<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大). X& B! Z+ O+ ]0 J: {0 q2 c' B
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:/ V+ J7 }3 E: s: e2 H- P
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
# X9 a' p8 k( y. \; `" K  u: k' n' ZI agree you points that it could be illegal5 y0 w- P5 y, \$ F) N$ ?: \4 j
but that is still a "gray area"
. a; }" z( n8 }* k1 X5 s( c3 j# ~whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
4 s9 G8 b% ~$ C0 e) g# `* p$ w0 m' w8 n1 p* k0 Q
anyway, I want to say that is3 R- |3 V' p' ^* M
who is supposed to be protected by laws( ~4 L5 g+ F* B
creators?
" t' y3 J) X6 q$ B' Obut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market9 o) t2 ^% _- B/ [, m2 T5 h
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.- }9 K4 ^9 ?+ C
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those7 O; c% D( V7 ?6 ]$ d  q& u7 p
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:; v5 {" ^4 m+ B8 H3 I- Y& c4 @
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
0 x* a; w* T, N4 `4 G- l
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
( t2 [& y9 `( t& w/ A) b  D. m6 @# h) q1 S9 P
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
6 R. s( x# h9 \/ |6 \唔係喎!
8 w$ n/ q; q( B+ R2 q: s古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!- n6 H' r0 R8 Z+ u; O, Z
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!2 }7 K( ~" `  Y7 }
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
  I+ n5 V& Q. r3 C4 M就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
3 X& m' R5 M4 M- L9 G一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
/ A+ I  I5 Q6 s9 j2 kdun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
/ k: b- f7 a, o6 Lif so bad, dun download la, right?2 l+ K+ r8 y5 e$ b
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
+ v# O1 ]/ @8 U1 F/ [8 w/ Abut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct
, o  N. L0 d9 m; r* ]$ }7 Ino need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
$ _- F, v+ s- s! tso what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
0 ~% a- q' Q( z. Susing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
* L) B. c/ Z/ Y) U3 O* J" {' ^! }: O) ywhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
2 E& g# l# m/ `  k  Vso, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!) O8 G8 [5 p( P4 X
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~" C8 o4 X1 U6 z. Q+ _, t
政府想比下馬威0的人~~
  ~) H3 ^6 t( m/ |" I錢就一定罰7 z& r' S) x+ e' L1 H2 F- m2 V
未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪," w9 ]9 l0 N! R" V
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?2 w8 Q" n0 T  U2 A( ^7 H/ \
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
" ]+ v& A" h* C) l到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。