<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大). x! X6 I* D; x- ?' p; a' b
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
. {. I) ]) e; C( e. t9 ~) l大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
  v1 x* G$ q0 u  f* y
I agree you points that it could be illegal4 Q' U* S& Q: ]3 `+ p1 e5 o0 F& z
but that is still a "gray area"& d; R& W3 [. P& x7 v& z% L6 o
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
  H; L3 N1 w( i$ X/ d
' V* t' d: C% M4 v( p+ B" Ianyway, I want to say that is  P  Z0 l, t3 g! z* [
who is supposed to be protected by laws9 t/ e# _! m2 x, G
creators?
* I/ p( Y) E. v: @. R! L! v. n7 Hbut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market" [9 z/ k$ _. a
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
8 f8 v2 a5 l  f1 ~& k4 v: rwhen we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those
6 _; z6 j% c3 ~  S' m, b1 bWhy nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
  e! F5 d$ L8 [其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
+ g) Q  y9 a* f9 ~8 ~0 [9 a我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:" t8 z' \! c3 i: L3 L

2 y( E! k. `, g9 Q% ~我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
/ h; }$ I; A4 i, v唔係喎!% W" u4 x2 N9 n! O. \3 ]( _
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
, v) m2 G/ n. \; R. q8 A. x我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!9 H4 q9 i9 ~0 Z8 C( a
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!& w9 M) E; N* e) q4 d- A& U
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
7 z8 j7 `0 T/ ~" s# y- G一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!2 @" x& u; k# m3 F  A1 @
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......- Q) u: E% N4 B5 D/ J# P
if so bad, dun download la, right?
1 E3 F8 v3 `1 y2 T/ {) a; U) ^7 o( vi am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^4 o  y$ L/ v' L/ M0 Z) V7 a
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct# ?$ s" p- u6 T5 x+ K/ |
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la5 _" E7 V8 G/ F3 f* q& x: D) W5 z
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
- H  n; Y$ [& ]4 Zusing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
6 w, B7 d! u2 V$ Fwhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!0 r) d! U9 k% D, s' w
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!; ^) l! y! c0 i' b* y
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~+ ^3 R( b! f% d. ~" y+ _
政府想比下馬威0的人~~" n" E3 ?9 x/ g
錢就一定罰. P% _0 ]8 B% a) {
未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,
( Z+ f- H: Q  t& p唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?4 l( U+ @; z& C/ `, S' a
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?3 U; C' g: L( T9 g! f
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。