 
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
1#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 顯示全部帖子
yes, it's correct.
7 T% p; o8 l" N. X; _. }/ V7 M% Y; B& ]2 q. U$ Y
according to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.
& V- t1 E* E7 `# ~' |2 w: y- }" f4 d) }) z! \9 [6 x
In the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,6 `6 i" h8 M% V5 `
and that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.
: e2 j7 J5 A9 p) K# x' |8 x+ B5 T! P6 g/ {/ E; ?9 R
so, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險
3 p {8 y' A F# u; k; f$ S) L5 t/ J/ h) N2 c+ c( Q V/ l
in 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑,
A! K! p4 z5 Z+ nat least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|