奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
1 r6 f8 {* g: V* t2 x1 e. H- ~( ^8 @3 Z9 a4 g# _6 \) S* l2 X
agree,3 e- {8 ]; N( G7 m' g, \/ D) N
我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
% E( W4 O  K$ k8 s但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,
# o: l3 o' Y9 g. }# D* `期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

9 R' v2 [. ?  D0 ~4 V: Y
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
! y) Z0 ^: b5 G; ~2 E4 G+ K2 s$ c4 ?已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地
+ `# X0 k6 g# |8 G+ G* _9 `5 m, g" [搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.; ?6 P' Z4 @: P
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:
6 E# w& h' h/ W0 W7 `8 w+ x3 A有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！
3 B+ d) M3 x+ B, k! Q  u, B4 ^6 d2 w+ o* y, M
係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???
% U# K+ d" @( b  J* T; f( O" \' c0 ]
# ~5 M1 e! i0 B為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

. s9 L* _1 K1 p8 @% [6 r4 d9 \
$ W5 a3 C, l! S$ B+ S絕對支持啦4 S" J6 Z3 X6 @& U8 T8 X1 H- z

; J$ U+ l2 I* K) T$ q; A有錯就認,打就企定7 i1 m/ G4 Z8 F; h6 E

, O; g6 m8 M5 k# D  n) a無錯當然要撐到底
5 d8 [4 s$ ]! F+ ^3 `& I6 L& i; M& v$ a2 f! R
但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩( i! ^& f: F( C+ K; P, [

4 D% s  v3 q% |, o+ b在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得8 H( o/ B* N& k' v4 W" C: q
9 U* ~7 U" R0 @7 e, X. Q3 q; s
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力; W8 V7 w( Y8 b: ^9 u" T3 }5 Q
  N' r7 j, Q) X) Q, n2 O7 X
我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生9 x8 X* D% T# p: x9 d
3 A: s$ K. F$ g  A7 k) E
唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
3 Z# y4 p& v; ^  q0 r( G& t/ V8 y' d9 k7 r) o8 ^
我唔認為lor
. [2 a! n; H4 {0 y0 E  a4 X- x0 i' `1 q- Y+ D  z
唔係話要整死佢地
" g) V8 B1 B! f7 v' U+ c1 `% }; B+ t* k
而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
4 F# b2 b' ], X5 E6 e# s& g  f( a
  m% v0 P# d+ B( [' i我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大! i7 O( H. B& T. @  D

, r0 a( {# \  \* J6 P! \有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的6 {6 ]6 x7 {9 V  c0 H

( [3 i; Q5 ]. i, T' X9 M唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由( Q5 F# j/ L# S9 k& F9 |6 b

4 M, y& V) `% f大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
& }1 f7 S/ `- p"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"5 }2 c2 [3 P+ P4 ]7 S

) b# Z+ D+ p, C" J我們的大學生
! D: a* a$ q2 U7 [7 j" |$ l' E( X  ~6 ~4 ^6 \1 I

" x2 }' l* p0 l$ h' |$ U( f) Y2 g: }, u* k+ |" T9 c0 n3 ?
/ M) s8 y4 t  f( y1 d  ]

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:# `. b) n! ~, s" |' H! b' v

) O% X( T) ?: H7 B% v, o9 E
, i  l( @8 n/ \有見地 !!!$ }7 y% B$ h, E% N0 I# k1 X
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html# i! C/ H  w8 m7 g6 j. X8 A& H) f

/ ~: i8 W/ L" [2 wI think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. & y+ D: O5 U5 i4 `% h* o$ K; r! Z
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind. , U9 x% o7 ^- T, ]# _' K/ H5 _5 ~1 o
I pretty sad that about the University official.$ x: G2 C* F" Z5 U8 m6 U+ T
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la7 y8 B" ?7 {3 \) V$ R, Z

; G; x; R! ~9 A" e0 e[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:
, ~. W  w- `, `% m& p; X2 w我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la1 k; \' h+ Y) W$ i0 G8 X

; v1 H9 w* L; y. R9 u, B[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

& n1 j- B7 N  l5 x2 G! u3 \
2 U( @1 n& C1 z  G0 p
兩者有何分別?
+ _# r6 D6 Q" w2 o. t中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?