|
 
- 帖子
- 199
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 102
- 魅力
- 3
- 讚好
- 0
|
3#
發表於 2007-5-18 09:12 PM
| 顯示全部帖子
Originally posted by shehboy at 2007-5-18 07:35 PM:
/ a& k. ~) j" D* E: t& Y2 k3 o8 o& z F$ r( Y P
: a9 g0 m( A5 t5 \0 @, l同意.
8 s5 s( _3 A X# T但呢度講緊既唔係外面好多... 7 @3 s4 A9 t; j5 q B& C
1 @' ~$ b! E4 n, r& DI do respect CU students' good heart on this, but with their limited ability, the have created a lot of troubles.5 b$ g' ]; [1 G+ l& T$ F% m
Your analysis is partly right, but i dont agree they did it for "為左搞噱頭" and you other subjective view against those students
" b. d9 y3 C- i3 O' u5 S' [I dont know if you have even been into publishing business, but I can tell you, it is not simply copy and paste from you Microsoft Word, every article they have published they have put a lot of effort into it. If they simply 為左搞噱頭 there are many things for them to do besides publishing newspaper articles.8 I+ Z M- d7 v4 s
As a commentator like us, we always simply looks at the result. If we want to become a good commentator, we need to look further down as we can reach the core of the matter.
) \* \ \6 c2 s+ C
6 l+ w' S1 h4 G/ P1) In my opinion, contrary to the gov. decision, i do not think think CU has breach any law
9 g1 }) w0 Y2 Z/ H* t2) In my opinion, I do think they are in good faith when they conduct the newspaper
, ^( Y. R3 ?4 m. M3) Also, in my opinion, CU students did not put enough consideration to look into the possible consequences as their work has published0 G' S" z9 A [- J$ P
$ p5 s/ u- U) I3 X- [
Thanks for reading this long ass boring reply |
|