Rika

由最好排到最壞: Q" D9 S; }: L" z/ N- {. o, n( z
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
' e$ q8 z+ h3 A* L$ r* S' yB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
* G( C4 E7 x$ jS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
) x1 w0 N0 Z3 z8 F4 C; f$ G0 i, RM, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure" ?1 o: ?3 f+ S8 |! h6 }+ z- g
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
: U5 c  e( @& X' j6 A% g) @% ?0 T( f+ g
% a5 i2 y# u% o9 A8 j# UM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人$ ?( D* a1 a; C& ?0 l
, H5 I, o+ i. q
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)6 R. m# p/ d) j8 d  ^
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
7 Q$ E+ n# u  ?
: b. L! ]& C, h6 H% [B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做% @1 ]7 `0 ~* Q, u( {
. Z0 ^1 z9 G/ l5 q+ \# w: U
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
( E; T% K! t4 Z4 [) c; P: ]8 x* ~, n+ k" Y! G& [$ H
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
0 Z- Q# g" u  _* q5 x     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
  y: w1 g: x1 z: n' p7 U0 o5 c
) N1 Q1 j  o& t$ f[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
% z. B* b/ ]' c. f; W而家答多次
: C2 i' j- N+ T3 I. u2 Q3 ]0 Hf: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
; p/ Q* h; k1 C( D0 H9 Zl: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架3 F) v. v" e4 h: l( ^, O0 z
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
# ?) C. y  X7 O* T% a4 ys: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.5 C) o- K2 W  ]6 O/ r0 h
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S% i9 X. \5 m/ b

; k3 [: @; Q  v0 A3 O9 f" vL為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
% I# r4 [* ~; @& bF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
& h: I5 [$ g/ LM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
- Q2 R# C" g7 K- n% z) E# ~! VS乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢1 L: c( N7 r$ K8 G
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞; B( B8 l" F. X( R
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"; L. i( J0 ]0 o$ e+ N. c
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取/ O9 [; ?8 U( ?; n1 X2 k
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法& Q( Z% U* e; [% J& \; ~3 u
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
9 t7 L  |) a9 V. fB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
2 j5 B% O0 O' [, u* k. E9 q- s( G- L3 I+ [; n& A( L3 M
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:" S. s" P' A2 V; x
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
$ b$ F9 `+ d7 n) eB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
3 w" t* V5 |' |* ?& D( NS = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件' P7 l+ ?* R% W
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方+ K0 [5 ]( g5 P9 ]# k& S$ g
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

. Z- p$ {4 _1 f( q9 _" `/ s
& @9 a( m  E  j* ] same choices with u , but want to add some comments
" p- @/ O  A8 m$ P9 h! J
8 `/ n9 F' i# t1 V+ mB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
+ N7 |. b5 X9 _4 Y3 ]( a& q
& F- T) b5 q8 [) X: |( ES : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
7 M, L$ a7 u; E$ ^4 ^/ z6 q  C3 F% }. i9 J/ x4 Y, R# s% w/ o
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
' i, W+ f' K3 r3 g  h# c
$ U/ K. O7 Q$ R. X$ o0 k+ Z, u6 cM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......" j+ j1 m% |- J! H. X/ @

6 ]/ i5 o; [, |$ U$ M[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
3 V- g( n6 Y  x& ]M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢/ z! r' J* E, V% X: ?
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點/ h& Z2 r4 p  K- o3 |4 @. e
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma0 Z$ }' @) o( d' j# g

4 b3 n0 U5 z- R* U最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....3 W! {) Z  w! w: Z* [8 N
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
, |# ?3 P1 t+ S- g  a( Y6 L( {% f! g4 B由最好開始排起既話，0 [! r4 P1 A' y1 y2 [) V  {
L B M F S 啦，# |/ X1 q- B. X% H7 w

' l3 [! O1 D  B5 C0 l其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，$ K* S: l( `, x/ R7 g5 x  F
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？8 S$ R2 S3 ^+ R# |  J: ~7 H
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？& h* C: z, y4 P, a( q/ w8 Y
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。3 R: }5 U0 ?* t. [# j. ?
$ W+ A7 s5 B$ w8 M/ X+ D. G2 W. a
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，2 o( b. C: r; _3 I
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
( o7 {8 F. |0 O7 I. A明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
3 M* G, \1 L3 R3 q1 g* f2 W0 K$ [3 E" {( R; J( T
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，* F& z" \+ [5 i) [: d& T0 z; s0 U5 `
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
  H  w- Y9 b7 V9 ^: f亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，0 V; \% \, K* L
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
# g" Y7 a. Z% |) V  E: b! n; O M 都可算壞了。- I8 z, z" }- c# _2 I% x" a3 }

# X, g2 t1 |5 m( s! T( ] F 呢個人仲掂，
1 E' e8 J7 z4 s& ^9 I6 Y知道既唔等於要講，+ V5 k! i0 v3 e
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
9 H7 T& F6 [- W: ~& ^/ A. }我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。8 v- n  d+ [! y9 |, F5 a4 C/ i: u

' E4 Z6 V, v+ S( J% Z. C/ T最衰個個緊係 S 啦，/ l: p- U9 q7 a, M8 v3 D' Y  Q, Z
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。7 \& U. n0 J: F+ n1 {
$ r" H6 l. w1 l& ?
' b1 _7 y* [1 s1 f) N+ c7 B, _. B" B
" I, |; W) y1 \% M8 H0 j. s3 o
題外話：- R1 `' v5 B- W4 n5 M5 u8 _
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，& f/ u* ]8 p' k
睇到 S 呢條友，; I0 L2 G8 }# {2 b4 C. x
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L. H, ?# x% c- l# K% v

: {8 ]  i; G0 U3 ^* PS: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
& c1 d4 i6 R2 |( b9 H5 `F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係6 X/ z$ P' i, y) w! @; ~
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
1 `; m7 f% s* Y6 G& y& \' {7 XB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害6 ?5 w" G, C: J, x6 k; S
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...