<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
' @$ q8 E( [4 A; N但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:9 j2 o5 _+ s/ H4 n# U; q& [8 {
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
! U2 P# k! E, d' q& P+ d
I agree you points that it could be illegal
0 _( }0 u( q& K( f4 T! m; qbut that is still a "gray area"
, o* }; K  |% N# M. `6 j9 @whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair9 P1 ]4 ^1 M1 ^5 f5 c% M
% X: l( F& |* Y2 v. d0 J
anyway, I want to say that is! k% j# p1 E+ J8 I: v8 X; H
who is supposed to be protected by laws
) O- C5 w. x- P: acreators?& e) b8 r8 O. D) I& A
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
" p6 f6 y6 s6 `' l+ ?3 C* klet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.$ }0 o! C* s7 Q! o- M0 t
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those
3 }* Z6 O% j3 Q& c: J$ Q5 pWhy nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
6 Q- L! p# Y' I, s+ m( V其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
0 t# [( u7 |: C. R5 E8 v
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:. L) @; M; L( b" M/ ]

+ o% D5 n1 z1 P0 P8 {0 k! w& C$ D$ ?我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
$ I( J5 M  @: \7 i" j% V% ~唔係喎!9 ]7 [" z2 k8 ?! B" q: U& Y. V
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!/ L  e( ?9 c/ i3 J' D
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
# m+ |- }+ p% M& F1 X+ X% ?# t佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!* z& f: K" g+ Z3 g8 J4 ^/ P4 ]
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事3 `4 }$ S3 ]  w$ x- N
一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
) I8 |' g& P8 `6 l' ndun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......8 H4 G; I% r8 G4 u
if so bad, dun download la, right?
# t8 l/ i) A! r0 si am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^, j- Y4 h. G/ k; x) g5 V
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct; p3 D5 G7 ^% O9 u! [* `9 n( R
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la4 q* Z4 }6 s" B: r
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
. ~. p1 d  a# D5 |) |1 f! |using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
/ {' G8 D& m. i6 jwhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
  z" ^; X. v) B& Rso, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!
8 Q; [3 p; P& [& {佢又唔係殺人放火~~~3 d9 c1 L: D. l0 e* P% [3 L
政府想比下馬威0的人~~" L' v. J" _! m) u4 p
錢就一定罰. y! d! {+ @  C$ u1 u! w
未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,
8 ~  J, T, [2 Y9 N唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
  H1 `5 p3 C8 U4 M9 r+ m$ w佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
8 V6 H( J9 N# f& D5 C0 |) [% ~到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。