<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)$ F  ?8 G5 @& l7 q# U
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
9 c/ W) Z! P' b0 \+ [8 W' O1 Q大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
( V0 l, |6 p- X7 ^
I agree you points that it could be illegal
2 W2 K& Q3 t3 ^. Lbut that is still a "gray area"5 x* V1 Y. X4 m, c: L1 @; [- P& p
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
  O+ q3 a. s6 g# g2 x
" B% _6 q, f. L' W( A2 |anyway, I want to say that is
) \3 T" p+ I% j8 T8 c/ G# {. k3 lwho is supposed to be protected by laws8 k' [6 z2 x0 T6 E
creators?4 y$ ]6 v) X  ]. u5 f
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
& z+ O2 z. [4 @  Q7 k! m1 wlet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
% e' G5 \9 Z! ]; zwhen we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those
% k, ~" b- Y+ P4 |" L9 [Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
% K; g* ^% k+ R9 S! }. K# G# q2 U! ~- J, F其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
% G4 f: }* \! l( B, k& |4 v( F6 b6 ?
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:. r+ H6 e: z2 Z& C2 h$ S
3 p7 a  m  q( |& A0 a7 c* M
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
2 T0 S" ?/ ~* z5 `5 p, S+ q7 H唔係喎!; X2 P+ i. F4 \9 E0 U  y
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
/ R0 a9 w3 }! a# s3 ?1 L# u1 q我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
8 Y6 W# z2 E4 @# f6 [( u佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!) m! O( e1 g3 @; k3 i  E' X0 W
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事0 w/ o; T1 ?3 H0 E, O; y9 {
一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
% H4 B' I) P$ C  g7 j8 p, I9 rdun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
( v+ d: W& N. t& F& v" [4 Vif so bad, dun download la, right?
- B" Z: p7 f0 E- \9 _- P* q, Ci am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^' e" s/ k' \) ]' z6 Y
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct
/ n7 S4 I( P; F. w1 G  s) Pno need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
* p) o% d! S; l3 m- Y8 n/ N" o! zso what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
* |: ^$ z! R3 z% D3 Ausing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
0 \1 J9 t! Z1 \6 W6 D2 a/ d3 swhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
6 K7 ~' K" S0 d9 h1 Vso, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!
8 @* I( o/ p" `) l( f' ^$ y佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
/ i( u/ |1 `- K- u" X政府想比下馬威0的人~~- z" Z2 {: q) C* [9 R  Y
錢就一定罰
& l$ h! W# p; g未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,
8 _+ P9 v$ u# S/ u" H唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
; t& U8 P* {0 |2 w; K, k8 z佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
2 `- S. M1 i) M- R+ X! I5 l+ p到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。