<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
, Z; X  @% v- S- @) T, J但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
3 D7 {7 X& r7 y/ Q4 I大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
, E4 ~( D- m: C1 S
I agree you points that it could be illegal
; n0 D( X1 [7 p0 |+ {but that is still a "gray area"
6 }  {# O8 B1 f( R$ owhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
. E3 H, c8 ?8 Y/ f8 L3 o/ u5 R; Y
8 w; }7 [+ z4 O/ K% |anyway, I want to say that is
% L3 J$ T' l, R( h# S# |who is supposed to be protected by laws5 K* `0 V9 C& \3 x0 S# k$ w* c  u
creators?- ^" F5 C* [4 v7 e7 o( X# x7 v) r
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market) U6 Q, h- u& m6 n0 g  H
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
- o4 M/ {7 u2 a1 uwhen we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those+ f" V/ O4 p- O  t0 D9 f
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
3 l9 A" r  l6 {; E其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
2 c- h# {, L+ j3 [' t8 s我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:4 `' ~7 \. }, H! E
' k/ m8 `4 n+ \  T$ M- _. k
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
) f4 I7 F% ]: @- P; N唔係喎!
9 V- _9 A( K; m  i$ w( F0 N) W8 R古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!9 y& Y2 N# M% x: H; \
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!* r9 g- B9 B' h" V# `' M, n) q+ I
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!9 Q) |) S2 U0 r7 c
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
  J3 W: R6 \8 d一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!# l8 P- Y$ Q6 L7 y- ^
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......* q/ D: z7 i( |
if so bad, dun download la, right?
$ b) C' ~& b3 t7 z. N! ri am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
6 n7 {6 x. x2 @  R. ~but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct
) n, u" R' j. z% }$ L% X* \+ Tno need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
* K6 ]; j3 E4 Rso what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
0 t& t' `* w4 m* G6 @using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
/ v$ j& N9 Q5 |. S" z; Bwhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!. p! B0 I; d3 ?2 p' `
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!$ t- X4 |% O3 x( V: H
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
2 O) e8 g. L2 [# h5 Q政府想比下馬威0的人~~
' S: E: P9 g0 S: R. \4 z錢就一定罰2 `! G  i! }0 R  f( g9 a
未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,
& X4 C7 O0 m8 o, |唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?2 b& i$ G$ F9 x$ s% T
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
8 M# v* B7 n/ C* t* S$ L3 n7 ]到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。