vivienna

Originally posted by 28083003 at 2005-6-18 01:07 AM:
( o$ C2 A3 b* |( V/ f. Z反轉黎諗# y0 A; `2 j' }3 h3 _' H
ps2之所以o係香港咁流行就因為有翻版: P$ n  v9 {9 w0 W0 A0 ~0 y) V; h8 m
你睇下DC,X-box
2 ]  _* t1 J3 ~. X6 x" }同ps2 o既機o既銷售量真係無得比9 I4 ?1 g: Q) _8 |. ~* v
你估ps2無老翻會唔會有咁多人買呢??

0 Q/ c/ T; D+ H講中曬!!!
* Q) x+ Y- l3 F% `4 x& i. D. Z2 Y# I/ v4 S4 p! A, P! k
仲有GAME貴跟本唔係籍口﹐寫GAME果班人都要食飯。( \  _" h' M% Q3 n9 k( M% Q1 F2 ?
( F  o2 {+ `; e  i" A1 X
講來講去﹐又係講知識產權尼樣野。

bodycharge

物就係囉. 改車唔犯法, 只有係條路行改車先算犯法.  同樣道理, 改機, 無錯, intension係要玩老番(但係仲未玩喎), 但係就算依家連買老番都算犯法的話, 政府大不了只可捉用改機來玩老番(如果真的立了法). 改機呢個行為, 又點可以算犯法呢?  明唔明呢??

vivienna

Originally posted by bodycharge at 2005-6-18 01:12 AM:
/ l1 J2 H3 h; g" b物就係囉. 改車唔犯法, 只有係條路行...

- M7 I; F8 ^  B+ E! ~o甘政府當初立法嚴禁運毒咪立錯左囉﹖話曬都未販賣﹖又未用﹖
( r: ?$ R5 ?: S0 P1 P0 ]5 Z; A. n/ X* C( {0 e5 t! o3 t. r: d. a& s& ]
要斷米路﹐政府就係要甘絕﹐條條路都要封斷曬。

bodycharge

哩個例子, 即係: 毒品=老番.  針筒=PS機.  政府唔可以禁針筒喎.  如果係咁, 全區碼DVD機都唔可以賣啦.

細驚

針筒應該係等同改左機既ps2
2 v3 f/ N& X+ q. W8 v7 Y; @3 p: U$ z8 Q1 j; n& F# Q" ^5 ~- d, o# c
其實政府今次立法原意係岩- b6 Y" v- `7 ?2 ^
但正如bodycharge兄咁講, 改左機, 但未玩翻版, 唔算有損版權3 k8 j2 i! g; J. D
唔可以用販毒唻比喻 而且部機係我既 我想點搞佢邊到人管1 c; R( |* u% h$ M3 }- x% o4 ]6 I$ x

/ }' f: L9 {0 ~/ |另外, 政府咁搞係好心做壞事
$ j( m4 O7 Q- {! Z/ s一個唔該令sony賺少左硬件既錢
: v# h- T. f$ w) k+ o$ _+ x9 R眾所周知; }: y6 {" `! Q5 C
ps2咁好賣, 同之前ps, gb, gba一樣原因 有翻版" h& x& S5 q# M; T! Z
佢假如真係立法成功 相信唔會再有咩人買ps26 A2 r: I0 I2 O& D
到時希望真係正版軟件可以支持到佢地香港分公司既運作

abc123aa

Originally posted by vivienna at 2005-6-18 01:12 AM:# k; _* V% R2 h& m& U

0 R" M# H# P. O! T0 u+ v* I講中曬!!!( A. k! F/ m; A
1 z3 ^0 b- ?% p9 B
仲有GAME貴跟本唔係籍口﹐寫GAME果班人都要食飯。# z& \; S$ i  H  w2 L/ L4 j& n& J
3 F8 `! q8 i# t7 Q. F% q- I- L
講來講去﹐又係講知識產權尼樣野。

+ W" s' Y( L) A2 T- n$ F( H4 P對~我得好少 game,因為冇咩錢,但係我唔會買翻版,因為都唔知玩唔玩整既,加上正版game畫面都靚d啦~8 o0 F& Y% \  w

9 K* w) d* w4 x) ~+ h8 kps2要睇vcd果d野買多一條唔知咩線就得

waterfire

唔係翻版, 點會有咁多人買...
) \" J! s  _( v% K/ n2 x其實最簡單一樣野% b; ^, s4 {5 m) A) T
正版好似翻版咁平
+ T+ `6 S: ^3 ?或者, 香港人個個好有錢, 買正版game 好似食餐飯咁1 ]% s" v& O/ z; A$ X) ~0 ^. {
咁就可以解決問題la

sheraton

I think PS2 piracy should not be an immediate concern to HK Gov't, who cares when we're only stealing, pirating, copying Japanese/American developed products?  Japanese "adapted" many Chinese culture and called it their own, who's going to pay us back for that?
( }6 m- q& ~0 k
+ h& D: [5 ?5 D. ?1 n  CBut I agree, Copyrights should be supported if it's on HK developed products like Movies and Music.  Coz HK, we should care, I could care less about Japan

bigg

我覺得唔可以apply毒品呢個例子1 L5 g: ]; i) k; Q/ }: `
因為你本身藏有大量毒品已經犯法, 咁你運毒就一定犯法啦,
$ C) t& @4 i' Y6 N2 k但ps2本身係合法既, 咁我買左番黎點改係我既事, 唔通我將部ps2放落屎坑都話我犯法! H0 b, Q* m- n0 N* ]/ B
我覺得政府應該係立例加重賣老翻既刑罰, 等佢地覺得冇錢賺就唔會賣
$ R. k. C1 q' A4 w7 ?! u, V' S2 P' p再講而家d人都用bt download game落ps2玩, 立呢條例都冇咩用

Miz

我就覺得係關..
, T, n1 J& b7 ?" H% c改機既用途- k6 l+ q8 U: u% p. D
如果改機既用途一定係用黎玩老番 so先要改既咁就可能會犯法囉
7 O5 r: p2 M. L) {政府咁做都係想阻止d人玩老番啫(其實邊阻到架)...冇做錯架~ 1 e5 C5 E% Z- P
我亦同意樓上話..『部機係我既 我想點搞佢邊到人管』