<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
; W" P6 o1 R# W但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
$ e! R% W9 F- V5 n% e! ^大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
: g( l& \( j! y; I8 J. [
I agree you points that it could be illegal2 I3 y0 d$ O, B& |) o) x; U5 b
but that is still a "gray area"
9 y8 l# O8 T1 p: J2 ]: W' Q1 Fwhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
" ~" z' m0 ?3 `* }4 _1 w  j- g0 q1 M- w, u" `: `# T
anyway, I want to say that is% v( n4 S3 Y9 k: H" }1 A( J: Z8 _! [
who is supposed to be protected by laws
% @5 n  @( R' ]! b& ?! pcreators?& F' X0 M7 ^9 P
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market- N1 L7 v- i" J- ]
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
: C7 g  w) v( e  Ewhen we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those% X- D2 s: E- k# T
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
( Y, Y+ |+ i" u8 L其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
0 _* i" o' s2 ^+ E: v4 V2 i  \3 S# x我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:: G5 c/ o2 c0 e- [6 V! C

' N. u) d9 Y8 {6 _9 e3 k% s我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
" q1 q! k* c; ?. o4 H, d
唔係喎!1 q" ]( S* v! x. V$ q, [; r
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
" i4 \9 U( z- a& u5 I我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!, p, v9 a  W& h+ I/ M+ h
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!6 m/ [2 P" ~6 z5 z; l4 P
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
- q0 E' m, d! c# r  I% x! v一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!7 d! i; [( f( u; ^1 r
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......1 m1 u9 F1 \  L
if so bad, dun download la, right?6 Z  E7 J' ?; S9 F7 ?; {( ^- ^
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^& c7 M' J" D* |# s
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct% ], b$ S2 @: t4 Q
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la4 w, t4 |- u$ U0 v
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society( h- u$ M% y; U' A
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........1 ]) L: d5 ~" m2 s3 `3 T3 T
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!' E+ E2 f  p) d" K$ N0 f
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!( g* z2 B1 k" t; ^+ I5 W0 N: {
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~7 k6 W/ U0 E0 a; a) l; ?
政府想比下馬威0的人~~/ v- N. i7 w4 h: @4 @
錢就一定罰  d! ]+ C! H. e, Q/ S
未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,; S! r# Y9 Y$ w- l1 T
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
1 F  ^+ r) @) S% m% z佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
7 B: }1 Z0 K! X2 ~到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。