<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
, y$ W5 y3 w+ q/ d但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
6 q- R4 U1 F5 d, }# ^大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
- j, E. I+ g/ x" ]0 {4 G1 q
I agree you points that it could be illegal
, C. {" [5 ^0 Lbut that is still a "gray area") F  J. a5 ^2 ~4 H, B- q" ^* Z
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
! e* b, Q1 l+ t2 T
8 y+ B( J6 H5 Q/ yanyway, I want to say that is6 b6 I! I  _& }: [- L4 `
who is supposed to be protected by laws! o! ^  n% f# O. y6 t' ^
creators?
8 }8 b8 |8 R; V, n% E% t' {4 Kbut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
2 q6 P, T# H: `# R8 Z" {- vlet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
% r9 Z9 Y. g9 F& [+ ?+ Twhen we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those# b9 P2 f6 o4 d  s& r# d
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:" f! y* n% [5 g: X# _5 Y) n
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
9 Q5 A! r9 v0 _: q
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:' d, Z2 D7 ?+ V& U

; o" H* {) E: x" r我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
0 r2 V2 ?' c% K4 l# t
唔係喎!0 _( c8 m( C, g+ k; u& ]. s. \
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
( W4 w& v0 h; U8 ~6 D; u' }我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!0 W# _6 L+ W3 V4 J3 s$ k. W0 Q  o
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
2 j# j! w) i4 S# ~2 y2 P8 w0 k就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
/ o1 [3 ]' W1 Q一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
+ t! ~/ {8 S, @, [* [1 B4 Edun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......5 m  @& \3 v* u2 Q
if so bad, dun download la, right?
; y: L  h! v# C) i0 v1 O/ W# Ui am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^: [) [0 M; f+ k6 W1 K
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct# H. k7 T  M' t+ G8 A
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
4 P. r7 L$ W; F2 P6 bso what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society5 V" G0 f& H8 B
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema........." L1 Z" o2 J$ p9 ?# {6 g
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
% Q# |0 F  C. n# i% }9 H4 `! eso, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!
( z- h; v. n' w* R3 A佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
- W" V8 z9 J( v政府想比下馬威0的人~~1 g; s& A* @; \+ a
錢就一定罰$ O6 R3 B. D8 |3 {/ R# [
未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,+ M1 R+ J* x/ e: l. W# [
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
" G+ T1 r& t2 Z# x& t1 f) Z佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
: h3 F9 K: m, Y4 c到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。