<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
& g- a& |- O1 y& R% h. M但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
6 F# \* p# s: Z, c! Z- b) f大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
7 I$ |+ }5 e' w8 X3 s( T1 aI agree you points that it could be illegal
+ x% u# D) q( H, C/ Ibut that is still a "gray area"
" c' a5 A) w" S. W7 \" ^7 Jwhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
9 Y4 W6 D( e& J; Z
6 F2 o* `) ~5 Z: |$ panyway, I want to say that is
% f$ t: A+ C/ [! Q' c" T0 D) S$ Owho is supposed to be protected by laws
! d7 d+ p# H# zcreators?
% ?% k  B5 s& P4 ~* Y1 ybut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market! n! d  ]4 u/ t, C8 X( C' q+ G
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.+ X* B: O" s; f- b* k
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those" m/ U: X4 n5 O
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:1 I* x: T# j# n+ @
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
! I; A7 A# p" ]  s8 _
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
% j& D, ?7 G" h1 |1 U+ R" F- K7 d
. M" \+ W) M6 U* Z我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
+ l% t- f2 ^) B" c# |唔係喎!
, m) o9 Y, v6 `$ q3 }( o/ T古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!; ?+ d0 T3 L/ Y3 u9 B# @4 v' ]7 P2 S
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
" x0 L& W/ a4 \8 u* |1 j佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
: b& A  q. u! M0 Z5 Y- h就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事: f% |7 H! h! D- h1 @; a* b
一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!& U0 h; u' t3 t, v
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......6 c  H: Y7 _" X, I, J
if so bad, dun download la, right?. P  M" ^( @8 f. F8 e; g  j
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^) R( N3 j; b& n
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct0 Z+ |! n$ Y' P- ]9 b+ ^8 }
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
: ?, T" V5 F% ?so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
! _0 X3 C+ n/ m# V: ousing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
* G' y4 ?, }! a' W1 ^why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
& v9 K$ P8 c% E+ i4 `so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!
/ ~2 {/ V% X2 C- R6 q佢又唔係殺人放火~~~6 B- X3 t$ X" C" z0 U- F2 _
政府想比下馬威0的人~~; o- w4 a/ l) P9 U6 O
錢就一定罰
7 y  T$ V5 Y2 c" D未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,: K- S) O$ H- I8 w/ n* z! G
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
0 O2 t* K9 P5 E佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?5 Q; G# f" G& [) n% k8 j4 I
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。