奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
( x7 V' |$ l; d6 b3 o: r, T) h2 @( L' `1 [$ X/ n4 Q
agree,* s; p$ D4 f- a0 D
我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
; w8 h4 p( |* g2 o! D' d但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,
( E" M0 f, |$ l/ e期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

5 F3 \& _4 d5 M3 O& t4 w2 q9 I4 @
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
+ ?" D3 D9 T) H6 l, B已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地
8 g' y& R( s' h# ?搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media./ n5 {9 M. S( K5 ?, h8 V7 j
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:  H% Z/ N1 k0 V7 Z0 I$ v+ j
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！
. H7 q+ t3 x( n3 U3 z  L1 R8 C8 E  M, u, N" k7 ]) o6 n) W
係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???! D1 i. C& j* i( Q4 }+ [

( M3 ^/ c, M3 ~# W' f' R- j& F5 O/ V0 P3 o為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

7 |* f& V2 n" B$ Y/ M( I2 r
1 U* u: J1 v. A9 K5 J" Z5 P
絕對支持啦
% n/ {. c! e$ j8 |& g& ?
3 E* h4 _* @8 }2 |( p/ P# `7 i有錯就認,打就企定
6 @) L# p  J. Q2 s. K( K& y
, T9 E8 t+ l, f! v8 A, o無錯當然要撐到底
8 [1 @/ U' z; s/ ?% c6 S
2 K/ i$ o2 V" f+ o' o但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩' W$ i, s, D! @+ m' A' Y

. c1 ?9 W$ N- x在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
1 ]: p6 ]* k  [% \- B6 r' P8 K+ O
  }6 I5 e2 Z8 L4 I2 Q5 L, G6 Y一份公眾讀物係好有影響力% ?) o3 T, f' Q( d3 Y! F+ q  h

4 w% U4 W. Z- j; B, h& s, j我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生. c+ c  T3 v! k

! t# ?' ^# c) }2 M7 s% s2 m唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
$ h/ L* E4 [+ c4 ~- P4 y. A) p, @  G9 s0 ^) T; x# Z
我唔認為lor, E' X, |, S7 I4 c
( m$ H; _7 u( w. K' ?# d8 o
唔係話要整死佢地
+ Q$ Z: Y$ x+ O/ \- n
; ^) b5 x9 b) a, s( n9 Z# |- n2 w而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用. t' a: g9 Y& j

  I0 z. S, n& [9 y4 B5 a我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大' p" b6 G1 c' A7 c1 J6 u3 t
/ p4 D1 Y: [0 |5 }) o2 b
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的) J- A8 w: Z" _7 f9 z
% c# o8 N5 F- k3 ]
唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由
# x1 p1 D: ^8 s: A6 u
, v* w& M4 }* j/ H/ V% S大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
4 w6 u" U( E* t% ?9 z) _"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"& X: e5 p) X' _( i! \
% N, a% O' w; q( @% W4 B
我們的大學生
5 _# u3 {+ G( S# j9 v0 Z+ \/ U% n8 C- {  H

4 o5 ^2 ~) E+ h+ U
" u0 e. {' g) U. R' v/ B
2 a! `" h, z4 O6 h6 p* }1 ^

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:  p: f, L* W3 P. [6 G
6 d) _# w  g" R- Z  Z% a0 W/ L
8 C9 |# C( h9 j6 F7 H, j
有見地 !!!
* ~2 S  K, U9 ^* i, C* l現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html! \- m# m5 \6 B: N, i* Q  z

6 S0 D4 L& U' Z& g, `, \) \& iI think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. 6 B% s9 }6 M+ ]" V
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
" j$ c3 K7 p7 X6 A& {I pretty sad that about the University official.
& g$ w; E% K1 D- X; _. r4 rIt's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la9 P3 S  o6 \' O2 S
; v. C2 r  J1 [) L* c
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:$ G( ~# V  W6 [1 D, O, K/ E
我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
' e* F' q2 I3 B) Q7 S) x
( }0 h4 J9 R7 _[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

6 z) A  G: a$ f! E+ C- d9 P0 x/ c

- Y) J: r1 [/ S6 `兩者有何分別?$ u8 e$ }3 t6 s# ^
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?