<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
/ c" k2 H: ~* c但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:1 K5 I0 i  Y2 G: H1 a. b
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
" p/ w( S, D4 I+ W+ C* g4 d  lI agree you points that it could be illegal# p# r2 m' u" `" r0 V5 ~9 C7 H
but that is still a "gray area"
2 ?& c; P7 X2 F) xwhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair0 u! I. z9 l3 u3 z  J
( o+ o8 a5 {* h  g7 m: v& D
anyway, I want to say that is3 M1 I& U) Y9 `  h
who is supposed to be protected by laws
6 S/ p  L. Q) t! ?1 Vcreators?$ R- F' a; `2 N* c
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
8 r$ ?6 r5 n6 u! Clet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
  [  W0 S. b* z/ h) H- d) [8 Fwhen we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those2 v1 @6 _/ Q# j
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
8 X' `- g  J0 Q* f( E0 f其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
" b+ k" z; q' l' M9 K5 f我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:3 A) D) n, F- v( h7 y; J+ X9 ]% W7 x% \  X
/ `( L5 N8 I: M% \$ B3 W7 q
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
  \2 E( Y' q  A- r# E( s( s唔係喎!4 }3 {5 i# q0 a6 F, f+ c6 Q! X
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!! J/ b9 R2 F& g7 ]1 S
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
) C' \5 Y- Q, P7 R+ r1 }佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
0 h6 }. i% ^. D9 C% m- _3 Z6 @( e就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
1 T6 o/ A$ Y) L* }: s, M一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
7 w+ Z$ p0 i1 K8 M: n' ?dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......! f6 }- i5 W0 b( m) K8 f% k
if so bad, dun download la, right?7 Q; n5 W% F( X
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
* `( e; V5 S$ h! ]+ e0 ~but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct% g( o  w, {: @9 P" {5 h; p9 b5 ^, V
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la9 g- Z. @" I  @( d- T
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
/ ^, Z4 T. j+ Uusing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema........., E: A! I- u( x% Q
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!/ ^+ g" H/ }% J. I5 n
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!
* D8 ?  h( O5 |6 |" w9 \1 }' G7 q佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
$ X: w; t- l8 c( m: a' j政府想比下馬威0的人~~) _# S; G! Z0 w
錢就一定罰- f! W, v! g8 F: s( J: L
未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,
& Z7 O/ t- l$ y7 M2 T. }唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
6 F, ]) q9 n5 A5 t佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?* t3 z  l7 ~. S: ~. Z
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。