<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)! p4 _  l3 e3 I% S0 r
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:6 G" u, t+ q2 A+ ~
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
% C# p: s7 Q3 U  r  @8 tI agree you points that it could be illegal, m4 Z; K  M$ j$ m! J
but that is still a "gray area") l% d% }1 n; S5 E; W
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
3 @; Y/ K. S2 }; s/ ^) }. T, i
/ c% I/ F2 x, O! G# {anyway, I want to say that is
" @9 z. J# E! R5 s! ]$ L9 U* Jwho is supposed to be protected by laws
4 n6 J7 z: q( z$ ecreators?# E( ^, P0 K6 J" p, G2 @$ k5 G
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
5 C2 U) {! q7 W- `let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.! ?2 K4 r. {% D2 }& r" o$ B
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those1 z% F  |- @  x4 \7 _; y7 q- R+ m
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
: U  N9 D3 A6 g3 k其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
7 E: A5 K+ j/ s! F1 Z" J4 E我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:5 A  \; y+ \1 a# i; f1 _* s9 A6 g. t

) ]; u5 l  W8 l我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
# _0 R5 `/ \# k* }
唔係喎!& h9 r- }; _; @+ t" O+ b. x' k
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!4 p0 c( d; h! }( D9 D
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
- N  C: e$ a1 m5 \% W9 }$ T2 s佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
; \0 j3 A* q0 H+ q0 b就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事) K4 a0 M8 K# U* v* i' T5 n2 d
一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!1 Z. m5 P) ?& D* X6 a' P5 M0 F
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......; e" H4 k* F8 E& q8 g
if so bad, dun download la, right?
6 q) ^6 X9 M8 f0 O8 g. ], |i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
5 Q/ a% F; @* k9 a& R6 X; Jbut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct
! J$ Q- E: E6 V  O+ |2 u* T) V5 ?no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la8 u! r, l, I* o' x" @  U
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
% z1 w; D( E2 A' B+ }$ A  ausing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
5 b9 Y& W3 f' L4 }, i0 [' cwhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!/ t4 t  @* l. A! Z
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!0 C5 \8 F% f6 U/ M. w
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
0 J0 s3 r( T0 Y  Y政府想比下馬威0的人~~, T, B6 ?: D, e) x
錢就一定罰& m0 @1 Y# l# h3 p7 }/ f
未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,
: b; e& v- p" m! t9 ~唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
9 b% N3 ^/ }* h- I% M' U佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?# s9 T& A- b( ?! k( h  I3 ]
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。