<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)# J7 v+ N% z. B$ A% L0 @5 a
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
: o3 ~$ J0 n1 ]大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
5 J" q" ?: Z( |% d4 ^( \
I agree you points that it could be illegal
- q9 i/ J9 s1 t" b% \but that is still a "gray area"2 H& I& m! S$ L) l  }5 \; C; R
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair" P, k/ P* y9 o$ r; ^! K

8 ~% H+ P- I+ t9 Y$ `anyway, I want to say that is# N% p+ \  r6 F( l4 q) N' ?) \+ C" `
who is supposed to be protected by laws% t4 M8 C8 `( k2 W) D) S* \
creators?! e4 H% {8 q" V: S3 `' _1 ~  ~1 c
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market5 r' O: F6 \8 H/ E) }) R( h
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
6 d* h0 u2 l4 e, L  g, ^, Zwhen we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those! A& P0 {! X, V0 h6 `
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:( M0 H1 Z( k9 Q3 J4 _3 [
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
6 J1 V7 a0 y. l+ `: x" h7 P$ `! B5 R我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:# G6 U' W/ p" J

4 S0 y/ x2 Z7 ~4 F7 j/ P我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
& q8 z$ W* j! @( p5 d# @5 t% E唔係喎!
$ g' G0 b- e3 j& n! ?, v2 i, H古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!+ K* |8 y* a9 e7 k. ]# |9 S! A
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
* T1 T. D  l- E9 x% M7 y佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!9 ]  z! M) M2 ^7 N
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
  s3 x" q& ^# y6 J一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!; N: a& J  ^& P: t5 h
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
: D" f: b5 l# Wif so bad, dun download la, right?* Y$ D, @. `; f% ~; |
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
5 s; `/ A# C% qbut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct
! m0 U2 ^! }. V! R# h0 {  \no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la+ ~+ u. v* k# v
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society5 @1 Z% [$ C+ @  Q
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
- g7 s& N9 `! ywhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!/ s! ]2 a6 u  |) |; F; I4 Q1 D
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!( r+ e# W: [  B) @! k, Y4 g% ~* z( z
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
( U1 h. ]! P4 s政府想比下馬威0的人~~& z$ H) c, e, u7 q7 M' x% f: O( p
錢就一定罰7 s3 I* E, }% i' P+ \+ q- g- R
未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,
* X& {9 U& D; S1 y9 w唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?6 o' d9 M% Z) p' B
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
" w$ A: \, y- r- K8 y1 J到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。