<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
, r2 J) G2 l* l# O& U. D但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:0 r- S8 H( {  p
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
& q' l- k+ ^0 G" }5 j
I agree you points that it could be illegal. H! ?* |! m+ c1 a
but that is still a "gray area"
- `" x, S3 l& L8 b5 Vwhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair: a2 e! O* b+ E3 @- W8 g9 r
$ l2 h- O* Q  B; m7 N0 V9 ~
anyway, I want to say that is
1 C+ R0 I- B2 v! X" K* F; u6 rwho is supposed to be protected by laws$ _- B! c7 s2 r6 b( x( L7 V
creators?
0 R* x. ^5 s( h6 A$ `" N  Jbut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
4 a. z! b7 b9 b: C8 N* Jlet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.- {" B+ e8 M/ g+ I. g2 q0 v0 e0 P0 T
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those
2 h! s, P8 J! J' R4 M) n8 N. LWhy nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:% ^) D4 C( [8 {% h  W8 ^4 U. {
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
/ q- p+ X7 F; V% ^# G6 y6 C
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
: c1 Y$ @& j# k+ j9 K
9 k) v3 K1 _% R! q7 N8 D5 i% ]我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
1 `( r- @8 q- ?% w
唔係喎!
+ I- V; r7 o: J" U+ D古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!( ]) n2 A% C# Q- Y
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!2 Q, b* `# b. |- W) {
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
0 L! N6 E% N8 M) w* k就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
9 m6 t/ D9 h& k" o$ o! T9 P一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
% n6 ]. ?1 Y0 \( ], ~* Hdun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
8 |- C5 [8 j; s& Lif so bad, dun download la, right?
8 |  \7 D3 F3 R# a7 C4 Ji am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
2 C: Q) {8 \+ s* Wbut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct, v; j, A  u0 I0 `1 w
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
8 j6 K" ^' L, H7 Q% o2 yso what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
' c3 b0 C( C" T/ P5 y; Husing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
; b) e3 B3 q' j+ H! W. ~1 @why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!: L' C2 i# ?0 I! C  b
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!
' |8 f" D, k! o4 F佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
) `3 h1 z) M; {% H" C政府想比下馬威0的人~~
* A* h# \+ ^; V5 I, R6 V- A錢就一定罰
" f3 B4 k5 N9 Z3 t未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,
' i& L, Y  J: @+ Z唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
. a* y- b, s1 X) |; W佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
6 l* [* g1 K0 @) d: n5 j  a到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。