<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
8 |( C* P) i$ y# w! S8 ~但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
4 I' O7 F: V$ l+ S9 Y8 @' {9 O大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
# G; u. f5 e/ O- W+ {. z8 D% W, U
I agree you points that it could be illegal
# `2 r1 o( b8 I9 y! Y. vbut that is still a "gray area"
  @3 o. D9 V0 U6 X3 ywhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair1 T' G8 C) X1 t0 f5 u' P
7 I0 M( D* D. `: I
anyway, I want to say that is" m% v2 `8 i) Z: \
who is supposed to be protected by laws
: e! J8 j, n- M5 B' x7 `* Dcreators?
( h6 W6 m! F( m  }but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market8 g2 L1 |& g2 Q( N% a5 k  t7 o0 b, g
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
% c1 z7 @. J3 Fwhen we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those5 \7 s3 ?2 u  |' V2 i/ i( A
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:7 X& R* f" Y2 [- z
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
* i, Q1 v. x) i' d; X; g我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:# O% C4 U: x, W8 C
$ M- s# Q1 r) [$ Y! {; S; X
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
' X  X0 X% [) m7 P! [0 H唔係喎!
' |. Y- ~& v; `. `古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!( C/ w  g8 l, k# z$ S) a
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
! C, k" M: m& K3 s$ u佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!8 Z$ i$ z  ?/ |
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事# ]$ k9 }& P: ^1 A' F: d: N. n
一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
' M5 i0 F3 h) y' A  o9 u) z) w8 Kdun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......; O! r, |, w% l# x' i# ~
if so bad, dun download la, right?
0 X3 P7 i! W1 z( ?; l. Ci am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^& D7 q& C1 R( Q* _6 v# R) `4 I
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct( S- ^" t+ `* O1 C; ?% ~3 q
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la4 d* W/ O" i1 Q
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society- c" Q' n  ]  C- m) G" v
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........9 X1 d0 D8 @; d
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!: g. V) v) I7 J5 ?8 T
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!
; k0 v7 R/ t) N, u( ~9 S' S( E佢又唔係殺人放火~~~* u' H. C: |; \
政府想比下馬威0的人~~' b& o( G  [8 i8 u. G# H
錢就一定罰( Q1 Z8 p. @. X' X
未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,5 G& B: J2 v! B$ W
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?! X% X2 k, w. @6 H1 L1 R; y
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?; S3 J; r& d: ~* b- N( Y1 n: i2 E
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。