<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
) x' P% m* F' {, z& d" i但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
8 I& i6 v* O, B大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
6 Q% r* N/ c7 Z5 iI agree you points that it could be illegal
7 c! {1 v; m  y5 Z) vbut that is still a "gray area"
: `+ \$ f9 v8 T7 A# [( bwhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair3 X& z: X& ^! ]5 R+ Z

" _5 g$ ~# l) r! A" ranyway, I want to say that is
* P- @& f) a' l  b; cwho is supposed to be protected by laws
2 N1 J: M5 @  Z9 c9 [3 ycreators?/ U8 l, l- w) J$ X
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market& s7 O  k4 A3 o' Q! l% x
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.. @5 O& F! p$ u0 f2 r/ D3 L
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those
2 m. c: g3 Q6 o* P+ D, N% sWhy nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
7 g7 R9 R# s! ?1 J. I; e其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
+ ~  y/ D/ s: K- |
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
5 E- a! L) Q0 T" t- O, o" f( z% u/ {5 H6 _+ Q* G  V
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
8 K" G& o8 v9 i6 `" j
唔係喎!
, }  n7 ^; G0 X' N' T' m$ _4 B古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
( ?. X$ s, K8 c1 p( l+ D/ x我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!' u. ^9 I1 L, q; Y: L" J1 A
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!8 d' m$ P2 v4 e. x8 E: r1 Z
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
% D' \  s# A6 m- ?) ~- _! d一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
' t9 R1 w% \* U* u. ydun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
) k) a9 ~# w8 a0 dif so bad, dun download la, right?/ f; M) k8 T9 I  I/ Y9 I: H
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
# a6 [: V) k/ ]% l1 b+ ^/ Gbut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct  ~! H) Z/ L; O, F6 t9 ?3 L
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la8 Z" F& M8 u5 E  `
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
6 L& e7 n; ?$ p7 s4 m, _using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........! \- j% l% N  y# ^% ~
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
0 V. P% G1 a) a6 yso, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!
. W' `2 h# Z* v* W0 S0 O9 W5 w佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
/ `/ U5 Y5 T* [' D1 b政府想比下馬威0的人~~
7 I$ [3 P% |+ U  T; `* ?錢就一定罰
* t3 y$ ]0 }1 ^+ T: {未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,, |7 w8 R3 \+ g) `$ C
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
5 i9 R; F" |5 ]& H& I佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?2 z* ?: G: {1 y# {0 H7 \$ L0 _
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。