<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)' c; m8 H6 I) L
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
+ k  j, Q8 K) ^8 t' }) o大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
; v8 H- ]* k% S; d3 E
I agree you points that it could be illegal- {5 d  u0 ^5 {& `" h! |, B. K8 L
but that is still a "gray area"
" N5 l4 T+ p8 l, P9 O$ f1 D8 Fwhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
1 j4 f1 f% k2 `' x0 p* L8 a2 r7 S& g% a" T4 K
anyway, I want to say that is
4 ?! m# [, ~# `% W. u6 h/ Rwho is supposed to be protected by laws
% F, l. z: p( ^- x9 w/ Z& tcreators?7 a( p$ L! U! a
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
$ q1 W' l: F: w, P) ^" Llet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
" t5 Z. R1 [: H9 Lwhen we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those# y' A  X3 ^2 Y9 h- P8 i* e, F2 o
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
" i- L( p. y3 X  W3 }8 ~其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
' E- F' ]# W" K' l我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:- [* \2 k4 y! B: B8 n0 B

: P7 J, r/ u  L& C4 Z我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
4 e# W) g1 j7 t; a
唔係喎!
( D$ ^5 m9 |" L# _古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
6 u. w& Q: K& z5 U+ m% U* |5 ^5 x$ K我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!: E+ r) Y% @" i. F4 H- \& n7 R
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!+ q; N- @! o- p9 a' t" }8 g5 J
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事% t) |3 I. \+ c, ]! U  Y. V
一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!, O9 e& L% a  y+ ?: ]$ Y
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......) z2 O# A) v, A. Y
if so bad, dun download la, right?) ^: I* d/ K1 j
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
3 o8 X& }. N& R/ M& Y+ i" l2 S9 rbut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct
+ E1 @8 T' j. l; @* g/ {3 b4 ~no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la0 ?/ [! o7 q4 T2 r
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
; C. [* Y9 T+ M( c% Ousing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
9 n1 G- `: G7 qwhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!7 d4 }  h9 I& ?- S( k
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!
: _+ I: m$ c' Q) }3 \' H佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
7 s  q+ r1 U8 }; Y' j" d& q" Q政府想比下馬威0的人~~
* V; l! P  ?% I7 f) k& ^5 S! X錢就一定罰
: g+ A4 s! t* S& N  N3 J未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,' s# ]2 J8 L) \
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
* z  c  K+ p8 L, J* C佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
$ K3 r" i1 u+ ^6 R' K- U* i到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。