vivienna

Originally posted by 28083003 at 2005-6-18 01:07 AM:
* V' d+ T. `& w反轉黎諗7 ~& c7 G+ J1 C. L, X) x+ W
ps2之所以o係香港咁流行就因為有翻版1 d; `+ ~& I2 b& `# \  g
你睇下DC,X-box( z  u) N9 o% V
同ps2 o既機o既銷售量真係無得比. J! C+ X) ]4 r! A5 |4 E" o
你估ps2無老翻會唔會有咁多人買呢??

- ~4 p, k5 r( k3 p, q) q- Y
講中曬!!!
2 ?2 @9 V+ U+ ^6 [. }7 z7 f. v, W$ |* {" ^) o
仲有GAME貴跟本唔係籍口﹐寫GAME果班人都要食飯。3 V" q7 U# b( f3 Q3 {4 N9 v6 {

- L# f" Z8 m" X講來講去﹐又係講知識產權尼樣野。

bodycharge

物就係囉. 改車唔犯法, 只有係條路行改車先算犯法.  同樣道理, 改機, 無錯, intension係要玩老番(但係仲未玩喎), 但係就算依家連買老番都算犯法的話, 政府大不了只可捉用改機來玩老番(如果真的立了法). 改機呢個行為, 又點可以算犯法呢?  明唔明呢??

vivienna

Originally posted by bodycharge at 2005-6-18 01:12 AM:* O2 r& }: D- L9 l: N0 I
物就係囉. 改車唔犯法, 只有係條路行...

* U* @  d* |* P/ l
o甘政府當初立法嚴禁運毒咪立錯左囉﹖話曬都未販賣﹖又未用﹖+ f) ~) i( [. d! b0 F

* k7 ?# h# M+ k要斷米路﹐政府就係要甘絕﹐條條路都要封斷曬。

bodycharge

哩個例子, 即係: 毒品=老番.  針筒=PS機.  政府唔可以禁針筒喎.  如果係咁, 全區碼DVD機都唔可以賣啦.

細驚

針筒應該係等同改左機既ps2
5 r/ c! U" e/ f) p2 p
/ R* w8 r" [" F) A其實政府今次立法原意係岩
) H6 |# w3 c6 W$ n  c但正如bodycharge兄咁講, 改左機, 但未玩翻版, 唔算有損版權( f, b7 z8 ]5 M: H
唔可以用販毒唻比喻 而且部機係我既 我想點搞佢邊到人管2 \# i0 }4 T4 ^8 b7 t

: A2 I/ y# d0 @另外, 政府咁搞係好心做壞事$ D. z8 c, Q2 [3 @6 M+ v
一個唔該令sony賺少左硬件既錢8 w" S2 S0 U; K' p2 G( L
眾所周知  V0 q4 t3 h( P0 t  y/ j$ a
ps2咁好賣, 同之前ps, gb, gba一樣原因 有翻版
& S6 L  d5 O7 m  T! b佢假如真係立法成功 相信唔會再有咩人買ps2% _( F$ ^  t: l: ?
到時希望真係正版軟件可以支持到佢地香港分公司既運作

abc123aa

Originally posted by vivienna at 2005-6-18 01:12 AM:
9 F" i; ?: r+ q. I% P# J3 G
9 E3 F/ v8 b7 c" @講中曬!!!. x# T1 W% @! n( q

5 s" X( B4 P/ e5 N, R9 F仲有GAME貴跟本唔係籍口﹐寫GAME果班人都要食飯。+ v( D3 ?4 S$ T/ r# q: f9 c# Y
, z4 Z4 @8 z. @* `2 E
講來講去﹐又係講知識產權尼樣野。

0 A  I5 s) b8 w' X1 ?& I& @對~我得好少 game,因為冇咩錢,但係我唔會買翻版,因為都唔知玩唔玩整既,加上正版game畫面都靚d啦~3 o( |8 Z$ E7 @& j  t
9 u& W" E: \6 m7 Y
ps2要睇vcd果d野買多一條唔知咩線就得

waterfire

唔係翻版, 點會有咁多人買...4 y2 ~/ I- D% h' n5 T
其實最簡單一樣野
9 S. Q5 ^7 E& F& b6 j$ F0 }正版好似翻版咁平
/ I" S# X( W9 `8 M+ T: y+ L. q: Q+ H或者, 香港人個個好有錢, 買正版game 好似食餐飯咁5 o, Q; ^2 s8 U9 Z5 Z1 R" B
咁就可以解決問題la

sheraton

I think PS2 piracy should not be an immediate concern to HK Gov't, who cares when we're only stealing, pirating, copying Japanese/American developed products?  Japanese "adapted" many Chinese culture and called it their own, who's going to pay us back for that?
2 w4 [% s& M4 r2 f" T
) a8 I* Z( B3 Q& ?+ JBut I agree, Copyrights should be supported if it's on HK developed products like Movies and Music.  Coz HK, we should care, I could care less about Japan

bigg

我覺得唔可以apply毒品呢個例子
. D* R1 m8 H/ Y因為你本身藏有大量毒品已經犯法, 咁你運毒就一定犯法啦,: i& L$ ?  ]4 Z/ L, g* b: ^) w# B
但ps2本身係合法既, 咁我買左番黎點改係我既事, 唔通我將部ps2放落屎坑都話我犯法
2 [2 H+ V, P; C$ B我覺得政府應該係立例加重賣老翻既刑罰, 等佢地覺得冇錢賺就唔會賣
. @5 C, d0 X, E$ w再講而家d人都用bt download game落ps2玩, 立呢條例都冇咩用

Miz

我就覺得係關..* s( u8 n. v) d' R( u4 R# V
改機既用途: K( K; B5 y' l7 w$ B3 k6 M
如果改機既用途一定係用黎玩老番 so先要改既咁就可能會犯法囉
8 a( d: t4 N7 S4 N: C- V! a政府咁做都係想阻止d人玩老番啫(其實邊阻到架)...冇做錯架~
& c; _! }0 V3 o+ k我亦同意樓上話..『部機係我既 我想點搞佢邊到人管』