Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
) L* q" z; V+ z4 t  t  O* r5 M/ ?/ |: h; u7 k* e( o

: z5 d% R+ a7 S, v) f我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

3 B; s+ K8 c/ K; g

* T( S0 L) l# e) \In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:, Y# l4 W) g) a/ q* g
5 t" d! Q5 ?, U7 D2 Q

7 \2 n% Z' J% I! X- _In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

; z) V- c' N4 q7 Z- L6 R9 u! y
7 P0 y9 k. [7 Y- d' z7 N8 v! toh really...  g* C! p6 K$ A* y8 u
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"
8 \+ w% a6 Y! o& u# j; j- ji didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題6 s+ u8 _/ O+ N/ Q7 t! I, c1 E) Z

! S. h* d& P* m. h: a8 I- X$ U當然這是個假設性問題
6 q* @- \- t" J* D' M: d9 E3 U但將人數倍大
" `& G* }! V; e2 s例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個5 \9 w; j" P0 b& V
(情況可以換作其他)8 L2 U$ Q( c9 t. C8 _) Q
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...) E- ]- L& ~# S5 T% K% x
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...4 h( M- V) C/ l' ]1 A" S
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
, W) ^2 m) u' Z4 L# t- F絕情谷既問題...
7 G0 f3 a6 D7 ~+ b2 F# P如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
; Q0 I& v; \; C: x  h4 l* e如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

+ A8 E1 R( @+ x% T
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好7 Y) C. U- g- A
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
; c5 S3 A+ N; w7 Z, W, C: h6 D  W8 o但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
- T/ `! ?+ ]0 |( c" F好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢
* \5 f7 L0 x" d' ?! ^! v0 U  B其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢& ^$ @& W$ |' }  c% [8 O9 ?9 u
( C8 Y" a# T& u" E0 I: `# d
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
: p! F8 r# x: q6 a* C  r  M不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:3 X; w% Y6 \4 G. ^- {& g
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

; e, k: [6 e+ y

3 h8 G- [+ @! o( Whaha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣% y3 A2 T4 P2 Q& Z% e0 c
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....$ z$ q* ?0 k1 _
2 h9 Y" k2 _5 K* d; F9 c& P
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child* w* S+ I! L! I6 A( m
yes, my reason is helping more
$ {) u0 y0 `5 p$ l6 @# g. Bfor this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
) g5 R2 R' Z. e+ `* F" Mif saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
& {: |) B2 d- X/ {) [/ Hbecause no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
7 G9 n/ x5 y; z4 talso i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
+ K. n' V) `+ u8 K; q* T9 ]may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!( A' Y+ @7 s6 C) w& c5 i9 i
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~! i6 H: l3 K1 O7 Z6 \; B6 o0 A! V
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~$ h% d9 \' Z+ U5 S5 C: N" P
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~# u; N! U, O9 s
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~7 |5 A2 @) ^2 a1 n) Y
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~. `% j# ^8 W$ @) y3 L3 \4 X% e
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
1 d) t# M( g( J( _' G8 ^: u8 b: S但如果o係當時o既情況中~~! |9 A: L0 H1 Z/ s
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）