- 帖子
- 199
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 102
- 魅力
- 3
- 讚好
- 0
|
10#
發表於 2007-5-18 09:12 PM
| 只看該作者
Originally posted by shehboy at 2007-5-18 07:35 PM:: _5 W* ?: _: h6 F0 x
" j1 a" ^1 w4 v r6 J2 L3 t) v7 Z6 ]: _0 H) t! h7 f0 }4 K. [
同意.
2 k$ }& E$ t0 |1 Q但呢度講緊既唔係外面好多... 0 v: I) U) E; B( K) W5 m, U* [" R+ d+ Y D% f) z+ L' i
I do respect CU students' good heart on this, but with their limited ability, the have created a lot of troubles.
: a. N5 m$ [/ ]Your analysis is partly right, but i dont agree they did it for "為左搞噱頭" and you other subjective view against those students ] p) x0 F) X7 x
I dont know if you have even been into publishing business, but I can tell you, it is not simply copy and paste from you Microsoft Word, every article they have published they have put a lot of effort into it. If they simply 為左搞噱頭 there are many things for them to do besides publishing newspaper articles. r+ L, L4 i* f1 I
As a commentator like us, we always simply looks at the result. If we want to become a good commentator, we need to look further down as we can reach the core of the matter./ j" \1 S K4 ]2 ~
1 ~' P k! |5 ?' Z) G& x
1) In my opinion, contrary to the gov. decision, i do not think think CU has breach any law
1 x* Q. @ k5 ~2) In my opinion, I do think they are in good faith when they conduct the newspaper8 |7 `1 }0 t3 h0 `* x: a# q
3) Also, in my opinion, CU students did not put enough consideration to look into the possible consequences as their work has published& ^# g# c N! A' h$ x
' r- Q5 M; h* f, i
Thanks for reading this long ass boring reply |
|