<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)( P4 v6 Q1 G9 L- A/ a0 v
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
+ V* J1 w  `! }' W$ {* Y# k1 Y5 d大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
; a2 U- O" T/ G0 U0 }
I agree you points that it could be illegal+ N& j: D5 ], W, \' H9 z' @: n
but that is still a "gray area". E$ s* Y5 n" J6 I- Q
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair( D# n) s+ Y# \3 u1 j
5 {$ r0 c  `( M0 `: V! E
anyway, I want to say that is
; ]% b" C; x2 Z3 Y" ~. N5 b+ p9 Hwho is supposed to be protected by laws; S" {' t5 p' k6 U. ^
creators?
! u. k" O' q+ y6 I9 I: B, z" t# Wbut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market) k( W) X4 _) b$ S
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.% V$ f" R; {- U/ B+ E% s/ N6 x1 h
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those# I. i) s' n& S' N3 N
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:  ?8 G, f( T1 @; b* y
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
4 }1 \6 }+ g$ g9 E; A# L. [; f+ w* i: {
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:2 M: c: ?9 }$ a8 ?

9 R! t2 H9 I0 m* Q* A  J. x我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
2 T8 j/ j% q7 A. L7 n
唔係喎!* p: N1 T# k% V; I- u
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!# w- w. w: C2 u+ V( {
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!/ A& |" y/ p8 d4 B4 F4 Y4 B
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!' v- s- _) u2 e( U
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
+ J4 d/ U' t8 P& j7 S一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
3 r* P" g' Z3 Jdun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
  g' Z# \- m9 c. u; K/ ?if so bad, dun download la, right?
& J/ \0 R# j3 oi am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^: L# ~( ~3 q/ A- T
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct
$ F& ^6 F9 f9 M2 d/ k* n' l/ \1 [no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
0 h: }7 y5 M2 x# a7 Zso what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society# `! `0 X' B' w7 n! f
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........% o6 k' |! y6 C$ k; [8 H& U
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
3 }6 I& x# F8 E: {so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!
0 d2 [. m' u) C佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
# W. e/ ~+ ?, a8 m& y5 o政府想比下馬威0的人~~2 A% n# R# Q$ q
錢就一定罰
% ?9 u1 h' V/ R- K未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,8 L2 O$ X% D* w! V0 v; _( ^
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?, ]7 }+ ?" z+ R: J+ E; D) l8 Y( a
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?9 X5 P+ Y2 [1 l- O) ^9 O* }, ~+ |" c
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。