<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)6 |! ~. W, m# C* z+ Y* |
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
/ Q6 K. e8 l& S  o2 o% g3 c- S1 `* I大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
. m1 y+ h  [. z9 H' _
I agree you points that it could be illegal) o; T+ w5 {. T# W9 n
but that is still a "gray area"
  O# J4 V' w/ u. l7 G* ~whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair/ M3 U) b9 s9 X) f' @
) ]2 z# Z1 x( c
anyway, I want to say that is+ h  `: c" h1 M2 p5 V/ L+ a
who is supposed to be protected by laws5 F1 ]% z. X5 |( L% m; Q9 D2 x
creators?
5 ?5 ~2 @( s/ a0 I8 |0 F/ e/ X# W$ Rbut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
5 m% @! \5 L6 e! ylet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.& H0 U/ e$ F$ y/ b  R0 ]
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those9 _" X5 a8 d# U2 G& @: S8 s9 r5 D
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
! y3 R) Z3 s3 |9 s, O0 N其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
; m8 f" n. O* c; [% M* |; w( H% h我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
! ?/ Q+ @& _  |% ^; R' z. |2 y1 t
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
7 l' T$ ]) V+ z+ S8 ]- _% e
唔係喎!
7 r% R5 f4 G/ r7 w' M* k古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
* X  s  P. e' M, U) e! q我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!! J0 a0 O0 g+ m( g/ @, x
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
+ h6 A: l4 H3 {就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事- [; N, M* {/ z% F& I3 ]0 H
一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
2 p4 q* i) F7 A" m3 _7 d8 |' J8 Pdun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......3 v: l. i/ e" e2 V  q# H! H' B
if so bad, dun download la, right?
8 H1 v; {1 S' d, Z  ]6 Ai am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^3 p# @4 f3 [6 w
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct! ^6 f* M2 d: K# ]5 U
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
5 S" W+ Q. Y# T7 ]8 e5 y" Iso what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society+ f0 P* H1 k4 C" y7 Z
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
% r$ @& g+ S! [9 ^2 y0 kwhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
7 i- B8 Z; _- }& z# aso, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!! v6 [1 G; M% L! B% E/ a
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~2 R4 ~4 q% ]! O5 o. |
政府想比下馬威0的人~~. q+ C0 `5 p( [4 e
錢就一定罰
- I1 b# }( m9 U, G- t, I未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,
& E2 P: a7 H: n唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
) L3 o' J6 G- }+ g0 W佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?; x1 c& ]9 p# S2 X" U; T8 a
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。