<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)3 r$ ]) w& @- F3 ^" h$ C
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
6 P1 Z8 [$ S3 Z5 Q大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
# `$ S* q% P4 ~& P2 HI agree you points that it could be illegal
4 Z) ]) f! a  k2 Pbut that is still a "gray area"+ M' m9 V' W6 Z9 }7 [
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair9 K$ c/ G3 m7 N& T
* Z% q0 Y; y# j8 \1 c
anyway, I want to say that is
' E: J4 E. ]) G; ]who is supposed to be protected by laws8 W8 A' @: s: z1 {2 ~+ s8 `% }
creators?' u# H& w9 a: y
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market. ?9 F, A: [+ U( Q7 ~4 {- }
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
; s3 y& {% a6 D8 Xwhen we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those# E0 y2 k' C) K0 R3 s
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
, O/ c& j( i) ?$ a; A3 e其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
7 Q: `5 a% K& Z+ d6 L% `1 l5 E我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
- N' h: ~$ ~) ^) R# l# m
6 w! J1 F( d+ [% w# ]我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
/ n/ E# Y5 G9 a唔係喎!
6 H: J" X9 E- q' k古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
" w0 X% q$ {1 f' L/ M6 k1 K1 h我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!* i+ j( ~6 J+ g
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!8 ~2 y. W8 d) G; n1 C: V; Y! S
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
3 D- ]" t5 Q* n! y) p& X) |5 E一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!2 x& e, s$ E# X) e- T! \/ D
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
) H# ^/ ?( ?3 c8 r; L5 i" `+ _if so bad, dun download la, right?
& i. n9 v* Z+ }i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
8 n- \; ~( N( H& Tbut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct
; d* ?: L6 `4 _, ?( cno need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
& Z# x6 R) Z0 cso what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society- C, N8 ^3 G) y( s( {  f4 C
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........$ v. `1 [9 {, V! F/ F1 I
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!' ^$ a- Y$ g- G( l3 E0 W. I$ _( p
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!
+ @/ p2 \8 ?' D. D佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
( {' S6 j$ w* l- k. w政府想比下馬威0的人~~
; g* [) ~* e0 b; N錢就一定罰$ W' `* U9 ^% e' |6 I* K' F7 x
未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,
/ {0 }, ~$ [& m唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?7 o$ U# d7 U7 u" R6 N1 Y
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
- w- ?2 j/ ~9 _% F到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。