vivienna

Originally posted by 28083003 at 2005-6-18 01:07 AM:5 C6 V+ m1 `5 z2 f4 a. a2 B
反轉黎諗
9 n, z( r6 R5 tps2之所以o係香港咁流行就因為有翻版7 y: |2 F' u" p# c  ], ^+ F
你睇下DC,X-box6 |; c# P1 t9 K% h/ G
同ps2 o既機o既銷售量真係無得比
  M* X5 S& `& ~" I& D, G9 y: e- |你估ps2無老翻會唔會有咁多人買呢??

! s* ~% S& E1 {, E) L
講中曬!!!
9 d3 i5 U3 V( t- D! j& d
, H4 p2 x6 x! O2 Z4 u; Z; r; q- X仲有GAME貴跟本唔係籍口﹐寫GAME果班人都要食飯。
& s5 o6 [1 F5 o$ {( J! P/ i$ ], n+ H, F0 m% D0 L
講來講去﹐又係講知識產權尼樣野。

bodycharge

物就係囉. 改車唔犯法, 只有係條路行改車先算犯法.  同樣道理, 改機, 無錯, intension係要玩老番(但係仲未玩喎), 但係就算依家連買老番都算犯法的話, 政府大不了只可捉用改機來玩老番(如果真的立了法). 改機呢個行為, 又點可以算犯法呢?  明唔明呢??

vivienna

Originally posted by bodycharge at 2005-6-18 01:12 AM:
. W0 ?! l- n9 {物就係囉. 改車唔犯法, 只有係條路行...

* P2 h( n8 \( h( A# q9 ^o甘政府當初立法嚴禁運毒咪立錯左囉﹖話曬都未販賣﹖又未用﹖
* A' Z- C9 T# g" R9 u" p/ }" s1 m; R; x9 l: s. G7 V# `5 L" R
要斷米路﹐政府就係要甘絕﹐條條路都要封斷曬。

bodycharge

哩個例子, 即係: 毒品=老番.  針筒=PS機.  政府唔可以禁針筒喎.  如果係咁, 全區碼DVD機都唔可以賣啦.

細驚

針筒應該係等同改左機既ps2
7 s: t$ Q- W" L1 U5 N0 C+ `9 g9 v# c1 {+ k, `, h, t" N
其實政府今次立法原意係岩$ l/ C1 Q+ p$ D/ Q6 u9 \
但正如bodycharge兄咁講, 改左機, 但未玩翻版, 唔算有損版權
6 D6 D7 Y5 e: ?. J- h; @唔可以用販毒唻比喻 而且部機係我既 我想點搞佢邊到人管
: V9 C' I0 {. o! Z: z! ^) Y1 H0 l6 {
. J; k1 b  a! [0 T; J+ d另外, 政府咁搞係好心做壞事
& q' P( I( w0 `一個唔該令sony賺少左硬件既錢- R, F# F. ~" u, ?  f
眾所周知/ p5 B# A! m- F9 }
ps2咁好賣, 同之前ps, gb, gba一樣原因 有翻版4 ]$ m" _9 V- }
佢假如真係立法成功 相信唔會再有咩人買ps2
/ ]+ B: R% T3 [  r7 Q到時希望真係正版軟件可以支持到佢地香港分公司既運作

abc123aa

Originally posted by vivienna at 2005-6-18 01:12 AM:9 s* w4 v9 h8 Z

- `; I, v5 G& G9 i2 e% ^講中曬!!!
  i# `- i& D! t! {2 M4 K( V* J0 b4 h6 G" Q' `
仲有GAME貴跟本唔係籍口﹐寫GAME果班人都要食飯。
0 W7 A1 [* ?3 @( q, ~- P: B* s: T$ Y* A* X, W
講來講去﹐又係講知識產權尼樣野。

: \. F+ P1 c! l
對~我得好少 game,因為冇咩錢,但係我唔會買翻版,因為都唔知玩唔玩整既,加上正版game畫面都靚d啦~
* d- A8 C- p9 n6 y; k
% a- d. }  y% s% x4 c& V3 |2 [- Fps2要睇vcd果d野買多一條唔知咩線就得

waterfire

唔係翻版, 點會有咁多人買...6 B& }) u: b. G0 b! @( _5 G
其實最簡單一樣野
1 Z! _5 D% r8 i9 W7 m正版好似翻版咁平/ n, q2 ~5 a7 n5 t: X: P
或者, 香港人個個好有錢, 買正版game 好似食餐飯咁
1 d& |9 {1 k+ @% ]咁就可以解決問題la

sheraton

I think PS2 piracy should not be an immediate concern to HK Gov't, who cares when we're only stealing, pirating, copying Japanese/American developed products?  Japanese "adapted" many Chinese culture and called it their own, who's going to pay us back for that?! `8 W7 D) l4 m& A) `8 X9 b

$ a9 Z: \+ e( F6 E/ F2 y* vBut I agree, Copyrights should be supported if it's on HK developed products like Movies and Music.  Coz HK, we should care, I could care less about Japan

bigg

我覺得唔可以apply毒品呢個例子, A# g4 g6 D2 T# H  J$ b
因為你本身藏有大量毒品已經犯法, 咁你運毒就一定犯法啦,
, ^% H7 Z! P8 v0 z9 ?+ X( ]3 I9 h; }7 x但ps2本身係合法既, 咁我買左番黎點改係我既事, 唔通我將部ps2放落屎坑都話我犯法
/ J- @6 S4 W0 S8 y& p+ c1 n% g我覺得政府應該係立例加重賣老翻既刑罰, 等佢地覺得冇錢賺就唔會賣
8 b( u2 [& H7 X' p再講而家d人都用bt download game落ps2玩, 立呢條例都冇咩用

Miz

我就覺得係關..8 U; G# }7 U, h- w' K' a" v
改機既用途, w' X" _0 B0 Z1 Y
如果改機既用途一定係用黎玩老番 so先要改既咁就可能會犯法囉
) s% P% Y3 G% H) R. D! l政府咁做都係想阻止d人玩老番啫(其實邊阻到架)...冇做錯架~ ' t5 D, b- `2 e4 N- J* D( Z- w
我亦同意樓上話..『部機係我既 我想點搞佢邊到人管』