|
  
- 帖子
- 706
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 316
- 魅力
- 150
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
12#
發表於 2008-10-8 07:03 PM
| 只看該作者
i thought it is the reason of rate of return. Z0 V" X' B* @# b8 y0 K% v
CDs could have different ratings, AAA -> F,
z. f8 B, Q- H, ?5 E6 u0 Z( emore risky ones would have higher premium (interest rate) as a compensation for an investment.
6 n0 J* _9 E9 P0 T( o: Emain reason why ppl buy those risky CDs is because the rate of return exceeds their internal rate of return,: ~+ V, H7 z2 t) M0 \, B
in other words, the interest rate of that investment > their required interest rate, therefore they invest in those securities.
/ ~0 {) ?( K5 J' O2 [0 W9 Q$ sAlso, fund managers would include risky assets in their portfolio for different purposes, eg efficiency.) {" F6 j+ E# L/ t
similar to bonds, CDs trading in the secondary market have different value at different times,
" ?1 m: ]) L4 [" ~( s/ Fnormally the value is calculated by adding it's principle and interest. ; a' N, C0 G: X+ v. {$ e3 b% z* w
eg. the value of the mortgage+the interests to be recieved in the future.
0 Q% f& y. g/ ~7 s7 Nbanks who sell the CDs, could enjoy a few benefits like, the present value of cash and passing the risk of holding a debt to another party.( U+ K( C( v& ?+ a4 d
" Z1 j! y0 Q# t, i3 I8 v* f! a; I2 Mim not quite sure if the multiplier effect does really matter in this case." I. _: O; n0 ^* ]5 j- U. a
in stock market, it's the demand and supply pushing the price up/downwards.
. m: k: e# d. q# ~For eg, A bought 10000 shares @10$ ; B sells 20000 shares to C @ $12,! S+ |* {+ g5 I; a1 B; T/ Y. Z
A's shares would suddenly increase to $120000 from $100000 which does not invlove any $ transaction.( Y$ ?+ \% p; C5 M. I5 E
The capital loss that ppl suffer nowadays, i believe, most of them does not really suffer a real $ lost yet as long as they dont sell their securities.
4 K9 ], |) q# g" ?8 S/ v& Ubut the value of their assets did really drop significantly.$ \6 v" W; J$ v+ j& V
0 W4 \* o" C8 ]# K. U, y
[ 本帖最後由 Kev 於 2008-10-8 07:26 PM 編輯 ] |
|