Rika

由最好排到最壞) p& C) M, x- W  `- @
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
. u2 ~$ s# ]: V0 UB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
" T9 @9 a) t9 \' `( wS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her# C0 b9 a5 s% {* B# b4 S; i
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
# R  l4 Z" m% G+ S# EL, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:  k/ a& S- n0 H  x

# D4 w1 v9 f0 |; t5 k  |M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人# O6 U$ ~+ l& j& O* s
; P8 ?, D, B. ]+ r" a
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)! w8 B, i; x7 I- N, ]! J
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!0 G, S( b2 s7 W' d$ }+ F
: _* C6 l% k7 }4 S7 b6 n
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做3 s8 N, v) A; ]6 k# p

) C. V! Z: S& [2 W' GL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
& K2 p2 P( e) l" g) I3 c8 @& W+ x- Z; b8 M1 W$ v% J+ W" W
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,5 m3 u" \# r  T: m9 N) `
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
0 Z" V, e) E/ n  t8 M) d8 `4 j, z' m& A( P
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案: s" i. D" y6 z9 P; Q, d
而家答多次
. I) i$ R: h- \0 m' A9 V9 cf: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽4 v; N1 T) D) h8 x1 ]8 o; c3 K. l
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架, A* U$ g8 f% ?: |5 }
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢# V' a5 ]( H+ b) p
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
+ \  R0 [5 H/ em: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
( a7 I- z3 M7 o- {) D7 i
/ w0 h- w; W% \! T" t, E6 a0 cL為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大/ |$ u( J) d& p2 u
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度( ]  V/ \) d2 v$ `; q
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
" Q- t" ]4 |6 v, V2 C+ C- N: g2 f! @S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢7 E3 w2 D) u' i6 w+ B
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞) B/ y& P- o- O9 g& x# |# q
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"( Q; |2 W) P9 m% _" A/ V3 l
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
; e8 j. a3 p$ b. J7 }5 i1 DM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
; V6 U1 `+ x4 X5 tL: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
$ Z. J2 Q2 b0 E1 X' B: ~B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情1 {2 v) v& D7 E
, g& h" J; U& E9 U. o0 M) o2 M
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:- k2 i( u3 H' H4 U- x
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己! d4 k7 U1 F. l+ E/ R1 [" R
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘1 j. c! ~  `; O9 @& `
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件; D4 c) P- w7 [! ^4 y# p9 l
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方: |" V& M; P1 J* K# S
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

+ ^) c9 s' g9 D( d9 }7 V9 w6 v! j

7 d+ \$ g; M5 g* p8 |9 C# N same choices with u , but want to add some comments
9 G$ f6 S$ c1 Q0 ~9 m, v- q* N* F5 p- N
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  ' J+ k+ ~% k6 r- E

+ @: P9 ^8 Z; O4 DS : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
: a4 m. s/ U& Z& l
6 c/ T- n, u+ X. eF : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome 6 [$ g6 L: R4 r# m* ]

- x; P. z; v- X2 F* O: e- {M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......; u2 y5 {0 A: L1 ]/ ]' R* f
0 q  [2 J; ]" p& z: c6 v' H8 Z
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
8 |4 ~) s7 G& }2 c3 b1 ~M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
; v; J- W5 k! V: k3 j" d: {7 Y# yL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點5 X* H  x$ [0 }# T( g0 z' f
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma9 C9 f" K+ I, a+ H

" @9 b' G$ r) {% H最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
# N7 L$ _# e& J7 L有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，( x. _/ J4 p8 O) o2 T
由最好開始排起既話，
  f$ C) ~" n8 X$ Y6 W5 IL B M F S 啦，
# c' T' H+ o2 ~* F
  K) b4 z+ ~3 h) A3 a1 p4 q2 c! r其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
8 n$ R' F7 ]$ E$ U4 T但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？8 C7 i8 s& @* Q! g
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？$ [, U/ A# O  W" R! w
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。6 ^- W6 l* z- p  B5 a

( x0 k0 @( \, l! b( b: Y而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，/ `, _/ x" z: ^) V1 J2 Y9 e0 b4 E
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
5 V5 X$ `" D1 s: L5 v. q明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。! M. I" Y: L1 I; f' Y7 p2 m
2 Q5 ?4 ?% N1 K0 X
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
; C6 e6 g8 L* Y4 g/ P) m# y M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
! S7 ^0 v4 Y( T# x, ~( ~- y亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
( o: R$ `, h; j& o) n) P知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，4 Q- p) {7 ]9 x$ \
M 都可算壞了。
3 ?: N) m3 O& i# y, j1 r3 I
4 x/ w8 E. u6 x0 n9 H F 呢個人仲掂，
3 j8 I$ v  N+ O. \知道既唔等於要講，& r, o, H  ~8 L3 o3 n7 }2 t/ Q+ [; n
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，( c) p$ X9 b' ]* o
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。" K% U+ p3 a( j: V2 Z

) X2 Y6 v' m. m最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
" K3 H' }5 Q4 S3 U8 @' Q- v) ~, m始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
$ w) @. \1 N. p! c$ S/ I* m/ ^( {0 ~
8 m, `( _/ O# b  U5 M' v

9 g% c5 R2 S1 g題外話：( h9 R+ z' e- H: X3 H
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
6 U9 N7 ^. a+ U- G- y4 O3 J, D睇到 S 呢條友，! J# G2 |0 A6 Q) S0 H/ \
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L/ S$ W& G& i% [# _* ~
8 Q/ g+ d0 n! j& A! d
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!* D7 K* y  ^( j/ o
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係  C3 I0 A8 w/ a( x7 d- s
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
  j. k  g. m( KB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
) e) z6 a3 V+ p4 T/ gL: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...