<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)8 Z' V5 b( d0 H. |' V2 X
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:3 X6 |; w% P0 ?- x3 x
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
# T! }; ^. H; W- B& {
I agree you points that it could be illegal( ]1 s+ N' g5 w8 O* x
but that is still a "gray area". f# S7 N4 R- M3 l
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
$ I  H" f# N$ b) F: X: b/ X  g  i9 k& V" [7 I' `; a6 E
anyway, I want to say that is5 `- A- W( x4 D
who is supposed to be protected by laws* m: X2 N/ W+ Q. Y; u0 |# q
creators?
- x: M% i, E0 N6 @+ G0 }but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
! G5 j! i0 R2 y5 Elet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
3 u# H. V  C2 Q4 j, O. wwhen we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those4 o1 t! ]5 ?/ I% ^9 S
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
7 i8 T! H1 a# E其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
$ `' r; F% T  g  j. O$ G9 f
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
+ c7 N2 @4 V! n' T
1 V  z3 T) g+ d# h我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
% t& x' n+ k2 H1 w- ]2 w) m唔係喎!
' |. p4 J) r" P0 R% _( `; a古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
: ^+ Q& e1 C4 \/ u$ q我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
  l. H) O7 K% M% o- Z' w% o佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!* W. u" u) z, A1 m
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事5 ^) I5 n8 I  R2 `
一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
' G/ P9 k/ t. V8 ^dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
/ J& t; ], ]- P. H, Tif so bad, dun download la, right?1 g- A5 O9 I; D" D' G, K  O, ]& g2 A
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
8 t0 h$ R# b& E# R$ P1 zbut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct. _6 v2 y5 k  @# F& K/ B
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la, K1 ]5 b. H; s& n& {, h/ e
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society7 w% R: A' c  p  V
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........' w* i) y4 ?# q" J  O* ^. a$ t: k
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
! a6 m. c1 M* d( h# mso, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!
) r" |' ]6 I" f+ M佢又唔係殺人放火~~~, l; M- X) v4 w# N! z
政府想比下馬威0的人~~
6 M# `# }! A) w3 c1 G0 D錢就一定罰& A7 v. C5 I8 B3 o& _) B
未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,
8 M& T6 S& |2 H! O% b唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
* s4 ?  i9 \; U% Y佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
* b+ s/ j3 `" e  u, B# n到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。