<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
& \" O# h7 h. v. o8 Z1 J) S但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:9 q1 l1 N3 Y" Y) @# L" v% [7 X1 p4 S) ]: v
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
7 Q; r; y+ w5 ]; e) C5 V
I agree you points that it could be illegal
; G" r: M+ y% A4 k$ B1 m) _% Dbut that is still a "gray area"
5 h  x. m+ z+ f% z) H, d% ~  F% Vwhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
4 _& H, c$ S0 Z/ v/ Q5 r+ k, R( g8 L. m: L7 C  Q! V, [: V
anyway, I want to say that is
3 J  `+ W5 U* _6 |, h( @who is supposed to be protected by laws- s3 K  ?; j3 l7 J* a/ D
creators?
: U  q# R" Y$ b2 k( ^but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
9 g; M2 K* U9 qlet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
6 ~6 r9 ~* x1 ]2 c1 fwhen we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those
& B+ \# z4 G( ?4 B3 i8 e7 p- _Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:; a/ @& Y1 @* o* ?
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
) y& Y! C4 h9 `+ G( y! {! y我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:  k0 a: F- M- D4 M/ \

: g" M+ C% U( I& C" Q我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
$ d' R9 G  k. I/ d: X唔係喎!
7 p" K1 Y) J2 H/ n! K" t古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
6 h( t4 J1 `7 W4 Y我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!& d+ V+ a# O! B3 T6 N* G) q( P* z
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
8 I; ?3 \3 `! b  R7 K# N9 v, n就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事) I/ v- N8 ]  [3 R- N& b* h8 I
一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!! \/ K! A1 M  {. j  m% Y
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......  t( w3 W. G" T, m" S# q8 F% E; Q
if so bad, dun download la, right?, y, `% e4 V4 y' M" l
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^9 S! J7 i. _) g- K
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct4 E4 t0 `2 a- l
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la# I* J, ]! r- I( l* a. D# P7 x4 f
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
5 }. {. w* [6 l1 g; T+ Cusing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
5 o5 T1 M8 Y* F: y  D& Fwhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
# c, C/ ^5 {. k* k" {so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!
  z4 \2 X3 N% ?* N佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
$ P1 W$ [# E, n2 R政府想比下馬威0的人~~
& q+ R: {) {6 g4 r3 b- \/ I錢就一定罰
* j) B, y8 b6 q未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,
% n5 ~) }! W3 C4 y9 u  {" O' X- O唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
3 g7 Q, t, `& t! u" ?佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
1 ^8 n0 |( K: d. J: I# v5 }到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。