<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
" L  R/ W4 d- G% _' \但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
8 I7 Z$ w/ W$ k* I; Y1 l大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
9 s, e' {) B" A4 ~
I agree you points that it could be illegal
$ a3 d7 k* J" _/ Y3 G* g2 K$ U( ]but that is still a "gray area": g7 Z- I+ }2 m7 c) n, U
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair, v" Y& T5 o* W5 C/ m+ g! A

. ?- u" X# ?/ X: lanyway, I want to say that is
2 i  w3 x4 S- R1 xwho is supposed to be protected by laws2 r4 x/ P7 C! d7 [$ L6 q* @- w4 M  f
creators?6 A7 J3 p* g0 _- Q8 C) Q( a2 A9 _7 L
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
5 Q5 `4 k; R! x. q/ Y: ?+ Wlet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.4 Q6 q, I: M; W, `
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those# m: p! u9 H- n/ X/ R& I( ?
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
7 b; N4 G0 c7 o. z  f5 o7 W9 w. t; {其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
* r* f: Q' p0 q) F+ L9 R  Z2 S我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:: u5 `( k2 H8 S$ D1 [
! Y. _8 z( Z4 R8 ^( H3 j
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
# o8 O7 s/ N6 q/ O& N0 q
唔係喎!
1 ]' [. A8 I3 A/ p  s古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!/ G' S- v: b8 q0 n2 h
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!; |9 b) Z6 p. w$ z
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!" f% {) s: s0 ?
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
, W+ H3 J# K. O8 @一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!. l. r, p8 ?, j$ |" Y
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face......." X6 T5 h) j' n. ?' w- C- V
if so bad, dun download la, right?3 W4 N. L2 P0 X  d5 H) u3 l" Q
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^1 O0 Y( _7 B/ n/ _4 P1 t$ e$ ?" N- s7 ]6 C
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct& F& ]) n( }& g! k% Y$ i- R
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la& P. O  E9 P' \1 ~/ v, T
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
0 Z- }  d: r4 Jusing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........5 U' x, n) M" z; |+ ^
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!6 F( p/ P" J5 j; G$ v7 F
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!
- _- p, f' e5 j0 E" R; y* U7 i佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
8 Z3 a- J* B4 ~; u政府想比下馬威0的人~~
9 p6 j( V1 x% R$ {  V2 _7 \錢就一定罰
9 r( E9 Q  q' d! w8 H; b6 a7 O未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,
8 F8 a/ c1 b6 f$ x) M! b唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
9 ^9 K3 ~' n* n9 ]  V佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
7 `6 d1 U6 |  W. L/ H" f到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。