|
  
- 帖子
- 706
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 316
- 魅力
- 150
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
12#
發表於 2008-10-8 07:03 PM
| 只看該作者
i thought it is the reason of rate of return.' Z* W. m, b: n8 o! U( S- g# g5 ?
CDs could have different ratings, AAA -> F,
2 [4 ?* k; O& f. Y0 B4 k$ Bmore risky ones would have higher premium (interest rate) as a compensation for an investment.
1 i* D3 b) a( \, R) C. ?- S0 S1 Amain reason why ppl buy those risky CDs is because the rate of return exceeds their internal rate of return,9 v$ a; ?3 k% t$ E% j
in other words, the interest rate of that investment > their required interest rate, therefore they invest in those securities.
4 p! v# g, l0 G7 g/ jAlso, fund managers would include risky assets in their portfolio for different purposes, eg efficiency.3 o6 {9 Q; @: P
similar to bonds, CDs trading in the secondary market have different value at different times,# Q8 O. w1 _8 }4 W& K, Y
normally the value is calculated by adding it's principle and interest.
( Z7 G, Q7 t( w1 l9 H2 U# Meg. the value of the mortgage+the interests to be recieved in the future.
) ~0 Z' O1 J. A G9 o& x8 obanks who sell the CDs, could enjoy a few benefits like, the present value of cash and passing the risk of holding a debt to another party.
+ ?; l2 h4 C) W( n* a, ]8 F* L4 p: _- ]# {2 R' v0 {- ?) @
im not quite sure if the multiplier effect does really matter in this case.
: y$ K$ w, T$ J) D8 K" Din stock market, it's the demand and supply pushing the price up/downwards.: _* a' _- @1 f' \: w
For eg, A bought 10000 shares @10$ ; B sells 20000 shares to C @ $12,4 N+ Y3 h% @* C9 I% ^
A's shares would suddenly increase to $120000 from $100000 which does not invlove any $ transaction.8 D. @- u% S- K6 o5 v9 v
The capital loss that ppl suffer nowadays, i believe, most of them does not really suffer a real $ lost yet as long as they dont sell their securities. * T& j( f# o5 t( K
but the value of their assets did really drop significantly.- J( V, G6 E4 H8 W4 Y0 M5 y
" L2 a" R2 o; d! J9 k# P7 l+ H: x[ 本帖最後由 Kev 於 2008-10-8 07:26 PM 編輯 ] |
|