<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
0 T' O0 W2 W% c( n( U但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
4 W( X( |" P% f" S大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
% m+ R- H7 c- l4 q, i/ C
I agree you points that it could be illegal0 a+ X/ Z2 U: M$ I  o
but that is still a "gray area"
0 P6 w4 F  [2 z( ewhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
# I4 D  E  @# g" A+ z2 U
- p" i$ T) g: o! o( ]% J: Z. C4 u) sanyway, I want to say that is
4 s& S8 p2 h# z! y( Z% ?' {who is supposed to be protected by laws
2 a3 i" Z. F- ~' H" L' y9 Bcreators?
- c* h9 }- _# d8 [6 w3 L+ X! c  Gbut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market* K0 |4 K- z0 i: Z* U: B8 S
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
0 a, f; j+ A3 R. Owhen we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those
  a1 J* M" P: w! c7 I- GWhy nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:7 C# |/ M6 m( I* l
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
3 ~! Y; d; ^2 t
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:2 i& ?' Y6 W/ ~2 R' r+ w. q

" S. i4 A7 q/ H1 I5 g/ F/ g我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
) }6 X) Q3 T" @. @( i4 Y
唔係喎!* _' P9 [. R# T
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
! Q; ?! W8 a6 o3 r& A& o' k我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
3 l: U3 {6 I. E: f" Y佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!. t' s# D9 p1 }' ^) P( k
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
2 M9 U% ?2 _5 N6 D( s2 L一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
. r6 ]1 q; g  Mdun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
5 r0 e- M, v( Yif so bad, dun download la, right?( {$ W* q( I9 _  R5 H
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^3 J/ ]& `% d% c+ R' f; d
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct
+ ~; g: n' m; p8 I' P6 D  i; R0 [0 L9 P/ Wno need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
) C1 I( b$ X: C! Sso what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
3 ^. L  \( g2 v9 X# M, w. S. musing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema........., G! G7 v" l( A+ v- Z1 m
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!9 `( ^, a( Y: Z8 H
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!
& _* P( e# |$ P佢又唔係殺人放火~~~, F4 I) A. t/ S5 j+ c  N2 V
政府想比下馬威0的人~~
& A) k. N. Z/ E7 u' F4 c錢就一定罰
. C* }4 o8 p8 B6 M  `3 d! I未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,& M+ B# Q9 a5 P3 |
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
1 u0 l4 @5 x9 {+ B佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
! q. N+ e; R3 }到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。