奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:; I- u' q  _$ }% H9 k. l

, C' D6 f' z' n- |0 a# xagree,2 a! L/ v: P! k2 z# o: ]
我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
# w5 h; F9 `# {- T5 r1 U# r但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,' u) ?# S7 |2 }+ U! b8 K5 k& T4 [
期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

6 i- ~" G! z( ^! {
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
# s) \# W, ^! \: W: p! H$ E/ {; F已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地) s, ~& u0 K% g* X. L
搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.
9 }; A+ a6 i* z8 i+ KJust some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:
# x0 T+ Z- s5 C& N$ N5 ^' n: S有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！
, N8 M, Z7 e7 G& Z5 d+ z
9 N: A9 c) R6 z( k9 G係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???1 V' n% Q4 p9 y7 K, q+ N

, F" \; W& R7 r" J+ X0 ]+ w為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

4 {6 Y9 y7 y; a# ^1 E# x2 e* b* p: K# V& b8 l$ e1 K+ P
絕對支持啦
: Y. V7 V1 O1 u2 u2 b
; E4 h* k" a. p$ H有錯就認,打就企定, f2 J3 s, H( v0 s% Z3 q
+ h" e! f1 s' Y/ C, c) ~7 P
無錯當然要撐到底4 B3 M: T+ |8 Z, j. T7 e& M

5 p9 S* v+ \6 J% d& p2 k! t但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩- H% W! W& ~- \& S
3 s- @3 t8 \) b1 ?- I
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得( C* |$ s% X$ X% @

9 j( S# E1 f. I: w# U一份公眾讀物係好有影響力7 ~/ K3 w- }- L5 I2 y+ p

: j9 E' d3 }3 P, n, J我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
# m# w1 J% J% z0 @2 c1 H
  w9 b% r+ A' M+ p9 h唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
, S6 s4 B- D/ L* I% n+ @' ^" l' r% z5 l
我唔認為lor
% r7 A( \7 s0 l
6 k  `3 N( n0 y( W2 s8 X: h唔係話要整死佢地
( N( G  U# |5 W3 _, w
+ R3 Y4 s+ s4 }' ]4 R而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用! d2 [# i1 b9 C& q2 r& f: J
5 D- b$ B: u1 ?) Q) H" {6 G$ q
我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大# Q; b; V9 f1 ~2 U  O8 ^9 f
2 K8 f2 [7 Q1 t, P6 y" V
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的! ^0 I  Z# W' q  l9 a

# c2 G! k9 S( F唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由# h  z' c9 c7 m2 o
' x( f+ S7 P# ^) @' q6 @8 V4 d
大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
) @8 c) }5 F* D" B2 \& U9 R& C"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"
4 N* o, z# ]$ L) p) u, u$ f7 ]3 h: b( [! D1 {
我們的大學生
3 Z( R" X% l# i. ^2 N3 Y2 v7 y* v5 L/ }6 o- @, v9 z
2 I1 j/ |4 B$ B- ^0 E# l. q/ `
, y# x/ v0 f) Y- Z) W! B
7 O7 ]& h9 c3 h+ ]% v6 e8 `: c

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:/ k! O' ^  Y/ Z
) b- |8 ^, b* o5 ]9 z+ [" I
$ Z. D9 R" a, v( q+ H; m
有見地 !!!
8 H  r9 h# c+ U3 Q6 V& V. v現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
' j- D6 b. A0 M) }$ c/ D
5 R/ a9 w& O# {6 Q8 R; JI think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers.
0 h$ }3 E0 O" P* D0 A$ W+ l7 V0 D3 mI never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind. 9 p/ G* y' N2 ~3 f4 |7 r0 v* k0 O
I pretty sad that about the University official.
0 ?2 ~; {( I! Z' OIt's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
; H, M0 @7 ?/ K& k- h
) `! U6 ]* s& A4 H[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:2 W6 J1 N1 }+ w& h
我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
# y4 N# Z; w8 W/ Y3 F3 F8 u8 @8 J0 k  M/ o2 j% `1 o
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

  U" V9 K$ F: p- J3 W6 U

* g- e8 Y8 A5 L( j: y  a/ l兩者有何分別?$ |. B) {# A; l8 ^
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?