|
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
1#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 顯示全部帖子
yes, it's correct.
5 j! [' J, u# O3 z& [' D6 w$ D {7 F8 E; @. g m
according to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.
2 ]+ [! N0 }* Y2 _1 ?
3 ~2 ?" b: z) C# q/ d7 c7 hIn the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,, ~0 j& z1 w+ m
and that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.
9 N7 F/ F9 Q7 W9 H p- b$ w- t" q3 G0 A
so, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險
9 z1 F; m' t- @0 t& l! ]6 X- G5 @1 N, K
in 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑,
6 h0 h4 c0 }! j N( Aat least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|
