<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
6 j. a! p  |# ^4 C- g5 Q5 r; @% |但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
( e& K# K8 e. r) k3 M大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
; d% {: B9 A. |: w- ?9 Z: j
I agree you points that it could be illegal: O( V/ z! W+ C  p+ C5 Q- }+ g
but that is still a "gray area") a4 f* {9 V2 S" y) ?6 e4 K4 z
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
- Y- L& ^) q/ Q/ A, }) w& \3 R. g' ~' r6 v4 A. d
anyway, I want to say that is
5 _$ G% w9 K% c0 E% kwho is supposed to be protected by laws
3 j" k4 }) r" ~7 S! y% M# l0 icreators?
% R9 y6 A& n7 s4 ]* l6 z  abut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market6 `. q) j: K3 ?+ ]; Y
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
' j( Y8 \+ i8 T  t; Cwhen we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those# p. y  R3 m+ m  [# f/ g- J
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
; i* w- r; ~9 ?其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
1 h/ ]1 E- K5 B2 h1 f/ l我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
# H( M5 Q, x6 l; N8 v; I6 y$ l0 P" V
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
% T2 G' h2 }' s5 [# p0 A. `7 l) c) I
唔係喎!6 F$ K: |/ W" C' E5 \. z/ u9 Q
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!0 F- u" m4 U. M; `
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
" O8 h* v' E7 L, q' g/ f佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!2 Z, ~9 U+ n$ v) B. N
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
9 F! ?& o/ ^1 j7 k+ ^1 Y一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!: _3 V$ n8 q! B- d
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......+ {; Z4 ?( F" j" b/ B& J! {
if so bad, dun download la, right?
  R+ h- I: P% n, Ni am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
( Q/ N  S) s6 t+ L' X3 x3 xbut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct
3 q1 Y$ J/ u! m+ F' f( M5 {no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la3 ?1 z1 ]: r8 `( M  e
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society  W9 {6 S  _( ^
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
- V6 O6 z1 O/ P4 e% W2 S, p: O  c3 g% Xwhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
1 E" C. d1 Q- Y2 D5 d3 K) Sso, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!2 T' C; @, w8 A
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~6 b/ u  d( m  i2 O5 ^
政府想比下馬威0的人~~8 K9 G" Y  B7 D: w# B7 f% d2 N
錢就一定罰! k8 e6 U, H. s3 Q$ I
未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,
, {6 ~8 R5 M+ d( Y. j唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?7 w$ }8 n6 T/ \$ Z7 O
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?& N9 B8 r5 B, Z0 N
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。