Rika

由最好排到最壞2 R; @7 K& ~- u3 `6 W' |' ?) h
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong2 j! \8 O; x  M( \
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount' B8 P0 m! w* A) `4 @8 m% [
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her1 Z! r7 y* b. p2 H6 ^' P2 ]6 J
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure( G/ V( z+ L) ?' S/ G: W
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
% M& r. e7 k1 J. E& z! l) k6 }- P- Y/ e
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
3 O3 z3 n6 c+ b* ?  }  w1 X+ _% D% D  ]; K% w0 i1 e" F) [
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)" s" s9 }2 A* t! {
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!2 C- G% H6 c- X6 p% W+ E

2 n7 B  r8 p7 p. Y% hB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
! D  @/ o. A1 a8 g4 a
$ R& C: ?7 }' L& K. EL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
7 a. P% F7 x3 {! |) I9 _" i  a! K) p1 E
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,% m$ M6 U1 |4 V; }  N8 O. U& _
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好7 f- X5 E& D/ o

4 n+ ^8 J# r2 S% f: b) N" N  J3 @0 b[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
  e4 Q* M, U9 |% ^而家答多次
/ C& L- W/ O; V+ }8 R2 g$ Cf: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
& I+ T6 m1 R0 ?" dl: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
5 v2 Z8 b# g8 |- F$ C5 Q# ~b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢3 F2 U7 j8 C; O# K: s
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
3 q1 ]7 M8 }  ^: w" j  pm: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S0 G3 N0 P! C' l2 r3 I$ W
* k( [) r) k* q/ W/ k+ D4 [
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
/ Y: {& V' f$ y5 I: H+ cF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度: v$ F: e  g2 R% X; F; T3 I
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒$ b# b$ b% w/ Q7 J: }2 S
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢5 {1 ^3 j% |, r, t; J0 M
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞+ N6 T) q" Y; t. W& `
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"" h) ~/ |& s- k+ q7 T, m2 }1 \8 D
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
% Y5 e& S! _. K& p7 {M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法3 N5 [* s/ ^* F: t2 R  {* P. K6 S7 ^
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
  j9 C6 F. G& X- q! d0 `B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
8 T) T! ^4 D- i/ i5 S( R0 z2 x
; V/ R2 T) P: a) U0 y2 m' x世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
. Y% z5 d; }8 ]/ i# `& {- QL = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
4 w8 M- b% V# aB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘5 a. |! r+ U4 V% v) ]
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件- T' C/ l0 ]# s$ V  i
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
8 l0 T- E8 z( p, d2 X: t  NM = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

* @  g$ z: f: V; N6 B: y$ c

( ~, W7 L$ h( S% P same choices with u , but want to add some comments 2 r. d, o% h' ?/ l
( m* r/ g' F! F0 J
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
0 I' x- O- p( @$ ~1 y* B7 d
/ x! j! C0 t  T/ Z2 x- b; yS : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
5 {& L9 N0 W/ N4 J7 i/ w  \7 j$ i/ h2 ^3 [$ J9 l
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome 0 X5 c  B) f0 w

/ o6 h& O$ h% NM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......$ n% V. ], S5 T9 w
" ?# N) I) ^6 @7 x/ X
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
1 G% z" u/ n! B9 n& q( f' jM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
' v  C( A( P# f% e4 fL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
; m( l$ s; ^$ B$ ^! OF, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
2 q) ?9 i% X* ~) s( H. C/ k- A
7 ^! v/ z& _0 }/ a, n. K- m! D最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
; Y' \$ O: [6 X, e1 l) ~有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，/ }! m4 U* G3 H/ ]5 v1 j2 `0 A
由最好開始排起既話，
6 y+ g: `% C/ x! dL B M F S 啦，9 l1 o1 o; c( T& q* h3 I
9 x' T, B, R" I; T% g/ x
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，0 q" }; J8 w8 q- p& Z; g, F; z
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？: j. c7 [  O# G$ A( r/ M' f% q% x/ Y  w
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？5 b$ |) T3 D, ]; E$ s
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。( \1 x0 @6 U7 g& v2 v, P: z; M

6 ]6 J! D# K; R而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，/ ?( B& |7 {+ B
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
; X3 b0 J- Y: s4 u8 X: J+ a明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。, S# s7 l! f' N) ^

; v- E9 _$ c! T. K) E  Q4 b而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
$ E8 X3 ^6 L8 V- h2 e5 a% g M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，9 \7 t: P# }$ R) O+ @. l
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，- f# U0 x5 C, s: h
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，5 q# E2 Q3 b( F' W  g% B) c
M 都可算壞了。0 O$ O% g  S" v
" h# h' `& z' H6 M4 V2 @
F 呢個人仲掂，
: {# a  s, Y' R: O% L5 Q( [知道既唔等於要講，
9 m5 l5 l0 _/ t% E& c1 w6 I如果呢件事發生係自己身上，. t' A* B9 G5 h: V8 ?
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
* c3 J$ i$ e7 L4 T# r- K
9 Q' ^) C1 W# E* A最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
/ l: C8 u0 I1 T- F8 G( N1 I7 _始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。& g$ h) r# I2 J
" @$ r. f; v$ b$ b& S# X" f/ _

! S  Y0 C4 Z$ w9 c9 e) K; Q
" ~2 h! q, _  G$ Y, X題外話：' G1 m! m. a* P# |
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
4 |8 f' J! L/ o8 }! v( _睇到 S 呢條友，
3 j# C2 {/ y! u  ]6 S2 u1 B我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
* M6 O1 [# Q8 Y1 G( K6 q
0 F) j2 i3 t- ES: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
+ U5 w4 B0 }3 o* F3 dF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係- z9 I& `5 \  M# N2 J$ ]3 M) u9 |
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她1 p, r) t  V; X
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害! L) y8 g/ \0 x0 e& A& P+ P
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...