<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
0 u! }  o1 d; D. J但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
) K3 i* c4 ~& Z$ T* b0 |大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
; t" i# p2 E2 H7 J
I agree you points that it could be illegal! `( s1 [6 j7 q+ U
but that is still a "gray area"+ M" T) s$ F" ?' U: o
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
0 y: f, ]( B7 @/ e7 a! N# a! \  k9 a& @" b) r( K. |
anyway, I want to say that is
. o- e0 ~) y% t2 i% y9 T( [5 twho is supposed to be protected by laws0 E0 i* _9 a# Z3 u) L
creators?
7 a# v; i8 |$ p  O. M9 J9 h' U8 [0 Lbut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market  m2 s4 L  C, _& E
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.5 t, @& i' ]6 E1 ]
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those
7 @# J. H+ G8 w# r" V  F2 fWhy nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:# B5 {" b$ x' m; j* E! r' i/ S
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
- _2 w/ G% _$ c/ W- Y) Z" m我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
2 `( v! I1 g+ }; M7 n
+ M; O- {9 ^" d7 _我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
) C' Y: ~( ~8 C3 g) }
唔係喎!1 k! }0 n, p4 ~) \( a  v! y
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
. s3 b+ B( [7 j/ e! a1 K我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
8 M! p- S$ D4 ?& l$ @佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!' n4 ?5 ^3 o3 j0 B  r$ J! x8 G6 L$ Q
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
0 J3 m: z4 h% W一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!6 v+ {7 {& X  d5 o! j
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
1 n/ l9 ~( _2 Z. U" N6 v7 u: Lif so bad, dun download la, right?3 ?1 J7 G) Y  j- d
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
: o1 }; |8 F1 sbut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct
+ P. }* q$ C, G9 `" _8 D" _no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
1 {  s% `+ }! X6 G5 g0 h! aso what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society) p2 Y) Q( p- K7 N* W2 d) x
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
! d* Z4 _% K, e3 {9 r) Jwhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!6 \( P# x# K. M6 J
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!
7 _( R% R. o* W" e: z佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
# O& _9 Q0 f0 Q" h5 V! @( D& t政府想比下馬威0的人~~
8 ^8 Z4 ]/ _$ n( h錢就一定罰
: }' Z/ \1 l3 |9 L6 H6 I未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,
& ]4 x$ c: _# y! e唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
7 N/ S6 b4 z3 L佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?) R) Y! r, [+ y
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。