|
  
- 帖子
- 706
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 316
- 魅力
- 150
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
12#
發表於 2008-10-8 07:03 PM
| 只看該作者
i thought it is the reason of rate of return.; N; j7 v3 ~3 b. o
CDs could have different ratings, AAA -> F,$ v+ V1 T# W3 [
more risky ones would have higher premium (interest rate) as a compensation for an investment.
4 L' H/ R: u/ i. smain reason why ppl buy those risky CDs is because the rate of return exceeds their internal rate of return,
+ n3 `. f' X+ i7 ^+ M2 v8 }in other words, the interest rate of that investment > their required interest rate, therefore they invest in those securities.5 g8 o# h9 Z# b0 M" `- s
Also, fund managers would include risky assets in their portfolio for different purposes, eg efficiency.! F; m1 V* z; [0 V
similar to bonds, CDs trading in the secondary market have different value at different times,. O$ o; J0 Y: Y, `+ m
normally the value is calculated by adding it's principle and interest. ( d% R+ R" f- D1 s, a# G$ r2 {3 I
eg. the value of the mortgage+the interests to be recieved in the future.
# q' L% M: A. J/ X; j& ~1 Zbanks who sell the CDs, could enjoy a few benefits like, the present value of cash and passing the risk of holding a debt to another party.; l! j4 | t3 P
7 w- I! V7 i9 \0 U c
im not quite sure if the multiplier effect does really matter in this case.
; \: T6 _ M/ O/ e8 |: j' Ein stock market, it's the demand and supply pushing the price up/downwards.
7 f' K- e- q- F2 n# @For eg, A bought 10000 shares @10$ ; B sells 20000 shares to C @ $12,2 }8 q7 X5 q! W% F; E8 a# c5 K8 J4 {
A's shares would suddenly increase to $120000 from $100000 which does not invlove any $ transaction.
$ Q, C7 G; b. T' ?% K3 f: w5 qThe capital loss that ppl suffer nowadays, i believe, most of them does not really suffer a real $ lost yet as long as they dont sell their securities.
$ b X2 p9 B, Wbut the value of their assets did really drop significantly.% D: ?& V5 C1 ^& v3 A2 v
, U/ E9 U9 u- G2 D
[ 本帖最後由 Kev 於 2008-10-8 07:26 PM 編輯 ] |
|