<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
) }/ g+ Z- J/ C但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:! S9 i5 z5 s6 o" Q, w
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
( J9 S2 G1 C* U& }I agree you points that it could be illegal
8 T" T1 ~/ b5 ]. T: Z/ Z3 {; Q' bbut that is still a "gray area"7 w! v" D9 t/ @* g  ^. A3 N6 a
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair7 ~0 V( r2 b) n8 n6 t9 H
! A* A- P* c* P. u- J
anyway, I want to say that is
+ v) O' I3 j0 I9 Ewho is supposed to be protected by laws: R' E; S5 r8 U8 p/ d
creators?9 W8 W# p1 e3 M" |2 o
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
; I7 e3 ]" a6 Q& L6 u  z% l% e! n0 ulet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
% T9 m6 O0 q+ F( t- M& A0 {when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those
" v  X2 k' a4 i$ [5 z/ XWhy nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
  I  c. p8 F  x; o- X其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
+ S5 V5 o6 D# L( {5 x$ Z# n6 K
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
( v1 V! v/ V( h5 }( p5 x& _
5 K5 `$ E8 t  E. Y- o: u, D我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
: ^/ n5 D" X- H- e+ E- Y! |2 I唔係喎!
4 S4 Y& W9 a$ V3 Y! F古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
' V( J* E( |% e5 k( g我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!) W$ J$ F9 W. d  a' ]6 {0 A2 Y
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
5 }* X. V1 G7 O0 Y就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事2 x; q  e8 L' m( S; K
一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
# V' V& `( G' u" b' A' Idun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
& j5 q& c. ~' b/ L& ?$ Mif so bad, dun download la, right?
0 G0 q+ p' l, v+ V) hi am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
9 a# j& D$ e2 R' q! A* A, f+ vbut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct$ I( n$ G, c9 o
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
  |7 o0 ^7 D) c4 C* [; dso what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
% N* l3 j6 s- j# Q; eusing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
* x- Y8 B2 R3 _6 N9 Y: A! J' kwhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!* U- b7 r+ a" q
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!: E8 `1 L% Q; A3 Y2 m* G- v' r
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
* o& j3 B: m9 y政府想比下馬威0的人~~# _( S9 ^: |/ v
錢就一定罰
2 M1 n. f" ~: k1 c. v; C未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,3 b+ G6 ~0 q1 [
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?- W. E* t+ k5 w, }) V2 @" s
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
, [7 a, O6 h0 |4 z! b到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。