<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
. G. U% t* I4 V7 s0 ]# f( h但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:+ T6 C& W% Q7 K9 h1 j0 K3 k, \
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
: [1 D( e/ H" A. M5 `3 [& W. F3 ^7 B/ fI agree you points that it could be illegal
2 m- R7 o' ]! |% z( }$ Jbut that is still a "gray area"" Z+ I- H% c/ p& `' L
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
5 Z+ F/ D) c, z2 B$ ]6 w, }4 l8 i( C+ _' i: E
anyway, I want to say that is
( T8 W" _1 }  wwho is supposed to be protected by laws+ `, [; O" G4 A0 k
creators?
; ?1 c0 f9 I6 [6 x* s; ?4 a$ g9 Nbut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
0 R# c, y7 I! Y7 L2 olet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money., i% T8 d' }+ C1 K) H" R
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those$ g! K3 _. P; ?+ j. \
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
* `0 o7 m# V# A! o其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
9 g2 O, D' s! B! r" \我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:% x3 b6 u# P! R3 @! n+ B

4 y. I! R9 |0 i. ]0 S( H我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
; X/ [4 m) P4 a. v9 n唔係喎!
3 k% W. q9 K  b9 Y' {3 |, }- r2 G古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
+ o2 p  i. H% M( c" c我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
8 J1 c: ]; S; |6 U" o佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!, ?* i; `1 c% M0 `
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事0 m! |' S+ w1 Y. |; r% l
一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!( v* G( u$ W2 E% W+ N  N7 }( D
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......) t  h* s  b' C. Q, q
if so bad, dun download la, right?6 S4 r  v+ D1 D5 C5 ~
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
( ~0 O& m, }- q. M1 z# V  ubut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct$ N: E& |2 |8 x* e& ^- e0 {" k
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la" C7 @& D% J/ i2 \8 U. J6 e1 w
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society. K, Q' y/ }: R9 l4 N; g
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........# Y) V' K! u1 ]; S4 R+ u
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
) ]9 C' N' E  j% e, Xso, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!
0 ^  A, s1 o6 m9 M: \佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
+ `- L+ w5 P( s; A- V政府想比下馬威0的人~~6 |9 {; C% k* l$ M; j5 H
錢就一定罰) j  F% y2 M' V% C# H
未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,! ~& q9 r* Q8 i8 _9 d. n
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
' v2 ^7 G, c2 a& u佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
+ u: i1 k1 {1 X- ~! n到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。