<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
/ T5 W/ W, b3 \9 B/ T+ z但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:/ P; P$ @* m  o6 x( ^5 G8 C* |
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
! G% R( ^  o" ?. O- E, N8 c8 TI agree you points that it could be illegal
2 b% p9 {2 Y) ~& ?. Y8 b  kbut that is still a "gray area"
! b" Y- V8 ?: x) lwhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair  F5 N* [3 }7 F/ w9 |- u, B8 p
. Z2 x1 k/ b! R
anyway, I want to say that is
3 |) e5 k" C1 P; D# l  Vwho is supposed to be protected by laws
* v) ^* U2 V4 \0 d/ ?$ }6 J2 vcreators?; p+ Z3 ]$ z0 z+ H0 A3 P; n4 t, H
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market  _- Y6 i8 T& V7 @; ~0 l, a
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money., V( L. X; `, i! I  n$ @
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those' b) G& f: a( n5 p) ]& J: ?1 b  J
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
# w8 }- b; ~/ B7 E5 B其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
4 j8 \( H- ~* c- q5 r我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
. e/ m6 p% c- X8 _" B  {
$ ?3 T4 i* b) e7 _0 z, A我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
/ G. |$ V' |" m, q
唔係喎!1 i, [1 Z$ Q1 _1 U5 W! ~0 ~  _
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
+ O1 z, I* I$ P! m* N1 n9 q我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
. J$ ^. `, N1 F佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!: q* ^8 r$ r+ Y) E! u% x
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事; g4 Z- ]: G/ R
一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!, y0 j$ G: Z: C" ?6 `
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......1 m2 q* ^* _7 W- Z
if so bad, dun download la, right?
* w5 |5 _# f/ {/ S, y: s. \i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
- r. w3 b4 b. W, Vbut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct
0 ~; F1 w$ {9 e! q* Wno need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
8 H6 g# _- u1 p: ]1 F, k' P+ Hso what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society$ }. n# `1 _# x8 l
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
+ J1 K7 R' c5 [3 V4 R# e6 ~9 J" I6 ]why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!0 y5 M$ e, ?# Y* A
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!
4 T* i) z! P1 {9 b* q佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
" p: I6 ]1 }4 S7 u1 C& y; A; b政府想比下馬威0的人~~8 w5 l& h0 a7 U3 H
錢就一定罰/ W8 D1 n6 f$ J; h+ t
未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,
. X) o! @9 V5 V唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
9 N* k0 L' G/ G6 x5 u佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?3 y' h& h' t+ w% m% B
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。