|
 
- 帖子
- 199
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 102
- 魅力
- 3
- 讚好
- 0
|
3#
發表於 2007-5-18 09:12 PM
| 顯示全部帖子
Originally posted by shehboy at 2007-5-18 07:35 PM:
0 C' z" U8 G3 }- n7 Z& Y
9 ^) h( j) }! P" ^) _5 u; h8 C8 ]7 |. h4 `" J6 w2 _3 m9 q: e
同意.1 }9 @8 O% l6 i4 _8 w# l2 o
但呢度講緊既唔係外面好多... * N6 r6 r! B) R% l* _
' C- g# @2 v3 O
I do respect CU students' good heart on this, but with their limited ability, the have created a lot of troubles.' V# z5 P4 n9 \( Q0 E" z9 L
Your analysis is partly right, but i dont agree they did it for "為左搞噱頭" and you other subjective view against those students0 `8 l/ f6 i. |# D6 T# I- c0 b
I dont know if you have even been into publishing business, but I can tell you, it is not simply copy and paste from you Microsoft Word, every article they have published they have put a lot of effort into it. If they simply 為左搞噱頭 there are many things for them to do besides publishing newspaper articles.( ^9 r( Z6 w9 o, y6 ~# O, M s& {
As a commentator like us, we always simply looks at the result. If we want to become a good commentator, we need to look further down as we can reach the core of the matter.
( m9 v) r# Q( A$ W. @+ q; _
: N+ u2 F# k; g. u5 n1) In my opinion, contrary to the gov. decision, i do not think think CU has breach any law
S4 d" G0 y, D0 U( R Q2) In my opinion, I do think they are in good faith when they conduct the newspaper4 X) J) F, C0 h
3) Also, in my opinion, CU students did not put enough consideration to look into the possible consequences as their work has published
, Q5 `5 u9 c w7 l' |. t- j; Y. K# U% H
Thanks for reading this long ass boring reply |
|