<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)9 W/ z6 P3 \7 i1 o( J5 S5 \5 [: Q
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
9 K( F4 P6 T" b大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
! J: _$ |) q  C% s& f/ n& c/ D
I agree you points that it could be illegal$ o0 l2 d2 v8 r7 @. C
but that is still a "gray area"# {1 X0 h7 ^9 E7 e. g
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
4 m7 f1 n  _) P3 _% S9 @, Z8 m  ]
anyway, I want to say that is5 _# h  T6 s! P( y
who is supposed to be protected by laws4 r* }+ Z8 S: x; G+ H9 z
creators?
$ }' g1 _8 d/ u7 {3 q4 Sbut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market( Y( s& A) i# s4 j
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.% M: o% `$ |1 |! {: s; x
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those: ?' T$ X. |; T& u6 V/ p
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
' {7 ^2 G% N' l其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
# p8 E( H2 E/ Q  j/ u/ b
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
; u4 j% b0 U# r" M. a( |; ?- _( v
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
+ K3 q8 X3 G0 E& N) M% [9 D6 d唔係喎!
6 Y& d  z  P; J( y古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
# q- N1 j" V) @9 d* f" M: n我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
* c# l, z+ L7 C# d# V, {佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
5 {3 f8 d# e0 N9 k. v; V4 t$ e! T就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事$ b3 z- C1 B6 i& H  ~
一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!. t, T" ]- K( J( b6 n  V, [
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
  A% B$ o- J5 w# |0 `if so bad, dun download la, right?8 H5 J( h& f, R( j, z
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^1 q8 h- @& ]6 Y0 w+ M! |2 h! x
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct# e* I! b$ d  k* Z  W
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
5 U& [4 j( }0 l, Fso what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
( y+ J. y4 b* g- J7 z) m  \( `using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........7 {% _( X# l' ?- c% w+ w$ X
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
& _& d- _+ H1 u' Jso, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!7 Z" `* x# Z, K7 X3 p. H
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
  ?" y/ [7 s/ U  S2 k; _# U* p政府想比下馬威0的人~~
+ y' Y6 ^% W3 l: a" i) e4 i錢就一定罰
+ X4 }6 D+ v; g7 W未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,0 Y6 |  w* u% q0 ^1 e& G
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?* s. t+ \1 J$ c( s, C
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?2 x, c& K/ Z' m
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。