<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)4 V! z9 g! Q+ U: _) `! _$ Y& l
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:" M' ?9 ^! O7 l- ]0 I
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
( b- z: p5 j( x/ T1 [- d
I agree you points that it could be illegal
2 I8 m0 m% r* \+ z9 q2 Bbut that is still a "gray area"
" V9 _, r! c5 B/ ^9 I1 Awhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
4 R! I, r! F. Q/ G
9 |; z6 |. c% I4 nanyway, I want to say that is: q0 _  p& J9 Z# s
who is supposed to be protected by laws0 z7 I6 \0 }9 N/ P6 c
creators?8 D3 Q3 x/ p/ A% w4 L
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
, b+ z9 T5 h+ b$ N' ]) p" i4 S5 h4 C4 `let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
1 n1 Q3 W% i2 T- ewhen we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those0 l% W, j0 `4 D! Z6 y  d; h
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
  R0 q$ V- ~' j! G' d其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
* A" \. B+ I% h3 Y2 B4 n我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
& v$ @9 f4 L3 X# P  L' e5 `- ^" o9 L" M1 O) K& x' q  U/ ]
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
. D$ g  g8 m. W+ n- N: A: H% z
唔係喎!6 W- U9 ^% |* A
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!2 n" h7 b2 L( J- M* T0 B+ I
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!' j7 Z) v( K! h, h7 S
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
* Z5 C9 j8 v/ x+ J; j就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事% R, @# t( G6 d8 D+ [& r/ R
一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
0 k" W1 y, a9 l2 |' @( rdun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......( c4 ]. ~( ?/ Z) d0 n: j
if so bad, dun download la, right?" W: G+ E$ B4 a. ?1 G
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
4 [* k- J' Z$ u! gbut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct
1 g$ U: I) I, ]5 Sno need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la! l* B8 w/ B* u; @
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society3 C  K5 v1 D( M- w$ {& w
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........6 r* U- p5 b; r# O+ [, E$ O
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!4 z5 n8 O5 h& A" b: T6 w
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!
! \  q4 `% V. q, ]佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
5 g. G" t/ e  t- S- `1 g政府想比下馬威0的人~~
3 x( I4 N4 r; C3 O  Q/ D  U9 ]1 w錢就一定罰
, J' f! N8 A. {未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,: q9 r1 {5 O5 d% `8 Z, l. S& @
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
% l& t8 c" U& ~, C佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
! W5 `7 s% M# j( Z3 R到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。