<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)4 ^" }  k0 r9 B! ]- g$ |
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
3 Q  |8 E$ \! r8 g% k8 T- f大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
! p% v; t; }( ^- X" [+ E7 M6 H4 h
I agree you points that it could be illegal
, u& |4 s5 F, c! j& h. y/ L/ Sbut that is still a "gray area"2 ^8 Y7 N. F, ?
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair: q. _0 f8 f* H9 ^
1 o1 W5 `+ V1 L  a5 [4 v
anyway, I want to say that is
% z7 k9 f. D* n$ p, awho is supposed to be protected by laws
7 ^: s0 J; t5 Z& Z/ }creators?
8 {" Q' D8 M* ?) Z+ \but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
5 b$ e6 T" Q0 Q( vlet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
% X) L7 c: _( wwhen we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those8 u* A6 T; F5 @
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:& f& ^0 j8 g  @; L! h
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
! n) `  B0 m# R7 j: o
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:  @! ]; s5 Q( e& H7 Q
1 z9 O' v' T$ F: g/ u9 d$ E5 p
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
  a; G& \$ N3 o" c5 J5 U, c" [唔係喎!9 B5 D% D3 V  r1 e$ x; E# a" P. O
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!5 q2 _( j! |* V6 l. R( P
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
3 o  ~0 f9 m' a( A. h  A( c佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
8 I0 V/ y5 E7 o; g' `就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
: N* _: A, X  U一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!) k. b' d( R5 ?2 \  l1 Z" c- v
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......* }/ s9 o$ T# a2 X5 k3 H
if so bad, dun download la, right?
4 h5 }# ]; I* W. ?% x* F- bi am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^$ r" Q1 I7 E$ g- Z8 p
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct3 k( ]- |# {9 M& W
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
2 r8 R' t+ X& T3 m3 I. }so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society- p. U9 Z: A+ d. j+ E
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........( G( Z, g% m. @1 n" N
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
' O  }  N- {2 X. f$ e: Vso, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!  }* |; o: o# r3 n  |4 K4 u% Z; U$ m4 D
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
' y$ Z6 _( o+ z政府想比下馬威0的人~~
; o5 M- K$ n  E錢就一定罰7 I2 G5 D! T5 q+ G2 w
未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪," c& g# X" T! g# _
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
0 w! B/ O5 ]* V; d& W佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?  y; |* Z/ t- u) i5 q- E# T
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。