|
  
- 帖子
- 706
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 316
- 魅力
- 150
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
12#
發表於 2008-10-8 07:03 PM
| 只看該作者
i thought it is the reason of rate of return.$ E% E9 K0 Q7 d5 R3 Y
CDs could have different ratings, AAA -> F,8 a" e( z+ W( W) N3 c1 g
more risky ones would have higher premium (interest rate) as a compensation for an investment.
, Z$ l# g( Y8 e5 L1 \4 `main reason why ppl buy those risky CDs is because the rate of return exceeds their internal rate of return,
# n# U1 x1 z7 t kin other words, the interest rate of that investment > their required interest rate, therefore they invest in those securities.
1 T2 A% N& {# w0 i& t, h- W: ^Also, fund managers would include risky assets in their portfolio for different purposes, eg efficiency.
) }# R7 J3 ?% M& U6 Lsimilar to bonds, CDs trading in the secondary market have different value at different times,3 l" V/ J9 r& q7 }
normally the value is calculated by adding it's principle and interest.
3 P. M( g2 p( E4 Y$ q4 Feg. the value of the mortgage+the interests to be recieved in the future.
, Z/ A% w( F% a) J2 p: |banks who sell the CDs, could enjoy a few benefits like, the present value of cash and passing the risk of holding a debt to another party.
, k5 r' t3 Z3 O1 K3 |
, e0 Z* ^! `" z8 O& t# d* ^im not quite sure if the multiplier effect does really matter in this case.$ j* L b6 S$ d- B# ~2 e1 M0 j2 Q
in stock market, it's the demand and supply pushing the price up/downwards.
) _% }( t1 F% mFor eg, A bought 10000 shares @10$ ; B sells 20000 shares to C @ $12,
- I- {8 M: b' p4 @7 B- PA's shares would suddenly increase to $120000 from $100000 which does not invlove any $ transaction.
2 A) b% q. i" Y7 ]The capital loss that ppl suffer nowadays, i believe, most of them does not really suffer a real $ lost yet as long as they dont sell their securities. - ^4 x9 ~2 W% o2 i4 W3 d' X
but the value of their assets did really drop significantly.1 S2 w' C5 |; F
6 w6 A6 r/ [$ W$ A# P3 d6 P) o2 e% M[ 本帖最後由 Kev 於 2008-10-8 07:26 PM 編輯 ] |
|