<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
* x+ l; X% o- I3 \但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
1 V  E# h( q9 m大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
" N, c# Y: C7 i7 t% Q- qI agree you points that it could be illegal5 ?/ U4 w$ h# C/ T- v9 d; t. B% {
but that is still a "gray area"
( c4 B( }* i. Dwhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
, K  k$ f; b% c+ a9 T# Y- g( L% t
anyway, I want to say that is
/ g) h$ {% j; D! {, ywho is supposed to be protected by laws
' f& R3 z. ^. V, y3 s3 B/ G9 Qcreators?
; B3 l$ ~% ]' I2 i, Y4 lbut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market( j% p! Y& V. v
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
2 W1 U/ [! a3 O7 y5 v. @( qwhen we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those! ]# j% k) @. k- E. x
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
' s! `/ |: @5 F' C其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
. g% X5 U& x: X# M' d7 ?
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
+ w/ K5 b5 y: W5 |6 L9 b$ N
  c3 k& O6 {( U* u1 j) I& {8 u我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
, l# {7 l& N6 k. \# d* M
唔係喎!
* U9 ^, p) ], C4 U古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!: W8 Y- M0 T' c1 m1 c
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!  l% H' A4 {& k" _! L3 L( l: w
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
- I1 C' {* H# c$ Z+ h就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事* G0 Q6 z/ h# f% K2 Q  u2 G# s
一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
, Y, l2 t3 Q: }dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
( u% V- l2 Z" J: Oif so bad, dun download la, right?
, R+ X9 Z% j6 U- y1 Ai am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
7 e) a7 p4 Y* S; M  |9 J2 ]1 Bbut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct3 i* X. P; f0 |3 P- n2 ~+ Y
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la' ?! P/ E) m( S. x0 V- M2 r
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society3 A1 B" u; g$ `1 N, m/ N/ O
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
+ n7 u* L0 r9 S- pwhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
* v  d( s% r1 P2 {. `5 v, O7 Qso, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!. i/ s: F2 Z% M( s+ ^
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
  u7 E/ Y4 X; m7 n/ V3 ~& S8 U政府想比下馬威0的人~~3 g, s2 j6 ?" g7 Q9 i! r
錢就一定罰
- b* v' _' ?# o' @( h5 j' J3 c1 M/ I未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,: g# i  S5 P! k+ d; T! H! X1 G. ^
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?8 t! t" D( [6 W4 y
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
+ y3 X  @8 D8 T3 N- A! {到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。