vivienna

Originally posted by 28083003 at 2005-6-18 01:07 AM:
! R4 }. N" k0 S# [, O反轉黎諗! \4 W4 e3 J# ]+ q
ps2之所以o係香港咁流行就因為有翻版9 K! l; Q' ]1 f5 t3 L
你睇下DC,X-box  Z/ w4 C$ E/ }. G0 Z( t+ k6 q
同ps2 o既機o既銷售量真係無得比: A4 |  X1 R. I
你估ps2無老翻會唔會有咁多人買呢??

3 [; v3 w9 M4 ]5 E& G# V# F( u講中曬!!!# w8 d* ^. {) R7 s

0 o' c( q0 `5 @; w! C+ f# N. I仲有GAME貴跟本唔係籍口﹐寫GAME果班人都要食飯。
, f) Z% c# ]' Q+ Z+ M2 \- |
, q; ^9 C- l* X, p4 G; k, [講來講去﹐又係講知識產權尼樣野。

bodycharge

物就係囉. 改車唔犯法, 只有係條路行改車先算犯法.  同樣道理, 改機, 無錯, intension係要玩老番(但係仲未玩喎), 但係就算依家連買老番都算犯法的話, 政府大不了只可捉用改機來玩老番(如果真的立了法). 改機呢個行為, 又點可以算犯法呢?  明唔明呢??

vivienna

Originally posted by bodycharge at 2005-6-18 01:12 AM:
) y& w* M: s9 f8 Z物就係囉. 改車唔犯法, 只有係條路行...

6 ?/ {" S7 @2 L2 ?/ _/ f
o甘政府當初立法嚴禁運毒咪立錯左囉﹖話曬都未販賣﹖又未用﹖* ^4 G5 a  y- i- i$ \! j  n* W8 [

1 ~/ E" S$ {0 z. z! b2 Q4 @% X: n- r- w& O要斷米路﹐政府就係要甘絕﹐條條路都要封斷曬。

bodycharge

哩個例子, 即係: 毒品=老番.  針筒=PS機.  政府唔可以禁針筒喎.  如果係咁, 全區碼DVD機都唔可以賣啦.

細驚

針筒應該係等同改左機既ps2
+ D6 Q" W. {+ F. v5 k0 z  X2 D9 \3 l" Z6 U& W( \# ?9 V
其實政府今次立法原意係岩/ O$ N- m9 M0 Y. s2 }/ w
但正如bodycharge兄咁講, 改左機, 但未玩翻版, 唔算有損版權$ i; @% E4 k' Z/ T/ q" L8 v( M5 N, D+ c
唔可以用販毒唻比喻 而且部機係我既 我想點搞佢邊到人管; S( k6 y+ l1 i; l/ p! k4 I
' N  P! |$ R4 ^  S/ j& T, C
另外, 政府咁搞係好心做壞事
) p0 W, Q" ~5 r0 {; S一個唔該令sony賺少左硬件既錢
0 E. Z: R/ Q  _# {" H% @. e眾所周知
* m) {8 s( V( f+ `  u5 g) q! P5 a1 ~- D( aps2咁好賣, 同之前ps, gb, gba一樣原因 有翻版2 _1 m8 V. L$ w
佢假如真係立法成功 相信唔會再有咩人買ps21 y+ C- _' b% A4 {/ H, ]( A" z+ X$ M
到時希望真係正版軟件可以支持到佢地香港分公司既運作

abc123aa

Originally posted by vivienna at 2005-6-18 01:12 AM:
! g6 K) _/ n3 U$ l2 q' d
7 B; v: J3 o8 B; F5 _講中曬!!!
& ~! M4 c9 n& o% Q0 j0 ^; s
0 ]' ?* k6 J; k* f% c7 F. x3 S仲有GAME貴跟本唔係籍口﹐寫GAME果班人都要食飯。
' R5 f5 |- {& c7 Y
& k4 z, }4 u' o. d: I+ z講來講去﹐又係講知識產權尼樣野。

' F4 V) w( l- c2 ]8 `0 B" C
對~我得好少 game,因為冇咩錢,但係我唔會買翻版,因為都唔知玩唔玩整既,加上正版game畫面都靚d啦~. w3 G7 e, Z% M% u( q3 m) z2 f
8 I! k' a4 ]+ P
ps2要睇vcd果d野買多一條唔知咩線就得

waterfire

唔係翻版, 點會有咁多人買...
+ i0 i7 ?5 Q* P: v其實最簡單一樣野
& l& L+ c" m& y9 E正版好似翻版咁平
+ \: e5 R* g2 u% M或者, 香港人個個好有錢, 買正版game 好似食餐飯咁: V4 m+ {1 l0 r/ z& \
咁就可以解決問題la

sheraton

I think PS2 piracy should not be an immediate concern to HK Gov't, who cares when we're only stealing, pirating, copying Japanese/American developed products?  Japanese "adapted" many Chinese culture and called it their own, who's going to pay us back for that?
' k5 }# W: y3 v7 j/ n0 |7 l! x9 m
( i4 R, H! `  QBut I agree, Copyrights should be supported if it's on HK developed products like Movies and Music.  Coz HK, we should care, I could care less about Japan

bigg

我覺得唔可以apply毒品呢個例子7 ]+ ^. I) f2 w2 @2 r1 }& ~
因為你本身藏有大量毒品已經犯法, 咁你運毒就一定犯法啦,0 d/ R' N; x" l2 L5 M7 C
但ps2本身係合法既, 咁我買左番黎點改係我既事, 唔通我將部ps2放落屎坑都話我犯法9 A( @. ~) s3 a. [. U7 V  ~! X
我覺得政府應該係立例加重賣老翻既刑罰, 等佢地覺得冇錢賺就唔會賣+ y8 b, M8 t- Z# F" G% E7 z
再講而家d人都用bt download game落ps2玩, 立呢條例都冇咩用

Miz

我就覺得係關..
0 X( Q. ~; E& A* j改機既用途; o$ V% ?: ^3 z- k4 _! ^/ ~3 a
如果改機既用途一定係用黎玩老番 so先要改既咁就可能會犯法囉
1 t4 s+ I. g1 ^% h! f" U政府咁做都係想阻止d人玩老番啫(其實邊阻到架)...冇做錯架~
2 h9 I" I& a/ C* `4 U( b( ?" {我亦同意樓上話..『部機係我既 我想點搞佢邊到人管』