Triangel

Originally posted by oz2 at 2008-2-5 01:33 AM:# t( i, {& ~5 [

6 u; ]: w; P+ V7 m2 J" R* P( C那麼方案(2),ok?

; Q5 [  R2 l% Y/ P; S6 Z
! G7 ?7 H% \! h5 `4 ]7 K/ F
可以帶出討論氣氛并且有討點的，我都會加分; ~4 y9 q: x4 B! L
Ok?

Triangel

Originally posted by oz2 at 2008-2-5 02:11 AM:2 {4 K( m4 z) i

& P7 \' E6 H  P: I3 R可能我的例子未必是好好,而且每件事... & D: ]* B0 v4 w4 U) @. s- f

0 U# H6 m7 C9 \) N1 y[棺材]多數人認為是[不好]的東西,但它不是一件[錯]的東西;* |7 B& k0 \6 J  P
即使把[棺材]被放在一些不恰當地方,也是行為上的[錯],不是[棺材]的[錯]。! H% G" N3 ^% J7 v

2 Z. u* b0 @: o  ^9 d9 \0 b" T. d, a5 x9 u2 h% R; R9 K- n
嘩，敢既例子你都稔到

Triangel

Originally posted by SWK at 2008-2-5 02:20 AM:
/ `! C9 b0 m6 e/ F5 ^! o/ @, ~
6 i0 O% t' g2 D* T8 i' @你啲舉例好似有啲"格硬理" 咁唔係你既錯 只係你舉例得不好

4 l4 S' v$ O1 y5 b
- {+ j# d- a2 X1 O# r" z
應該係：【格硬黎】， 唔係： ［格硬理］

Triangel

Originally posted by oz2 at 2008-2-5 02:42 AM:& a4 I9 x8 I0 U! x) Q& }
, ?2 T$ L3 E4 j' @5 m
多謝你見意,也令到我又有另一見解:$ r3 r1 k( P$ I/ Z2 D& M3 F8 S# J* r

0 Y7 F3 \" F0 [1 |# E1 r不希望因為此帖而令到會員之間產生罵戰
- ~7 t" S+ i1 j' x% X* f3 }...

7 C9 b( @/ S8 Q* t; w2 c! ]& ?" h, {, x
放心，我相信 SWK姐姐唔係敢既意義, right?

Triangel

Originally posted by s20021601 at 2008-2-5 09:10 AM:+ A! X9 v1 ]7 {9 T$ w
我就覺得「不好」同「錯」呢個關係......) M8 _3 V9 }" B
哈哈..講到連我自己都唔係幾明tim...7 ?/ I8 d+ ~) V  m: A, Z7 r0 b
還望大家見諒
3 t# S* y( S4 M8 A6 L

. ?, K8 \4 C* X6 ]. h' S0 d/ I3 `' w

6 R0 B) k$ s* v( W& q. {' u" D' }8 Ls2002, 我真係睇極都吾明

Triangel

Originally posted by yeung hiu he at 2008-2-5 09:47 AM:
  x! E' X' r) {/ ?其實我覺得(不好) 同 (錯), 每次都連...

6 I( \# ^3 l/ Q7 E
- s8 z; q9 k" c
Your point is?

Triangel

Originally posted by alanfcw at 2008-2-5 01:35 PM:" ^9 }5 W% H2 Y' d/ V# n
不好同錯 2樣野黎 我覺得& l" i. p! @' ?& W. \

0 V) D% h. f2 g媽媽見我做得唔好既野未必打你,如做功課呀
2 x3 V0 o+ j) e# H' z0 Q0 J. S: x0 E
4 x% \, Y; G8 \5 A但係錯既野佢一定會打你,如你同人打架

' x9 B3 R: B8 i3 e
6 s1 v# R! ~) N! E你咪幸福咯!
" y1 U1 S& h/ y- R6 {5 _我老頂見我做得唔好, 未必打我, 不過話以後都吾駛我做啦, 死末!
1 j# J- S0 |0 j  f8 e1 y但係做錯野, 佢一定都吾會打我, 不過要揾過份工啫!