<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
- ]3 ~  M1 r  u  p但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:& Y" V' F, V  `
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
4 b: M; g' O9 D+ f
I agree you points that it could be illegal
3 ?3 v( C$ B9 Y- |3 Q% Obut that is still a "gray area"
6 ]  S. |. D1 r: }4 mwhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
1 {! k+ A" c- Z  H. f: ?
& ?0 Y2 ?9 x' H5 Y+ L+ vanyway, I want to say that is: f3 |6 O9 d4 l, l) ?: n/ b' ^
who is supposed to be protected by laws" a4 H2 {# \  H! C/ ^; \2 m3 E1 }
creators?
) k: O# n, ^8 J2 d* r- Kbut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
2 f* Y$ }- K9 G/ @5 s, s8 olet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money./ S- S* ^9 i" W% j. _3 A
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those8 G+ M7 x% U# L& z0 P! K* \. A8 X" X
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
, ^+ @7 _7 ]) J4 s6 m  e1 R6 L其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
4 ~+ G; T2 v' k6 @: p我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
# ]# i* [& M- r! j  I# r3 W# G' P1 \; i" p
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
* G) [  y# @$ x$ J: O
唔係喎!
( R! B; n1 |6 a3 \& w: D7 M* u古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!' [0 _1 @2 Z( b0 Y5 {4 V
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!' ~' H' s* `, z& y3 G
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!$ v* a. {" s0 }5 H2 I5 i; \! y
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
. O. r' j& m4 Z9 w4 b( D; t一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!6 Z/ o# W, l) \6 P, Z
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......; P+ Q/ p0 _, s  p8 H' Q
if so bad, dun download la, right?
( Q' {5 [: l0 S7 hi am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^5 _" v+ Q1 T9 C* Q& u1 p! S: k
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct
4 a: W9 {: [7 A( P& Ino need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la( j0 N- |& O: I5 J7 z3 v! k
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society% x5 k5 ]9 G7 N
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.......... z" ?6 ~- \3 m8 U
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!+ z$ c* y- s: n( S) T4 ]6 F
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!
" Q) x* w/ [# J5 N! M9 T7 C佢又唔係殺人放火~~~8 |$ m6 a6 R0 u; A8 O& X8 l
政府想比下馬威0的人~~+ B; U. s: ^( H& x& `3 f: M
錢就一定罰+ _& ^' R( R  ~) G
未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,
- a# [8 A+ F' u# d6 v唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?% k) k! R; [( n9 d- R" o5 y
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
1 z% z6 m$ L* _( ?2 ~到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。