Rika

由最好排到最壞2 t% D" z* h! `, J- O* ]: I! F  _3 v
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong& O* u9 Y! {% U% L6 T
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
- A3 Q) G/ U6 hS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her& F5 q2 {3 g' V5 r6 Z8 Q
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure9 U0 T" O7 m+ F/ O9 n6 v$ ]
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:$ q7 J) A) f7 R. }! y( I- N! Z/ e& W

4 R7 S  ]# P' _; `9 f! kM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人) @$ k5 _7 _2 \) V. v

) {- X9 S4 d3 y$ bS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)* _9 A& Y9 `4 i" Y$ C. I6 L) F
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!) m( p) p0 ~, r  ^. V5 s  F" l8 K
* E1 ~$ v- T" W& f) @
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做: Q* z/ B1 @. b) y$ b/ M

5 w" t! D7 A/ s( TL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志; m. F4 b' S# f3 l( Q! ?) w! @

: m4 B+ a* M" g) t% g5 @! @6 ~  xF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
' ^" N/ Q- |8 t     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好' ?1 R1 d" p+ ]3 z' ?& E
& d5 t; w- `% U: {2 o3 r- ~
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案1 p" e( J& X; o' S, m8 ^
而家答多次
) c& P0 z7 U6 l6 K4 Y4 m) W0 bf: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
1 s  [9 }  h% R2 ^% }/ xl: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架" t, k/ L9 S; W% w% y$ M" o( [2 L- G1 t
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
/ m  d& g+ N8 G! D2 m8 ps: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願." |. j0 |. x* u; E
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
7 d) v, u1 N! {) ~' G3 L" ]
" e" Z1 I9 e- z* ~! Z( P6 T; kL為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
' M$ R9 J# X# Z- L4 pF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
: W5 }7 C6 T/ Q5 T. o$ i6 E6 o% V: pM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒; H$ q( d8 Y3 O+ j6 i5 G
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢5 L9 }8 l; L0 w" d# Y
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞! q9 M, g+ b% X' L$ C# l/ Y
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
7 e) X3 _) S+ p( N6 `; A# t, `S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
! U& p" R) H3 T! l4 s8 ]) F, `5 D3 QM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法4 B3 F# E) u! O  s' W# H1 j$ A% V
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果, R& o1 A! d2 N; T! l( L' ^6 h
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情) v! G" m8 @2 g/ |" b; `1 d
( L- E2 K6 k' D! `/ H
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
/ ]2 W  w1 ~0 uL = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己$ W6 @- n3 K9 F' m
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
+ ]+ S0 X) o2 oS = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件& V! r9 K$ a2 I
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
+ T2 S; m5 M8 {1 ]$ G- TM = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

  `7 h' R0 B6 \2 c" }/ K0 c1 M
! t7 h0 L7 W2 L$ X2 ?2 F' H
same choices with u , but want to add some comments
3 H# r: k9 e/ _: P5 M: L2 d- [, Y* u/ f# M
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  2 `8 b, C& f1 o+ ~0 l# `4 m4 }

3 b1 p5 J) i! F2 KS : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
, q0 E# W8 l: E# i% u) l4 y4 R, v- r' S7 e) s, H
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome / L6 e# L6 h* `* q, H. F
$ z+ F0 F4 G# k. I4 X
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
! G" k& f$ G4 X" \; I
; G0 [; [8 m5 [2 c[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge" |0 H# h5 l8 v. R9 H! {
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
8 m2 U, V  O  S5 [# t; c. ^L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點& z, `# L+ Y  _2 U. N! F
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma7 B6 R; u7 @# s% B- B

1 }( X0 H- s( ~3 H) T最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
! r3 W/ N$ k% X* p# z" ^! z& c3 }8 }有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
) C* n3 w# _+ Z0 @5 d4 X+ G由最好開始排起既話，6 B. @1 E' f2 J  K0 K
L B M F S 啦，
2 I* g* c9 V! x& C/ K8 C$ P- q
( q3 q* R" ]6 F* M# c- n8 G; Q其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，% M* Q' _" G8 L) `/ {
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？- h9 e( V1 K7 F) _
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？0 O4 J; W0 x6 a2 N9 g4 e4 p7 {$ y
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。$ e/ N8 F: r4 i* g

0 h8 C, b4 v7 \$ j1 L" p9 v而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，+ O8 y4 ~+ M, |) h: x6 X+ L
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，5 ?6 d9 C0 c( E% S2 B, E
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。. b! U+ j6 s. Z, g3 J( Z( H! f- |

  W4 V- B1 e3 T* M1 I# j而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，% ^. K# }. J4 Y  k1 C
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
: a& ?3 ~- o" Z5 s* l& \亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
$ k3 Q8 f. P- u" s# B1 c知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
" @1 m. R8 c) ]) S( q8 l- D. F M 都可算壞了。1 q/ ?/ Y9 [- _5 }. Z" J; G2 e
5 D! k0 T& a0 A3 o' S9 J
F 呢個人仲掂，
, I: K* o; {$ Y3 ?5 h/ t. O知道既唔等於要講，
' N; @! T8 A. ~2 L: r如果呢件事發生係自己身上，5 ~  }3 j7 f/ U  b  r, c
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
) X: g* K! j4 J+ I' L9 Q# y. y9 `! l! p. S7 L
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
( O  ?& O9 m, I1 _始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
1 i9 ~9 D+ Y. `. t  k; j  _  L; e

* v6 o- D5 x5 q
% @! A+ {' c6 r% A題外話：  G4 r/ J  a" E. _" e5 y9 P, x2 p
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，9 t& ~: D1 q! W8 p/ Q  |9 J
睇到 S 呢條友，
; I, f; W9 z+ [: t( p1 M6 e& x我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
& y) _' `% d1 j6 Q, D& w+ {8 |3 p( n; ~( T6 u& p
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
  {# \9 _% I! B. F# qF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係" U+ f& H- L: q) I- {
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她# t# E* q2 |; C4 S8 N
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害( b! F1 O. X5 y
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...