|
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
1#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 顯示全部帖子
yes, it's correct.
% [- e3 U& J0 m: z6 p
/ g2 P! F" }/ u; V; caccording to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.
4 i: s( c- a- |) k1 ?2 f8 |/ J1 \! J1 b+ U7 R0 D A- ?
In the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,
* T. u( I! q/ H1 `6 L4 P6 h; b6 iand that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him. E+ r: X" t, B8 G \/ A
' P4 s& e/ D7 a5 R
so, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險/ x( m' J& l! e# s9 R
) q" x7 p5 Z/ X l* A0 I5 P$ Xin 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑, 8 ]8 e9 C$ {9 m, @) }, `
at least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|
