vivienna

Originally posted by 28083003 at 2005-6-18 01:07 AM:, p; [! E* }( i$ N- |
反轉黎諗; `: ~, D" X0 `/ B6 s! G' f
ps2之所以o係香港咁流行就因為有翻版
2 W) M7 O+ H3 q; x. O$ E- H你睇下DC,X-box6 [. F( u# N( b
同ps2 o既機o既銷售量真係無得比
5 A9 j1 o+ n: E1 Y! g你估ps2無老翻會唔會有咁多人買呢??

& D: ~: m3 Z9 r" c2 a講中曬!!!
+ h7 d0 d. {3 M' x: k4 R, F3 L' f6 l( ~
仲有GAME貴跟本唔係籍口﹐寫GAME果班人都要食飯。
+ b* X5 _+ ~9 r! h8 Q% `# V! Y5 a7 e4 X
講來講去﹐又係講知識產權尼樣野。

bodycharge

物就係囉. 改車唔犯法, 只有係條路行改車先算犯法.  同樣道理, 改機, 無錯, intension係要玩老番(但係仲未玩喎), 但係就算依家連買老番都算犯法的話, 政府大不了只可捉用改機來玩老番(如果真的立了法). 改機呢個行為, 又點可以算犯法呢?  明唔明呢??

vivienna

Originally posted by bodycharge at 2005-6-18 01:12 AM:
5 a1 d5 K; X, _4 F6 E; Z( [7 N物就係囉. 改車唔犯法, 只有係條路行...

' u, \- ]0 ~; @- K4 qo甘政府當初立法嚴禁運毒咪立錯左囉﹖話曬都未販賣﹖又未用﹖
& U; S, d) M: B
  L3 d$ ]9 }5 j$ v* G, b" a要斷米路﹐政府就係要甘絕﹐條條路都要封斷曬。

bodycharge

哩個例子, 即係: 毒品=老番.  針筒=PS機.  政府唔可以禁針筒喎.  如果係咁, 全區碼DVD機都唔可以賣啦.

細驚

針筒應該係等同改左機既ps28 n3 O! Q5 J, ^5 W
0 S" h7 q+ S' ], `0 X3 {
其實政府今次立法原意係岩3 t* p. i3 j( z
但正如bodycharge兄咁講, 改左機, 但未玩翻版, 唔算有損版權+ k# @2 Z$ _# T2 W! S4 e
唔可以用販毒唻比喻 而且部機係我既 我想點搞佢邊到人管
8 T4 M. ?  O" P4 L: f) n# [6 [0 B
另外, 政府咁搞係好心做壞事9 _3 @6 T/ `- _9 o0 ^% T0 Z
一個唔該令sony賺少左硬件既錢
+ K% ^5 l- ~' U& u眾所周知3 P7 _# g1 H5 c3 j! {+ |) W7 G
ps2咁好賣, 同之前ps, gb, gba一樣原因 有翻版
: ]+ S/ A6 m: F+ {. Z* L佢假如真係立法成功 相信唔會再有咩人買ps2# t* N6 n4 R& l7 Q
到時希望真係正版軟件可以支持到佢地香港分公司既運作

abc123aa

Originally posted by vivienna at 2005-6-18 01:12 AM:
. [) r! z3 u0 y3 Z" M
1 N( C6 c/ M7 W1 x1 m' I講中曬!!!
9 C) N& F& E/ m! Q: l
- p/ \( i' F6 c: S. r- c3 i仲有GAME貴跟本唔係籍口﹐寫GAME果班人都要食飯。1 G+ k5 ~$ G! N. C2 F

2 j0 o9 y8 ]4 O5 c) N3 |! G講來講去﹐又係講知識產權尼樣野。

* S0 R6 c! j3 [& D$ h3 {! Q對~我得好少 game,因為冇咩錢,但係我唔會買翻版,因為都唔知玩唔玩整既,加上正版game畫面都靚d啦~
' z4 W; O* B8 H+ u- R; ^
- {9 {; B/ b( n& [ps2要睇vcd果d野買多一條唔知咩線就得

waterfire

唔係翻版, 點會有咁多人買...0 l- G1 s/ v8 a0 \& F
其實最簡單一樣野9 y! o3 R+ F7 \5 b% h
正版好似翻版咁平4 ]; f. W% s& s" ~+ H
或者, 香港人個個好有錢, 買正版game 好似食餐飯咁  C$ B7 B) I2 D/ D5 B# z5 {3 W
咁就可以解決問題la

sheraton

I think PS2 piracy should not be an immediate concern to HK Gov't, who cares when we're only stealing, pirating, copying Japanese/American developed products?  Japanese "adapted" many Chinese culture and called it their own, who's going to pay us back for that?
! g9 B5 r: Z0 q$ w; T2 v! \1 ^4 m7 _. c4 y% i/ o
But I agree, Copyrights should be supported if it's on HK developed products like Movies and Music.  Coz HK, we should care, I could care less about Japan

bigg

我覺得唔可以apply毒品呢個例子! A# t; \3 q& T9 ^
因為你本身藏有大量毒品已經犯法, 咁你運毒就一定犯法啦,
3 G$ y+ t' z5 |' n但ps2本身係合法既, 咁我買左番黎點改係我既事, 唔通我將部ps2放落屎坑都話我犯法$ R0 g8 V7 Y8 a
我覺得政府應該係立例加重賣老翻既刑罰, 等佢地覺得冇錢賺就唔會賣
# p4 f7 }8 L. v8 I  U* O$ T再講而家d人都用bt download game落ps2玩, 立呢條例都冇咩用

Miz

我就覺得係關..
! t8 q& j  C" T! ?" m改機既用途3 [/ H# s; U( i5 o, i$ b$ k
如果改機既用途一定係用黎玩老番 so先要改既咁就可能會犯法囉
2 T' ?# R, T: r. H( I! K6 ^8 R政府咁做都係想阻止d人玩老番啫(其實邊阻到架)...冇做錯架~ ! O$ k/ `" W& ]/ S7 |0 @0 v
我亦同意樓上話..『部機係我既 我想點搞佢邊到人管』