 
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
1#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 顯示全部帖子
yes, it's correct.
/ c+ M5 z& ]/ b' a
% Z2 z7 W9 ?! R( N/ [+ laccording to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.
! t( a1 _% C( m0 A8 R+ @" b% O
; @6 |. A8 g- Q# @1 QIn the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,
! b6 p/ J: k" C6 i4 \and that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.
( @& W9 w W9 j# q0 _7 x9 Z% D
! l# y4 X/ n. a! q+ ~' r& s ^: fso, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險# l8 G, i" z% q$ S/ n
! w- b' C8 u' ^
in 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑,
; ~2 o; I! U; J' uat least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|