<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
: x, p1 |) v7 d! a* V但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
# E4 c9 }* p! t% Z! R大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
) _4 z2 J! r( fI agree you points that it could be illegal
( L. y) z6 P8 ^8 Tbut that is still a "gray area"; k6 ^8 z3 z" [8 H" ^
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair8 T" Z' ~; t% \* n
' x5 |& z5 c* e: S; G- I7 O
anyway, I want to say that is
' R) x" I) z( ^& Q6 V+ [$ `+ Wwho is supposed to be protected by laws1 F% s) Z2 b. U2 T( L4 v
creators?
- U2 v0 I. p% U5 ^# `but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market1 `; s8 K  J; S, }. e) b1 ^
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
' L- X$ v8 @) F* F; ?4 A* cwhen we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those: y, A  y! D/ ]9 G9 S. e
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
1 u7 `; j" f. v0 ~+ f% L) @9 Y) m) L其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
2 b  L, R) R6 E# F
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
6 `% |2 h" Q: G' A+ f) d8 v1 z4 R3 n4 o; _
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
- K  J# b6 Z9 b8 Y唔係喎!2 g4 H! z% }/ V
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
; d3 S7 G7 m4 g8 q: a" u0 \我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
9 z! s5 U" g+ a7 B" W佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
4 \4 ^& s3 z# A- h就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事6 }: p! v$ c+ k6 a# s7 x' ?' W! e3 M" z
一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!% M# @$ a  P) v, i* K# j
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
- j8 `! m" e& g+ Jif so bad, dun download la, right?
; s* K. y- K: P  W5 V0 m6 H/ ai am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
" L& J" W7 Q, D* l" n" r3 Ibut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct
3 k' |; A3 v/ G2 U" {$ {8 }' ]no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la# M9 I3 I7 X4 g9 S- }
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
9 T9 k# y* k9 q) j8 S( ausing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........* {; ?2 p3 {5 q  V9 ]; c* j
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!2 d8 |8 ?/ W- I' C5 C
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!1 _1 `3 L& j. `7 u* {
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~" ~6 V2 @4 W! q1 a; C) X/ p
政府想比下馬威0的人~~2 Q$ d) {3 U/ h. v7 v# F8 U/ h
錢就一定罰
, x( h8 F4 `/ a6 b未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,* m) ?' Z$ ?0 h
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
; C9 Q+ U# B8 ~! a4 l佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?7 t& c8 M0 z  _4 H
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。