奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
+ @2 y$ ~9 P* }; G5 H4 U9 ?9 p7 Z
# \$ S, A' S$ w* Pagree,
- A. l) N4 a! i9 ~' }我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
3 c. l; k; l. q8 Y. U但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,
- x+ Z) B  m8 X  J, o2 ~- d期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

+ G! e6 n1 a1 x/ f
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html) A- `0 c" x) i0 k+ L$ }
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地
/ g! H9 \! i2 m+ i搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.3 t+ ~+ R2 ?# k8 C% v% M- d
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:. A# ^* {, Y& K
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！ ( u4 P% T1 F3 N% L! d$ _: W9 J0 l

1 M9 p0 \6 l- k' T% N7 W+ h0 p9 W& w係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???1 R* X5 `/ r' K# f. V$ t

- T4 ~; W- B' Y& |. ^2 ^7 n為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

( g5 `9 u$ K4 t0 O2 S5 v8 }

$ M) j; s3 d" y絕對支持啦" |" l7 [0 j4 l

8 L$ e+ A; V! J) h# U# f, {) B有錯就認,打就企定
$ c! x1 o' V7 x  `, P8 l1 r- N" D$ L" q
無錯當然要撐到底5 D9 B; g1 z  ^  g/ u% A

- l; N7 B8 U8 K5 s7 W但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩
& M& T8 E( p& H  z  @5 ?5 v
6 \. _- M1 u' k- X8 @8 V) w在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得8 _+ n" ?3 v1 J4 x+ L! h
0 [9 b$ T6 J: f  p
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力
6 H. \5 h  O) ]; b. e1 R
/ F0 u) i; I5 G6 c1 }1 Q我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生  Q" i- n$ ~/ i6 u+ l4 z- J% F

6 {2 y- a9 i" G唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?0 W5 |* J0 `) H3 D; j, V+ y

/ q; G7 t% G2 w% U2 p) |我唔認為lor; t1 ?- v5 J2 ~" T

- W6 R7 e! q1 `. i9 P唔係話要整死佢地! Y! g7 B0 G! H/ }3 ?& `
' b1 M* ?  S# E6 O5 P+ ^* {
而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
5 K' u: W1 E- A8 I' [7 r/ d
( t& h, R1 U2 ~8 I* R! B我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大. p+ ]* v! s2 R
5 [  R# S9 |  }* o) y: ~# P- r* ^
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的: H2 D; q/ \+ ]" B3 Z

, _* f, Z3 p9 G! w" x9 Z- g唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由0 W$ l4 W9 D4 I8 p8 b4 J7 D
, L3 R  s/ U7 i. ^* V* f
大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句9 t: h8 Z) r' e! H/ S; U9 ~# o
"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"/ P3 `/ x8 F. d, a: ?
9 [8 m0 `4 p3 ?1 K. A9 w
我們的大學生* `- S* s. Z& n; H+ U+ e. n$ M* M
% h8 [% U# i- S5 Z5 |* l
) C, `9 g/ [& `! _+ c- @

1 g! ]7 q9 M; o3 `+ b0 e( ?3 o1 x8 e2 K: U# H) [

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
; X$ Q- e- E. E) H. h7 B9 W0 J; c; M
' X+ R4 d, ^: ^3 L
2 f! H% X4 }1 f$ J! C3 M) Z有見地 !!!
- L9 c+ A3 ^) }* D現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html# w9 L" M  D) E0 a6 o
7 a& l1 q; ]; V
I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers.
4 F8 a; S. V9 F, s+ `# CI never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
0 R# r! T3 R& I0 jI pretty sad that about the University official.) e( Q8 r$ I! r5 k  A$ M
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la( [3 K# a/ B, g$ `/ @. W3 K

; r( j. v" g( b0 v( G[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:
& T$ Z/ g- m8 O) j* F我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la% A8 j% A; c/ A( v; I8 \0 |
+ C) O* @7 Q& A3 t" V* z
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

9 L& l% ]1 V( N: o  T2 {  H
. h/ Z$ w% k% u
兩者有何分別?
9 e; ?# C* W( a中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?