史艷文2

雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
; `' F; M# i- R. F3 \6 O) H但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!

F.king

Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
: k' i  x- U" Y+ a: a% s大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...

( A& U' K) Z# _/ ~, cI agree you points that it could be illegal
) J" O  N4 P* _% d( o7 Wbut that is still a "gray area"
' v& O4 s7 P2 E/ P4 y4 v8 w3 Wwhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair1 T+ r$ y5 u) p& q6 ~' S  t# u8 M
1 |2 G' S1 X. F! d% J
anyway, I want to say that is0 \/ V( h1 v4 c9 n
who is supposed to be protected by laws
" c7 g+ H. k5 Screators?
+ f' B9 ]6 j1 E0 U# ?3 xbut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
) m9 s2 R5 @5 }1 |) l* `4 Nlet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.! U( [' g) p# v; ^
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those- c7 R+ l# y) m- A3 D5 Z( L, G
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???

junob04

Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
4 k0 r" h% c  B: n其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=

6 f/ m5 T# O) X9 H" i: q' S* w, U我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!

HansChan

Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
/ _6 X7 Z! x6 V9 U1 M, u3 n  b" ]- o& {
1 ]8 |0 L7 D8 {+ h9 Y! x, X我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!

" G/ B( r. [1 W9 P5 O3 a
唔係喎!* m9 V2 ?  y& e/ b  [1 U/ m/ w& F
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
0 ^  S* h' j* {$ W* b我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!- X2 J$ W% J/ @4 n6 Q" Y: F
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!  z+ N7 h' A$ e3 g' m" X) @
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!

大家樂1234

希望佢無事
$ f' G5 S1 a' D5 ?% Y一有先例以後就死嚕

jason williams

honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!. P# v8 \7 C, H1 h! U( J$ ?
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......; B; i5 O/ K+ N) e. f8 W5 y8 T
if so bad, dun download la, right?
4 S/ U' {) Y; W# c3 N  ~8 Z! xi am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^- y" M& S3 p% A- h) F) c0 D
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct
. Z8 o* p$ R8 r5 r0 a. W) y1 f. F. ino need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la# f0 h; u, G8 x; P4 b2 g& B$ k
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
+ A5 [" q. \* ?$ T  Z4 e8 h$ ~using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
" \2 V- R" W5 f0 D1 K) Mwhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
& v+ v1 @$ k( t2 Q5 W& ?so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^

coolyiceman

罰款,冇留案底!  t3 f# O# y, S7 s; n, e# S) x
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~  r1 k0 O5 Q5 }
政府想比下馬威0的人~~4 D3 U, r. k! e& ^9 \& j. c9 [6 p
錢就一定罰! O; ?4 N- D8 ^/ z
未必要坐牢~~

HansChan

如果真係判佢有罪,8 j5 q* B' L+ U. y
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?0 c5 ~  a8 J1 k3 `
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
$ T5 O3 z* c9 ^' n2 B到時有冇人幫佢呢?!

EV4886

最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...

@bcc@

冇事!!!!!:cool: