<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
* R. C: R( q) T& [7 @. E# g6 n; }但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
$ B* V! l2 u* r2 G. L2 u& J4 L大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
: K4 J4 W; V% }3 i, w3 Q
I agree you points that it could be illegal
7 P! P" X( [5 Q3 k  w6 F% p' Kbut that is still a "gray area"
/ @6 \6 o2 V5 \- Z8 K3 uwhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
, R" e' J( B9 J- D4 l# ^! t$ j2 y. C3 Y  E
anyway, I want to say that is* g0 D0 {+ ~& X3 s4 R2 Q* j5 ^
who is supposed to be protected by laws
( ]7 j  `! Z7 [# n+ ^! [creators?
( [2 a$ y3 o( Y, ^6 Nbut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
! c- B; [: z  U: qlet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.6 s. i. p' C; o) w4 [& g
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those
$ @" y5 [. E7 D7 d0 ]Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
$ \2 P8 Q) I# F7 O) e9 v: w其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
( u2 ~# T6 `0 c" J我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:( |% x  w1 c" L9 W9 |
" L7 Y+ I, t% b% N. A: M
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
) Q! B' S; G. _% o
唔係喎!
- ^+ V% |" s# r8 L; K古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!& s1 K& [* k7 k  H- q
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
, X; ]+ Q' z. _- i8 v佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!# h+ F* P) s1 y
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
1 J( l6 n& g/ X5 V+ ]一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
' I! o% o0 Y* Y! \  Jdun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
7 l) P1 d# z. M! M! Uif so bad, dun download la, right?
; Z. ~: j& q' ei am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^9 @# P! c5 \2 Y, C" m0 F
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct: _2 ^2 \9 i2 ], P& `
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
: q, v) R  T  c3 B- I& Y5 Vso what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
1 d! X# ~9 E, t4 Musing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........' i! I* o: Y/ Y7 J
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
5 E# ~$ x, ^% B/ J, n  e# Fso, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!0 v' `3 Q3 X: o  K6 |* x
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~# W6 ~! j! n6 ~
政府想比下馬威0的人~~. G/ h# n( R4 t) Z. ~
錢就一定罰7 i4 b2 q" e3 g% S4 W8 K6 B' F! U
未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,1 `! T, h6 t3 l% S0 |! s/ a* c
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
5 F2 }8 a; L- q* L6 s佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?! R3 y; p" ?- P
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。