Rika

由最好排到最壞8 A: r( _0 W4 T7 o3 M
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong8 d8 g# r" H* d1 t) R  `4 [
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount9 b; U% B5 I# Z- {+ S
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her3 _- a' [* }/ a3 G  C
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
) K4 s# ^5 n1 lL, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
* H* l- D3 }$ L2 F# t8 `# N
2 y8 N( D) Q, o/ b2 WM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
' H6 N# N! G7 {! Y  h5 O2 K( r7 `/ E$ A/ f3 J5 A7 z
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)# I, ^7 V( @6 d
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
: @9 S+ G* }% G$ z3 Z
6 b- H; b5 P" z7 Z4 P. u( HB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
- {5 ^% V7 c0 f, {, M5 Q% g
  G1 Q1 }9 Y- g+ G  YL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志1 u6 _! c0 M/ A9 Q6 E

2 C$ I" N$ r/ K: l2 DF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
! L! x! |( p& h     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
1 a8 _2 \1 X% m) m, S' z- |0 |+ \3 V: t7 K0 n1 o. _
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
! _. k7 r6 ~1 ~而家答多次$ x0 E' q# Q% ?
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
; q# {5 @1 A; b4 l. J% pl: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架, u: m: v% T* Y
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
8 t  f- ^$ \' V# Q8 Ys: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願./ K1 h# A- G9 x, n6 E" E6 u
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S* {  E, h" C* f
" H5 n* Z. F/ S6 N2 j. N
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大; T- O: O6 D" o% P. B$ ~/ ~
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
1 ?, ^2 s5 j, ~0 ^M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
2 O& \: x- D$ k8 H. eS乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢. Q2 Y7 E) j; o" s
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
; F: X, j7 {7 A) m, ?% N6 FF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"1 f4 J' e$ N5 @! Q1 |6 Z
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取# Z+ o3 Y5 E' o" ~" u" n3 M4 O# {+ h
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
3 T% M) R# O. s2 p9 rL: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
7 g) w, h# p+ m3 ]. WB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
% d; N4 p9 I  E& ?6 x5 H, c
7 I4 L6 u' M1 x$ C' q" o, ?) p: N# f世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
0 k+ e" X) n- X+ O) kL = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
) S/ {7 Z# W  o4 V8 B- j) AB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
2 w7 \. i' h  V1 x3 J( PS = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
$ c& ~* ^' ]9 E7 V3 ~& ^F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
- a$ u4 _5 ^$ q; C. f5 _" H; M: UM = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

7 Y9 [1 @( R( L3 B. E: c
% B2 D+ T9 \- m0 j same choices with u , but want to add some comments
3 q: F0 c# h. v# C$ |. p) v4 S$ F0 x6 C, k
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
  I! n- e% W( V
. p/ w/ @& p" n6 I/ T# ~S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )9 e4 x3 v: I( U* M

5 k5 P) y) l* b3 q+ A- L, j7 JF : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome . o' D, V0 t6 ^  ]0 Q  i' Q* D
/ `2 h( N1 R" q0 K# m+ c
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so....... U$ }! I+ V$ ]0 s' b: C
2 W9 s( H  b8 p0 R
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge  g( x  y9 p3 j. y- O# g
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢& z, X. m4 ~& w9 b) B5 Y/ z3 j& p
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
$ a  k+ @) X8 {8 m1 q# \- TF, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma$ X# V( S* }* A4 {
/ h( n9 |4 ~3 Z2 f$ L
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
" U, A0 y+ Y  P. S有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，4 k7 f. E; S$ v
由最好開始排起既話，/ O3 V9 Q, L0 S* b, ~
L B M F S 啦，& h3 x& R% Z1 l6 ^# T

; X# P( D# f' w( b# S1 D6 ?其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，8 S) ~' t; Q) O2 y
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
* h4 o( z1 b$ k8 V如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？, H, x; A) K. s4 {/ q9 H4 h( X
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。/ l7 o, M% R. F; T- c# Q; j

& v5 x6 a" C4 I7 v# e: D4 b而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，, q/ i. m4 B* J/ ?
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
* }7 N" g" w/ n# E$ h" {1 }% w+ K" ~明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
+ X& C% O8 c9 X; v, d' k' Y' u: w
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
9 {  r2 U/ R' }7 R0 o( u9 w* V M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
* F; p$ |; X) w, W, T亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，* c5 ~$ ]* Z5 U& ~# u2 O& \
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，. ~- Z, }1 P# O" C. Y+ \
M 都可算壞了。
: T, a3 ~/ A7 J% u: ?' ?& b  ^& b5 }9 V, L
F 呢個人仲掂，& S& P) }3 c( m; l8 v  r
知道既唔等於要講，
% e- U! p  a& B% c如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
9 E$ E% B7 p8 o" t* A1 y我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
. F, Y) v$ T1 C8 j0 R5 G9 X0 {. l6 Y" r, ~) k' x- z/ u
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
' U  m( m' Y* l0 c' Z  z6 b始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。. @% m, A3 n7 K' X
/ u! L$ M! s# T' v3 i6 T

$ h7 q+ P. P8 \% C0 S) v" y* h) k5 l: }5 i/ @2 X* Z  e* a) y+ Y
題外話：
- P' r  Q% V% c! b唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，; x  J! b$ m6 f* s, d+ {# U6 X$ R4 Z
睇到 S 呢條友，
  f! @5 E4 T4 x. o. G我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L% X5 L6 Q' N0 {. A3 }) H
0 m  d! ?: q, M8 c. d
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
  R( U; \, I' b1 ?" t5 YF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係1 \* s- @: A9 J. J7 m7 q' r
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她& \  ?. v  n! E& S1 t2 L; |
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
5 x$ J7 N% M% q! v4 zL: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...