<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
$ V  @- ?  T0 P: @4 |; A但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
$ a% P% W+ ?: }2 J1 d) @大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
# |1 H+ m; J+ b$ u: N9 jI agree you points that it could be illegal* ^  Z5 H; M' S& k6 W
but that is still a "gray area"
6 ^0 \+ |/ I' p) m% gwhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
. O% F4 L, p9 P5 Q, J' y1 u6 ~
0 Z. S8 w1 f3 G% @' q: K4 L, S$ Danyway, I want to say that is9 T* b) B8 @& f" t7 b% Z$ u
who is supposed to be protected by laws
0 T: Q- Q7 t. q" p# q/ J: \( m( t. d: Hcreators?
0 f- ?( q! B- Z" w* Abut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market8 a! s5 t) H7 A  G  R1 D. K2 p) g+ I
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
2 b" t! T2 }: h5 ]$ Xwhen we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those
7 f( f9 I! P) b+ [( I5 gWhy nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:1 M+ q6 N" Q* U. [1 P- Z* A
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
/ h8 z7 k! f- q1 w. ?我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:% V! A0 w6 @6 C" V2 W
( J- e5 l8 F! ^) T
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
+ Y3 I* c7 r5 U7 `7 t! C唔係喎!
0 s  j  A7 D9 Z8 `) p古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!# k3 W, I! v( |; M% ~' a, i
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!! u$ s' J8 |! N8 f
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
5 f) G; L' m5 U$ b) {% N, S就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事  g5 t% T" l6 [
一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!# o. T" h! B9 m, G+ j! S; u
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
0 @. F0 v! ^% L& Oif so bad, dun download la, right?8 s% Z+ z3 S* h$ L
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^4 e" r' _5 W- Q. w4 O* U
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct  Q! D7 z% i- ]4 Z3 `; M
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la; E" K$ m! X( p6 z7 k
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society4 {' E2 J( a1 d9 a# U. _# H
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........; ]# i6 f" `) r9 D* C
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
, r; L, I* C; G$ }* n( Z$ ^so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!
- w1 s9 j* v- d( G佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
, C$ @! u. O7 i# s$ ?政府想比下馬威0的人~~' i3 M$ @  f6 w
錢就一定罰
; w( X" x* G! R' d& Z未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,
0 L& S# p2 @' p3 Y唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?1 p; L6 t+ e# b# l2 e) i. u% f
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
% T2 j1 @: ~$ e( ^! I6 W3 w到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。