<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
: S4 i# J- i! M7 o4 a' r但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:5 e1 t) \% p9 f
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
9 D8 ]8 N$ z: Y3 V3 V, G) r! J8 j5 ?0 aI agree you points that it could be illegal7 ~0 O$ z9 {0 c. @2 m" w
but that is still a "gray area"; T$ C6 D" g; Z  w* J- V
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair5 M: v! w. q1 {1 v! G  @. x

$ z" \3 i6 e2 ]% y6 T' J9 A/ ?anyway, I want to say that is  F& o/ s, O+ g4 d
who is supposed to be protected by laws
. E) M2 |0 h3 j+ w( I6 o) a3 ecreators?
% g3 o# L% u1 E) F# _but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
& x- N' U, f$ y6 b' i) h& t4 W* P5 alet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money./ e. S8 _: |) u9 N, @" ^3 V
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those, F8 E5 x3 M% ~  a+ H0 b9 W9 e) H
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
! y# e; F; ]0 K4 f- x' T7 G其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
, ^: e, f; m- B/ p
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:* |& G' h/ ~2 f& w0 ^8 E
+ m$ R3 O2 z& r) n9 i6 ?! ^
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
4 s& o" ^5 q6 b) Y
唔係喎!
3 w4 y1 M! Q# B8 ]+ a8 @4 ~古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!& \* l8 U* N  H/ G( A1 l4 W
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
6 o; X2 L& h6 r1 N  J0 l9 b) j) y& P佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!' x# B. n/ Y# e' S# V2 ]3 X, D1 n7 o
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
/ n6 N' t4 ]! h0 W5 I. E, ?一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!4 `2 q& ^# K( R5 s: ]. z" y
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
6 K* k# L! y8 k# oif so bad, dun download la, right?
; ~- y7 A3 T' T" L, S9 ki am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
9 s& F8 K- H- b  U, H+ M2 kbut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct3 m& e) l0 z3 ^' `! A/ ^
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la' V: R# k' a; B5 O9 A6 d) I
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society4 A9 L, n$ c5 G" G# k3 \
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
' [8 Z, x  o& t% [# bwhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!/ _0 N  U# U1 J, p5 Y5 p4 o
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!
2 e8 A7 [# T1 c# i佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
; O. E- p0 |' D3 W政府想比下馬威0的人~~# Y% V2 p4 S3 C- S
錢就一定罰
/ E# K/ I8 k+ _7 o9 D! @4 o! m未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,
: X9 U5 m' W6 A- @+ B唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
  o! |2 @& L, S) T, k0 j/ i佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?/ n1 K2 ^* l+ o, r& L
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。