奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:. l: ]% `1 a: m' _

+ ]. v6 O/ W- K/ y2 Eagree,$ O8 r8 C9 U6 }  I9 d: j
我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,8 @& i5 z1 C# b! k4 |% R* I
但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,
9 R; l; l, {. B1 a7 F3 E期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

5 t7 I: t5 @1 F" {$ c. n3 j
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
# e7 K* ?2 m2 f  G. U已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地
, Y' f  w& Y! z, x4 h搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.) u# e  b0 t5 h
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:5 s& t7 w6 r. T: D2 A# h9 d
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！
9 i1 X" I+ k/ ^4 b" D  n1 k+ \  X4 R% b. m) L1 i7 W
係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???( ?' W9 H* |' ~' Z9 K3 W
; h- [, c" R9 `7 R! |/ j4 u9 h
為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

: g2 L# \: k3 e: b' M
/ r2 y- O5 l  S% w2 A+ k
絕對支持啦5 w9 a0 i7 v1 ]6 _3 K7 y

: [/ u( h8 Y/ x! F/ \+ }8 e5 p1 Y有錯就認,打就企定
7 r* ]2 B" Q3 [. H: L9 D% L' I4 K
+ n* _- Y7 {; H( p( V2 d無錯當然要撐到底
, b8 c" l, i8 v. v
1 Y. E/ |4 {. `' m但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩$ b- Q: `) M1 N" S
! h- e' x: U' M
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
* X! d; N% Z5 v. P0 j7 b" R1 y% ?" N* p0 U' I) ?/ C
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力9 r. _) l6 e  r% s3 ~. o  f; D

+ @! {8 J# _$ D我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生" S. n9 i5 R7 m0 k( l! k' p% f9 r3 E
6 k/ m3 ^$ d" r: K. U& F3 p
唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?% t5 B$ |4 T9 T. k5 R

5 T8 y6 x6 ^% ]我唔認為lor
( }1 r9 ?. V9 T" h. S( F6 W2 Y* \4 n2 r+ e# t- f3 a
唔係話要整死佢地
: q9 @4 n/ R: T6 l
% j9 ?" a3 O- A4 ?( v! O+ M0 v而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用' @+ H8 e7 p, X
$ N1 Q+ V9 T8 h" w
我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大
& n5 b2 e# z: E. ?8 s' A, K" p
( v! L$ f% h1 ?. j' W8 i( r% X+ G- C有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的
$ [6 y' a5 u7 P9 f/ |* Q; j+ h" A: Y) F. X
唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由
0 j* L3 K1 i" e! `4 g# M' c! ^- V: x6 T/ k
大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句. c! [' H7 p, U, l' m4 R# j1 A. [
"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"- m2 {8 E- |9 `( Y' b

4 ~( a+ Z  s& O# o我們的大學生
& F) U5 z1 O& h% R( g* A9 E, i! b4 T7 p( J
5 y- N8 I! d0 T
2 S; ?- I1 j9 N) G+ p. a: P2 f

& x! Q; {+ K' R- o3 [  C' t

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:/ m# o" o$ v- I2 S, Z% r

' H, _* I& e0 i2 a) |# k8 e, i- D- b, p  [
有見地 !!!- K) o, `9 h2 D$ \. b7 C
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html! U; D6 Y+ Z: o$ b% m

; Z2 X% P1 o% fI think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers.
( d) b: @% O/ c9 C: y8 D4 x) EI never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind. ! D8 ?$ b6 G! G4 Z9 s  b8 h4 c9 v' F
I pretty sad that about the University official.* j$ z9 U6 [- P: m. O* @: G
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
+ f) l7 q- @2 Z4 h' H
+ g! v' `. i1 x$ U[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:
3 e+ E7 }4 d! @8 x  R我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
! q1 M1 T" r* P$ K3 f% U$ B7 d8 A7 Y: A: ?* T* M; f
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

3 L) Z$ ?$ T" L0 J! e" V0 Y0 H" K7 ?  a& m% c
兩者有何分別?% q* e! q2 H* q1 `0 L- F1 q% c
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?