Rika

由最好排到最壞
/ v* g/ w: E% ]- p: q$ |% }F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong4 j9 T  g* B3 T' a
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
9 T- r* L1 g/ B" q( _: mS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
5 _8 l& A. y+ b8 N7 V$ W: vM, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
9 T+ C* p+ G  [L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:! h, q  G& A2 Y" j& h6 \

6 D8 ]& o/ y8 N; {M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人& ]# v8 g# u! G0 |) M" I! M4 C

! ?) a+ d2 n0 v3 l' m' S' `* QS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
* w8 x- g2 Q6 A, B+ t6 k     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
9 V" u2 ~) X  S" i; `9 Y" M
1 E, O( e7 {% ]! c  e+ r/ B) eB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做! b6 T$ E9 \4 d9 u: W' c
9 a9 a' }( r, O' y9 Z) c
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志- a7 d- V8 l. Q* \$ q( i- I( M: P5 B

* @% w0 i, x# a4 wF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁," J2 J- E3 M( ^1 u$ ~8 N5 D4 g
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好2 d% F# p9 f8 M" c' {( H4 L

" [- q& Y+ J5 ]  I% I/ A6 r[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案; |. Y) N( ]: h6 Z- k2 k/ F# a
而家答多次
; r" O: q6 R/ |- A3 F; y% |+ {( Wf: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽% X9 v# t4 ~8 C  Y% u6 v" U8 L
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架3 K$ q" v9 l7 F# }! `
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
! J, k& V3 c, k" f$ es: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
% p, B. ^7 n' x# F3 I* I% ?, E- Km: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S& A) Y/ N, ~& ^5 M6 J

1 d/ ]! l* ~( mL為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大4 v; R3 |3 r( c9 f) u0 t
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度5 K! I+ u% i- d. P) t! A; S! w
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒% S9 G# G$ _! {3 K  B) E% i
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢3 g) Z' u7 i. t$ i
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞8 V4 K4 h' j' q/ t  A' J
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"! x9 x6 e+ [6 {2 C+ p* A; p/ R6 r2 ?
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取8 e. j! P$ n; z% I# g, G8 {4 e, H
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法2 |, {7 X7 [1 a  g1 ?
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
( @2 ^$ z8 L" o6 T& uB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情8 ?( a) H% H8 y: D

! f8 m4 z7 Z. a2 C5 h世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
) y6 R4 n" Q; s# D2 s" O) ]  `L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己( n* M  f  x+ `  [
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
# w8 p1 E& [$ D4 ~* {4 pS = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
. R: C: c" Q* l: {8 `F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方9 B$ {3 p3 d+ H2 Q# B' e: S1 g
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

9 ^( }/ z/ t0 T6 C; X8 f/ ~9 U" X1 M3 }) y8 h% g+ M
same choices with u , but want to add some comments ; l; S- M  {8 o) Z! }: @- M
' L& y. T7 g2 p0 d9 C2 Z
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
+ P! s% T$ @( r/ q4 N3 R1 G- d1 M$ U# [  c
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
0 v8 ^: N* V; Q1 o. V' p& `( N! m4 ^1 @
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome : P! C" v) P+ n* K

0 \( m0 g0 R- r" P& S, QM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
$ `2 K1 E: r, B; L: _0 ?7 R* J; ^6 r) ?# f1 ?5 [9 N5 j5 z; |
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge/ g3 s8 \& w6 P0 ?( \
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢2 \8 [, D9 k- G( Y
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點5 j# g. B; L6 N
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
8 l+ m/ z9 m5 c) l4 Y2 {% D
" H( m  g, C1 }# s最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
1 ^$ J$ Z% s2 P# {有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，& Z* p/ [! @: |, X  z% Y
由最好開始排起既話，3 K1 Q- t5 h0 P. j: D+ v! J, z! v
L B M F S 啦，5 L9 h, ?1 E0 E
( r$ ~/ f- m+ W7 B& p! x* V
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
% w1 x' R3 p. Z3 {但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？5 D# w( P  K; ^: W
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？2 Z7 m' o7 ]! |. n" E% u1 y
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
7 p1 S3 H+ z. Y- [  s9 F
6 w  m3 W+ y5 V1 |; L6 I而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，8 k9 t/ t0 g" z# w4 W
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
- I; s" m* M* m- f+ W4 j明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。! C5 E3 S. ~8 |) e
6 h4 [3 X" T; ~& ~+ d
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，$ d# H* Y+ [( z9 `- q% V3 N: B
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
3 S, |' p3 G' a# V7 j4 m/ O8 W亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
7 z" B0 [3 y) A' i9 j知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，" I4 y; W3 j% W
M 都可算壞了。
- B0 d; H6 I" c/ O6 K
) |& ^, X  p: J" v F 呢個人仲掂，
1 A3 N- k& V/ s" T( k知道既唔等於要講，$ N& D9 K' a1 ]9 a3 h! S7 v, i
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
* f7 Z! c* p8 m3 V" U) i# g9 {, Z我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
5 C0 M6 `3 g6 _5 x: R! V& _: g% Q" A1 S5 e
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
1 J& A, Y) T) s7 j0 a% o6 k始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。' ?. E8 l/ z" d8 E6 l9 C

5 q1 K( r, @' b' Z6 e6 b, \) I0 S0 ]$ o0 @

( _; ~% u7 D; C! U題外話：8 G5 a* J( o9 g8 S% n
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
; H& u4 e; K- P睇到 S 呢條友，$ L! U8 y8 J* a& z+ g
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
  H: L; Z% {% w9 l* l1 e3 C
' N  l' T, |& r2 I& E) O, ~S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!8 q5 k# z$ d, R4 ]0 s! u$ \
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係, ]7 e5 @& o, D% H+ O7 l& x& W6 N
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
1 t% D  j4 T4 s' ^4 }9 y, Z% ZB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
* G' H& s1 [' q9 c( ?8 e1 CL: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...