Rika

由最好排到最壞. \4 F: l8 D4 K
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong+ m3 a7 U: A% X1 _5 W8 C2 r
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount# X( j" Z$ k, f' M8 ^) e6 I
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her- B( G3 J3 I( ?! j
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure1 A9 S* Y' U( f1 O( f4 x& h
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:2 i9 U0 d' L$ {' d+ B7 l' \. b$ {+ S

1 ?: j% U7 @- n6 S# u" DM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人; h" H, F" E9 m5 I" `
4 f! j, o6 M( J( V$ b
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
! z! b2 S6 f: ?. s9 {9 c     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!4 _+ ~9 C0 U$ v% B: X3 L+ X
, U* \5 l7 c6 Q# F- l/ u
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
0 u% l1 O" P3 c: @4 D  P: F7 y% B- H% G% x/ K- X- r
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
: Z1 u5 W7 G- i0 O( A+ c+ _6 v
1 C) I( D$ e# T( \. C) JF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
; M9 M  S8 A% h5 J. p     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
% [. K. r+ }/ b7 T/ E/ K' O
& z$ s* c8 M1 q  C% ?; B3 I[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
/ e. K. @7 y% H& f  y# X2 u而家答多次0 |) [3 T+ V0 t& h
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽# ~$ ~- e4 p0 ]+ r( V* D% i/ A
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
1 D1 H" `( K" Wb: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
3 q% w$ i; {- ks: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.% A9 O2 e7 K- S' b$ F
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
, d8 u2 h; \1 Y( n# T
+ |1 {+ }* C0 O1 A+ I, a5 C+ YL為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
" P$ d/ y5 J; p2 y$ nF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度' E6 t: m1 P8 N/ w+ V: _* N
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
* R9 O, x; s  M) Z, cS乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
/ R" h# B2 n! ^4 f3 p5 r7 i" IB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
$ N& t: `5 \- T2 b1 \F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"* t% F1 X; z) [8 W! Y# F2 p* {
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
$ B2 k* g8 {0 S6 U  B/ m3 ~" M, [9 rM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
: c3 a2 c" V* G' ~L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
) m' ?1 m5 [' e1 a8 _B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情0 {0 C* n7 S% P; N

; {. K- C2 Q. l& z1 l" n$ C: T世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
7 s+ ~) t* t9 @! k* }# vL = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
( x+ B2 m7 D: s  g# UB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
  P: g& u! F- T1 M8 Q4 X* nS = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
: y. F! w4 X0 y9 T! J" ?F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
4 r8 x! Y! c$ {% j- W$ C, J1 pM = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

- l' W, X. ]# y5 u, z
3 m  B5 s! G# Q& r4 V
same choices with u , but want to add some comments # [6 s: @5 K& B0 {

$ Q" g: l1 K2 [: H6 e, O, l5 o! CB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
. B! q$ `/ R2 |! |/ {0 y  j8 B1 u- I: E; X; }. ~! E+ L  ~# p2 c$ v6 j
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
+ A+ n9 E  g) n& T7 k, O" J* b
3 Z. M8 K7 Y$ h6 o( \; ]F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
0 g4 g+ t. x, K% y! N" |3 b; s5 B6 S* K3 @. j
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
/ o* h& E6 H" |6 J% {0 V1 T' C& a/ [( T) q
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
0 m2 E" ?& x# a/ F' AM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢- M" z8 K2 g" _: I0 F+ ^- A. A
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
" @7 }5 a- p3 N3 s/ NF, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma7 t" O$ }+ q# O% S% w; c

! |7 Z. R5 z0 |$ Q最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
2 L" J, u) D8 k, X) p# H& w3 C- `有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，) W( o) k& A; L2 ~
由最好開始排起既話，# I0 e0 V0 M3 ]! R$ D! j5 N' W
L B M F S 啦，
9 a. M+ `+ b0 \2 C9 o3 ^! {5 e0 a) I# f; n
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
! ]( J" w& V1 {但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
% n2 T( `' A! F如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
: A- {5 ~5 F8 Y. l4 F2 N又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。/ r' ^2 K* r4 V/ w' D: Q1 R% f
# S+ U* c4 f: D1 ~
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，0 T* R  [; L4 o' g' T4 L4 @- ~
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，' d5 A/ T# w4 n
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
+ C+ |1 M$ i. Y  J
  K5 A! V4 |6 \而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，( O- O* a9 h$ ~+ O0 p
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
( G- D$ E; @6 Z! ]' H- q亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，5 Q1 |0 M/ ~1 Y3 n5 i, |
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
$ G6 [# U$ Y; E4 ^8 S7 C- M9 [ M 都可算壞了。
9 {* O7 ]4 r7 U* C* i& u
6 m7 E. R5 G4 {' X' a+ m F 呢個人仲掂，
/ Q& w/ s6 [* ?& r% t% d知道既唔等於要講，
7 c- A: _. N) c3 S2 C" Q. i1 X# Z( S如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
5 v4 X9 e' o3 m- W我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
# _# k/ @: S' m/ Q8 M* F- D
* J+ v, S" y  y2 |9 \& C* {4 Q" @最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
$ q" @8 o2 s+ ^& u始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
+ J" `' h6 T' k- |! s
# |, l8 @! z+ ~( D+ |
6 ]  ]6 O0 Q% X' P/ H& C0 _, s' e: }, P; U3 z% g5 n
題外話：+ A, ^! W: W: e# ~
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，' Z0 k# q' y& {
睇到 S 呢條友，9 H# S! s: R9 c4 ]7 t- J5 h
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L( w1 Y; T* J  K# H7 w

9 ?' ^3 I/ M4 d! @- v, O2 dS: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
7 K1 b& e4 V5 F. c( JF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係6 ^% d2 @2 i# J1 m8 V& S8 F
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
0 j  R+ x1 Q8 y! rB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
8 @( Y/ S# w9 ^6 m, S  SL: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...