 
- 帖子
- 199
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 102
- 魅力
- 3
- 讚好
- 0
|
3#
發表於 2007-5-18 09:12 PM
| 顯示全部帖子
Originally posted by shehboy at 2007-5-18 07:35 PM:* a5 e D, ]5 u9 K- {
* z/ G6 k# {+ c- ?9 P0 C8 G |% _( t- I; U) A2 e" `
同意.
" m [4 X$ Q/ q" T2 }9 p但呢度講緊既唔係外面好多... % ~, h% d( z1 Q
( g# x4 [& K* O. _; E) w8 GI do respect CU students' good heart on this, but with their limited ability, the have created a lot of troubles., ]. _! J" U/ W8 N. x3 X) s# V
Your analysis is partly right, but i dont agree they did it for "為左搞噱頭" and you other subjective view against those students
: [7 Z2 F. Y6 ?9 \I dont know if you have even been into publishing business, but I can tell you, it is not simply copy and paste from you Microsoft Word, every article they have published they have put a lot of effort into it. If they simply 為左搞噱頭 there are many things for them to do besides publishing newspaper articles.
4 x. D* W8 h W) `, ] p# \As a commentator like us, we always simply looks at the result. If we want to become a good commentator, we need to look further down as we can reach the core of the matter.5 ?3 Q$ |- ]3 M
7 @( v/ x; j% R( m1) In my opinion, contrary to the gov. decision, i do not think think CU has breach any law. A/ {( D1 ^1 d, x% m) @
2) In my opinion, I do think they are in good faith when they conduct the newspaper
. S9 o* ^6 c$ \. f$ z- o) M3) Also, in my opinion, CU students did not put enough consideration to look into the possible consequences as their work has published- Y& j% O/ f; s5 A1 Y
o4 l( E# T6 @8 q% X3 {& b7 R( ~Thanks for reading this long ass boring reply |
|