<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)$ `) s. l" ]* b* Q0 A$ _7 X( ]
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:( @  x$ v4 K1 p6 V* d
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
/ C$ J) ], k& g, o  v8 e3 WI agree you points that it could be illegal) D  |1 a. |# y) M5 `1 O' q
but that is still a "gray area"4 t* s$ i* Y* v+ k
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
  H$ I! p* X0 I! M+ N+ _4 o/ W& L- `
" D0 S, K$ L; ]  \) danyway, I want to say that is0 @$ x# _' W6 C3 ]/ \8 p" ], W! J
who is supposed to be protected by laws% \7 l0 P" s# o9 y% m" b8 R: F
creators?
5 n6 [/ P2 N1 S# w  \) l. q  ibut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market" A1 @+ M7 e. u# {+ J8 b
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money., L/ x4 ~( T; `) Y( x' k
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those
) z7 S3 B" g0 \4 c# p# {9 AWhy nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
2 ?/ \* W5 {: U其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
. C# ~& K) [% |  q! {8 v
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
5 y/ t& x  h% [+ X( g* C$ \! d
1 T) N! |: x( g$ m/ M' a- y0 E3 f4 @我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
$ j, e/ E6 y8 |" P) |
唔係喎!! ~3 L* X0 d$ s/ B% j
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
' \0 R3 G1 z4 A5 ~; ]0 z3 l5 V3 o我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
2 F- p% u+ s; y% N$ U5 J* k; o佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
' n/ C$ P' f4 N8 s' T7 [% r就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事) X1 t+ ]3 f  m% f9 U
一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!" }. W; V, H9 L! q5 Z/ A! N
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
/ u0 y0 K+ g- g5 y* |) `  @' R/ b- mif so bad, dun download la, right?
( M2 `, G4 _3 ^. d( ?0 x# ki am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
- D! p0 N! z  N7 qbut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct1 a( A+ V- }1 D  N
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
7 q0 @0 @0 L/ z* }3 _so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
' T$ @7 ]* d- dusing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
- X1 M0 D0 p; l- bwhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
! k" F6 p3 F- Aso, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!3 N% [& `5 ]* A* C, y
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~! I( E& s' V! J5 _( C1 |$ ^; d& b
政府想比下馬威0的人~~
- l8 ~$ H8 Z2 K錢就一定罰
& q0 D6 T* ]# o  w% @未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,
# @0 f: U, k8 V0 J% Z; m) x唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?) ^2 W: `( W$ l" f
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?  o$ M6 ?4 p( O4 T9 Y" ]
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。