<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)9 G1 b$ \# n# C& h' y+ W" [: I
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
1 A: D  x% M' p$ C1 D2 i" E: H大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
1 b. M; _& T9 X  O
I agree you points that it could be illegal
  t" p% W8 Y( x6 X9 M9 {/ E" [but that is still a "gray area"
& T, Q8 v" v" V7 ywhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
0 l. J0 T  H) o4 L  h# }- B7 r* _
8 E& P4 p6 ]9 i3 nanyway, I want to say that is
) A8 K$ @* v4 owho is supposed to be protected by laws2 Q$ l) y) {1 W
creators?7 Z' [3 `3 _; T
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
* D7 _( ~1 T2 _6 Nlet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
+ U+ L0 H, k4 zwhen we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those. c2 i" F% s" T( s5 Q
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
, y8 ]5 `0 {  }( L) W* j其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
3 t. @6 ^# |9 }- C, Y: H1 T
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
# b" k- ]* Z0 e3 b; v1 Y9 f* B/ [2 d3 ~
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
3 Z. F, a9 O# s唔係喎!9 _7 @/ d1 J& l
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
) q0 R# K) [0 y3 v3 D我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!4 G6 n$ ?* A7 l6 j* f5 t6 b+ ^
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!5 A! Y1 x& K* M8 p
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事' v0 i( T: W, d: \! L& S6 x! @0 K
一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!( C9 U, l/ c0 R: ?- D6 b6 \% M7 [
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......8 ?" H, E: N6 k0 \, b
if so bad, dun download la, right?6 \: }) Q, U* B
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^. C: ~! o% [, _* E6 R( T: [
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct
1 i6 C0 g  {. K7 Hno need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
& t1 `/ u( a, W+ Y. Xso what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society1 R; m& U2 H9 J% E( H
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
7 ]' O- w9 t: j" w2 zwhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
2 v- U  r5 @: x: [so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!1 _& [" r( T4 |0 p" T/ T9 o. n1 B
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
* o/ i, @# u9 E" f) j政府想比下馬威0的人~~  U5 L1 t+ Q' g. H
錢就一定罰
1 G' Q9 s# V* ~8 @2 w( X未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,$ M+ W! c* N9 a
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
: s1 Z8 t! I+ o$ J7 A! s佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?- }) L! U1 ?) o. Q* V" F8 q
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。