<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)* Q- V$ w- g, R( J3 D
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
, U6 ]( J! \0 u" p3 G/ l- p. u6 H3 i大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
2 o! K; l7 Z' h8 s, C( _4 f
I agree you points that it could be illegal" N' a! J- B7 N9 w$ S
but that is still a "gray area"
- A! T: L6 ^3 Z+ G+ Owhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
+ [& t1 ~) y5 a9 F* H" s  G# R  e5 J
anyway, I want to say that is
2 ~/ q8 ~. v2 }who is supposed to be protected by laws0 O% D! M$ |! v! Q  L* b+ d$ n
creators?
1 k3 M+ t* W$ `8 r$ ybut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
* @0 w- p% h5 n. ilet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money./ h( }( H' w; u% F
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those
+ c, y) [, Y( ^+ E1 ?Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:0 l( P6 m5 m7 u# d; S/ k
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
7 v% v4 I* ~  T我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
# K2 R7 N% K- {: D( _* G7 j( b2 [: g9 [, m# [& L2 u) k6 L
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
7 u0 P! {2 y8 S, Q
唔係喎!
" E' z3 i# u) [2 h古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
; u' b" J$ ]" W# Q/ L+ @7 k8 o我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
( c1 v8 t9 W$ w) O佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!+ G4 ~! w# s8 _9 c8 ]0 E
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事7 Y- ~' Y8 T2 E. [
一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!& v* n) _- Q' F+ v, c5 e' k% L" {
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
+ I+ p8 E7 [* V! f1 k4 Hif so bad, dun download la, right?& E. j4 s: H9 ]! T+ b, W& P6 B$ M. u
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
$ X, x0 _* C+ F/ d! Tbut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct. G: O4 _& U1 _/ w6 m4 G
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la4 ^, P3 b9 s% Y' t5 r
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
& R! d( }! d& A: G/ A" eusing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........: k! ^' M! R4 [4 e3 W, E
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
$ N$ j" F1 q4 Bso, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!2 w# W3 q; {' A; o8 Z; ~) g+ \3 M
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~: O$ c: A2 A5 U, w8 P8 M
政府想比下馬威0的人~~6 I" u. h3 S& U2 }# m
錢就一定罰
1 m. \& j3 p$ _- t未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,8 O+ ?8 V5 X# S- k0 k' h' g& N
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
# {3 [: g- v0 D' s佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?$ a7 u7 r7 y/ B6 Q
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。