<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)9 b6 g/ ]+ ~5 R3 k# B
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:. i" I/ s/ ~$ R8 K3 W; ?+ S
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
3 y0 S8 v; j- t9 H' t% `  d8 tI agree you points that it could be illegal
7 S, H: k8 r* i$ nbut that is still a "gray area"  _* I( ^/ l* _% b8 i1 l* ~" J
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
3 ~7 [; t: ^6 o2 m& x+ r  \. a- ~  W4 ~( m6 I; z5 a1 m0 x. W& c
anyway, I want to say that is
3 w- e* q$ k$ D& |6 {who is supposed to be protected by laws
  \' h. g/ ]( q& t0 Gcreators?; w2 G3 R( j  D' }' |, o& d
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market/ _. G! R8 q$ o* S9 B
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
4 I* S, l! \# g* S& l0 v7 P: [when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those; Q7 [7 g5 @! s, H2 p
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:3 D3 J% L1 r. C& d& `
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
5 C1 R9 l0 H( [) V' n
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:9 v8 L0 V. U- \, N7 C3 B

! O) u/ g6 D3 m# P/ Y我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
) m, ]& o9 S, K: f  }, N' ]唔係喎!
& |, a0 W% ^% j+ p" E9 X. d! @/ v2 b' ~古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
) |2 S& g- B- p我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!- j5 D6 j) ]8 U
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!! n7 X3 P0 w& B6 n
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事2 w( K& D  u% Y, F! u% s
一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
! ?- h0 v* u& C; A: adun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......1 P/ p+ P8 G' @
if so bad, dun download la, right?
2 I6 |+ L  |" f& r) x1 Ti am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
# e' `/ B8 g! @# Kbut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct
" m7 n& X5 [# t; e) Xno need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
7 T9 n" T/ T: tso what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society% g1 W( \$ B5 |5 Q
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........; T' p9 c: M1 |, \6 d
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!+ n% M) ~' o, F- x2 J! Y
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!
+ E! h+ {! G& C. z4 K佢又唔係殺人放火~~~: a9 \  O% t+ v! b
政府想比下馬威0的人~~* i3 y$ m( |  N2 M  e
錢就一定罰$ F5 E" S9 E' P' ]
未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,/ s# n9 m  }6 ^+ e1 I
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
. F' V1 j9 E9 s; r" t3 V) o" w8 D佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
7 p- C8 J* x' @% [8 r! i) M到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。