slwong3

真可憐但冇法: f+ {# Q& E& x3 t, R
諗下有朝一日有條傻仔真係吞左棋盤吞瓜左時米又有人鬧爆
" Q& s( @) S1 d* S, W- h3 q7 R' ^要怪就怪加陣太多怪獸加長訓練出一批智障兒童* s  \/ `5 ?, F$ F4 q: i
高智能低智商
- y3 o4 S0 x! g5 [0 h  s* ^咩聞所未聞既刀可以發生出黎
" R& T  b( O! z3 Z4 C早年刀有單話有個細路係個水到腳瓜既池浸瓜左拉
; h2 t, t% |. H2 u* w' d所以加 ...
& c' D! o3 v4 \& Y& Lmnbvc 發表於 2011-11-10 06:22 PM

7 r! _. h6 X% m2 |% ~, H

( y6 q8 J9 k) T9 @8 g  XWell, to be honest, I think this case and the charge don't make any sense.
/ y6 y( y9 g  g8 ?2 ~; g1 V7 g4 f( W8 o& p* [- u- m% k
If you're saying the kids will eat the paper chess board....then the kids may also eat a piece of eraser, paper or even put tissue in the mouth.
. s9 e7 V, D. v) T6 T$ xThere is possiblity that a kid will eat anything.4 G! b0 H: ]9 E, e0 {5 Q
You can't use the reason that the (paper is too thin) to charge the retail store.# J. h6 ?& I, w; Z/ w
- h$ I  o9 M" ]
Besiders, the store owner is right, he didn't make this kind of chess board.
. {' a# k$ V' q
0 p4 H, i6 p  |2 g) ~, z0 XEg. For example, if there is importing food that is infected or posioned, will they charge and punish the retail seller or the manufacturer?1 G  p: p6 y+ B; X2 W
The worst case is to ask the retail seller to stop selling such products and return them back to the manufacturer.