奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:& x$ k- i# S+ ]# o

! G$ K: w5 B9 C! _! a/ q1 o& m& Lagree,, X  x. }' {7 V9 M9 M/ `
我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
1 m& ?. y6 q9 d& X! @% N" S/ X但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,/ @- v" F, g: ~9 Z+ C* w
期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

3 h; n9 t3 ]3 N9 p3 _http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html$ O* f7 h/ k5 P0 K
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地3 u6 U! D7 h% P- J/ e" f: A( d9 I
搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.
+ S! {' R4 X& o. \Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:" r# W' x# u1 {% a. P) z, _0 `
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！ 5 \5 h$ }$ y  F4 d8 J
' v1 e2 ?5 O% \  S; H$ \8 z
係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???4 D5 N- H7 P. A4 t! x, J

9 k0 c+ ~3 M2 X3 D( d1 _- H為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

9 }3 _  y# {4 s  @$ _

7 j/ B- p0 S# H$ g  n& a絕對支持啦1 |1 `) Z9 z7 E/ O) x* ?
2 r5 N6 x5 o2 y2 R$ J. I7 K4 w3 b
有錯就認,打就企定9 I/ p1 O* p9 Y
. J# R: n  c0 p
無錯當然要撐到底
# @$ J3 [7 `  z+ X, @. Q- @& w0 T8 v8 @, R6 [
但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩
2 C& s9 \( \) R! u, N  A% _( W4 A/ ]! {9 M8 Z: C8 J3 |
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得+ ?; [. }/ l$ b: v
/ ~) ]. N0 P: \( Y
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力, ^1 Q- e7 R7 c/ V/ Y0 y2 U( k

) ^6 j3 X  k2 p& \$ n8 r我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生6 j1 K" h7 F8 ?) H
% l6 x" H( ?5 f3 O2 Z
唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?* I  N: {$ r. p/ ~+ E  F; `/ e4 d
* u6 H% @+ r7 C& i
我唔認為lor! M' u* X% u. E, P8 R: j

1 G6 Q  Y8 l  @$ |& {9 t& B6 ~0 _1 U唔係話要整死佢地
2 Z" Y8 m" b4 h) v6 a
& d# l& r5 o2 Q6 c$ W而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用% y; `4 N9 N' L7 ?1 [
3 R; P$ C) l" t
我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大! k' S0 {; l$ b6 z; m/ c
1 y) {! U# W, E" j% m& z
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的6 X6 N0 ~5 O' r" T% g, E

) Z% P, Q) Z, f8 d+ R  @1 d$ f唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由( y: A# ?; m. ~; O
3 i+ Q! h$ \5 W% u0 A
大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
1 W9 J1 o& K6 T"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"1 A. }. o9 R  m: a! f

9 ]6 h6 k' V2 ?我們的大學生5 R( t1 n$ B; E; x9 w, n; Y

  J- u: w3 c; e0 ~
9 _4 I( O* G/ o$ @
$ s1 e) D5 }& i; b" U% e3 r7 v/ i. D' x1 z7 n- o( B% ?& [

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
6 _. a' U7 v/ k1 n5 u9 z+ e2 \6 _. G; K/ T0 Z3 C5 \% [

' a: ?# h- d4 }8 p' K; \有見地 !!!
6 F; E0 n  u- q3 O現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
3 b$ u) \- h6 B% m- [
) R' s3 i8 R; I0 ~" B* N) RI think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers.
- e. e7 @9 y% l, Y, ZI never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
  T% _+ G/ l! j, M2 [, bI pretty sad that about the University official.
+ t$ n+ l3 W+ k0 JIt's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la3 D5 U1 B) o4 G4 g3 }# q

- m0 G9 u% G; [2 E7 |[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:
3 o- V7 U- Q- k, b; r  M我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
  s; r/ J* l  v2 _( x2 ]7 W/ e& S" n" C% b) D8 j% a8 A* ^" i
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

; O  ^) {& [+ n- p9 c5 F! [1 \& B9 J9 N
兩者有何分別?  t: n' N: f0 |' J/ E
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?