|
  
- 帖子
- 706
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 316
- 魅力
- 150
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
1#
發表於 2008-10-8 07:03 PM
| 顯示全部帖子
i thought it is the reason of rate of return.
& u( n, x1 o R+ Q3 J; t! K, o0 MCDs could have different ratings, AAA -> F,
' f3 ` Z5 E* a8 cmore risky ones would have higher premium (interest rate) as a compensation for an investment.: ]* m* i2 `8 d8 |7 x) m* l
main reason why ppl buy those risky CDs is because the rate of return exceeds their internal rate of return,/ ?/ \5 Q7 K; w j
in other words, the interest rate of that investment > their required interest rate, therefore they invest in those securities.
$ I! _ P& @5 V7 ^) J" i% {3 WAlso, fund managers would include risky assets in their portfolio for different purposes, eg efficiency.4 I* L: i$ U) N
similar to bonds, CDs trading in the secondary market have different value at different times,
. W7 G! K8 z: ^# Ynormally the value is calculated by adding it's principle and interest. ( k3 V, C! X2 m% `- n, A0 B% O
eg. the value of the mortgage+the interests to be recieved in the future. ( v8 H0 H/ {& @. ?
banks who sell the CDs, could enjoy a few benefits like, the present value of cash and passing the risk of holding a debt to another party.
- B' T) p3 o# z9 P& k! Z
% I* m1 w$ }4 B6 Q% U. Qim not quite sure if the multiplier effect does really matter in this case.: V% v$ r% Q; `+ W1 x: X
in stock market, it's the demand and supply pushing the price up/downwards.8 B" w. @/ N5 K9 T& q% J
For eg, A bought 10000 shares @10$ ; B sells 20000 shares to C @ $12,
$ | ~; G1 b8 \& OA's shares would suddenly increase to $120000 from $100000 which does not invlove any $ transaction.
0 L% q) W7 ?% o( z0 s+ {The capital loss that ppl suffer nowadays, i believe, most of them does not really suffer a real $ lost yet as long as they dont sell their securities. : n k# d0 M! b7 f' \& g3 ~
but the value of their assets did really drop significantly.
. ^5 W9 O% d, u7 x
% i7 a6 I2 t& P5 K, y) z8 N5 c- ~[ 本帖最後由 Kev 於 2008-10-8 07:26 PM 編輯 ] |
|