<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)7 [! f% a  D( h
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
- ?: f) D  b2 s* N. z# w# k4 y大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
) M  |: o& T( i1 ?4 q
I agree you points that it could be illegal
  [0 p& Z. h7 h  w+ r0 a, n+ sbut that is still a "gray area"
7 f/ M" U8 r; x; c: N% ]; `3 twhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair2 H' `" X' m$ K

5 u: g$ a" h# W6 k: N) ]anyway, I want to say that is
  r# S& W" I) `; o  M2 [who is supposed to be protected by laws% h# p# o9 x/ m1 U& l- X
creators?# }) G' u) t* t; x# f0 j
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
$ E  {6 L4 T  Hlet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.: O$ Z1 Z0 F$ ^" D: Q
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those' }% @0 \6 ], m! h) X; i
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
; N9 G% V4 A2 P其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
/ ?8 p. ^% ~$ M+ j6 A. H我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
% q+ d+ v! y- v4 |- ~: b* q2 e$ F
; x; L1 w; c4 ~& h2 O' O) ~1 N% d我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
7 u. y  z4 k3 [1 G+ r
唔係喎!
* z6 O) Y  O4 Z$ o古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!" [" ?% p* Q( w" @5 m- w
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!3 r( Z. B- t' u% t8 Q: |
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
3 [5 i' _' X+ a, Q就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
% E2 u$ x! _! f9 P8 V一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!0 N& r9 f- j2 t* Q7 I/ Y
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......) j2 F) O0 D" H
if so bad, dun download la, right?
7 f, e+ a+ W/ ji am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
) F; G2 f: Z. S% G/ r: O( {but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct
9 i3 W. P. f; j7 uno need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la8 S" c7 Q2 I5 o6 i) W! j: S
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society( J% Y0 d# m" a7 @/ B5 i
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
0 G" R) F7 j) N  y2 D4 kwhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!1 I: k7 b/ J8 O8 _' T
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!# ^. n* r1 K) ]0 u
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
8 k6 z7 X1 W6 d2 f8 V政府想比下馬威0的人~~. y; E6 [( |9 |" ?
錢就一定罰
% e/ x1 m% T% D, d$ F未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,. r# ~9 F" G3 x6 w% U* O' O3 z
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?( _* n/ U' y2 [. W' a. d2 m" j
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?; W1 O3 j+ U& ]: w+ {; T- L
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。