<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
/ F) `# j8 ~3 Y/ h+ V1 i4 v但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
; I3 }1 p8 Y$ _大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
" r6 B$ b* z" a2 H9 z/ ?/ U/ wI agree you points that it could be illegal
, X( U8 _9 H$ M1 u5 Y+ a$ @4 ebut that is still a "gray area"
) y: ~% {7 k2 R# A$ f3 H5 wwhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair4 y* H5 s* N7 u( v) W

( W6 T' L! D, j2 H! _. ]8 B1 \anyway, I want to say that is
- o. A% f4 x+ R" p7 |who is supposed to be protected by laws/ i5 d, w: L* E9 N, H% v$ c
creators?
4 }$ D. l& j7 M9 A* Pbut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market1 S) ?9 h2 A" m4 I$ C
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
! {) Q# ~& L9 \: c3 f  owhen we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those  Q. @* i" L+ n' r; Y/ f4 t; x/ c
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
" e3 s( A( x5 p9 x! }4 `& Z( m其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
. H6 w) c0 X. Z  X  x, a我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:. p1 V& h: X& P. f. F
9 ^# N% A2 J' D! X' \/ \* j
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
, O* M7 {5 k( p# a- J; c唔係喎!% H/ A/ q3 U& L/ a+ u! @
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!7 g3 Q+ ^) O' v
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!: ~  g' ~% ]7 u2 ^3 o/ r  t% R
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!+ A' P, w0 z: |
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事( P3 [. n4 w/ T& y2 F4 u4 }6 d
一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!* p9 ^6 [2 u* u) @8 A
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......' v- R1 D- f, g! E2 M
if so bad, dun download la, right?2 h* S6 J) }- E+ k8 p
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^+ Z$ w0 Q" F6 z2 A6 B
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct3 i* I: K& l8 M/ j' E0 M1 p3 s
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
8 l# g2 H$ _9 r5 i' B$ ]  Y. D  }- Wso what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
: l1 z  t: w4 ~3 K5 F: B* Ausing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
7 o, D5 M$ ^5 Q/ l+ q" v2 Awhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!% Z* ]: j; J! B* t$ v
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!
) P6 C4 I2 g' G3 K佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
8 x; x9 H6 ^0 F: u" m政府想比下馬威0的人~~
8 }# f. I9 w' w9 |, w# V% g錢就一定罰
( [' X. Q$ H' g7 o: R2 C0 L未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,
$ h9 v( E  i6 b  N唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
0 S( v" {0 w+ b0 D& X9 E佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?: }9 F4 a9 G7 H0 ?
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。