<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)! M- t; q  ]1 ]! I: [1 N- S# t2 M
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:$ K3 N$ w" ?2 s6 S
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
: m. j  M& T( x" y0 f% C) }
I agree you points that it could be illegal7 B3 c4 C" s( C! g& \2 D& b, C
but that is still a "gray area"5 V7 c% h4 X! F( C
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
0 b* b5 b) S. ~. I6 Z6 C% ~) K
; w5 S- R( b8 i# Y6 S2 B- Zanyway, I want to say that is
8 C, K. C' Q2 c- D( ]# X1 g. r9 H# `4 \who is supposed to be protected by laws
8 T) R. x) g4 f7 |& ucreators?# b# _; ?: g$ q) ^1 I+ y2 \0 f
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
& Y; E4 V' J: w, T. V2 Z1 rlet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
& n- d: d, H7 q: L+ dwhen we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those
6 W, J' t+ [2 N* zWhy nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:# m* t) ]" c9 A# n' p( B, T
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
7 d# A9 |$ u  u; e5 ^- C" @3 W& U
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:9 t  C8 d9 }* V" W" d
' ?# p) b& O: r: T3 m$ `
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
( N6 @% \; d6 P  P6 B& t- g
唔係喎!( m  S  ~9 |  H7 v4 X
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
3 L2 z# z4 }$ P2 S0 r我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!5 t* x; u: W* S1 s
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
, i! `. S; Q  Z6 B! n' N就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事; e- ?  T# D+ p) b
一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
/ P1 r3 [4 C0 i% Fdun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......9 |8 r) @/ E6 s: k3 Y: ^
if so bad, dun download la, right?2 @. a# i8 E' f3 \$ a
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
! }/ `5 G$ _/ w4 Wbut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct# I# O1 e5 D& M1 L  ]6 {0 q4 ]/ z* y
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
/ n) Z: V! h% h8 cso what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society: `& G% Y  ?' B/ d4 y: b; g
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........$ @9 r& F7 g5 C9 ?
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!" I9 l2 D: f! g( e) z  J
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!
6 d# Z" w6 h) a- v% U5 d佢又唔係殺人放火~~~( E2 I$ b8 _+ G& H
政府想比下馬威0的人~~. }& V' T  x# f& u. G  [8 Z! p
錢就一定罰
! y  {0 O% w1 q9 w5 g未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,
1 w# l& L' N0 X' m0 S/ M唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
/ Y! @( A# l6 L+ u, o3 F  P佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?* ^* c# K! |( t2 y
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。