<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
% a0 c9 A0 K1 v- T. T4 {8 U$ T2 C但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
1 U$ V  r+ b) D: R6 S2 o大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
4 I7 I+ T0 r/ V$ N; t8 _
I agree you points that it could be illegal
  ~5 ^) ?  a: a/ g6 s. S' {; }but that is still a "gray area"
& x7 D: Y2 x; }( P% i. i( \) `8 Nwhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
- H7 v! \0 Y! s) d# ^/ v! V* W6 Z" r+ s" p
anyway, I want to say that is
4 \. q9 H. ?3 B7 {8 N" \who is supposed to be protected by laws
" n( ^. M  W  c+ v. }3 rcreators?
- `- e- b3 j" ~' p; }4 n$ u' n+ Z# c0 ebut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
. L( r9 A5 N( ^, g- Blet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
0 n5 Y# W: `1 @: [7 K' _% d, cwhen we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those( Q. F6 c$ d/ N# X0 Q% O7 Y! K; {
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
6 M- u- p! \+ |3 e其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
  ]( j' ^, v; F我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:+ c+ J9 u* x5 v; `( H, d; ]6 h

3 m- o1 Q) O& G) R9 k我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
. B" A1 d" T" P% J6 _, l& c
唔係喎!
0 U( I. ^# A. ^$ Y: {古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!) e9 V! p/ U9 e1 m- @# m: }. W- h: h
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
# j8 V5 F9 X/ S' s& l) x+ b3 i佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!- t# Y/ R0 f, j2 ?4 c; ]
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事7 t& V7 P3 t' u3 ~. R# c
一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!6 d" _4 o' b+ M- O/ y
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
1 @$ N4 E1 n; L3 h+ G# @) K; zif so bad, dun download la, right?
1 C9 q1 ^4 X! P6 n( h0 d) _+ w9 B2 h& ti am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^- k* F& G0 ?, @. P1 ?
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct
; C. M: k5 x8 C3 k" i$ ono need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
  V4 ^* L- H' ]" j  n: Uso what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
- M* m5 I( k! h# L1 Vusing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
( M. c7 h7 R  W$ x' D' A. J$ |why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
8 P1 v% v; I: v" m: a5 x) X: _9 Q# `so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!" X0 L3 l4 A7 y
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
$ h( n) v& G8 P. A! C/ _政府想比下馬威0的人~~6 m& N2 N# |! ?
錢就一定罰! s2 ~- _( o8 g0 v6 j' ~/ M
未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,' `  M1 Y( r) I4 G+ @( _) q$ ^" p+ b
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?: Q9 q/ M5 v$ K0 |: Z  x
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
$ T' N* x4 d) M2 }. V# [: ?到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。