<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
8 Q+ P3 d) D9 x' J" |6 c: C但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:8 Q0 N2 `- u+ A. K, p$ i9 [
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
. r) A: V; K8 a/ s0 j# b& u; N" ZI agree you points that it could be illegal. l6 P( F+ m+ N, l( A  ?8 h
but that is still a "gray area"' x3 C. P) ?- `8 j1 T
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair0 Q6 ?  G; r$ Z5 z
) {( Z. v/ j: V6 \, W+ {
anyway, I want to say that is/ ^$ W, N% K/ R! T" Q# ]+ e
who is supposed to be protected by laws# E$ u7 d  U% Z% ]9 ]
creators?8 Z/ E0 ]# A+ O& f% Z8 l
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
6 [! _% m2 p+ ]( E0 J& O! l6 Mlet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.9 o- G" A8 o6 O3 ]. n0 H' M1 z
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those. {0 D' s' t+ k" C) H
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
; H" f. G$ [4 F3 W" i其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
2 [4 Q9 m7 j. G$ S8 \. A6 x  w" u0 D我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:  X7 H4 Y) F! R! y

8 [, {/ F" b  t; F我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
! w9 E2 ~: T% N9 V
唔係喎!2 B& p1 s; w% R# g
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
5 ?. ^3 X  e% a我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!- e2 v# ?" h3 D9 _
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!/ m) L7 ^) ^3 R1 D* p* g
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事7 f9 `. v- F% W7 w' U
一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!0 y% B: z; j+ I7 @) Z; n7 i
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......8 E- S+ h' _" W8 Z5 ~" G4 V
if so bad, dun download la, right?
: W  E" s9 `5 q$ `i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^1 q' k+ `, L- i6 R' R
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct
' ?7 O) A3 k; d* s8 xno need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la. H+ {# P5 X# |+ N+ A
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society: P9 m7 z" d6 Y
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........: C6 R6 j, u: a; O1 x! Z
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
6 C8 Q' q. V+ V2 K, R" k. h8 }so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!- v, R' A+ L' J
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
/ b! ~. b- H- @7 r5 [2 G政府想比下馬威0的人~~- j! j. T$ ?$ p6 j: ~! Q
錢就一定罰$ ^. x% \" W: x; R+ H
未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,5 Z. V* A# ^$ _5 R) w
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?( ~; g9 h: t& k; z2 o# v
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?1 c% N1 W+ N- {
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。