<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)% ^& D# D7 g7 p6 G1 J" ]& _
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
9 }" r/ q; u$ q2 H* @! N大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
& l* u( _+ h9 mI agree you points that it could be illegal
  H* k, D# c2 @5 }* [; o' fbut that is still a "gray area"
: e6 ]9 f2 u! W1 k& ?whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
/ t0 s9 M' {$ D' i
% A8 F1 J7 D1 g8 {/ janyway, I want to say that is# [7 L3 x  z3 y; ]
who is supposed to be protected by laws0 e4 p- e! ?* _4 p7 n/ L# w
creators?  p+ \$ f$ D+ \
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
2 v8 t. a& M7 K# Slet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
& E2 |2 \' t4 ^+ twhen we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those
7 K; t# N& u9 s5 zWhy nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:& G4 U6 W: r5 D
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
. r) b* y2 u8 N0 y# ~我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:' ?6 D. F8 d% z$ K7 c. M
8 }$ |" k. `% t1 c. Q3 |" O" B, e
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
; v; p2 W5 D; l3 F唔係喎!; E: s, G7 z1 D2 o; p$ e
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
8 W" t' ]) `  g4 e( d; u# l# I4 d, K我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
  n! l0 k& Y6 G6 r+ X0 q& P. S佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
, G% O# c5 T- M' L; w4 H7 z就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
1 Y2 C* s6 V! t! G* v( C; J, P! r5 [一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
& q8 V( P! u  P: ]% H6 I0 sdun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
1 S* |, e* N8 z& m3 Tif so bad, dun download la, right?6 l2 Q: m! w& d1 Z" {! y
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^; Z- T1 K& O7 L- A/ a4 x; B- l
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct
+ w4 B3 _% n0 y5 q5 V. Tno need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la0 g- l* G$ A$ P
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
; B! Z& k9 n! L' c; r- {7 Vusing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........# v2 }1 Y7 c1 d/ S
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!# w% ^/ V" T, _! ~, }: w: V  V
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!
; ]' J8 `* ?. c5 W1 N佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
. q4 m. x# ^3 O6 v政府想比下馬威0的人~~
& A# d9 J1 S2 `" e4 G/ q# t錢就一定罰
/ z1 \4 k. w; [9 K未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,
( K5 c7 H. b1 D5 V- A6 T7 y唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
& O( w4 _  e1 x, W佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?' D* t' B/ p5 X/ Y3 _& ~
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。