<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)  R4 K. t: \+ d: `6 r
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
- c' Q$ S0 g! `! o4 @8 K2 ?2 ~0 G大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
8 F6 ~6 O% K; |5 f0 o% T: i; D
I agree you points that it could be illegal
3 i6 `! D% g- s; P' Pbut that is still a "gray area"
2 i0 J1 o( M$ r0 X# \: Iwhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair5 X; t9 E- m6 c1 p2 [# }

: Z( p+ o0 G0 H' Z, k- h: C* Fanyway, I want to say that is# d% d& l, O. K. w% i
who is supposed to be protected by laws
6 d3 b- d  D% A' x" Tcreators?  H& q; f- B' Z% P6 F$ n  {
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
% k+ O6 P! v: X9 O. z# {* `$ Vlet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.* p+ n# D) E4 c. |3 f3 q7 S
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those' x$ ~9 `+ r9 S7 b0 [; }7 Q
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
3 b! P7 n9 u2 h" Q其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
. h- w3 g6 d" J  C! l3 `8 t2 q8 m% m
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
* o3 I; d' e4 g6 @$ ]
' q& ~! q1 G% _我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
; x) c. S8 E: y# D5 s( N; ~唔係喎!8 r0 n1 K' V1 r: j+ l9 f8 V& y3 U1 u
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
- X9 o6 |! F+ w& U* L我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!( L, X5 X% O2 d( L) L; _
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!* t8 m( g4 s+ G8 `: k% x. e
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事2 a2 Z+ W# @* Q* l
一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!! K. t. K, g- t1 h8 S: W6 @
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
% c, H1 t+ t, `$ _4 h  Oif so bad, dun download la, right?
! ?/ X( n3 l8 d5 E( \i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^" [- w) e& c' A4 F: q" P' @3 T
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct) _: p8 b; H5 b9 o4 o3 G) `
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la/ b2 N0 `: y$ ^
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
7 K, q# u3 ~0 h8 s. w2 m7 ousing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........! P) T; C* L  i5 v! T7 m4 w/ a
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!5 w; A( [4 P: `8 M* X2 h6 O
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!# D. P) A' Y$ z# G/ ]
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
2 _  u, m% E0 M政府想比下馬威0的人~~
) q( I* A* v8 x+ \錢就一定罰
3 X3 O  i; l' Z! g4 A8 n) k未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,
+ [& g. j) M3 s3 r唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
$ f: a$ k- ?1 X, v0 F6 ~) W佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?- I% U* k3 }& C$ r5 A
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。