|
 
- 帖子
- 199
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 102
- 魅力
- 3
- 讚好
- 0
|
3#
發表於 2007-5-18 09:12 PM
| 顯示全部帖子
Originally posted by shehboy at 2007-5-18 07:35 PM:
' N" X1 \; I$ E2 G1 @& }$ A8 u7 L, l, ^( x
9 y/ ^5 B# c4 K- x" j同意.
: }# c" a$ z; X- `/ G但呢度講緊既唔係外面好多... ' ~1 C1 _. t1 k+ z
9 z0 u" F* G8 m, U. R
I do respect CU students' good heart on this, but with their limited ability, the have created a lot of troubles.
, r) _9 R, \1 fYour analysis is partly right, but i dont agree they did it for "為左搞噱頭" and you other subjective view against those students
/ F% Q" r! x- h" B) O' m. UI dont know if you have even been into publishing business, but I can tell you, it is not simply copy and paste from you Microsoft Word, every article they have published they have put a lot of effort into it. If they simply 為左搞噱頭 there are many things for them to do besides publishing newspaper articles.
5 b7 ?& v! U' e/ D3 W- i& @! G5 eAs a commentator like us, we always simply looks at the result. If we want to become a good commentator, we need to look further down as we can reach the core of the matter.0 Z8 Z* T$ h$ z4 P6 i0 r
/ ?! p) q' {, @5 e
1) In my opinion, contrary to the gov. decision, i do not think think CU has breach any law" l- b4 O. X! R$ ` s; d
2) In my opinion, I do think they are in good faith when they conduct the newspaper1 n6 X) \. y2 }3 c( s G
3) Also, in my opinion, CU students did not put enough consideration to look into the possible consequences as their work has published
( D+ K& P2 z7 |; m/ \7 y6 x/ x
7 y- O& V& C6 A* L# O& GThanks for reading this long ass boring reply |
|