<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)/ `3 D9 I0 h! \! `5 W2 M- V& V
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
) t  a6 B# U! X3 e; b% @  u大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
. o& T4 @6 A( QI agree you points that it could be illegal
, N( P# j2 C0 D1 ]but that is still a "gray area"' s* I9 D( _% {2 q! ]  g
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair6 \# C1 S* p* s9 @/ w% G4 I' @- d# c

( |- N6 Y4 \- }6 t5 Fanyway, I want to say that is
& |: Y' F. }) E; U4 B8 A% @who is supposed to be protected by laws
3 p2 z) w7 F' Kcreators?
8 A+ J2 M) C6 l( r1 W& X% Pbut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
2 a; r5 G% S. ]; Alet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.+ G" R9 ?6 I% F9 l5 {) m6 \, T
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those& ~" i. \) o( h; t# e' X
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
. P2 @  K' U' R. j其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
" o0 R; I! P8 ~; L
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
' j( p1 @* X: W- ?/ Y
& _  ?* p  w; k" u  o我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
: }; B1 }, ]( M3 r/ K2 I  p唔係喎!- A" F# X  d& h  L+ g
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
5 T" R2 W% H+ W2 }我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
7 M6 c6 s& V" o+ f- S2 |/ B( }佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!9 A3 q  R4 R/ v* H( |; S
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事9 \. Z. }4 ?4 b$ n, b- I
一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!5 I2 D/ p9 o$ |" }( f  F1 P6 I9 Z
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face......., S8 f$ q7 Y$ T1 e" g4 E/ f- G7 w
if so bad, dun download la, right?
, Y# ?7 O) g) s6 ~& Gi am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
: e6 p% g1 }0 i$ A, r4 X; rbut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct9 n( j- K8 N; s
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la# r: `( J. c  z' j* T/ F
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
  y2 ^+ S" ?  ausing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........6 k' R) m% O9 [$ [+ G& S
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
9 b) E, B+ ]! F$ Iso, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!
% t7 F& G, \+ Q3 c7 d! f  H5 E佢又唔係殺人放火~~~1 r4 \) J2 G- l8 m2 f1 _/ k
政府想比下馬威0的人~~
0 R. _1 Z; G& e* p錢就一定罰
: h9 _0 |4 [  R未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,
% e/ T8 q( |# B- a唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?% i3 v2 n+ ]7 J9 v; C6 K! w+ D" g
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
7 `/ R. z/ J1 |9 X4 E到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。