|
  
- 帖子
- 706
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 316
- 魅力
- 150
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
12#
發表於 2008-10-8 07:03 PM
| 只看該作者
i thought it is the reason of rate of return.# @ U; I2 q. y3 F5 Z- @, _' W
CDs could have different ratings, AAA -> F,
* g g1 q. Z% c( ]) `more risky ones would have higher premium (interest rate) as a compensation for an investment.
- |: T; q2 j9 c, S/ Smain reason why ppl buy those risky CDs is because the rate of return exceeds their internal rate of return, B/ c2 h/ w& l/ z
in other words, the interest rate of that investment > their required interest rate, therefore they invest in those securities.
2 a5 T( n! n" u6 `Also, fund managers would include risky assets in their portfolio for different purposes, eg efficiency.- J j u, a* W4 p+ B7 K
similar to bonds, CDs trading in the secondary market have different value at different times,% ?$ N! i- T+ x' t
normally the value is calculated by adding it's principle and interest.
: U( m+ l( R6 [& p9 r1 Q! [eg. the value of the mortgage+the interests to be recieved in the future. : g q9 _( ~* _+ W1 ?! U8 c( b. {$ Z
banks who sell the CDs, could enjoy a few benefits like, the present value of cash and passing the risk of holding a debt to another party.* j, Y1 l$ D6 R- o7 H# t4 H
" ?% Q0 B: H" a( x" a$ E; t* w
im not quite sure if the multiplier effect does really matter in this case.
8 A; G; C) O5 {0 e0 [# e& Yin stock market, it's the demand and supply pushing the price up/downwards.
- ^: f' f; x+ v& ~4 h8 ^For eg, A bought 10000 shares @10$ ; B sells 20000 shares to C @ $12,4 K# P% c5 R, L9 M; v6 ~: `- h
A's shares would suddenly increase to $120000 from $100000 which does not invlove any $ transaction.
+ F( {" p/ T4 \% D1 H# ^0 XThe capital loss that ppl suffer nowadays, i believe, most of them does not really suffer a real $ lost yet as long as they dont sell their securities.
5 x; K5 ^9 K9 s, C+ pbut the value of their assets did really drop significantly.
% ]* Z$ |6 a! T0 L8 n' B7 |4 o: h2 u' `* K$ E. R8 k% [
[ 本帖最後由 Kev 於 2008-10-8 07:26 PM 編輯 ] |
|