data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07e1e/07e1e63996ad98132e371ace14df4d98a3af28b8" alt="Rank: 5" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07e1e/07e1e63996ad98132e371ace14df4d98a3af28b8" alt="Rank: 5" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07e1e/07e1e63996ad98132e371ace14df4d98a3af28b8" alt="Rank: 5" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07e1e/07e1e63996ad98132e371ace14df4d98a3af28b8" alt="Rank: 5" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07e1e/07e1e63996ad98132e371ace14df4d98a3af28b8" alt="Rank: 5"
- 帖子
- 9804
- 精華
- 1
- 威望
- 2393
- 魅力
- 23
- 讚好
- 0
|
32#
發表於 2006-12-1 12:28 AM
| 只看該作者
Originally posted by 12d3 at 2006-11-30 11:46 PM:7 N; N3 y/ m% T. O% j- ^
我係樓上所作的提議只是信口而出, 所以今次做左少少資料搜集:* _8 D k8 n4 G4 W! q7 P; M
; S# O" Z. L8 t* s7 ]http://hk.news.yahoo.com/061129/12/1xdcv.html (內有更多相關資料)+ J0 i5 D/ Q* }, b! [
5 `6 ]" W: m- j0 D4 f4 I1 O+ c
# \* L U! F; J% x2 {本人按:9 e( J* ]- H1 b% |# V
拒發出世紙, 可以當作成不提供服務. 並未剝削嬰兒國籍及居港權, 所以並未違反人權. 但影響將更複雜及長遠. & `7 n3 r' ]4 F; K. I5 A" z; T
: c4 a; o9 L/ R: ?data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f8c78/f8c78f31d5cad1b4fb14d9c206ffd006170d4b4b" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f8c78/f8c78f31d5cad1b4fb14d9c206ffd006170d4b4b" alt="" 的確,如是將『拒發出世紙, 可以當作成不提供服務.』當然沒有違反人權,亦有權利拒絕其他國藉孕婦來港產子............上面我引難民為例,皆因居港權包括在港出生兒童,如果因孕婦沒找數,而把她的港產孩子抹去居港權,當然違反人權................如今可把居港權(擁有香港出世紙)≠發出世紙(服務),可另當別論data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f8c78/f8c78f31d5cad1b4fb14d9c206ffd006170d4b4b" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f8c78/f8c78f31d5cad1b4fb14d9c206ffd006170d4b4b" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f8c78/f8c78f31d5cad1b4fb14d9c206ffd006170d4b4b" alt=""
# ^, a* ~8 ^5 s+ A/ K. U" N2 Y
3 c9 z6 h, x8 o# dthx~~~~12d3 提供資料修正 |
|