<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
3 [. ]# j1 B1 _( r. k但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:: p3 v* N0 B8 u# J, m$ v5 e4 A
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
5 F! D4 b& H, z9 j
I agree you points that it could be illegal$ V- L) @2 h& m' n0 Q
but that is still a "gray area"
4 T3 {0 v# t) L3 J+ Y/ {0 cwhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
5 g# n! `+ Q* d! l+ n* G& x& o" D1 W* G8 Q0 V4 o* z, F3 Y2 x  P2 _) e
anyway, I want to say that is4 ]3 c; f, m# b/ J+ U$ ]
who is supposed to be protected by laws
4 H/ `9 c/ Z7 ucreators?
; X/ A9 u8 w5 z: @" O" u$ F/ abut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market! \& ]/ Y, ?1 Y9 x3 F- i' l
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
8 r# R9 X. N; i9 Y; [5 K/ dwhen we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those0 B4 a# ?) N' M9 O9 M$ Q* v/ ?+ b
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
9 B8 F, O9 J4 k其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
: ?6 Y/ X0 i* c6 w( ~我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:+ a1 Q! V4 Z8 ]/ N* u% k8 }

) V- y1 P6 B6 x9 T# R我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
8 I5 U! x* o/ X8 j2 m; c0 B) H唔係喎!0 F3 W5 o9 q6 H. Y7 q
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!) Z/ r# F7 X1 k+ P" t
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!* O5 `5 K9 _8 f  s: C
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!6 V5 M0 z# f1 L  x7 b0 b  X" w
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事, \  \' P$ J. ?/ W8 ~
一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!/ D+ r( }% t6 u6 @
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
( a$ ^3 q9 n" m  Z) R4 P& q+ Uif so bad, dun download la, right?# K" V" p0 V. g# _8 y' S) B
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^+ l5 j  u' \. G4 @! y$ Q
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct7 a; M1 f8 q8 V4 n7 z3 Z* ^
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
; I: v6 {( c0 L3 ~$ f3 c2 {so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society5 a: ?- X6 I2 W) q' y
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........9 F; g) d5 d6 T3 z" c+ Y
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
2 U& J6 Q' g' p# n% Oso, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!
% V' X$ Z  _* O( \% q: F0 K0 ]佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
) {" O* S- ?9 M$ C/ b% j$ v8 P政府想比下馬威0的人~~1 K% D6 @! c9 u2 w2 _
錢就一定罰, N5 @, o! Z2 w3 e0 ]
未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,: j: i' \) ^5 q: n
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?. J  q% u& d; T
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
- u5 [: l4 ~& f到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。