Rika

由最好排到最壞9 x& V9 y4 A$ [: e9 X
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong4 ~2 o$ w( l( q  ^2 z
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
  O* [$ `9 C2 FS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her$ `3 \) F5 ]7 W# M2 M! H
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
; [7 N& G; H/ S$ T* S8 T( {; jL, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:- W! o9 f" @1 H( G

+ J" I/ b- _3 X% T' C* RM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
( d. F. V8 q2 t, \( g# B; }4 F' A% c" x5 C% M& J9 s8 p' `7 K
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
" ]# ^% A  J! H( X7 l     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
$ h" H" @3 ~' t: E6 M$ B- O- Z0 ^
( G/ A9 F$ V% [: n$ J' `B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做1 U4 d% Q8 d4 D  `1 N  p
% S' a* ?1 i3 o" B
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志0 V3 ^" ]* N1 P, C) _2 ?* Z; S' W
8 }6 W7 ^2 N3 `( S; r
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
- A" Q$ e( }+ R& {     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好3 k6 Z- x- @5 D& f0 [- @9 t6 {

" G5 m' q$ Y: t0 ~2 x; |[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
. S$ w, a  ]3 y/ o! q; B7 y而家答多次
0 \2 m; u( c& K4 w2 a' Hf: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
8 `' r0 K$ @2 n  n1 hl: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
9 r+ i2 I4 Y0 E8 Q8 v' W8 yb: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢3 O2 B: P, x! \( `
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.; H, P2 t  V8 ]( y% P
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S* |5 C" O. v- w" A/ O4 Y

- M. Z. t$ ?( y1 d/ P6 }L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
& d4 ?' p8 T  W4 P* @- s: L# b* aF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度  ~/ I0 k. }& E# ]2 A" O
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒) K3 s4 N8 _# T5 |! Q2 N1 s
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢  B8 t8 ~2 K2 G0 l/ L8 P! {$ [, A
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞$ J! g7 F& ]( P; _/ s
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
  o' N% z8 F  y+ ^7 x2 R1 w7 QS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
7 K6 x. n. l; {# B' ^, jM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法  V& z0 S. i! p; g; j& d
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
* n5 ^2 y# C$ V' U0 \B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情7 H2 g& \1 h% p8 n; S1 N
! q5 g9 R% X2 c4 J+ e2 S. N
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
1 B. l8 P, d. V2 m1 U, qL = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
, z2 Z- Z7 X" o+ UB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
; ^3 O; H/ K% P2 W# HS = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
; a0 Z! D3 I' C6 A. i/ _8 e$ @F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方7 A( r, h4 G& V4 Y. f" w0 A& u7 n
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

1 e0 x* G7 J% P8 ~; O8 r# K& v  p2 d+ G( L: J7 A% X8 F8 d; Z' {
same choices with u , but want to add some comments : s4 Z* N% b5 s; T
9 \, q) d: a4 b3 e! J
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
! R# m! V+ `. ?  w) ?
% X' w! s2 M+ G  j. SS : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 ): f7 x% y$ v% N; O$ V

/ m% a! B+ F& T4 i! v( |- uF : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome - Z* P4 U% T; c. y

# t" b* W* I( r7 a3 H0 ~+ ]5 oM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......8 ^, Y6 m1 Z" v

, k* o2 c- x0 D( z[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge% }+ q- ]' F& p
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢9 B# {+ `3 S1 B4 l# O+ q
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點% G: I3 C: b0 t$ K3 K0 H8 E
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
6 M) c1 D" H" B2 r$ {0 n* I
" n+ r6 B% h$ o最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
% U& P$ u2 G, \3 H7 F6 y有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
. T, y$ |. L8 Y7 O' J' G- B由最好開始排起既話，$ P& \" P) Y$ q
L B M F S 啦，
( Q) R$ W- Q  D6 L  Q& c" {* ?) q2 |* w" Q# L8 |
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
- _' d0 k: P) i9 k9 F1 J但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
2 O2 {  Z# K! U如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
8 s/ c" z( y8 h又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
2 p2 W; S9 H2 h' v3 p
6 O% l, b. }- H4 T' D- H而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，( \# g* c- A' ^- n
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，# J# Y: G; w3 a+ b& x. T
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。: C9 c+ B& M, O1 V& h; b, e
) g# o6 B4 q. ]
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，9 T; r8 H7 v. U# X5 G+ t
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，5 S2 ?* y/ A% J5 T7 s* z
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
0 B; \. W6 W- ~9 A知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
- ^& b1 ^/ k9 _# u. ]4 }$ W$ c0 i M 都可算壞了。
9 z' w2 `9 F- m4 J5 t' @- L8 h3 w  O$ N- R3 Q- }
F 呢個人仲掂，
. R( z6 V2 U' |  j: n知道既唔等於要講，
* \, B7 J3 ^3 b2 {/ y如果呢件事發生係自己身上，' D+ w4 @6 D! u- D5 T: n3 d. M
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
; k* w* i3 Q- e1 D# w, d* d- z, a; q2 F6 \. d6 C
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
( w. d# \1 _' E始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。+ l3 T' a# _& H4 A) R9 Y/ W; M

9 |0 ^0 r3 L. ]! w* c/ O# A
" P- y% m- x$ g; U
& d+ H: S! g. @  R- W題外話：. I8 z% N8 l5 ~; l# F
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，* r& x6 K3 s+ c4 L* }$ P
睇到 S 呢條友，
& @7 m& L& D. N" F& b! b. A0 X2 ~我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L/ |& p$ R5 p9 b2 N+ [9 y- b

  V  k) s0 t6 Z0 a  t# FS: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
7 f) l$ c1 p! j  I# ]F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係3 D8 ?1 B# d+ r: I/ A& W
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她6 l4 G. ~) F7 ?8 g) [/ _6 U2 b
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害0 U1 s) l8 a  w5 [
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...