<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)( K9 e* D/ h) T1 F
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
/ H( \- R. M, e大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
4 W7 N& z5 Y" E0 j4 wI agree you points that it could be illegal
4 x. ~+ X$ I# [6 `& ?but that is still a "gray area"
+ y9 ~* i2 d' }) ]whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair: m+ E5 m1 {2 j
# [) z" s" \- i. R  \+ F; f( k
anyway, I want to say that is
& _0 R+ T9 Q" ?3 K- X8 F# \3 pwho is supposed to be protected by laws
  q9 e- ^1 s# W$ C% S8 Lcreators?6 i; F9 V' Q7 g
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
! S- N+ Y8 b% o; Ulet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.6 N: X7 t; v/ G) z5 h1 u4 ^9 X
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those
/ g, M) x$ ~6 o$ X, Z- aWhy nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
( r1 g0 W. X  M& I其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
9 t& j2 g3 p# ]3 P8 i. P: F
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:7 e4 U) w: M8 w& ~' I2 U3 u( t
0 I2 q3 G: }+ [, u0 s
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
/ [. A8 ]: u7 W) e% b2 o唔係喎!
) W4 r6 Y0 v7 O" |- e% F8 ?古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
4 l0 U4 Z2 _9 |) Q; B我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!5 U) P6 {) ?" n" p9 C" |8 V  x  e
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!8 E+ e6 j4 d7 a% Q+ A3 c
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事4 I  [' \4 K; U% D: H
一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!- T9 \! E- O' Q* V, \; U) D
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......4 R0 Q. m0 i% t/ n2 ?% X8 r
if so bad, dun download la, right?
7 \! }. f6 C+ K* C0 u1 h( ^$ `- fi am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
+ S! C) j. }$ [2 D! v+ [but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct1 i* G/ n1 [+ H8 k& D5 s+ k, V
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la; X+ c; \9 z7 R9 N
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society$ J* G8 F( B* d( A
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
* h3 {$ x/ R' M% Cwhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
; I) s% c& h+ I9 kso, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!0 f- X  |6 V9 r& m
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~( Q2 Q& B, e4 }
政府想比下馬威0的人~~0 W) O  W. T0 t" ~1 x9 m8 w
錢就一定罰) y9 ]" c4 s! Y$ n
未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,% v# F5 p; X: I/ b/ n4 R& B
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?& R+ D; f$ G# Y$ O1 P/ W) U
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
* d* M+ j: M6 L9 S4 t3 x到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。