |/ a% O) [, }/ s
but that is still a "gray area"/ v: Y( M3 w) l* T3 h
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair( }: K6 v2 ~, U! @

1 J& a1 {  a+ K. ]anyway, I want to say that is
& @( |4 ?" d  V1 D3 Z3 uwho is supposed to be protected by laws
7 ^, B# A; F% _! `' ~, F0 d) ?creators?
; F! r, R- _' p; X+ ~: wbut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market/ F" U3 \! s, x% y0 t
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
) |5 N! |; n0 ]( Gwhen we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those
* G* L6 ]) |. h4 c8 p2 V$ uWhy nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
# b9 o0 Z' x+ k* j. s! D其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
' Y* T# |8 `, y我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:  G- n! I; ?1 Z# Z8 f# F' y+ x$ @1 u

, X! j( p" R, ~0 U6 V' q* m' e$ l我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
9 y, h  ~: I4 j) l; h唔係喎!) r  X. m8 ~/ o: h$ L
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
; t4 u5 z* a1 K7 D# r; s我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
" J3 r2 f, K5 s# r/ G9 d佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!2 W0 r4 _# m1 Y* |
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
7 |0 x3 v0 P. r. B一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
/ D( A% ]$ l  q; |+ @# M. _dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
# W  J6 ^5 [( v& Y( h6 L3 ~9 [! }if so bad, dun download la, right?+ ]# w3 F$ w* x; L! N
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
6 g$ E1 D) {% V1 e7 f* I# f/ sbut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct& w% e5 m" C; U4 s; V& y- {
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
& p& \& a# d9 S. P9 ^3 Uso what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
; r! E1 e- N. s# [using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........& {- @2 t3 `4 |5 N' ^% N
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!6 _9 G$ k9 q7 q. @" G- t1 s
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!: F% X5 ^! B9 x1 B
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
5 {7 S, _: F# K; O政府想比下馬威0的人~~0 h5 C$ b& k! G  G, V7 s
錢就一定罰" ~$ [' v# {/ D  o
未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,
  e' U) Y4 |2 Q: u唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?- v# b) O& a- P: w( b; g
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?( _( G  x4 A. V: m0 l6 `
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。