史艷文2

雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
& P/ q5 O/ R/ C但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!

F.king

Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
5 X, D: y3 {$ T* |5 e6 M大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...

. p* K/ o, {" a6 d
I agree you points that it could be illegal
8 O* O: a/ {# i; ]7 a1 r5 L- z# ]/ `9 Pbut that is still a "gray area"0 {( w4 Y* b9 _0 F# h' Y1 G0 Y6 s1 E
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
# Q4 P7 o# L% \+ R# r  k
; X: {9 I0 N! u% y5 R7 Oanyway, I want to say that is, Z; D+ a# ^9 |& ]$ A( D
who is supposed to be protected by laws
+ Y! R5 x. p# f: acreators?
, [0 W& V& M' Y1 f) Ybut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market; k7 E! A& F1 s$ _" R5 s/ h
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.0 a( C! n3 A! v, ~
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those
% {7 R" h, n+ ?6 Y! h8 M: b4 ?Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???

junob04

Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:9 x2 K0 s$ F+ z4 U
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=

! A; K* e& M" s/ S* }) i* f6 [& `我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!

HansChan

Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:; X$ D7 C& }2 W7 k0 y) ^/ g6 M

9 ]! [" e; Z* x" d) ?我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!

: J% a) ?# x/ ?2 f. O唔係喎!
( D% ^: c3 B/ ?3 l古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
& @: Z& G, F; F3 z我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!% q- K& [1 R$ {
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
* _1 s' A& Q3 x8 U; A+ H就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!

大家樂1234

希望佢無事
! s6 p  U. O' x/ v1 Q- O5 @一有先例以後就死嚕

jason williams

honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
( o0 _. [8 ?1 n7 S9 Udun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......+ e6 }. Z$ i3 Q( L
if so bad, dun download la, right?% m" q1 Q. @  N7 a( T  ]. M
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^: M" @0 @# N$ X4 F2 y0 p
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct
; I: v1 Q) m% I% ]4 q+ T# q* Z4 @. s) Dno need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
  _4 X/ h( k) I$ s) C$ S' sso what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
# h. Q  |9 ]& w  \0 G" susing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........) L0 r" g/ k8 T8 w+ N- U
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!# Q' H. B& n* s1 k  T) _/ n5 N# M
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^

coolyiceman

罰款,冇留案底!
& q3 e! B; f) i/ w" n' ^) c佢又唔係殺人放火~~~- A0 _5 d! J; P9 t2 r& Q
政府想比下馬威0的人~~
3 \5 Q  ?  `$ {2 s" c1 ?3 G錢就一定罰( j% K6 N& a/ z- K
未必要坐牢~~

HansChan

如果真係判佢有罪," {' ]& o" y" c* i/ g
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
/ p; p4 U" n) w! B佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?) U2 W, Q/ A  V) Q  _
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!

EV4886

最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...

@bcc@

冇事!!!!!:cool: