奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:. T" H) e" Y+ |: d7 k
' ]* b* l) x0 x. r5 b/ O
agree,# F3 I. Z5 l+ y+ T* r  l
我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
5 Y+ @' @% j; d6 V" v但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,( X, J* V9 ]# p5 q7 _
期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

" f  F3 D# J) T9 ^; h& _http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
  p3 _8 a: D% u8 ?; Q! D. b9 e已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地
/ Z2 j9 S% i. G/ @搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media., u$ B0 i0 L* b, A# ?
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:
: E' i6 D$ p# r3 Q2 Z* g有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！
2 x5 U; H5 C5 z- s0 w# G% z( X0 q" e3 p) V8 k& q; y/ k) t. X" M
係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???
- I1 A. B. ]% u! I" l$ \
9 V0 p$ E# ?3 ]: C* x4 A為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

" ?/ _* ?2 z& Z0 S3 q( h" y, o$ f) r) d* n
絕對支持啦
1 X4 Z- L1 z: ~3 r" ~' f8 w9 ]; v% g0 {! f, Q- ]
有錯就認,打就企定3 {# N8 z3 w; [7 K
6 o- l8 s4 B) J9 }) z
無錯當然要撐到底/ g! J6 f/ W) f& a7 \
0 z9 g8 E& I. g/ o( ?
但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩; R5 x. O5 T2 H; r; e+ q5 @

% R, C9 N; x' @在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
1 h7 A' x' ^$ Z* a# w* @, c
7 G% l1 Q0 Q6 C6 d" F一份公眾讀物係好有影響力, a6 r8 _0 q# d* J/ V5 d- X7 Q
5 ^1 h0 H3 T# N( f0 E) {. R9 R
我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
' N5 Z6 a& x. z/ m# Q# G0 p' x/ A6 V
唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
- p, d  R" |3 u& ^  d6 ]' Y! t+ P* @' z) F, p
我唔認為lor) r5 }2 i4 Z2 D5 Z* X7 P, C

( U# }2 m4 \: j) e/ @2 a3 r/ b唔係話要整死佢地
% K& O' J8 f3 v3 i. Y+ i4 y1 b1 L  }6 M/ Z
而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用: ?# W) K. [) M- b6 O+ Q' N+ t9 g4 ]

* L: V) T' J. j1 U, v我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大
. ~. r6 r0 b- m$ c, i8 |
: q% g7 @0 f! g; l$ Q2 N" ~$ y$ _有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的  i& ]7 d# m: z# b5 ]! W

( e5 T7 I) n! ]0 g8 h0 R唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由
/ Z6 {3 A& o" v
1 t  e) W; Q8 M" [, Z. J4 I' T6 z大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句( d/ x4 s1 s5 A% ^5 n
"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非") u7 A* u6 J* t' t6 f

7 T6 O# n* U) i4 t: G% E6 c4 I我們的大學生
; N$ J, ]1 o. o
$ o8 P% P3 V+ x7 i2 e  G9 O
% b% W- @6 E5 j8 T" Q. i' e2 b8 d0 ^0 c2 d
- [  z# j9 Z' O% b  r2 {

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
; B8 V0 b  ^$ e
* a" L% J) J, F& s
6 _+ [6 U3 n: W- O+ v有見地 !!!
1 D& t8 g1 J7 D5 e0 m) I現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
! w5 r9 y1 i  k* L4 @, l* V2 @3 m$ h; O+ K
I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers.
3 J2 u& b; i$ }, vI never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
, N0 S+ |: `8 Y  I/ a5 jI pretty sad that about the University official.8 V: x* v# O* K. e& ]3 f
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
" j9 c) W; Y* u1 {& j) o' k7 a3 Q/ r& a
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:1 H; [& k) g4 D2 y0 {, i
我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la; z$ i; |$ L1 ~! t" l# c4 K

7 O( A8 S- m% }7 r[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

+ F& ^$ k' R6 i5 u
  @/ [% `2 F# d& o: |8 b" h2 Q2 @& M
兩者有何分別?8 T- e( u* C1 A. U) T
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?