|
  
- 帖子
- 706
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 316
- 魅力
- 150
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
12#
發表於 2008-10-8 07:03 PM
| 只看該作者
i thought it is the reason of rate of return.* e. S% X7 c S9 \0 Y0 U- I
CDs could have different ratings, AAA -> F,
6 y9 p4 |' V' h e7 C+ c9 ]5 Amore risky ones would have higher premium (interest rate) as a compensation for an investment.3 k+ o6 { a! s5 a l
main reason why ppl buy those risky CDs is because the rate of return exceeds their internal rate of return,0 D, E, v7 [& k& M7 c8 C
in other words, the interest rate of that investment > their required interest rate, therefore they invest in those securities.! _0 v, K6 G* i" Y+ G
Also, fund managers would include risky assets in their portfolio for different purposes, eg efficiency.
5 P( \* h0 [3 c' u! V* M- b- U. Msimilar to bonds, CDs trading in the secondary market have different value at different times,
5 j1 S2 J9 E, U. [) |normally the value is calculated by adding it's principle and interest.
$ H- j% W* d V) |0 U# f# Teg. the value of the mortgage+the interests to be recieved in the future. 1 t J0 }. F1 ~8 L
banks who sell the CDs, could enjoy a few benefits like, the present value of cash and passing the risk of holding a debt to another party.
, t! r! j& T; m
" Z; Y) x/ h- a( G, D- ] sim not quite sure if the multiplier effect does really matter in this case.0 `+ k9 U3 f( q6 R; M
in stock market, it's the demand and supply pushing the price up/downwards.
9 K& p$ y( P' a- h+ m6 NFor eg, A bought 10000 shares @10$ ; B sells 20000 shares to C @ $12, w" ]# T3 [+ l6 r
A's shares would suddenly increase to $120000 from $100000 which does not invlove any $ transaction.% P& w0 L6 b V; v, h0 D9 g
The capital loss that ppl suffer nowadays, i believe, most of them does not really suffer a real $ lost yet as long as they dont sell their securities. ( H& P2 P: ?( F, g) x/ k
but the value of their assets did really drop significantly.( W. J" ~/ k, f* l+ ?4 L& b* L, S$ F
3 t( K y2 g7 [& T! v9 d; k8 g
[ 本帖最後由 Kev 於 2008-10-8 07:26 PM 編輯 ] |
|