奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:$ ]4 _+ R5 B# s% w* z
1 S3 ~: x2 u6 A/ |6 L, d
agree,
- B2 E. X3 z! r我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
" n' n. a6 w" p8 e; I9 Q2 G- e3 i9 R但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,
3 k- J+ G  A& r2 I期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

" M8 k7 u1 k( ]& ?7 L, v# l/ j. V
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html4 ]3 \( V3 Z6 d$ q1 Y# T' b. }) r
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地
8 o, Z2 W! P0 A0 G搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.
, s3 K- ~- w6 R7 y& B. H, V7 TJust some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:
3 B; W' v. a1 \6 H' W4 ?有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！ 1 E  Y1 m9 ]# q- k

# E* c$ f5 x5 `( `( m係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???
6 C; z4 w; g9 b0 u
4 l6 F# a$ M. e8 c! V- n為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

) Z) Q* H+ |% o6 O8 w* Q

( V( W! f: v7 ]! b0 E絕對支持啦
8 s( F+ s! o% k
4 i  o; V+ q; v* u: _有錯就認,打就企定+ i( W& Y2 {3 M( M; X1 |1 q6 T  T7 }

7 t$ J: r; v3 x8 K# U2 P- _; E9 N無錯當然要撐到底
9 a* f+ C4 i; M8 _
+ P0 F! E$ E: C% e5 o但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩
' Y& q* y3 L7 a2 T/ m- H' A8 f8 u; i5 N
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
4 g; z0 e& ~! V6 Y- X; E- J5 M; W% ?& B+ E3 l; ~, J/ u0 ^, Q
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力- T' x1 J" z2 ]# i* B2 |+ Q1 B

8 B7 K7 `' [8 F# O8 D$ F我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
3 I. o# V- v1 a; Y( e0 d1 i3 Z/ _2 R5 x8 J. u% @8 X( T" y+ O) n
唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
1 ?% D6 p& I3 u" [3 U- D- m6 L4 a. t0 A
我唔認為lor
6 m! Y* g1 J' C" U0 _3 P9 N* w, X1 Z# O3 \1 ]" T
唔係話要整死佢地' v* ^! h0 h% k! {$ l5 n

4 H. Y7 c4 u. o$ W而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用4 ?; Q8 M  @) @: g" n) u) l! m

) M' V. r3 E3 `# J我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大+ W% m! r; L; @( ]8 t; N
/ Q9 \" \# x  j/ D/ {9 m9 W4 I( Z
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的
. @& w6 M) c# d3 s6 z' ~
0 _+ n# K% u7 p9 ~( I唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由
  }  t) \1 ^, g% T# y6 N) M
( M3 Z% W- I4 ]' M' x; q) X9 i) \大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句4 z. z! G# }$ @
"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"  i) l  \: C0 h# A

+ q+ T7 V, k( {/ n* L* h8 d! K我們的大學生  a# T/ m2 \2 L6 V' E& o

1 ^, t* J4 z$ e% I& f
5 E- e. ~) H% X# ~# G' n$ l- ?* }9 {  P0 H6 `' A

0 g- c$ T: }1 V3 E6 W

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:8 N+ a5 v6 k3 K( \1 I1 {# N$ Z

/ [/ u7 B, M; q
4 p8 p9 D- r9 L% P8 L有見地 !!!
6 V7 l( O' y7 Z0 \現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
5 Z  R4 ^7 G, y+ ^8 j2 x+ d6 m6 I, P: B) \& D# `( Z! A, h
I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers.
6 `8 r2 K' s( W8 e' T+ ^I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
* l* l$ k: Z5 UI pretty sad that about the University official.1 @0 a! B: C  h9 y7 |% j
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la  w5 x. q1 s  f8 f3 z  v

7 V' `/ u6 O( k[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:" t& r( [) |2 b8 h! P$ a
我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la- `4 L; q: M; \6 ]9 M
6 E; V8 y8 r3 M' I
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

4 d0 Z6 _8 v  l0 O

! e; K3 I% k6 \兩者有何分別?
0 e3 o1 ?* N1 ~% _0 N中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?