<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
3 k# w( {. h. s+ z! j- B0 [/ V0 f但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:2 }/ S- D% D! P5 T7 C5 E
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
& R3 Q' R3 C( b$ \: _I agree you points that it could be illegal% q3 c4 q0 x( r7 j) ?& z
but that is still a "gray area") k6 X/ n# h; r3 |8 q5 o8 B
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
0 O/ j3 ^7 A/ K
8 o- U, C2 ?8 n$ \anyway, I want to say that is. v- f4 `# k% C0 _) M
who is supposed to be protected by laws
5 N; P' k- \# Q6 w/ Icreators?6 t' ]: V# O6 r: u3 Z/ [7 U
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market/ h0 w0 h. d8 o4 Y$ x1 O
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
2 h  B3 x7 m" Z6 _* e, u; I; `5 cwhen we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those( }9 F/ ?3 D: d  R/ r* o
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
0 v  Q" K" w" g其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
( D& F9 q, J* E- D; b
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
. z9 l) q) h5 B3 a: o+ f6 ~" Y, j# K3 ^9 `% g6 B, T/ E
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
5 u/ A0 F3 m; ]8 ?2 D' |9 `8 H0 B' ^唔係喎!1 I! J/ |. _$ N7 \
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!2 Z: \$ Y- k, H( R, U* O6 {9 _- x
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!# j$ r* A; N+ d+ `, s" W
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
4 O) n) u2 L% C) I% }! n5 X3 E就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
7 j* ]5 g' |8 D" u7 z一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!/ t4 [& \0 X. [# |6 a( H; U
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......4 |0 h  f; m4 z9 F# z7 h5 S
if so bad, dun download la, right?" M5 T( ?9 `' w, P! T
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
6 ~: ~7 B, A8 m/ [$ s# Rbut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct( O% @1 v8 Q: o4 R
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la2 M# P4 Y4 H# @6 u7 E( Q$ z  y
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
6 G. \2 z1 u1 qusing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........& W* B% H6 g1 Y& u* P
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
/ a, E7 }% h# L2 xso, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!
- z- X( t' L7 r2 B佢又唔係殺人放火~~~  ?, z# I# W! w& |% j; F1 i
政府想比下馬威0的人~~
4 }2 s. w8 b1 u) f9 N: y錢就一定罰' z+ v# ^3 l) u7 g: g
未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,
0 g  L) t1 E7 }; g6 H1 i唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
4 B' E' Z* x9 n+ j2 k佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
. B( U- u0 V% c到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。