<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
* M1 f5 |+ ~8 _/ V但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
( @& f/ W/ {, r6 c大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
+ b+ Q5 o: L* {4 y/ N$ K; D" Z
I agree you points that it could be illegal
7 M/ [0 O$ M3 Cbut that is still a "gray area") z7 H# B1 ~4 u6 \5 R$ _0 p
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
- T( c% `, d7 R. d/ [8 O" r0 l; l, C3 s& I5 E
anyway, I want to say that is' L  _# C7 @4 ^2 J# v) }% }% v0 D, h0 I
who is supposed to be protected by laws
" l2 E" f4 w& X9 A7 Dcreators?
4 g7 F4 r3 W$ n" W0 ubut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
5 z$ G8 m1 C: J$ a1 R4 A3 Elet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.9 {" w  s/ V) T
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those3 {) h( w' [7 K( W
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:7 r: q6 \# Q) \2 a! ^3 e
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
3 R( C3 ~5 \7 b- c# W, r$ {: X我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
, e" z) L2 ~* g( g+ r, ]9 q5 y$ J" S( \
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
) {8 F. e0 Y" f5 K* A1 l) Y唔係喎!; ^, r* p9 l$ n3 y: y* ?' _9 \
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
" S# M5 U6 g8 a我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
6 ^3 v8 B' s5 s9 O3 |* l5 H  E8 E4 [佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
* a# i! z6 j0 ]& Y3 U+ g" W就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事- i6 h" i  b" x; T- i5 Q$ [' b
一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!8 K, E3 z/ ]& H* P
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
1 w) L: B9 ^3 g! _: D# tif so bad, dun download la, right?) K$ S: e# o# C9 f: n, m
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^. v' r0 {* I& _) t3 I
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct
/ R& p8 [/ D  pno need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
' l3 z3 u- h$ I! s  `4 Dso what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
9 _) I2 O, y& V2 t7 Uusing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........0 W" S6 e. E) i( I9 Y: ^
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!. d: c: W+ y1 A
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!
* N$ p% y) W; x- S( C佢又唔係殺人放火~~~3 x/ v; j  m9 ]* u. w; Z
政府想比下馬威0的人~~
( A4 o" X6 S5 P- }$ u- O錢就一定罰8 K3 T1 t3 L; b# O% ?6 ^
未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,
; U9 P6 v( x* M/ F) ]唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?* t% O9 j; R* D* o! \4 N
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?5 J, H: T# E; g! I. X5 q
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。