|
  
- 帖子
- 706
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 316
- 魅力
- 150
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
12#
發表於 2008-10-8 07:03 PM
| 只看該作者
i thought it is the reason of rate of return.
2 N3 d& |, H* gCDs could have different ratings, AAA -> F,
7 p6 x4 {7 g5 E# C r3 Xmore risky ones would have higher premium (interest rate) as a compensation for an investment.0 N' V4 I/ ~/ d8 M8 g, Y4 T% _
main reason why ppl buy those risky CDs is because the rate of return exceeds their internal rate of return,& l8 l3 Y/ l( h7 j8 r
in other words, the interest rate of that investment > their required interest rate, therefore they invest in those securities.) Q+ ^9 U' G; W
Also, fund managers would include risky assets in their portfolio for different purposes, eg efficiency.
4 f) t, C; j& Rsimilar to bonds, CDs trading in the secondary market have different value at different times,8 r, V0 x% ?/ a! f
normally the value is calculated by adding it's principle and interest. ! p, L9 m: _/ z3 J3 S" N
eg. the value of the mortgage+the interests to be recieved in the future. 0 Q9 V' v, n+ A9 b1 h
banks who sell the CDs, could enjoy a few benefits like, the present value of cash and passing the risk of holding a debt to another party./ K) H" C" v& B1 @! x1 n$ Q; W
: ~" U0 e: Q% A8 R vim not quite sure if the multiplier effect does really matter in this case.
1 Z# d2 a$ ]' Y9 s" z" qin stock market, it's the demand and supply pushing the price up/downwards.& J( _: P A- N
For eg, A bought 10000 shares @10$ ; B sells 20000 shares to C @ $12,
+ r# ^. I) [. H+ g9 w( e/ U1 dA's shares would suddenly increase to $120000 from $100000 which does not invlove any $ transaction./ H0 i- [6 x$ O u
The capital loss that ppl suffer nowadays, i believe, most of them does not really suffer a real $ lost yet as long as they dont sell their securities. ! S6 W, r! j& a. V5 j
but the value of their assets did really drop significantly.) ^) G! D& c1 q5 ~% a
: C! E- U0 S* h! l[ 本帖最後由 Kev 於 2008-10-8 07:26 PM 編輯 ] |
|