<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
) K6 M- r& a# P8 U5 q但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:# v2 ^1 E9 ?: g4 ^2 C9 u
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
% r3 p, Y5 G, T$ HI agree you points that it could be illegal5 J5 c0 A  X) t5 ]! l) l2 }
but that is still a "gray area"2 V6 ?" V, j8 h0 b$ Y1 \  b4 w
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair9 d. e" N- C( X( J( ?2 q* y1 b

$ Q  G5 r( ?4 t. z3 \  i' q" xanyway, I want to say that is
: _% _' R: d) F; Xwho is supposed to be protected by laws
  t- d+ H9 o( _' Zcreators?
, I! q; B: w% d; z% }4 q" k0 Pbut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market6 y: `4 |& P+ ]) H; u$ c6 I
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.) t! @+ C7 j8 O, g, [0 U
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those
( |8 v1 c: u& Y/ q, KWhy nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:2 A0 O8 ]. P5 \) i) D3 v
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
4 m3 E3 p; t4 ]5 q" Q1 I' |9 I我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
5 j& B6 f) i3 C6 ]4 _3 I; o( Z0 [. V# f2 v  G
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
2 g3 P, A0 `* G, T唔係喎!
+ U1 r; o' x  }古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!/ t" p6 D6 H3 p  Q- _9 _
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!$ b; W9 `: i4 C/ e9 C; p
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
- c/ M5 k; G* b, X1 ^就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事  C3 W6 y. {# B! i
一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
6 r0 \7 R) B6 L3 xdun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......6 }( L5 U: E. I. z' M+ _  \
if so bad, dun download la, right?7 F1 {- f0 N* R$ f1 D  \
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^' t" P) u2 b* N: S, z' f
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct: o5 W4 t5 ?  e6 w! }+ \& [
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la) [/ h! D* A8 r9 ?2 G1 U
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
3 T* C. ^- L& n" D1 `using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
+ z+ T9 F" Q2 V" R; O2 swhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
! }% B4 M' W& R# p, ^, Tso, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!& O; J$ d2 L6 E6 U
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~: c3 G  a( Y5 @3 F; o: B& N* @
政府想比下馬威0的人~~4 S; l! |6 C2 {2 U) @4 M
錢就一定罰2 h- C" i% l" a/ B6 I
未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,
! [1 E' S3 A2 @0 L唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
( u! b2 z! T4 T6 e+ r; q0 a佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
0 r$ B5 M: A" ?/ u1 ^到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。