Triangel

Originally posted by oz2 at 2008-2-5 01:33 AM:
- N, j' l# P2 n% o+ c. S1 u$ Y
6 B' K; i/ l% I9 t+ i. N那麼方案(2),ok?

( E# a8 ~$ v0 _& y) G7 }2 W% P& w% v4 O, {0 ?* t
可以帶出討論氣氛并且有討點的，我都會加分3 V2 ]/ ^2 n; B: j* s
Ok?

Triangel

Originally posted by oz2 at 2008-2-5 02:11 AM:$ O5 Y, @; N! g) _/ E& y6 ~( M. E

1 d- ^5 q4 g# ?- e+ \! l可能我的例子未必是好好,而且每件事... * v/ c8 F3 L3 D6 H4 i" I

1 |4 x  J% R* z% U- `( K# k[棺材]多數人認為是[不好]的東西,但它不是一件[錯]的東西;; \$ b2 o! |* N$ i( X
即使把[棺材]被放在一些不恰當地方,也是行為上的[錯],不是[棺材]的[錯]。
8 a3 b9 @/ m0 G& n+ L- o

$ f) H1 T1 p  N% K. C4 E# a4 X6 k9 T
嘩，敢既例子你都稔到

Triangel

Originally posted by SWK at 2008-2-5 02:20 AM:, z" @+ I& U' p: o' s. S4 T+ i

0 f' g% b& ~" {/ n" F你啲舉例好似有啲"格硬理" 咁唔係你既錯 只係你舉例得不好

  f  e; U/ A6 l4 `
& U/ Q4 N+ N5 f0 u應該係：【格硬黎】， 唔係： ［格硬理］

Triangel

Originally posted by oz2 at 2008-2-5 02:42 AM:( l/ D. H1 u  h+ g9 z& ^+ Z% m

' _' ]& e4 z' \6 L! R多謝你見意,也令到我又有另一見解:% x/ h* F9 P. A2 Q' M9 u

2 Q9 s" c, }2 |9 w# [% b: o( _不希望因為此帖而令到會員之間產生罵戰; S: T4 d7 J) @* p5 u5 s1 Q. y8 Z# ?
...

7 R* \0 n8 L9 l4 E( T
9 n$ L( d) O1 h4 K- Z放心，我相信 SWK姐姐唔係敢既意義, right?

Triangel

Originally posted by s20021601 at 2008-2-5 09:10 AM:5 x9 S2 h- T, N. |
我就覺得「不好」同「錯」呢個關係......
( J# M0 e4 y" f3 h# E" @哈哈..講到連我自己都唔係幾明tim...
( a: v, t4 p: k, s6 p  A還望大家見諒
6 ~- z& c+ v7 l3 e

( {$ ]9 Z$ }" u9 y9 ?( L: A5 t0 \6 Y+ V* T5 b5 F; N" ^; |6 q6 n
s2002, 我真係睇極都吾明

Triangel

Originally posted by yeung hiu he at 2008-2-5 09:47 AM:/ L# @, ?% Z6 _2 S
其實我覺得(不好) 同 (錯), 每次都連...

, Q# {9 I3 F  ~2 b' {1 E7 l7 b2 [3 E$ Q2 Q
Your point is?

Triangel

Originally posted by alanfcw at 2008-2-5 01:35 PM:
( d3 S& ?+ l# \5 H- Z& w3 h9 |9 e$ J' L不好同錯 2樣野黎 我覺得  E: E. V2 m2 y, ^5 Z
8 }5 z! |7 \/ B; D: Q( g
媽媽見我做得唔好既野未必打你,如做功課呀* W5 @& v9 c+ ~; E

# I8 ^9 w+ P9 j+ r) C: j但係錯既野佢一定會打你,如你同人打架

4 f+ E4 J4 q7 C0 w1 o2 }
* l! U  S* }, \/ D你咪幸福咯!: ]5 S8 S* i: s! U
我老頂見我做得唔好, 未必打我, 不過話以後都吾駛我做啦, 死末!% ~% l; N9 |! Y0 G# N5 Z
但係做錯野, 佢一定都吾會打我, 不過要揾過份工啫!