<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
, v, z, U" Y  J- d) m& h5 D* e8 D+ ?# C但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:; |% v, I$ {1 I5 T3 ]
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
: C8 T3 k1 k& d2 W! BI agree you points that it could be illegal
8 e. B& r, K1 H# t3 u+ t' Dbut that is still a "gray area"
, f% T- V) _# O2 o$ Nwhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair6 J( C0 r. ^6 G/ y4 e
5 w2 X" w% V& A6 G) _/ D/ I
anyway, I want to say that is
. Z2 h4 {( z7 L9 w4 z; d8 A9 @who is supposed to be protected by laws
3 p- X3 d$ P2 K/ e6 _creators?9 [& _+ ^% P8 u; x7 P
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market5 a8 Z! u; u0 F6 G6 B
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money./ Q. q( ^+ S) u1 |) ~$ S
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those
* S# Y8 ]  u. K; P# QWhy nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:: n9 @/ c4 V* ?! X
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
3 ?% d- E$ o  k6 x7 ]我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
: p1 |5 G9 W2 k* g6 E, y- F4 \; m$ _) P3 D! [' d
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
% w& \3 q' S2 m' z4 l
唔係喎!
, U7 M+ ]+ G4 o+ q; x古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
# g  {0 ~' l+ L* \/ F; u0 [+ U; ^' t- g我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
8 Y1 C9 [! U; _# w: Y0 h佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
0 b( D2 Z6 B$ L7 u: O4 W* e" u. j就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事6 `- a$ d  k$ h/ `( o' t
一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
7 i. }1 Y/ L' |# |3 jdun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
1 c& n" ~. m- T/ i# ~- N! ^. {8 I" u9 ^if so bad, dun download la, right?+ j) i; \1 ?5 ^
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^1 w; W& o. r. [  i
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct6 F' P; W7 e5 U' n: @7 q
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
& C5 b2 G; ~- yso what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society2 s- c3 _* `" Y" A) r' ^* ?3 J4 N
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
; @" a$ B$ `' \8 Jwhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!+ S! `3 ?0 B9 M8 Z% l
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!' @% `3 T- X! K; G2 z0 w
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~" `  }5 }: U5 t, y  V6 b
政府想比下馬威0的人~~
* F' |) [; i5 c8 \. m# S錢就一定罰) r+ a+ R+ m5 b" z1 L; S
未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,
& L0 M$ H+ y+ E唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
% E% _4 {; b. ]* K# D佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
8 T* G+ D, R8 @$ O# i" O- E- o到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。