奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:3 \/ g! O2 j! j7 h" F, Q6 f+ v
( f+ @* x. B% i7 e. W8 K8 v
agree,3 G, F$ |  I; P4 O% ?1 x9 }4 ?
我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
# `' J% D  e( J/ l但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,* g7 Q$ e) W1 u3 p. k% ]/ Y( }
期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

! q2 H+ z  O0 a0 q. }1 H; H
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html5 w5 q/ ~. w0 Y
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地
- N! o) w* R+ O- A, M  t  W搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.- o+ ]+ K4 n/ S! G! H" r0 M
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:5 a& l+ U) c" c
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！ ( e6 {  r7 V. }) X1 o
, |- K6 S! T% a: m4 y
係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???
) C( v! h- H, i- ~$ w3 y+ d
2 B+ s+ \/ x5 M$ y3 ]為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

3 B0 q, b% K/ C
5 [" E7 @, k7 E: ~8 v- h% `絕對支持啦  A7 Z, [- ~2 s6 T- n
& L* [. C0 m" T. Y9 z- p" _; U  Z4 z
有錯就認,打就企定" }5 ~* c% m6 D# C

. l7 W2 V! s3 @  Y無錯當然要撐到底; r7 r6 I5 [+ B

' ~1 T# K- X: D' R9 C. \3 O! l' U但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩
( r1 Z& C4 _/ [$ v0 a* `( ^, D" B) }/ N- t
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
8 n/ {- ^8 {; K; C# u. H* i0 D7 W
2 n7 ]# w" ?6 m1 B3 Z: C  H一份公眾讀物係好有影響力
  P8 e, q- @/ l
% F2 G) Q" t' A+ N5 k3 t& P我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
4 R& B! m& i3 R! f7 O
" w$ }5 Q3 U4 G唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?; W4 [# y. p+ T- D7 E6 k2 a% W
3 u6 V% ^& ~6 K6 w8 p; k
我唔認為lor
7 A9 x" Z3 g6 m5 N4 W. R
- s' c+ e0 E9 q唔係話要整死佢地
1 q+ \# Y% d; z9 U! W6 w) ]7 y3 M5 ?
而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
; x1 D7 j+ N4 \
  i3 j) D" a) s5 T我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大' y( F, O/ y  |5 t2 T& @# T
2 f* a* e) K; c! p' z3 X/ w
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的) T6 B' b1 X5 {$ w+ s, b6 u0 K2 v% d
$ s! ^& T$ A& q  h: S6 i: \3 T
唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由
! Z2 n( \4 E" l( p  }: H( R
' Y, @% A9 a1 @% i3 t6 B( D大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
6 X& k6 |, S8 G; r) S"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"
4 i# s7 m* I0 Y8 g4 b6 z/ s9 Z4 N$ G
我們的大學生
8 E9 ~$ a" w, I* j& @. L! H
" y" _$ }3 `3 v  m/ u6 i/ Q* c8 F3 I3 h  a
3 O' m6 }. L8 J3 e
0 w, Z- A1 D# n0 v

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
7 F# {- y) \& z% g0 _. u6 g
' b2 `" ^  b4 [! r4 q3 v5 s( u( d4 C3 f+ M2 R6 g
有見地 !!!
2 w: ~# [, Q: w5 I" Q1 i現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
3 ]8 s) ]$ Z, y5 d! f" ^( f8 v6 a; M! _
I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. ) i" B: M/ G% K& Y* c0 \
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind. ; N/ O, d; C' f% V: w0 I% Y4 I
I pretty sad that about the University official.% ]3 P3 Y6 d5 D
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
9 }6 k+ w( X& T+ [, ~- w7 _1 R, I
: r8 L) e2 A- B, u/ z3 P$ c% l[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:  w- L  ~3 \) O
我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la# q8 V8 i& `- |) g; D

% ~3 c$ S3 |9 S7 U+ |- t' D[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

# B8 B- D$ L3 M  a7 e7 |' f# r- N
* l3 {/ Q' Z6 p4 |$ u6 O. f+ _
兩者有何分別?( ?: E/ T# z, |3 k) I6 S7 m
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?