|
  
- 帖子
- 706
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 316
- 魅力
- 150
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
12#
發表於 2008-10-8 07:03 PM
| 只看該作者
i thought it is the reason of rate of return.
# K9 V6 U& u# z9 M+ rCDs could have different ratings, AAA -> F,
- g4 [: X! a( s7 K" x( J% `more risky ones would have higher premium (interest rate) as a compensation for an investment.
% e: Q! o/ ]( [# e6 l d- amain reason why ppl buy those risky CDs is because the rate of return exceeds their internal rate of return,
: f& a3 C5 i7 o Y, ~! rin other words, the interest rate of that investment > their required interest rate, therefore they invest in those securities.
3 P! y' o5 }0 A( A! `3 M! D" hAlso, fund managers would include risky assets in their portfolio for different purposes, eg efficiency.
. \: e% Q: c( N; `9 q1 o9 ]: }similar to bonds, CDs trading in the secondary market have different value at different times,/ s& g% e1 i5 k
normally the value is calculated by adding it's principle and interest.
" T4 I+ o. s& t4 Meg. the value of the mortgage+the interests to be recieved in the future. / Y3 z4 c- x) v
banks who sell the CDs, could enjoy a few benefits like, the present value of cash and passing the risk of holding a debt to another party.
( I0 ^: ~2 j$ J1 i0 C
, m; l; s- c$ ^# ]" m# W$ Wim not quite sure if the multiplier effect does really matter in this case.; O0 m; r& T' p1 C( U& F) u& [
in stock market, it's the demand and supply pushing the price up/downwards.% V9 {2 s( F7 _3 Y$ N; G
For eg, A bought 10000 shares @10$ ; B sells 20000 shares to C @ $12,+ ^* i0 ~% {- D+ b d
A's shares would suddenly increase to $120000 from $100000 which does not invlove any $ transaction.; z( m: X p r$ J. T
The capital loss that ppl suffer nowadays, i believe, most of them does not really suffer a real $ lost yet as long as they dont sell their securities.
/ R% R3 b& w7 H6 l& f0 B* I, G9 ibut the value of their assets did really drop significantly.
" w2 T* V5 H4 w/ U
* H" k; G, s1 J% Q- _5 I4 d# |; d0 d[ 本帖最後由 Kev 於 2008-10-8 07:26 PM 編輯 ] |
|