<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
$ S' w& ]* [7 p5 I3 J# e$ u但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
' P& v% p7 }# }' \4 C大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
( C( g0 E$ Z1 |5 R/ P* `0 k# ]I agree you points that it could be illegal
& n; _  W) m: K9 G4 J) o8 Nbut that is still a "gray area"
. b* e) R4 s3 ~; W& Nwhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair8 d# x' v2 Q. k4 _0 Y+ N' |
+ j. X, Y: x+ _7 E9 H- d
anyway, I want to say that is  Z- w% q2 v# T# ]6 ?% b$ X
who is supposed to be protected by laws
, q* k' {( i! \" m- d9 Tcreators?
2 _, }# O' y! S! {but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
8 R' T+ g$ V' O+ [3 M' p  Y* tlet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
* S. q* E$ I- ^* |3 ?when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those
) `9 p9 ?3 G! DWhy nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:0 ^% e. T; ?% a& U( a
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
! V) b2 `) y8 X0 M我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:9 ]( {' L0 D' T; F8 ^) |1 s$ v' k
, ~! t# }' \" E5 K4 ]; j7 N9 w
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
. ]9 k6 j9 j, s6 f: H+ `2 m
唔係喎!
, R! k9 b. Y0 w- l古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
: k1 x! T9 k( L8 P* ~我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!* k, _" U7 O4 a3 t4 W7 V" |
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
. V2 U4 }) r' y/ |7 V, p  o就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事0 _6 y( a# q/ F  ?% Y8 r: `0 j* x
一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!% q3 v, O* o- y7 M- G. [, Y- W
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
) C* ~/ S4 F+ p' Nif so bad, dun download la, right?: B1 [% Q9 k+ t
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^; m# F$ q) j0 v; r; a& A
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct3 g4 _( Y" H" e" S9 m" d, Q; x( m
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la( J4 W6 H+ o6 X, u# o
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
+ J" H( @) K$ u' Eusing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........  F0 V, w; O3 o' p( J; x$ D$ H
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!, J, C0 @0 W& ?$ N
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!' r" s2 U) x- a
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
8 L3 J3 g9 Z8 |( t$ l政府想比下馬威0的人~~2 w) ^5 S' X8 I' f7 _9 ]
錢就一定罰
( h- c* Z4 j8 |' X$ C4 ~7 K; e未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,' Z5 s; m+ z$ O5 N( M9 F* T4 K# y
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?' j# Y. U) h, g
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
7 N4 E9 I1 j% V2 M到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。