<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)7 Z- E$ Y. U/ w
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
" W. f% Q! [6 j0 ~/ |) P; @2 [大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
  N/ K5 j8 e6 `I agree you points that it could be illegal
4 u4 Q+ J5 r8 x7 a% {3 obut that is still a "gray area"
" S) C$ x* b: o. iwhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair- S9 d: y" ]7 f: K
, E/ K( ]9 B& i" P# y# {; E
anyway, I want to say that is; [* @8 q0 T$ b/ v$ Y( k) R
who is supposed to be protected by laws
9 c7 K1 N! M# A# s* ^- Ucreators?
* ~& W4 [7 p3 I# qbut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market, r) h' a" P+ F. [' Z( V6 i8 c
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.7 s- }& R; O' R$ C! h; S
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those& ^$ b6 }3 [0 U
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:1 p( c1 d  K& t& r/ C
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
- |, {5 L# a( M% r4 a3 s
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
1 H" J# _" o& w* }) e  ~3 J; x4 a! y
5 U+ h! a6 B* n, c8 T2 h  [' U我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
9 Y6 Z. w6 g2 \' G唔係喎!
  {+ q" s7 {0 ?: D7 j5 C+ V古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!% c% O" O( `& B2 ^3 q; ~
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
& O) }# l. I7 B3 D5 O  s- f佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!; R/ _) c) d1 _) v, b$ ]
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
/ U; v' u- X4 S, V3 k0 @一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
; E4 ]. p0 q) s/ M/ E6 R. g* R; \dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......& z! a) \5 H& ?4 g. Q0 U* H# B  s+ Q6 P
if so bad, dun download la, right?
  t1 i0 R3 T2 g& {  @0 yi am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^- E- {$ p% Q# y0 n. v, g! I
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct& O" z, e3 E% `. R; F5 u
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la8 u' @( b! [% [
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
$ q8 u! `! f. {using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
, D$ @+ Q. {( G$ ^) l' S6 v. ?why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!: r5 k' u$ P+ f9 W/ X
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!
: `$ V# p. H; Y" G+ U; ]% V佢又唔係殺人放火~~~0 Y% p4 Q% F' q* o0 b# H0 C. \
政府想比下馬威0的人~~$ f1 S, ~3 I  v! d* n% K0 s
錢就一定罰! H9 q4 }7 z* ]/ V
未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,' z& U: c& U0 e8 h
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
8 Q) Q3 k9 R* {5 j佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
5 _. \3 V/ c8 w到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。