<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
, u2 p; \* Z# E+ [5 B7 V' n% G但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:1 I* S% I, i! u$ ?6 d6 ?9 D% _
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
3 ~+ N8 M* v$ O0 C0 i1 E: rI agree you points that it could be illegal
+ B8 F( D6 ]8 t" o  Tbut that is still a "gray area", g8 r) v  B+ r5 u7 e
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair. ^- k0 B0 G1 P$ b1 q: S, o- V4 b
7 _$ s9 H+ U* v8 f+ d
anyway, I want to say that is3 E- t6 X4 @0 a0 O4 ?  _, a/ G
who is supposed to be protected by laws* H; D% t9 u& e- w. M) v
creators?
% G3 [& Q  ~+ x2 F# M" U& j- b- obut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
3 I- r+ f8 x/ i* ]& Mlet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
+ E; r' [- ^% R- owhen we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those
/ q/ K( P$ X+ H# t6 p! d! Q' nWhy nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:$ E( `! H3 t" J" n( O2 d% X
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
6 P, ^- V  A3 h
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
' f6 K) }7 p+ [0 K4 W4 a4 A1 g3 n7 c4 t" ?& g* i
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
& N+ `. Z5 D' I
唔係喎!
4 Z9 F8 ~$ b) H" \古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!, U0 n3 C; a+ j( i+ t, A
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
. J% s& I" R1 Q, `$ j佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!5 x# @+ F5 Y" a6 j& {2 B& q
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事* R- o7 k! u4 x6 S5 R9 p' |
一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
* X! K4 D) W8 r* Q! jdun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......$ B0 y* l3 l6 i1 Y& v
if so bad, dun download la, right?$ i  l; }- V2 |( U' D1 m
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^* G, Z8 _, g4 L) {2 v
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct" B$ k& `  i/ ^4 W
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
0 Y/ K4 G+ C7 ?4 D/ B! X7 Dso what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
- k" z. P- y" S2 c( L1 Susing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
2 X% _. P# p7 X, Ywhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
5 y, p7 p0 N8 g& j0 g) cso, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!% X* h" O5 B7 n
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~6 x* e, y8 t6 G* [1 u
政府想比下馬威0的人~~
& P0 a$ w: I" O# U, m- p錢就一定罰
; t# ?' \6 t5 e  o- j# u- b未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,
; ^7 m2 P2 @/ e+ ~; N9 V唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?! `: U2 v! m. ~8 b6 q8 _
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
' k+ B- d. d8 o到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。