<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
; i4 ~1 u$ \# q! C; A但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
5 I6 n" p- O% Y# ]! |+ Q大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
  M4 _3 f7 Q9 {* sI agree you points that it could be illegal
) n  c- W) M% ]but that is still a "gray area"
! g# t0 k2 c2 q$ e2 Qwhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
  C. N$ k; ?- ]; ?  I, c. m' Y, @3 F$ ^% {6 L! S
anyway, I want to say that is7 H5 k2 Q4 _) u9 X9 N
who is supposed to be protected by laws1 V0 @8 f6 y2 ?4 i% ^+ p
creators?
1 O9 f. n8 {" h5 }5 ?- ~: u1 wbut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market+ U$ \2 K* U3 z3 B/ n& X9 ^
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.; \/ L5 |- ~/ ]; _5 ?" S- G# F; p. @9 p
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those% }* M/ }7 R, w) S( m4 e3 R4 [. }
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:+ A8 X) X) h$ |. K$ ^
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
7 n1 Q5 R& T: j5 k) A' g我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
$ M" `: J# t1 l6 t. d# T$ ?3 s3 _
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
3 q, m7 e7 {7 e% g5 }5 y. u唔係喎!# V: A1 W2 K2 D  w+ z; t, D+ c
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
7 C& e1 c% [" B我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!! O0 ^& l# z- s. u7 L. c
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!& V2 X: F& P; o& d1 p" F
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
8 V# r1 l. U0 o( [0 g一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
9 a2 B. X! E5 e7 c; W2 [, ~dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
& U5 q# c: W; ~6 B4 p, q( Wif so bad, dun download la, right?
) s& }, s& o. y& M5 Vi am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^0 u9 x, I: |7 A6 ?* t
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct# y  ^) K# M8 D$ M  Y7 U
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
8 [8 i$ T! _+ P2 H( C5 j  \! Y) @so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
& A- m' j* t( i2 n* iusing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
" T+ V* b: B- l& _why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
' V) {4 l# s% V3 k7 kso, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!
" Q% v1 |  K' n" G+ o/ B佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
% B& i& i0 C6 O( _政府想比下馬威0的人~~  i/ G" l+ h7 R
錢就一定罰% k. ]. ~6 h7 f. C
未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,
+ W. c( t( c. r* v* n+ D; m唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?% l/ T2 U6 p4 u3 C
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
; Q. t7 d- t  l9 P- e# k  d! l到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。