Triangel

Originally posted by oz2 at 2008-2-5 01:33 AM:
: E" D: d) e' `8 x  X4 l
. m+ N0 G; X& g/ b8 R4 o" E- C那麼方案(2),ok?

1 l/ L0 y; e4 X. B& P3 b
8 ~) F% Z- C, Z7 G& q
可以帶出討論氣氛并且有討點的，我都會加分
( v' Y; R- e2 m1 `5 lOk?

Triangel

Originally posted by oz2 at 2008-2-5 02:11 AM:0 G+ a' f4 k7 K" S+ \' b+ Y" ~

& q8 C1 k- k! q7 f可能我的例子未必是好好,而且每件事... ! q2 V+ i+ T# {7 C9 O$ E9 x

* r" P- E3 H8 k( v$ r+ Y" K[棺材]多數人認為是[不好]的東西,但它不是一件[錯]的東西;2 H; |: c+ e7 f/ }8 x* h2 m  f
即使把[棺材]被放在一些不恰當地方,也是行為上的[錯],不是[棺材]的[錯]。
! Z6 B' v  b* \% `2 ]& |

) J* [/ e; b% ]# e0 ~( u

4 l) \, q( {/ V嘩，敢既例子你都稔到

Triangel

Originally posted by SWK at 2008-2-5 02:20 AM:% X5 c  r) ~) G2 K& J9 p2 m
/ s* i1 M) w1 U; O
你啲舉例好似有啲"格硬理" 咁唔係你既錯 只係你舉例得不好

3 m6 `2 P$ Y" n& c8 J& V/ X. @; c
' m( x- W; z/ \+ e% u
應該係：【格硬黎】， 唔係： ［格硬理］

Triangel

Originally posted by oz2 at 2008-2-5 02:42 AM:5 W1 E0 j1 i; N& x. s

. |. t# P& p2 p) j多謝你見意,也令到我又有另一見解:9 J7 W! x# G- `5 ]* m7 s5 z

3 Z' `9 n6 M  Z( \不希望因為此帖而令到會員之間產生罵戰
5 f! L& h, g+ ^/ U...

0 E' i4 K4 B! K3 a) U
% {4 J" _) [; I( i# f/ ]
放心，我相信 SWK姐姐唔係敢既意義, right?

Triangel

Originally posted by s20021601 at 2008-2-5 09:10 AM:
# ^0 k% o; [. p3 C. V  k+ }我就覺得「不好」同「錯」呢個關係......
' Q4 H3 B0 P7 L4 u1 ]哈哈..講到連我自己都唔係幾明tim...2 [. _3 L/ m( V' x. i& R# a
還望大家見諒, |8 N0 {# `* ?

) }4 H* j5 r! b& c
5 D: W5 O/ J, Y# r/ ^+ gs2002, 我真係睇極都吾明

Triangel

Originally posted by yeung hiu he at 2008-2-5 09:47 AM:7 X9 K2 m, Q2 Q  ~: ~+ G
其實我覺得(不好) 同 (錯), 每次都連...

3 M# L5 K+ A% B2 B: U
% `$ M* a# U9 S* _7 l0 JYour point is?

Triangel

Originally posted by alanfcw at 2008-2-5 01:35 PM:
# [) m6 f& z5 D1 @& Y! B' H不好同錯 2樣野黎 我覺得
& b# n* |5 g6 ?  i1 F9 N& O# |3 k6 N* c5 J9 ?
媽媽見我做得唔好既野未必打你,如做功課呀9 [4 E  r3 U+ {7 ^) x- B) u$ ?

7 s! Y7 m. H9 t3 E/ J4 Y* W但係錯既野佢一定會打你,如你同人打架

8 e/ p. ?2 i6 B% t/ ?
1 G# i. b1 a# i6 v7 m6 p
你咪幸福咯!
" Q7 g4 ^  n/ J  m& Y2 `% ~我老頂見我做得唔好, 未必打我, 不過話以後都吾駛我做啦, 死末!
" Q1 G- ]$ V9 ?5 [但係做錯野, 佢一定都吾會打我, 不過要揾過份工啫!