<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
( y$ l- r! _) Y  S$ `但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
$ T1 T! M% [& w) B1 b大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
! Q8 n( D. X! r. R9 D
I agree you points that it could be illegal& G8 _5 t; z8 ?5 ]% Q* ?
but that is still a "gray area"
5 \. e0 @5 U8 \  Y! Z$ xwhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
% `8 Q1 ~8 i0 e: Z+ F) f: S1 B7 |5 |; d& `" i& _+ a& f8 Q
anyway, I want to say that is
5 L. O$ R+ p) J" c* c; C2 j- Mwho is supposed to be protected by laws9 Y7 B( {5 T& }0 i/ u
creators?6 }3 T7 F6 o6 Z9 k4 K  e# ^
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
" a# Z0 m5 Z+ P9 q3 i' clet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money., {2 b! }* B  ?: Z) o
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those+ i; M# v! X) w: f
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:% z5 F7 M0 _; B9 u1 I
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
% Q& @$ S: h" d  i: V" Q; q. {我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:0 Q  Q$ P; Y# E0 e* y
* w6 W0 ]' s% A! F( K  S6 i" _
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
5 {7 e# W) o" K9 }" `( v6 O' u3 Y唔係喎!
% O# }# d! w  e+ G0 Z7 M7 Y+ v古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!0 V8 B" q& y# J; j3 S6 s7 `  `
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
# Q! e6 a! q; z  A6 Z佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
7 K7 ?  F, V  E就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
5 A# g: U9 d: P  I) j4 l" [一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!1 @: u" |3 Y3 o
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
, k1 k( R, ?$ D' |9 S. ?5 ?. Aif so bad, dun download la, right?
% D( B1 e! @5 f( V# s# l& `! |- w1 ], Ti am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
, S1 ~, ^1 F  N( |' i/ K( C% W* s# gbut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct
) ^; w* U; V# q' q3 m+ M8 {no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la' f5 j9 h/ R2 A2 z
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
7 L& u& k' o/ Q$ i& q9 Z& ousing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
# i) d2 l- t. v) w, V$ [1 `8 c' I* pwhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
- a& ]$ P& k5 k, P3 p8 y& p+ mso, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!! {( F: ~. L6 i: {* d" c; y: V
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
' {2 e! C. F$ K4 @* `0 x政府想比下馬威0的人~~# Q; z* Q* [# e7 U4 q, _4 k* ^
錢就一定罰% h$ _1 L8 N  B% U; W
未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,! o' N/ _) @6 s+ S# K/ n
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?+ W" }  D5 z/ V! i8 l
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
5 y- |# ]! m, `5 x# N到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。