|
  
- 帖子
- 706
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 316
- 魅力
- 150
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
12#
發表於 2008-10-8 07:03 PM
| 只看該作者
i thought it is the reason of rate of return.
$ u0 M9 H* o, C, ~8 a. `3 lCDs could have different ratings, AAA -> F,
. w* B) z$ { y1 [1 e/ E3 g% lmore risky ones would have higher premium (interest rate) as a compensation for an investment.2 e8 C; T' w& t6 J7 g3 s; u
main reason why ppl buy those risky CDs is because the rate of return exceeds their internal rate of return,
$ x! w) v# R+ d4 ]! Pin other words, the interest rate of that investment > their required interest rate, therefore they invest in those securities.# I( p w0 b; l
Also, fund managers would include risky assets in their portfolio for different purposes, eg efficiency.2 C" H+ h- `, A, _
similar to bonds, CDs trading in the secondary market have different value at different times,# h' @. D* x+ n
normally the value is calculated by adding it's principle and interest.
' @; K l2 c/ m; ?, a: x/ y% geg. the value of the mortgage+the interests to be recieved in the future. N* n+ m m) [# M+ Q% l
banks who sell the CDs, could enjoy a few benefits like, the present value of cash and passing the risk of holding a debt to another party.
- y9 u9 x" K# n. D `4 z( h/ J: w j
+ r8 n5 H7 l& {( P8 gim not quite sure if the multiplier effect does really matter in this case.0 E8 I0 |$ u6 K. V- e' v3 Q- {
in stock market, it's the demand and supply pushing the price up/downwards.8 H. g# f \, G! y( K
For eg, A bought 10000 shares @10$ ; B sells 20000 shares to C @ $12,, A3 i: U& k9 v, V. v8 U7 a
A's shares would suddenly increase to $120000 from $100000 which does not invlove any $ transaction.
9 z0 u9 r0 I$ p8 e3 @+ e$ CThe capital loss that ppl suffer nowadays, i believe, most of them does not really suffer a real $ lost yet as long as they dont sell their securities. 8 v3 v% q% x9 _; O; V2 x% \
but the value of their assets did really drop significantly., q @2 P7 `5 C+ f
! `& b1 C0 W- C. j6 W1 L[ 本帖最後由 Kev 於 2008-10-8 07:26 PM 編輯 ] |
|