|
  
- 帖子
- 706
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 316
- 魅力
- 150
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
12#
發表於 2008-10-8 07:03 PM
| 只看該作者
i thought it is the reason of rate of return.7 I2 l0 f, u9 T( f2 }
CDs could have different ratings, AAA -> F,
, i# c$ b0 U' p8 Amore risky ones would have higher premium (interest rate) as a compensation for an investment.- q/ Q% ~* _, Q, o! v/ N
main reason why ppl buy those risky CDs is because the rate of return exceeds their internal rate of return,
+ b2 m* z3 {, h) ?7 X6 }3 B& r8 F" kin other words, the interest rate of that investment > their required interest rate, therefore they invest in those securities.5 F6 G6 Z3 z# j7 G9 ` ^1 K
Also, fund managers would include risky assets in their portfolio for different purposes, eg efficiency.- l: b1 l6 v" L9 L2 G- X
similar to bonds, CDs trading in the secondary market have different value at different times,
8 |6 }- o2 `$ F9 @; ]. vnormally the value is calculated by adding it's principle and interest.
3 j6 u3 y' z; \8 u$ n& d# eeg. the value of the mortgage+the interests to be recieved in the future. & u7 \. F. J# O5 K$ P: {
banks who sell the CDs, could enjoy a few benefits like, the present value of cash and passing the risk of holding a debt to another party.0 P# e$ A4 |6 Z$ N
$ G6 _% M0 x' G7 L* J3 {im not quite sure if the multiplier effect does really matter in this case.* d$ J! f0 D- W1 q+ R: f. r
in stock market, it's the demand and supply pushing the price up/downwards.
! Q+ C# v6 `( t& w' fFor eg, A bought 10000 shares @10$ ; B sells 20000 shares to C @ $12,
8 J8 h! A# j/ y g7 |! \$ k5 VA's shares would suddenly increase to $120000 from $100000 which does not invlove any $ transaction./ c5 ^. l9 ^& ~, o. A" Y6 b
The capital loss that ppl suffer nowadays, i believe, most of them does not really suffer a real $ lost yet as long as they dont sell their securities.
) A: ?. A m7 M- Q& gbut the value of their assets did really drop significantly.
2 ]3 b, w$ K. U/ t, f( ?4 V1 {
; s$ U# f8 k; Q. r$ U( ~/ H$ s[ 本帖最後由 Kev 於 2008-10-8 07:26 PM 編輯 ] |
|