|
  
- 帖子
- 706
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 316
- 魅力
- 150
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
12#
發表於 2008-10-8 07:03 PM
| 只看該作者
i thought it is the reason of rate of return.( h" }6 R1 O2 C: q1 s
CDs could have different ratings, AAA -> F,. i0 T* D5 o& `3 \9 @
more risky ones would have higher premium (interest rate) as a compensation for an investment.
( G# a7 s& p3 K* D1 X& Hmain reason why ppl buy those risky CDs is because the rate of return exceeds their internal rate of return,1 `* o1 W, l6 J8 C# \
in other words, the interest rate of that investment > their required interest rate, therefore they invest in those securities.
9 [; l# }+ s7 P$ YAlso, fund managers would include risky assets in their portfolio for different purposes, eg efficiency.8 G( L( R, I% \3 x* M) l
similar to bonds, CDs trading in the secondary market have different value at different times,0 \% {+ O0 F1 b) x4 o6 X
normally the value is calculated by adding it's principle and interest. 0 P! U# b5 \/ I K3 }% l
eg. the value of the mortgage+the interests to be recieved in the future. + n! j+ R' q$ V9 u9 L
banks who sell the CDs, could enjoy a few benefits like, the present value of cash and passing the risk of holding a debt to another party./ w, L5 p7 A9 w; w9 Z; O0 I1 C& j
' c1 n" ?' M# \3 \; o) J) L l
im not quite sure if the multiplier effect does really matter in this case.; Z9 }+ p& A3 ]! U, P9 V6 H
in stock market, it's the demand and supply pushing the price up/downwards.
* d4 ]0 g" o$ w) }1 C: B3 qFor eg, A bought 10000 shares @10$ ; B sells 20000 shares to C @ $12,
- k3 q: X4 h7 Z% W$ [7 hA's shares would suddenly increase to $120000 from $100000 which does not invlove any $ transaction.' v4 u9 i) Q' `' @+ W
The capital loss that ppl suffer nowadays, i believe, most of them does not really suffer a real $ lost yet as long as they dont sell their securities.
! v9 k5 m1 ^' M6 X9 ubut the value of their assets did really drop significantly.
0 A8 ~& z; Z# Q( N9 S. p G
. Q9 E. H- u6 p ]+ m l[ 本帖最後由 Kev 於 2008-10-8 07:26 PM 編輯 ] |
|