|
  
- 帖子
- 706
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 316
- 魅力
- 150
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
12#
發表於 2008-10-8 07:03 PM
| 只看該作者
i thought it is the reason of rate of return.7 h' X& ~4 p* k5 x( N+ c. B
CDs could have different ratings, AAA -> F, e- w; v7 w; g7 i8 ]; D
more risky ones would have higher premium (interest rate) as a compensation for an investment.4 e: ]( t& d" d1 R9 n; E
main reason why ppl buy those risky CDs is because the rate of return exceeds their internal rate of return,! a, t t4 j7 P) s' a
in other words, the interest rate of that investment > their required interest rate, therefore they invest in those securities.
, Z! ?) q* X: y* D$ B3 Y" cAlso, fund managers would include risky assets in their portfolio for different purposes, eg efficiency.5 k) l. ^$ W0 ~( W# x' j
similar to bonds, CDs trading in the secondary market have different value at different times,
: }" i! E; T1 `% F z; H& znormally the value is calculated by adding it's principle and interest.
) U9 F# m& n) O$ f4 g! l# Yeg. the value of the mortgage+the interests to be recieved in the future.
( |5 a/ ^7 w" b. l# ~' q [banks who sell the CDs, could enjoy a few benefits like, the present value of cash and passing the risk of holding a debt to another party.9 c& z: L( ?, [; m" b: U7 u6 z
. Q0 @/ [9 H% r5 J1 c# ^" Lim not quite sure if the multiplier effect does really matter in this case.
4 ^6 `0 m8 J; d" Xin stock market, it's the demand and supply pushing the price up/downwards. f) q4 r5 p/ i# ^$ L& F
For eg, A bought 10000 shares @10$ ; B sells 20000 shares to C @ $12,
; {0 i6 ?& Z6 d6 lA's shares would suddenly increase to $120000 from $100000 which does not invlove any $ transaction.
( X% N. d+ u. C7 aThe capital loss that ppl suffer nowadays, i believe, most of them does not really suffer a real $ lost yet as long as they dont sell their securities.
3 E Z n" Z- W! M: R6 Abut the value of their assets did really drop significantly./ f- o6 L, l$ w
. ~, o$ H# `7 p1 k
[ 本帖最後由 Kev 於 2008-10-8 07:26 PM 編輯 ] |
|