<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大): Y& V( U' w& e" Y" M$ h$ r
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
9 {, e" y* B( |% G4 S! S9 v大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
7 k$ x* |7 `" v7 ?8 \I agree you points that it could be illegal" j4 x/ w, i5 g, L
but that is still a "gray area": i7 q3 D  u: J/ Q
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
  i. D0 w! _% ~4 Y* A8 s9 b8 k
* x& J/ @3 O* e$ x2 ?4 K' ranyway, I want to say that is- N' }( y  x' S- N" y# i* M; c2 S
who is supposed to be protected by laws& Q  o- a- w. v% |7 c- c9 _- u
creators?5 t; C! R! U  _! Q
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
3 L% ?$ s1 p3 @) S  V* ^, H% v0 R# wlet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.) L) t8 e2 X9 B5 d+ w6 A
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those# g+ k) X" b7 }% j% d+ _6 j2 v6 ~
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
2 l% M( n8 D. U( V* y% S' p: ]其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
9 y) U- R' j: J$ f, a我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
+ ~- z; A; j$ O9 \. c8 `9 D; ]
% U' h& ]9 M/ Y  {' _我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
# P; G: a9 {( q" @唔係喎!
, H1 ^7 Q. C, T: n: H9 q古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
6 j, J! |8 Z% |6 w我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!9 L1 {! R. b' _6 ?
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
; P6 z1 X- @: G0 W2 [就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事$ j& I) `  A" S* G3 w* W
一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!6 O( U9 z4 A: q/ V
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......( ^( m+ V$ ^& ?5 I% {7 u( U; Y9 T
if so bad, dun download la, right?1 m& P7 I* A* V% R3 U" O* i
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
% H; o( k$ j/ g) \0 x- jbut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct
0 L6 `* c  m3 s9 b4 J- dno need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la. Z! @( q: u0 J+ ^2 @0 y2 a" @
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
! Y3 h0 G& U, ?- }2 u: Dusing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.......... b5 R% s/ b* V1 {
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
; b6 ~% t3 `4 ?# H( Cso, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!% _) e5 q+ Z  v
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~1 @! z/ b+ ]' z/ k  m
政府想比下馬威0的人~~
+ ]  I" V' o- i$ U0 V, ?8 ~錢就一定罰2 ~$ S! x9 N9 f
未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,% @8 \* C8 D; _' q
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?$ X$ U- ?4 a, \& ~+ F
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
2 Y. b0 x/ v' s+ p1 n到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。