 
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
1#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 顯示全部帖子
yes, it's correct.% S& l2 i: \4 T
G( ?" R- M1 N& Z7 W" k1 l( r
according to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.
7 [+ H3 \1 ^) Z( c% D( [
/ E9 x5 {; ]1 r0 rIn the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,7 T9 o, ^* e e6 D6 R
and that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.
c6 S9 B% L: o* ~
4 |; n) S1 p' bso, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險# V( `) ^' H9 W j% }2 O
7 n1 _: }! T0 V" [; v t0 q
in 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑,
. N" Z8 p# A0 V0 _ _) Hat least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|