<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
. x& u" D3 g  z* ^9 I7 X, t3 O但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
4 B  a8 U, ^7 K大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
, X7 g) D  E5 E# G# u) hI agree you points that it could be illegal& R9 ^; ]# c* H& U- l* f
but that is still a "gray area"& \. f! T+ v+ A% G1 M
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair0 U# \! c. E, n7 Y5 k
. U; W, D% @% I. x) H2 c
anyway, I want to say that is
7 y8 o4 _1 N. t; U* v* v  M, Cwho is supposed to be protected by laws5 Y& I1 C" d: S' O' r
creators?3 E9 X, C; f) L) [- `% y  W
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market- N+ q. H2 K8 M+ M" Z" {
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
) e" H2 X. J! I# H9 \when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those. u' }# s; i/ N) l2 ]4 \
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:+ [' `1 V* h% x1 `# H
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
6 q- g+ X; ?9 A9 M' f- m
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
1 }( _, o; f0 @+ b. b5 s6 x  q% L& u$ ]7 i/ ^8 t: z
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
- T8 u8 G  B6 g  m& k/ h: M& D9 u唔係喎!# r* z8 E% E& B# r! S; M
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!6 y$ @1 E! ]. n: u0 V) {& C4 L0 }5 U' S
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!! G9 C+ o# f6 K8 m: W. `' k
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
5 [6 X, e! O- w" i+ l- s, V就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事+ _+ @; y- e( B0 K( }
一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!# L# L0 z9 L( k# j: [
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......+ O. i; L, M4 V' L( Z
if so bad, dun download la, right?! @$ |4 z* Z( o7 e  x
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^8 _+ f- |$ w9 H
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct5 S7 w. J# R1 |
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
1 F# W6 _0 p$ \3 aso what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
2 U* q- s) p- I  m% o3 Lusing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........6 k  u# R0 {/ i* a  r0 J* h
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!) Q/ D" b2 S+ b3 o5 ?
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!
* }" d7 E( J1 y# u/ p佢又唔係殺人放火~~~& c* p4 B9 j  J& C* L
政府想比下馬威0的人~~
- l4 k  q& u0 A4 w0 _錢就一定罰+ X  X! `# |% f* W9 T
未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,8 n9 x- B1 G' {* [
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
1 B. e* A9 r- ?9 x7 \佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
0 F  ~! e; Q: d1 N4 b8 H到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。