<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)" A7 e8 m/ F; O2 |/ g# q) b
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
& y5 ?' b1 L/ `9 v  ~/ _大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
) E4 Z9 C7 l: S; O. a
I agree you points that it could be illegal
9 w8 q3 i/ P3 dbut that is still a "gray area"
$ d" h$ f% a% s6 _whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair( `6 T( \1 }1 G$ y' a7 Z' i* I/ M
  L; k) @, D0 _/ `* J0 u
anyway, I want to say that is
, i9 y- D/ L) j& R0 ^5 N7 O( [who is supposed to be protected by laws
+ {2 D/ ^+ E" X3 v" Kcreators?
" G+ n' o! B/ X: g) Rbut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
# Z3 w2 A1 Q& S- _let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
9 y/ i- {" U2 `- @% o& k# jwhen we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those3 l' A  K1 R& i3 c$ R6 }
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
$ F4 l( P0 q: D/ V! |* P0 @: _其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
; G" R) M* l! L. K2 {我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
# W, g3 `, ]4 g' V- }6 [( |$ I0 _0 D& R9 z5 n, g: Q
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
3 m1 b4 O! x, P唔係喎!
$ H8 i; `; w- P. W8 D% `古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
+ Y5 E; u, K0 M5 W' f3 w+ a我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!5 a$ l/ f$ m. n( Y
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
( T  ^( [+ T1 q9 v; z& M就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事) G7 K5 j' V' e# v7 g# [# x. h
一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
# N4 ]7 s, ?) S* B3 T" I; Kdun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
1 ?8 S( X: E# |7 p+ W- eif so bad, dun download la, right?
$ y' X: K* E+ }, Q! S' Ci am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
  L9 Y" n+ i! Y) U; C* O# ^8 ]1 Cbut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct
% x1 y# m! b6 v6 }no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la- S( D- F1 z! V8 r
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
3 ^; ^# ]5 G5 s/ e3 uusing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........) u+ r7 W# F0 b; S
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!, }' r% @7 U& M3 S
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!
7 j/ w; m! H5 B3 H( L5 j佢又唔係殺人放火~~~4 `) t. w( \0 d" ^9 f" i0 b
政府想比下馬威0的人~~
/ t0 D9 l& _- S# I% J錢就一定罰
2 Y- g- v) ^, }; L' S未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,
9 D% J, K, d- ?4 d唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
( m6 C7 t. D3 X% ^% ^1 [+ g2 o佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
; _) t& S7 J: `- q# b" f' ~到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。