<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)1 g. c! T& ~, }$ n# {1 z4 R
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
! i" K0 |7 s. B3 o# F; j# z% Y大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
2 x4 t8 k5 o; qI agree you points that it could be illegal( m* b9 ~. E- M
but that is still a "gray area", K" ?( E6 ~8 g# T# D
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
! [. a" q; e# w1 q- M% D4 v1 o3 Y
anyway, I want to say that is: K7 ~, R2 i! E3 I+ t
who is supposed to be protected by laws
( _  M6 W/ n. B; dcreators?( y) L5 q- B  A" [- Z( b! F
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
/ L( g5 Y3 \/ n$ klet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.! c3 T7 o' U, p$ E( F
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those
. _2 o# s1 [  G7 X( w4 WWhy nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
0 _0 o9 M1 j0 K& N: n. ?其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
# t8 t" `: d/ e4 B+ e) \/ B1 j
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:. {: u9 V) A. V  P' f
) w- X1 @/ x' a( c( U: v, |
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
8 x0 l" b+ R3 `- h$ n/ V
唔係喎!
1 y: j$ ~# u/ J古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
1 R4 `2 W$ K3 G" X& g% G" n7 G我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
& g4 U. {4 Z& _9 u& B3 |佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
; l, |% i- c" b& D4 {就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事2 J5 s  {) v9 x4 a% ?. h: m# A
一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
% F0 W0 N, r: X' Qdun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......0 M! z7 O! {# s, Q3 p: L) H
if so bad, dun download la, right?( ~8 _: Z- m2 G/ T3 Z
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^: u. E/ n' |1 j9 t. T; z  y
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct3 B5 `  I' E' G; R: g, R: ^2 U( h
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
, C7 g' J! i; j0 l/ F( W: Eso what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society1 {5 X% L$ I& j$ f
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
' C3 O8 O, n/ f+ i2 uwhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!% u2 @: G( v# f5 R% X9 z7 h- T
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!
' s; N% n  O9 Z3 K4 H佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
2 u+ F  I( e1 S& e政府想比下馬威0的人~~+ t# `* I. h* _  t0 t2 M6 E
錢就一定罰$ X, ?( B; d- j$ F' R1 h# ~
未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,8 \+ }  c" @  [" T. n
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?7 H, C8 Q, o8 Q$ O
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?1 ]: U  b4 v0 H8 x
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。