|
  
- 帖子
- 706
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 316
- 魅力
- 150
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
12#
發表於 2008-10-8 07:03 PM
| 只看該作者
i thought it is the reason of rate of return.
# _$ T; U2 {( h( v4 KCDs could have different ratings, AAA -> F,0 w; s9 ?9 K7 `6 l/ ?
more risky ones would have higher premium (interest rate) as a compensation for an investment.
" y) V% x3 T+ @- |2 nmain reason why ppl buy those risky CDs is because the rate of return exceeds their internal rate of return,
8 P D( r* w: U4 Jin other words, the interest rate of that investment > their required interest rate, therefore they invest in those securities.$ ~9 ~" I' @5 P
Also, fund managers would include risky assets in their portfolio for different purposes, eg efficiency." l9 p% e6 F" A) t4 U& D
similar to bonds, CDs trading in the secondary market have different value at different times,7 T4 |+ ]* v* {5 B. c x9 E
normally the value is calculated by adding it's principle and interest.
5 S# C; T1 t- X0 s. B2 M# Xeg. the value of the mortgage+the interests to be recieved in the future. 8 r+ G9 Q+ P- X+ j8 K, M
banks who sell the CDs, could enjoy a few benefits like, the present value of cash and passing the risk of holding a debt to another party.
1 u$ v4 N5 k9 `) u( N6 m) ]$ c6 G& s& S5 b- ^4 a1 [! W
im not quite sure if the multiplier effect does really matter in this case.
* R* v# F I( [( \4 n+ f7 H" S1 Bin stock market, it's the demand and supply pushing the price up/downwards.
+ A; d( b0 n$ t5 B1 k% t( r/ JFor eg, A bought 10000 shares @10$ ; B sells 20000 shares to C @ $12,& l4 r# O3 R% [; o# G
A's shares would suddenly increase to $120000 from $100000 which does not invlove any $ transaction.# _' R! D' z/ Z3 v U7 B1 _
The capital loss that ppl suffer nowadays, i believe, most of them does not really suffer a real $ lost yet as long as they dont sell their securities. ' M/ X- e8 y L5 d" Q
but the value of their assets did really drop significantly.
y$ s1 A( f: d+ c2 r5 H) `; Z# n2 V% k" f) B# r2 I: f
[ 本帖最後由 Kev 於 2008-10-8 07:26 PM 編輯 ] |
|