<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)* c2 E6 R( [8 D# G- b
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:* R, n' N/ p4 U  S
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
3 ?3 o1 X) J, U) O
I agree you points that it could be illegal2 \+ F, X1 s# k+ i  H
but that is still a "gray area"
: M" x, K! j; ?4 R9 v* }7 T+ Nwhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
3 L6 [2 M9 Q$ B8 o
# O# _. u5 W" A5 D7 Danyway, I want to say that is! H2 Y) S! Q9 s! \1 o7 ~
who is supposed to be protected by laws7 G. Y( U6 T* C& @" K3 ^8 {+ x
creators?- P2 H$ I8 R3 M8 Z0 z
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market; Z% T# u: c$ ?4 C; b% ]9 j
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.) ?0 j4 Z# N' V1 T; y9 ]: P
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those
' i; o9 c% P6 `2 \! D& Z5 j* F) RWhy nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
! Q0 L9 X  _8 ^2 @* @$ a8 X其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
3 g$ J8 D" U  O* G) J
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:/ D$ P$ r( }; K, J' x7 Y) L% g3 A
: u& U+ U$ y2 i% m# L. f
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
2 J/ G5 ^. f% H, p2 g唔係喎!
. X2 _+ l# W( S# m" H古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!7 A* M& p6 B$ y) g
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!+ c' w2 I5 c' ~% H% G* n' h5 ?4 @/ U
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
: h. g$ X: E2 g& z  w) V# G2 _就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事) g3 H, A' w: L4 Z- S. `& q
一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!% U& C6 M  }& X0 ^, I
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
5 n  c, F9 {* _6 _/ Fif so bad, dun download la, right?/ _" B  r0 e# I5 E0 Z5 n, r
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
9 K. D8 B4 h6 R  z. g% M$ tbut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct  w! |7 o  `& z8 y  P' p5 E5 ~
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
7 }/ c* @2 l" D/ r$ D8 M. n. J8 x4 A! ^so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
$ c2 ]1 t- l- `) ~using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........+ z/ e4 J* ]& ^" @0 L
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!4 x  z9 ]& |* t/ t: a! B
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!( ?1 V: q- w" ~7 T
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
0 o7 M& i" F) s0 ]- i政府想比下馬威0的人~~0 Y- M/ g0 D8 y' Y5 ?
錢就一定罰0 K% o5 |  S  l$ B% K  G, K( o
未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,; I% I! X: g2 f. p3 K
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
1 S6 k! g' P# i- }佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?1 g% T- W# R8 {, B
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。