Rika

由最好排到最壞
5 a  G8 \3 m9 Y6 J- k* lF, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
: m! K: W0 P! [B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount, y2 k, R& v1 h2 V1 i
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her- q  j$ t& X4 i$ X4 h" R* o
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure+ I+ d' A/ X& u  _/ H) O- z
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
! C) p; V  a" k- J6 U' z5 Q- o5 q2 i2 N6 N; ?) x
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
# v9 I3 d& d5 y( Z1 |. w# x5 w$ n- w1 B* C0 }% _& t, v
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
0 R1 m2 W8 b. I8 l  N# M     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!9 Q% Y' H" z2 l' |7 E6 `: \
0 y) n8 s) N/ A% ~, d
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做! S' N. B8 K" h  t* {3 f
$ q! ]% n6 _8 S  U+ G! i; W8 S
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
- _: p6 |4 b' a* H9 w* w9 K( b# b, `$ G  y+ o
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
% y  I% ?( Z* G" G2 e( x     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好  q$ r1 X7 v  X

9 {9 U8 l! v) O7 I; x[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案+ {, z: \( {6 @: Y
而家答多次9 T5 `4 W$ Z0 f$ a( @- y" t! Q. D* C
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽# v1 _" U1 D+ D
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
8 D/ e/ t+ l: ]" vb: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢. Z# R  Y: z0 ?$ e
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
7 Y/ g- m3 V$ A6 [9 D# Y1 E5 F0 _. `m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S5 f3 L; H7 q! J$ k: b( [) a# _5 E

+ H% ]0 w+ Z# W$ ?* }6 z9 C2 uL為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大+ {' Y; K. q$ ^9 Z
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
5 }: |2 m) O$ t4 k" A' lM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
6 k. ]% ~1 }- tS乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢" a7 @7 _! w2 I( y' [$ N
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
$ v0 [4 g5 r' v+ s( ^% ZF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默", `+ g1 r: E- Y# p6 ]
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
, [1 J1 ?0 S9 R9 j4 Y( @M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
3 y; a# }$ Y+ B1 n7 z8 yL: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
- a- X% Y: s( t; [B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
  X! x* d8 q7 k2 R- g: W" Q) p% E$ w/ R
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:4 V+ v! S4 L: E+ r! d6 K
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
* v" b, G0 I. C$ _6 r9 OB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
  W! q1 D1 n* J7 I! F, B) G2 mS = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
+ H( ?0 H( U6 q2 eF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方! [2 x3 y& [8 _
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

& [9 P* B3 w  w. A, K% H
* J3 x- V( O0 ~: H* D& J. [ same choices with u , but want to add some comments
1 |% _/ a! ~  E! i; a
  F4 F1 n; B1 R/ C1 _' DB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  * x) S3 ^: i$ d: i, a

, w; x* t. x  TS : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )6 r9 b) B% I; F$ n4 Q# U
( d, \6 @- ]7 E; a
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
( o( G* o! t. c4 `
. y5 X& z8 c$ i! L0 k5 rM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......1 H- P& W* W% z) z0 o' ]- r4 `

, c- t4 C6 T; l! {[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
# R& O3 D0 H& s! KM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
7 e& ^) @) f# F0 PL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
2 P' P; n6 z& Z* s7 I/ ^8 l  p$ T! r- iF, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma; G' M! ~  r; @! \+ f

3 f* j1 o  R  b最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
! C; h9 Q. }; x" ?& F, ~4 `有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，2 L% ]5 v8 P/ ]- c' b9 W2 W' ^: S) {
由最好開始排起既話，
5 f' U) U6 u  z8 lL B M F S 啦，3 p  y" k. P: f2 t8 O) @
. m" [3 {+ E1 y7 V$ w1 J
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
8 I+ @+ Y8 K, j* G+ f- u但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？9 I, i7 S$ y- X# E
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？+ v: [$ f) @  Y  Z: f% Q
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
- m1 B$ j. A) C7 O5 U3 {% a7 ]( x5 b) O6 a( K1 g3 u  @- k
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
& ^: L0 ^, E! n/ t0 X所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
# G1 r% S- u$ Z2 B' E! E明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
) Y* H% X3 P9 a( `& g# b& ?- T! C$ B) r0 ~# B" X
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，# `) ^% C; \1 s5 Z
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
3 C$ |& e' q/ W9 V7 B/ [亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
0 g; r) H) v' D9 J知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，% z5 [, }# X3 r! h
M 都可算壞了。. |- Z3 _$ E& N) c. \5 X
7 `+ [, \' t& ~" S' Z1 @3 t* {; c
F 呢個人仲掂，
# r" i5 P0 U# P- O知道既唔等於要講，
* `4 t! K1 {6 ?7 O1 J# [' g如果呢件事發生係自己身上，" D4 M4 {7 F5 j7 K0 k
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
0 }7 G: x8 W5 {4 F
, T- |) m. U* Q9 j1 \最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
8 |5 X$ {* h! x7 B始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
8 Z% h) E2 C! P3 `  @2 v; g, q9 K7 T  t4 x+ N! x4 L+ I. Y; d
+ R0 d9 }" L, r+ P) ]7 L$ x- J

4 |2 M5 G/ E3 @2 Q8 m題外話：! p; J& V/ w3 l7 J. f! o0 `/ }" ]
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，3 J' G0 [! ?) s1 @1 S5 A
睇到 S 呢條友，' P/ `: {) R6 U! t" T# g3 J
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L# L' k% ], |6 a4 l- P, \8 y

9 _, ^& W, k  W/ [3 |S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!) G/ f1 d+ P7 ?5 o; z/ k2 @
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
6 z# H- q# r% `* cM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
: P5 r1 Y, V4 B0 pB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害! f0 Z2 |1 J) m0 N
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...