 
- 帖子
- 199
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 102
- 魅力
- 3
- 讚好
- 0
|
3#
發表於 2007-5-18 09:12 PM
| 顯示全部帖子
Originally posted by shehboy at 2007-5-18 07:35 PM:
* s) |3 H% U2 {- F& M. n( h
) J$ @1 ?3 U3 C
) _% F$ `5 O% h' A+ G同意.
' r n. Y% C3 [* V5 N1 T* k2 C但呢度講緊既唔係外面好多... 4 Z) z3 f3 B) ]5 Y/ i2 Q8 i
, O% m2 z; [3 h7 {$ p4 q! dI do respect CU students' good heart on this, but with their limited ability, the have created a lot of troubles.
" J& P5 e; J1 s7 J1 b: [- _Your analysis is partly right, but i dont agree they did it for "為左搞噱頭" and you other subjective view against those students
8 Y9 H# J2 X' eI dont know if you have even been into publishing business, but I can tell you, it is not simply copy and paste from you Microsoft Word, every article they have published they have put a lot of effort into it. If they simply 為左搞噱頭 there are many things for them to do besides publishing newspaper articles.
0 r8 u) M# m# D, TAs a commentator like us, we always simply looks at the result. If we want to become a good commentator, we need to look further down as we can reach the core of the matter.
2 r7 D% u* {3 ]2 N) q0 l2 Y6 T: ~# t9 b- ?+ v8 M/ i$ f
1) In my opinion, contrary to the gov. decision, i do not think think CU has breach any law9 ] s: d3 W9 m7 y* V5 V
2) In my opinion, I do think they are in good faith when they conduct the newspaper' r% {( j6 q- d8 C, R
3) Also, in my opinion, CU students did not put enough consideration to look into the possible consequences as their work has published2 w H# k( N& q
1 c" a% f1 o, W& m
Thanks for reading this long ass boring reply |
|