|
  
- 帖子
- 706
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 316
- 魅力
- 150
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
12#
發表於 2008-10-8 07:03 PM
| 只看該作者
i thought it is the reason of rate of return.
- j# w' r# o. J5 C7 F: y4 G3 K: ]! Y& kCDs could have different ratings, AAA -> F,! F' j, F! Y( z. G' n) v4 B
more risky ones would have higher premium (interest rate) as a compensation for an investment.: S) r0 `7 M1 o- \
main reason why ppl buy those risky CDs is because the rate of return exceeds their internal rate of return,
4 z! u1 @/ |5 i4 Hin other words, the interest rate of that investment > their required interest rate, therefore they invest in those securities.
/ ~' y$ _1 h2 h2 t( PAlso, fund managers would include risky assets in their portfolio for different purposes, eg efficiency.: T: I4 c3 H9 k* E V C4 J
similar to bonds, CDs trading in the secondary market have different value at different times,
1 r; U8 D8 H9 z( X' k3 V1 hnormally the value is calculated by adding it's principle and interest.
; `, `6 l8 ^. z* E4 w7 Aeg. the value of the mortgage+the interests to be recieved in the future.
& G7 c. a2 B3 d$ z) A8 ?banks who sell the CDs, could enjoy a few benefits like, the present value of cash and passing the risk of holding a debt to another party.+ y& [2 m0 ~, L. Z' t
$ ]6 {1 E E) {) Z$ J
im not quite sure if the multiplier effect does really matter in this case.
( O( o; R5 E3 w4 j# l6 V: t9 o5 Oin stock market, it's the demand and supply pushing the price up/downwards.
, C m- Z( R# j( y) p! {5 d+ uFor eg, A bought 10000 shares @10$ ; B sells 20000 shares to C @ $12,
5 s! K9 B$ w8 V: x% t" [: ~A's shares would suddenly increase to $120000 from $100000 which does not invlove any $ transaction.
: S; f( N9 \- [8 c1 t* m1 S6 u8 q {The capital loss that ppl suffer nowadays, i believe, most of them does not really suffer a real $ lost yet as long as they dont sell their securities.
0 c6 ~% A9 j& s9 b; Dbut the value of their assets did really drop significantly.
8 l; @) O) a0 `. \2 T6 w) K* f( j: o: M' H& A0 W
[ 本帖最後由 Kev 於 2008-10-8 07:26 PM 編輯 ] |
|