<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
4 i  T6 t. n! p* \但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
7 y' E  \8 g9 \8 a大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
$ |2 t) T2 L  X2 l5 z! P
I agree you points that it could be illegal) u) c/ S1 G) n, l9 W% B
but that is still a "gray area"
/ y$ X7 o" ?; B4 Z# e/ Ywhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
& [& t9 Q9 q& p- h, p" D7 D' [! U3 b& y/ }( ?% i, k
anyway, I want to say that is
4 a- q: X7 Q9 o$ jwho is supposed to be protected by laws6 X. Z5 p. `6 R0 |- G8 X
creators?8 W' u$ M3 }6 O& s+ `
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
- g: H$ s7 f& u, Hlet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
4 _2 j! ?9 I" h4 N: O# U$ Uwhen we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those
  Z- Y- O4 _4 x/ ~& y: O; tWhy nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:2 B( j) b9 E9 |: m8 o! \) D1 p
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
/ ?' P7 C" I5 @/ q% C9 R我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
" D: K8 W' P2 N" q9 y5 \
/ r/ {# {2 B$ r: p  r我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
; v# m0 f3 ~$ D! `% q唔係喎!$ Y8 [4 C+ @% b4 m. {9 A" _
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
' [8 V# r& A- w+ W% N我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
# S+ e3 e: O/ B" e5 Q3 L6 m佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!( x$ l6 J: l) L
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
% v: B! E1 ^8 f8 v4 ]$ I3 _  i一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!7 \1 R$ W; U- _- X# |6 N
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......1 u$ ^% }( }# V7 h8 q
if so bad, dun download la, right?
* i0 l& |: J- \; ki am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^- s! B% q4 ~2 ~/ J3 `) K
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct
, [) G9 \1 n& q( F# ~no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la/ X0 [0 V# T: b
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society$ i3 d8 Q" ~" ]
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........0 n: Y+ U/ }( x5 K/ J: s" d4 a
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
! o+ t/ h! K# q' `& L. fso, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!: \" g" L9 n5 ]
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
8 }5 S' ]4 x- g0 y/ @/ g1 t政府想比下馬威0的人~~* ]. ?, R$ v% G9 @- J" b7 y
錢就一定罰  v& f8 o. |! g/ }1 ?$ R
未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,. f, l  k5 C1 ^* r- d5 x6 C
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
+ y) e: L4 T$ W. n$ D佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
1 h0 E9 @5 g3 M; O- K到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。