<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大): Q4 G- X) p3 e/ O% U  s2 F
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
" V2 M  A: a3 [2 V大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
3 J1 R: M! H2 Z+ N# bI agree you points that it could be illegal
+ U$ b  b# C7 }( P9 S* fbut that is still a "gray area"
0 J) b& @9 m. J2 I% ewhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair) S% Y* M) s2 }

9 a9 a+ q/ {7 b& T& D; }anyway, I want to say that is
! d- \! g$ _- }9 Wwho is supposed to be protected by laws0 q# A) g4 I* R/ L0 D- [1 o
creators?
" w. |  M, `: v$ @% w* R, a  Sbut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market! a# M& t6 Z" d3 b  I+ N% r- i
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
) |: i; d1 _3 j9 l- A8 G- \. awhen we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those% {: e2 e" s1 U% @2 `. l, k
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:/ c) t/ H, Q0 F$ [
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
' s' p( V1 M. b# t我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:9 N7 i9 p" \# G6 O

  [# U! v1 b+ E' d* F/ t! h) ^我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
7 e* n. c; n& g" G9 h4 I
唔係喎!
8 G1 w! r. o: S% _: l5 |$ Z古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
3 i, x, V- h  y, D我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
# Y9 _1 Y: }% k) _$ W9 Q6 X, z佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
. N$ u' B" e3 g/ I! ?9 l' V; j% e就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
+ `) i1 f, h; O! y5 e) @5 O一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
. n+ g( H5 ?0 g' gdun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face......." ^- K9 _0 X( _
if so bad, dun download la, right?
3 L5 [/ c/ v# e# x: fi am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^7 [% M( I$ w" R  J8 Y0 J& b6 ?
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct0 o# c* I$ w! N5 L
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la! d  l/ x5 K% E6 G! H( x
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
# y: H3 b4 y& eusing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema........./ {" {1 p  \3 C" O" ~3 {  _
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
* P! z& F1 O0 q5 Q4 Zso, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!3 S7 ^. O0 p. W; l
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
- T- a6 N: E$ l" C3 r政府想比下馬威0的人~~  l) |+ t  S7 i" Z
錢就一定罰
* y1 i& Y& C5 e/ v( S0 b未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,* F9 M* D% l" L+ Q% |7 Z: e/ e  P) j
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
3 G' o6 o3 {6 g. ^  ]佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
- F6 {0 \/ t/ W到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。