<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
/ y% b+ m$ o4 @8 x% m! x0 @7 i但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:) }3 T* L, S. ~
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
' s8 @9 W4 ~9 Z5 `7 z3 Y# [I agree you points that it could be illegal
2 X2 R: h- |2 n1 s; v1 D( ]but that is still a "gray area"* Y; |" k% q% N& z5 x( }
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
" h- [1 u! n( N, `# u- {
* C3 K- [! @) c+ {3 `& _anyway, I want to say that is, P/ G1 N! O3 g8 Y6 X0 y5 n
who is supposed to be protected by laws. P& z- k5 n. j. f% j
creators?: w) f" A, ]( ]+ V/ s
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market# T2 P' `. b4 V+ _4 q
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
9 |! H0 {5 C" F) B* Rwhen we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those' m( P3 x/ q8 ]- k& d  k
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:3 X0 }0 s$ K% q* M
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
  J" k1 x- h$ P$ |  H. H) r
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:1 _7 Q, R( O* Y, B  n

* g# s- N4 B, n2 M我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
, }. w, J' \& _! a9 L2 H# z唔係喎!
: l) a+ ~3 I. Y' H, [, {9 ~/ n4 z古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!1 ^' N- ?# w' p2 c/ ?! k9 Q. ~( F
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!* t1 a- |/ U/ P$ n) A, F! I
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!( I4 S" r, y# g
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
% Y6 U1 M+ h& f) Q, a; I6 p一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!# ?2 Q4 ?" D1 V! u' r" F, V, ?
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......  B& ^6 @! N9 D$ W  q  ?1 b5 j
if so bad, dun download la, right?) |/ I  y3 Q, o
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
1 W7 s+ n0 r; K! I& C3 c1 kbut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct
% n& q! e5 ]# K! s5 ^% ?no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la- x, L/ Y/ b3 F+ f) A6 n1 H
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
2 r" v. s1 E" l+ S& z. Vusing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
  k5 Z/ N4 g  P0 K) uwhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
( L% V; |9 t: k& K# [+ T1 hso, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!
. G% ]+ f7 a* S/ s% k佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
* t2 s8 \1 k- |' v政府想比下馬威0的人~~
; J6 A  m8 i" n4 u! W4 y' v錢就一定罰
# p9 k- L; h1 e% A) E7 t未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,
% l  ?+ ?; g5 A* _% |" k$ y/ r4 E' J唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
& S% w% J2 f" ~( y; \佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?9 w$ o+ N+ z  u5 H7 Z
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。