Rika

由最好排到最壞
- i7 g+ x4 u6 u5 j' XF, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
# S9 U3 h) W8 U  sB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount4 @- r$ m* I3 N8 q( N
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her' g, O( }9 o$ A; G/ i
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
4 l' [) v6 G: _; X( xL, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:4 S8 L" M- ]/ d, A  Z7 {! d
2 D5 W9 g9 {$ G; G
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人$ X& y6 ?& J: @& P: M
! ]0 d; T1 Y% q. ~, Z
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)1 Q( k$ p2 |  L1 R. f; N) \; z# p
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
/ w6 r4 I* h5 ]  y& j' ~) O1 m1 B, |  v
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做( L1 I- J; q" z% A6 n

  N1 J' @; @1 W  N! @0 wL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志7 J5 U% v; ]4 @. h8 M

9 R$ I+ @6 B0 d% ~" _2 k4 t1 SF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,2 N% a5 S# M- N3 Q+ O. G0 L" T
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好. k6 v  i/ @1 V+ q5 C8 j

8 l2 ]  T) ]1 j' @. {9 f  {[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
+ D1 x, ~7 D0 |% G而家答多次
; `3 `/ C; \% _) w) tf: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽! K# W7 f" T, M  l5 |' D; H
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
: ]  q. s: a3 Lb: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
( `$ b/ c4 U' s+ ^! l: J0 F. B: ys: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
/ q" }. a, ^& |; M- _7 r$ P$ [2 _m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S/ I$ w( s, e: V1 x! v

) W% H+ w" b% x2 p( v1 Z! S& XL為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
' v/ [7 {2 N6 S" `# LF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度. X1 N7 ]2 ~4 ?+ {1 L( K5 P
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
# N& U- w- a3 ^S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
, ~( h$ f1 w$ j# D( W6 O! TB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞3 V. u' l- K& L9 Z7 S6 r
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
& [$ R, m" A/ F  T! JS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
( r  I0 W) v: H2 n- }# o( eM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法- @; C% ]2 c& W4 t5 b6 a  Z
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
# h3 i0 [0 w0 ]$ P1 eB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情( s6 I3 {7 j$ N3 s' O  B6 _( D7 u
8 |1 B$ a( |* X1 ^) ?
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:7 F& I6 H, z4 P) }6 }- l- _' U( g: e8 {/ K
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
2 H* l4 i7 I# _  eB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘5 n. F- t6 o" z# l: S
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件) ^% T9 S! i: |* R& T$ D5 k
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方' z& e! D2 O' k% t2 v. C
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

7 j( y1 d: _/ A. n4 Y4 }  s

( y- {/ b. q: f: ]" w same choices with u , but want to add some comments
4 F% R, _& r! ]9 z- p* D2 u9 {. M+ A* l0 P4 B- g
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
6 t7 O/ F& w2 m. g6 `$ S
6 h2 {6 A/ O: D( F) Y2 F6 J  iS : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
/ b  N1 N; I8 M8 F3 E# ]
+ J/ S, p) _& g( |& dF : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
3 k5 F* j9 ~) Z& y" k# w
! K# h7 Q3 p7 e. ]3 V: c# tM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......+ J: ]" n5 t) A/ }3 F

' X& g2 P1 \; o' v[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge; E: Q% m2 q& B, _
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
  w" y7 [  m/ W0 u3 z# l  [L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點8 d* G* O3 X3 F3 O: e
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma$ ~: I0 J9 n& d; D
+ p) n' i! O$ q3 x9 a% X
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
: P( \& p, Y! w; [+ J有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，9 R8 ?4 b8 J3 G: ], f$ ], R
由最好開始排起既話，% w% s( p. y# R; m* R
L B M F S 啦，0 i( g1 v" \2 `7 R/ S8 N
; h; E" C5 {( I' K2 U7 K
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，0 C7 p+ ?. e1 g8 _4 H7 ?
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？9 N0 X3 t; F3 Z: E, X, W3 v
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？% _7 M2 n4 r/ q5 W
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
- z% e5 i; Z6 D( R
6 ]. y/ P: m4 o0 s) c7 R而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，  f9 a2 A' o. H/ K; l
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，- t0 G, r9 {2 \* Y) G+ b: L
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
0 o. H: H3 |7 y1 |$ O
' M( `: }$ F9 I* W: h8 k而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
7 @. K$ p) |' V/ S5 ]7 n% Z M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，; b- u# P5 q: ]' X, D2 o  o
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，3 T! n7 e2 v$ ^9 f' p! I7 @
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，0 g; h: j5 {; M$ |) w
M 都可算壞了。
0 n/ E7 D9 i% p( v2 B
$ w0 F/ H8 N" ?( d% F1 G: ~2 ?" y F 呢個人仲掂，, e2 C5 v, k% t& g- q6 n' ]7 j
知道既唔等於要講，2 j5 Z. _+ G0 D4 ]) o$ \2 u- y; d
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，  Y# T; c( D; p, p
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
% G6 }1 a; ^& k7 b2 ~9 Q2 L
8 B5 Y1 E) J8 Y最衰個個緊係 S 啦，, |# O$ f6 a; T8 W( G7 ^
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。' ~# @/ c7 {/ \$ R$ y- c
( f% n5 b) O2 d; G

$ |' E( F. D' H% h+ b  T! j- K1 `. n
題外話：5 s; b% H) Q4 A9 Q" e! [+ x
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，. q5 Z7 h: V; N# ]* h
睇到 S 呢條友，
; I6 ?' K# n2 I+ f! c我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L* d7 w& j, \7 @
+ ^: `" W  U; r9 A) a
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!- ]# r* f3 A' U! n1 ^* N
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係  J7 H- T$ ?. B/ T* H5 R
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她' U; }! C7 i, B$ E& \* x- d: u
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
$ s9 ?4 |1 k3 o3 cL: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...