|
  
- 帖子
- 706
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 316
- 魅力
- 150
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
12#
發表於 2008-10-8 07:03 PM
| 只看該作者
i thought it is the reason of rate of return.
: Y8 ^. ` x( ^; j& B$ ?. yCDs could have different ratings, AAA -> F,
% Z$ X! C i9 Y! l0 l1 Tmore risky ones would have higher premium (interest rate) as a compensation for an investment.1 u/ y$ v% A" G" V& h1 B
main reason why ppl buy those risky CDs is because the rate of return exceeds their internal rate of return,
# }% [) x& i& U* U. O) qin other words, the interest rate of that investment > their required interest rate, therefore they invest in those securities.3 _& g, U6 Z; S, F0 l
Also, fund managers would include risky assets in their portfolio for different purposes, eg efficiency.
6 q/ p4 U* h, M+ N; ]! C+ X& H) F+ ]similar to bonds, CDs trading in the secondary market have different value at different times,* @% R9 b) d% j* x7 y
normally the value is calculated by adding it's principle and interest. 5 {/ _2 O f( h! J e3 K/ U
eg. the value of the mortgage+the interests to be recieved in the future. 9 Y5 M) v5 c+ N, w1 N1 O
banks who sell the CDs, could enjoy a few benefits like, the present value of cash and passing the risk of holding a debt to another party.
" `8 X8 y0 @1 y0 D" }" M, q6 o4 z0 b# f- Q
im not quite sure if the multiplier effect does really matter in this case.. h0 K- E7 A1 Q2 j9 m$ K8 g1 D, h
in stock market, it's the demand and supply pushing the price up/downwards.
2 @% l8 T7 q- lFor eg, A bought 10000 shares @10$ ; B sells 20000 shares to C @ $12,4 L' m' Q7 S1 p
A's shares would suddenly increase to $120000 from $100000 which does not invlove any $ transaction.9 m2 j" |5 g6 {( l6 c
The capital loss that ppl suffer nowadays, i believe, most of them does not really suffer a real $ lost yet as long as they dont sell their securities.
- m6 q/ Q1 j- ]3 x, a6 Vbut the value of their assets did really drop significantly.0 _% W: ^7 A+ U& b k* `4 c: o
) s U2 Y; b l/ S3 x[ 本帖最後由 Kev 於 2008-10-8 07:26 PM 編輯 ] |
|