<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)8 b% B' I, V. B. z" O
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
% F; I% J0 P0 O大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
% D+ |; v0 T* r# [  V7 PI agree you points that it could be illegal
' ?+ T3 o7 m* gbut that is still a "gray area"
/ [8 _; G+ a* E6 O1 Z& rwhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
0 i$ w( v; Q$ a7 R, l5 _3 @5 e8 Q" k2 {, g  p
anyway, I want to say that is* n) l; L$ i+ f  I1 q
who is supposed to be protected by laws
/ Q' a; f) [2 Z/ s# ucreators?
" _7 o3 L' s6 A# l7 nbut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market7 ]! v6 _& j  z$ E5 |3 j
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.# n' U! `6 a' h5 s5 b
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those% m, [. G0 @4 w6 q
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:7 W7 ~# H/ j) F. D! ^
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
: B( J) c1 q4 o' c$ H9 T0 S4 ?
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:% C! j: r) K* i! q  Q. \1 h

& H3 z! U0 b5 M+ I我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
% D3 C/ r/ B1 {+ b2 j& q唔係喎!
. G% |; R" E. P: j4 E# y) ^4 o9 R古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
& x6 t  L& c$ P0 r% T5 C: w/ m4 M我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!; i" O, Q, O, K, ]/ l7 n+ h- B; h, J
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
' b: D+ G* Q$ }- V+ s" I就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
$ r  ^4 u0 Q4 u3 U' r# Z一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
$ J8 v3 M5 b, \! `8 }. Pdun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
# i, K# Q3 C: z1 ~4 h7 A3 [if so bad, dun download la, right?" V- i- l0 z, x  ~2 O
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
  ]$ B& ?- ]: ybut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct
' [1 K$ v! f) a. O, fno need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
8 h/ m; n$ Y' M9 I4 H6 Q3 {so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
' x" X! B( z5 musing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
3 I9 \5 F- g0 U, Xwhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
+ [7 p1 h# v* U2 m' Jso, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!
$ v8 C0 z. C, v: W0 P佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
4 H) b! v6 [# v+ q& V8 ?9 b& \政府想比下馬威0的人~~) ^- [6 ]* D% `( n$ K
錢就一定罰
& p; \* q: w; T, C" g未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,9 C  u( [  U7 I0 J" W6 {" q1 G
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
( E. P3 @4 S, l: @2 O4 A- D佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
; T9 {# c7 ~+ T/ Q0 o) B到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。