|
  
- 帖子
- 706
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 316
- 魅力
- 150
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
12#
發表於 2008-10-8 07:03 PM
| 只看該作者
i thought it is the reason of rate of return.; ]" v" o. ?% {5 u. h
CDs could have different ratings, AAA -> F,2 s+ {5 o5 X& C9 a% V" S, e8 i
more risky ones would have higher premium (interest rate) as a compensation for an investment.0 |& n. l. V6 l' M# y' e, S6 q% I
main reason why ppl buy those risky CDs is because the rate of return exceeds their internal rate of return,
1 l+ O ^6 D' O& ~$ Xin other words, the interest rate of that investment > their required interest rate, therefore they invest in those securities.
" v( w( ^3 K) e$ O$ gAlso, fund managers would include risky assets in their portfolio for different purposes, eg efficiency.
: ~6 ?! r, y }! Zsimilar to bonds, CDs trading in the secondary market have different value at different times," {6 H' L1 }5 d$ B+ [5 R
normally the value is calculated by adding it's principle and interest. - z2 P, B# C5 ?1 ?+ n# B$ |
eg. the value of the mortgage+the interests to be recieved in the future.
9 b0 F$ z- m. J% p: w+ A$ E+ Mbanks who sell the CDs, could enjoy a few benefits like, the present value of cash and passing the risk of holding a debt to another party.7 U- ?8 O- ^& j# U# h J4 @
. P/ C, |# c- @' q4 Him not quite sure if the multiplier effect does really matter in this case.
; ^* y. ]* n- \& W( \. @# Iin stock market, it's the demand and supply pushing the price up/downwards.4 n! d) M2 U: p. l& t
For eg, A bought 10000 shares @10$ ; B sells 20000 shares to C @ $12,# X. l. f+ b" I7 I( `, e
A's shares would suddenly increase to $120000 from $100000 which does not invlove any $ transaction.
- Y* O# L& E" g; g/ e; L9 {& [The capital loss that ppl suffer nowadays, i believe, most of them does not really suffer a real $ lost yet as long as they dont sell their securities.
T! Z. L. Y( F4 r" N0 ]but the value of their assets did really drop significantly.
I' V# b( p% ]8 ~; c/ K5 z% @8 r, A4 j6 h( e: j4 D$ w
[ 本帖最後由 Kev 於 2008-10-8 07:26 PM 編輯 ] |
|