奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
' F/ v; T$ R- F7 ~
  H6 d' x6 H5 Z7 zagree,
, I& N7 V0 P4 J) o2 ?+ J我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,1 K0 ?  n7 q3 |% b7 D: K+ p8 F
但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,5 p3 v. S+ e% v/ p
期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

1 ~- y3 {# I+ }2 `http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
) q( k- u$ D# o/ N" z6 ]已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地. O1 z8 {2 K% n3 j) H( D7 S: }1 {
搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.
/ }3 w( v8 n& g+ u$ iJust some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:* @8 y3 K5 [2 c# o; |# b: C
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！   |  s! y3 [. o4 H. N, W
: `2 a% X9 y& F8 h7 @. r1 I; Y2 N
係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???( O1 `0 N4 Q- G6 k
' a6 X7 M+ G) m* I- Z- s
為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

4 D- {) s6 |$ j0 K0 Y/ T

, a5 `- n$ y' d. G, V, H; q絕對支持啦1 F( c$ ]4 \0 m3 m

# X! K- `: ?! D0 E有錯就認,打就企定  v6 G2 \. K2 U
5 a( w8 x/ N( C( X
無錯當然要撐到底
8 P- U* e5 r$ `" N, ^! U
3 k8 b# X: p' E+ ~但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩0 ?6 f9 K& p6 x, f) ~# E5 p
8 U" ^: ]" o/ q7 M4 V; z# `
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
7 P! |* @" D; G- f' z8 ?
9 m0 Y7 y- Z1 C3 x: @8 X一份公眾讀物係好有影響力
( u; \0 ^0 ^$ T- `5 r' B$ _6 |, c6 j2 g
我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生/ w+ Z7 d+ a0 e* P! ]1 j

+ V# Z5 x  j8 N# s9 i+ ~' I  h唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
, }& J( c# B# r9 d0 l7 d6 ]  w3 b0 f5 p8 ]) }0 B+ `
我唔認為lor
0 I) ~; v* a# ?2 H& b$ d
( ?; G) M% K# N$ E唔係話要整死佢地9 [9 N$ Q5 U5 Z4 M1 i4 Y( S% u' `1 ]

8 s, ^5 ~9 \/ Y; ?( w% @! i而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用% J9 L& F* g7 d4 ~/ J/ N

( K5 O4 @5 r0 p+ O0 k4 N. y% L我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大
8 e: |+ H0 w2 T  u6 i+ ]  C! l; `, b4 F: ~
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的) {$ ?8 q3 k* I) {, W' m( ~1 R
! {4 Z' h2 K! g; u4 G
唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由, s( O8 `+ I$ W. g+ K

3 U3 C3 V) @7 q5 K, J大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句' d+ u( V0 m3 f6 [* ^  a# f
"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"
0 q+ {/ s3 h9 w9 V
  O  Z( H9 p! I$ |我們的大學生
' k9 j, J+ I9 g: M# L
5 I& x/ x" {& ]+ b, J/ g6 e2 y8 E
# V" X6 w# u+ T' E9 D, k7 Q5 m+ n3 p8 Y  A6 R8 U

9 z% x7 K  W; n5 g. a5 D( }

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
- N9 s2 I6 \) \/ \! H# C6 ]/ I; P# ~7 A4 Y( U  D* A
' v+ B7 V; M, Z5 w  q- m7 |
有見地 !!!
2 a* b$ E1 B1 D! n現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
0 G3 Q- B; V2 n% N. ^, I7 Z6 L$ u# e9 }  T
I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. 6 C* K1 M, {( g3 C5 x
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
4 G& O! d2 {0 n* W7 y. II pretty sad that about the University official.' U5 P! w0 U2 _. M# u0 m+ X
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la6 [9 Y4 L  `. T' H( Q  Y
% E+ _9 y4 P, n/ a1 x- l5 [& C7 y
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:' [  d# ]# P7 }; z' W( n
我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
2 I* _* j! |: ~+ q3 D
$ L- a% n- W& I4 {[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

" y- b* L4 e& i' V  e" V3 v; E; B
兩者有何分別?
6 n5 j% Z  n" ^! B2 `) s7 }6 m2 C中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?