Rika

由最好排到最壞
- q( o) ]' x* V7 c7 aF, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
- W0 o1 q: w8 M$ fB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount) _* c$ |! h! v& h
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her8 `2 @% P2 s6 E* _
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure* ^: `. ^. f7 J+ L8 r4 ^
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
2 e- ~. U1 g4 U) G7 {0 H
4 F' p2 U" `# ?9 bM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
: u( b* T# _* K- h4 O
  b+ G6 P: p2 y3 I& t+ GS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)3 B9 U4 R! o# F1 B) x1 k/ i
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!* Y! {0 [7 h, k7 J

7 M! {6 j2 P) S' BB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
$ _" v: s8 |3 ?6 \3 G# X" D; p2 Z9 G! ]; u; _, L! T* i6 P& H: k$ j
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志! ]: V* H$ Y/ [
. L6 r. u& b* s
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
  v( w2 D) D, F4 U3 P, w5 u+ a" U) g     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好+ i! u( a" ]& V+ [4 I) Q
/ U9 G$ _# D, J
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
( [8 j$ W- B7 H0 B7 |  n+ w而家答多次6 b+ x0 ?/ X/ Q7 x( n+ u& v- f9 }
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽! F% Q* Z. T$ e  D' X. M
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架6 a7 ~# d5 ^$ C% q$ w9 p* ^! }
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
7 J3 c+ A$ l) w( o1 ^s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
" O# l- W9 e  k9 km: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
7 ~& _& M' }+ D" `+ V7 q: b1 y: d' [
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大1 U# I' z2 m% r( h5 b
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
; C: U( t8 Q6 l0 X$ B& F" bM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
8 X: ]% A* _$ k6 Q% ?S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢. `& h& W& v9 b$ \& u
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
# ^+ K; u2 H8 c: j* A; _+ IF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
+ I0 Z) C' f: l# P6 {4 J* sS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取5 y( y, i+ ], W  v" M3 i
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
7 e) b$ w( W; A% fL: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果3 O1 x% d* l& z# X6 t. p$ ~
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
! q1 E8 g( w. Y/ R4 o4 F* Q5 _$ ]
, K/ ~2 p/ m  x$ {世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
# c9 s1 p6 D+ WL = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
1 d: y2 U$ ^  b. y# C& NB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
, t0 {2 I% b2 {2 }$ R3 Y) C' MS = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件8 r- g/ A5 W, h5 p0 y! H# x/ C/ @
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方, v4 |( V- j6 _
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

, `1 I' n. e! G4 F2 j  F, x7 E  G
8 z( }& y5 Y0 q. L  w& q
same choices with u , but want to add some comments
! c" _( Z0 d+ j. u% F4 r0 V0 S( F+ e5 }* l
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
4 T( s! v9 F8 m- }2 ~, I
3 S2 v8 J" I" e. C; T3 ~S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )  Z4 y# r+ n+ S, \$ s( d

3 l0 w/ y. [* G$ B' W: HF : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome ; k8 F2 B6 c9 v! W, D0 t6 Z& r4 A

$ k$ [" U$ h, B8 o3 g* GM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......# e7 d0 J* h, u  B$ C8 q! V7 D$ b
' a2 k% U; S% |/ `, g: x% F- r
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge- i  T# }+ X2 H: J8 `$ c
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
0 Y' u7 H* l  Z- V% n$ D/ @- |L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點' P/ V4 S  W, N' m" p1 [- ^
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
; S8 f: C1 k: I8 Z/ c
% x8 _/ _) _3 W+ x- b- O! O* U最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....# ]) ]/ Q- G/ E7 r1 r( n9 c
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
" o& i: G( n) ~/ u" e由最好開始排起既話，. w& _' U! ^. c/ R/ T5 C* i0 H
L B M F S 啦，( W# e4 H5 j0 h

' v2 [; h& M+ P& }3 D2 b3 S其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
" |: u7 E7 P& f; J3 G但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？, s% o7 a0 V/ x
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
1 Q$ |$ O  ^: V* n8 ^" {又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。# |+ c9 d- `) @! S
, \/ _8 T' q$ e& }# t+ A% b
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
" A- l( Y) l) R5 e所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
# U! u# M: @; B明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。% `" O9 F: z- K( R
) q& H$ n- x/ Q9 c2 b
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
" [/ w9 `" j8 L7 l; z- X: `6 c M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
6 l/ r$ o5 ^( y2 F亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，, |5 Q, b! K- X, X- ]+ E- V
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
' X' _( r* F* w2 ~; O) U) _ M 都可算壞了。2 C9 X  ~, s' b; m, y

; I5 r' [& a+ h9 g F 呢個人仲掂，
1 H6 ?& A- n: M知道既唔等於要講，7 {8 @7 K6 p# w) F
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
3 H- r2 O9 s% a; ]. q我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
7 n$ t9 k" S% g* r1 g! n
% x& C+ D% W5 v) Y$ J$ r' u最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
7 X( W3 x3 Q2 P始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。: S% ~8 E( X! v) p9 k6 i
9 i; C' p) L6 o$ F
: L+ H; `2 n1 x4 a3 @! l
. z/ e7 I; G  ]& k
題外話：3 U2 u7 j' C1 g& a
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
- W# i+ j4 E3 `( z8 O. j睇到 S 呢條友，9 A* ^6 M, L: T+ C' Q( |" o& w  A
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L9 B0 W! `! L$ V# A

  ~6 Y, M0 j2 }' cS: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
6 c6 V6 I& t% M: p% g0 b: ~F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係" K8 t% ]" q% a- S/ ]
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
/ i& s( T4 v# CB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害( \8 V0 m" A3 K/ G% F$ \
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...