<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
4 [1 v  I4 E; W5 z5 {: d% g但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
& }6 a. Z8 U2 c) t( N. S2 I大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
/ A9 _" b/ g0 K9 i; b7 OI agree you points that it could be illegal* O' a. B+ d2 K1 @6 ?. _
but that is still a "gray area"/ S9 u8 \, Y7 d; v
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
% A; S' u2 R. |  j/ ?7 t/ [
# k: r2 y. m$ d  Y+ ?5 Ganyway, I want to say that is
2 p+ w6 A8 V$ C2 C) wwho is supposed to be protected by laws! _0 t" f, k, L6 F" M
creators?
' b) Q# `) i  Ibut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market* ?0 y/ \% C0 |3 T' N0 b8 F
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.2 x5 {- p+ h. o0 p7 E" L+ u- h! R0 C
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those/ Z1 l: p1 G* y. p
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:6 K& i8 W- c  u& ?
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
7 m/ Y3 ^1 }- S' T
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
  I, f! B# e1 o) S% p9 f" r
' {" K/ E% R; H# u; ~) \我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
- W' d% [( i" {+ w* @* E6 H
唔係喎!& _1 Q, E  t4 F+ J1 f' n# Z! v
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
2 Z: y* ], u2 g* z我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!- Z7 m1 j3 ?; @$ U3 f9 G
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!. D( k1 d6 O& |3 W7 X3 ?
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事( ~8 d% c0 |1 l4 |7 ?
一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
5 r1 R; J4 R/ N" B5 K+ {* d+ }( Qdun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
$ i6 J" P' z! H4 _& @1 G& [) C1 bif so bad, dun download la, right?
: |4 y6 Y# H3 x: U/ i3 Vi am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^6 c+ ^7 W4 n8 l5 G2 N% F6 y  H
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct# u9 F1 }) r& a
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la' C. {# ?8 M) \$ G" a
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
8 `  T- O/ L8 G2 Susing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
( B7 C- P( M$ }& n) g3 fwhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!0 h4 B" O" k2 s( V
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!5 D' s5 t" {$ E8 \/ ~6 U
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
! E9 n' g2 ^- m8 F8 U. X' Z政府想比下馬威0的人~~% T$ }/ B3 v! X, H: G
錢就一定罰
( c( }9 z' A, o. |: W: T9 b未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,% M6 @/ r3 B/ f8 H# H
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?& r) j5 @9 y" N8 p) F' e
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
! K+ ]1 O. ~' a到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。