PG-13

Originally posted by shehboy at 2007-5-18 01:35 AM:% R% u9 }9 r' B% n! F- {9 l0 C
中大學生報話咁係為左引起人對性既討...

. z3 R2 p9 _8 @9 x  I
) A0 B! C, P7 `. i# J) S5 }: EHmm base on your analysis, you must be a phd of either education study or social study...
0 t; x: X: L* m7 b* A7 I# y6 g, a& T; m- @
Look, you mentioned that no one should say a thing unless he/she is really good at it,
+ f& O4 N! K/ k4 m" qand by the fact that you have made some comment on CU news, you must be some expert on that field.
# U* T1 ~" T1 m1 x7 j" w. ^7 U* f
) r; b3 r  S. c0 y2 R, q) XSuggestion: before you make a statement, make sure it is not contradictory

PG-13

I have to clarify that I am not associate with CU, I dont even know a single CU student or staff.
5 c) z1 o) a& d/ i* `7 Q* oNo doubt that the CU student decision is not a smart one. If they are smart enough they wont create so much of a trouble. But I dont think you shall blame them.  g+ o7 Y: L! o9 C6 W. F

3 P( |0 ]6 u5 D, D3 h8 q: @My focus is not on those CU students, I am more concern about the 影 視 及 娛 樂 事 務 管 理 處 $ c9 a% I* N" q3 N  q. G" o
They are the one shall be blamed.
2 t8 j! y6 _) y8 D+ C( bDon't you think 影視處's decision is affected by the public a lot?
- C1 l2 N$ X% j8 o5 U 影視處 is supposed to be a qusi-tribunal that has the power to judge thing. Different from other governmental department, when it involved of making judgments they shall follow a very strict rules... not from outside pressures.% s: O7 o3 E  x6 R7 z

" P1 Z9 [8 V& R6 ]6 f% z6 ]SO, when you bitch on the CU students, you don't and should not blame them BECAUSE they are university students. You shall consider as a normal person, like you and you other friends.
/ m. j1 f4 N0 @2 HThat is the legal point of view and that is the view that 影視處 are supposed to have.
/ j. J( p/ I* y* k7 i$ I8 p- p
* j9 l" i- G( |# n( F9 i% R8 jWhen you look at CU's newspaper and compare to other publishers such as easyfinders or east weekly you will find that CU's newspaper is, at worse, on the same plain as those magazines.
6 b3 _+ L; ~4 `, v. q2 m; k2 m- g. _
; s+ b' }7 S9 ]5 U1 Z: h4 y, TLast, if you really think CU students should subject to a higher moral responsibility. Then tell me, can they enjoy special right from us? or form the government?
. K' c# J+ o; l/ D% O$ Y, ]/ y( s+ u7 F6 o
If you still think they shall have a higher moral standard, then I can understand why that QC student have an argument that he shall not get charged of indecent assault.

PG-13

Originally posted by shehboy at 2007-5-18 07:35 PM:
. F- B0 y; l1 c8 z+ x! O+ U. o% R3 o( v( j# Y6 i% y+ _$ W

; S; u8 _; `: H5 T' U" m6 i/ S同意.
. @! e9 g1 x! D; E/ X! H但呢度講緊既唔係外面好多...

% V9 }. k' ]- O; }! s  h
  ]$ Q" F; u% ?I do respect CU students' good heart on this, but with their limited ability, the have created a lot of troubles.
3 Z; I/ U  x7 J4 |; R0 ^* b9 H' V* aYour analysis is partly right, but i dont agree they did it for "為左搞噱頭" and you other subjective view against those students
  m" P) C, v. V" F  V. f: hI dont know if you have even been into publishing business, but I can tell you, it is not simply copy and paste from you Microsoft Word, every article they have published they have put a lot of effort into it. If they simply 為左搞噱頭 there are many things for them to do besides publishing newspaper articles.
+ w  {; `6 E  v+ v. [+ cAs a commentator like us, we always simply looks at the result. If we want to become a good commentator, we need to look further down as we can reach the core of the matter.
4 ^* H0 x  ?, k4 l" m
- j! K4 l) w% _; M1) In my opinion, contrary to the gov. decision, i do not think think CU has breach any law
( z; j- z* l! C4 O; K* t2) In my opinion, I do think they are in good faith when they conduct the newspaper1 A, C, k/ c5 P9 T: d0 H
3) Also, in my opinion, CU students did not put enough consideration to look into the possible consequences as their work has published
& R* N7 Z. M  L. o/ H; A5 m
6 g' l6 U: t. Q! B! {1 D0 M* a  xThanks for reading this long ass boring reply

PG-13

Originally posted by shehboy at 2007-5-19 04:37 AM:
" V3 X& [* E0 V5 `* s. C6 N3 N  [: m7 M* @; @- J0 D3 z( h

5 R& B7 u& k6 j& I6 k2 {見你都好有heart寫個long ass bor...

$ U$ n$ A5 ^9 D- ?" @# r" F# N1 z; h+ ~, |  b
Your last point is right into my heart.
& ]8 \  a$ z& t( @$ c. e/ a0 gNot that I think they are retards Heehee
7 L2 x. C0 w! s, }- R& |5 _2 H) o  r: J' x) a' b
Maybe you have overestimated the ability of universities students. Don't put too much expectation, then you can appreciate their work.
) d# _0 e: N- w- a- M5 }& a4 `( t, G. }1 T. {
This time they has made a big and stupid mistake but I still bow for them. Its hard to see one who can stand out to make something different, something radical. ) \; v( i7 d# G

9 ^* u6 m0 k* P% Y: ~They are still in school, the whole idea of conducting a student newspaper is only a leaning process. I still don't think they deserve too much of a blame, people make mistake and after this incident, they will become a better person.' |  r9 N# k/ Y& H, k. I

% Y/ F% v4 [- F0 H
% `9 v* ^: N# x: a" M6 O; ~/ w: Q/ @# Y5 {4 h3 L: \
Last, I do think they need some pressure from public.