vivienna

Originally posted by 28083003 at 2005-6-18 01:07 AM:% _+ s& i  m' f6 Q! [
反轉黎諗
7 x4 {& d3 g+ B4 ~1 u" lps2之所以o係香港咁流行就因為有翻版, S  W) u- s" [3 l1 z# `
你睇下DC,X-box
& i* H# U+ W5 a7 q7 r( e! C同ps2 o既機o既銷售量真係無得比
5 N4 j9 w- w1 I你估ps2無老翻會唔會有咁多人買呢??

  x$ N$ V4 k! m# |1 l$ b: q講中曬!!!
1 R! P, W( |4 Z# e+ F9 |6 V+ @8 n" f! O2 O: p9 y1 X! X
仲有GAME貴跟本唔係籍口﹐寫GAME果班人都要食飯。% r; Y; I3 v" L7 R; s

& m, _* F/ O, p6 M! T講來講去﹐又係講知識產權尼樣野。

bodycharge

物就係囉. 改車唔犯法, 只有係條路行改車先算犯法.  同樣道理, 改機, 無錯, intension係要玩老番(但係仲未玩喎), 但係就算依家連買老番都算犯法的話, 政府大不了只可捉用改機來玩老番(如果真的立了法). 改機呢個行為, 又點可以算犯法呢?  明唔明呢??

vivienna

Originally posted by bodycharge at 2005-6-18 01:12 AM:
% @3 X* J  `' ^, p5 C物就係囉. 改車唔犯法, 只有係條路行...

4 X- I  u9 X' b0 V6 K8 k& m5 B0 Lo甘政府當初立法嚴禁運毒咪立錯左囉﹖話曬都未販賣﹖又未用﹖
4 |7 ^/ ?2 q& Y5 M$ ~4 T2 v- c8 |) M# y. l0 p
要斷米路﹐政府就係要甘絕﹐條條路都要封斷曬。

bodycharge

哩個例子, 即係: 毒品=老番.  針筒=PS機.  政府唔可以禁針筒喎.  如果係咁, 全區碼DVD機都唔可以賣啦.

細驚

針筒應該係等同改左機既ps2
7 s5 X9 C( i. F! q! s* f/ V& ^0 D! C# R) [2 P1 _
其實政府今次立法原意係岩) M$ Q  b8 t7 K6 r/ x  c! i
但正如bodycharge兄咁講, 改左機, 但未玩翻版, 唔算有損版權
; a6 k" x1 N! ~; ], K: L! g# ?唔可以用販毒唻比喻 而且部機係我既 我想點搞佢邊到人管
) S5 n0 O, y3 n' o% l, v3 ?0 B' X. X- R4 z! Z5 `
另外, 政府咁搞係好心做壞事
+ ?0 X5 A) ^1 j0 s; W# l一個唔該令sony賺少左硬件既錢  \; [* `" `2 C% [' k" z
眾所周知3 _( h4 P( B7 Y: J6 E5 ?5 v
ps2咁好賣, 同之前ps, gb, gba一樣原因 有翻版
3 G7 {, L3 o* }* E; n佢假如真係立法成功 相信唔會再有咩人買ps2
* b6 `2 [! P- t到時希望真係正版軟件可以支持到佢地香港分公司既運作

abc123aa

Originally posted by vivienna at 2005-6-18 01:12 AM:& h/ J" ?, L; V6 L% e

! D; }" Q9 o: l1 f- O1 m講中曬!!!" K0 D  q4 y* j; J$ S+ o% {8 r

6 G  _$ k& k( k3 r& W# T/ M仲有GAME貴跟本唔係籍口﹐寫GAME果班人都要食飯。6 d' {5 N& T# }: k+ K: \$ q' i3 M  i

. `# g/ r! U8 t+ _講來講去﹐又係講知識產權尼樣野。

  C* ]1 z( F4 B7 ^# ?' U8 T對~我得好少 game,因為冇咩錢,但係我唔會買翻版,因為都唔知玩唔玩整既,加上正版game畫面都靚d啦~
2 f% O9 J0 p" {- H/ v4 Y5 G: q) }! |2 L# I' E
ps2要睇vcd果d野買多一條唔知咩線就得

waterfire

唔係翻版, 點會有咁多人買...
: T3 b. W& s  I) |  T, d) i+ _其實最簡單一樣野* L, x& a  M# {1 A3 y
正版好似翻版咁平' v, T5 d+ y1 R
或者, 香港人個個好有錢, 買正版game 好似食餐飯咁! i6 ?/ U- }* N* c3 ^: S
咁就可以解決問題la

sheraton

I think PS2 piracy should not be an immediate concern to HK Gov't, who cares when we're only stealing, pirating, copying Japanese/American developed products?  Japanese "adapted" many Chinese culture and called it their own, who's going to pay us back for that?
+ x7 w5 ^, ]% t: G2 X/ k* t& D' ~/ g# w8 ~% r
But I agree, Copyrights should be supported if it's on HK developed products like Movies and Music.  Coz HK, we should care, I could care less about Japan

bigg

我覺得唔可以apply毒品呢個例子
# s' R' \( X$ G因為你本身藏有大量毒品已經犯法, 咁你運毒就一定犯法啦,
' B( k# i. O: I& c& R但ps2本身係合法既, 咁我買左番黎點改係我既事, 唔通我將部ps2放落屎坑都話我犯法* s# f7 j3 i+ @: @+ h$ h" r
我覺得政府應該係立例加重賣老翻既刑罰, 等佢地覺得冇錢賺就唔會賣# ?$ Y0 Y6 _' f- E
再講而家d人都用bt download game落ps2玩, 立呢條例都冇咩用

Miz

我就覺得係關..
+ R0 @) B* ?9 d) A* I改機既用途! m) F( T& G7 o5 v
如果改機既用途一定係用黎玩老番 so先要改既咁就可能會犯法囉
5 J6 d$ k; d+ @政府咁做都係想阻止d人玩老番啫(其實邊阻到架)...冇做錯架~
$ |! M9 G! R! A* J# T) x我亦同意樓上話..『部機係我既 我想點搞佢邊到人管』