奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:$ J% m1 k4 q$ Y9 Y1 O- G
( h  D% q8 W# N! b& h
agree,+ M$ b  a$ y+ `' G$ B/ E( H
我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
8 [- n4 P; u  j% h* N但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,
$ a+ {! ?8 J" N1 Q+ R. W期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

- t9 Y5 G# _; @3 }9 a/ K
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html' a( h) w! q& A; I0 Q7 p- E! X
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地; g) I9 }& K  I+ v$ I+ O; ^
搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.0 C3 x/ l5 f  }3 x4 }
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:
3 s' g; t3 `4 p. ~1 P9 V2 J有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！
2 M; j4 k6 w/ N5 ^
  R$ X; |! L* J5 Y. G5 W4 p7 n7 Q係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???
1 ~; ]! z9 O' m  r! C6 ~' m5 n; V. J0 y( v. h: I$ Q
為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

( r. v2 e0 v: p# h% S3 e, A5 U

; o$ B0 O. U* K4 G絕對支持啦6 K) D& t& r+ ]2 Z) ~  D3 n/ Y* a6 ~5 A
+ `0 ?! S* x* t" }+ p
有錯就認,打就企定
! F- K6 L& `  V4 I9 J. n$ v9 y+ }3 w0 n
無錯當然要撐到底1 R. Q: `8 N" I' Y: O% n5 t0 v/ A5 p2 J

  B& U' `, ^" K但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩5 h, B* M5 ^% _9 P! F3 p7 X

# i, f4 a6 p" J9 i" L5 D在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
2 [! s- Q" C6 ]3 M2 n, B; F* K0 U. [" d. @2 @4 s- u
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力
% r% v: O/ h7 O' p; }: W3 D# J3 }6 S" j% b+ @$ [
我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
7 V. Q( a) }  ?8 Y% J0 y$ |2 u# y  ~
唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?1 Z4 f& L  D  P$ b7 c' H7 o1 {
1 b  g( l# @; d) W
我唔認為lor* Y1 O8 I" H& Z& i# q  p3 a' t- {- O

1 l! v2 e. c' D9 |" P! y唔係話要整死佢地
4 f9 ^9 x: l1 s+ @9 O+ I% I8 S2 ^! e1 D7 |$ A* q
而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
8 L7 \5 a# K0 G( i8 Y2 c2 W! l6 t6 j  o
我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大. j7 ^4 G) R+ g& Q" j
$ u. g$ T# f, h; X! C
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的. y, N% s, t- p0 A
3 Q# z# E2 h; b- ^
唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由
8 M, }3 R! J) n* p" X4 \8 N, v, N% P  S! \
大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
! Y: k1 C5 S% x! ^' h& O"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"
6 {( i! y9 V! r! C( X! ^9 H, G5 j9 d7 E. b2 K, Z' O: k5 k; p
我們的大學生: A  L  f7 M1 Y" _: R7 Q

! y0 @- _6 w0 ?, a3 g; f- P$ }. e
0 x9 p2 R, T+ G7 ?! R  m1 w* h5 N) j
$ n5 U$ I. R) s$ _8 a

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
3 [+ _) u7 H9 E: M/ l) n: v, `2 a) R. ]$ ~2 O$ p( E

6 |, P" d% y  p) y0 g有見地 !!!
6 n' L6 ^: _. r8 [$ A8 d現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
; Z& a& W' m; s" l' g( z; M
0 O* \  \" A" rI think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. ) R( x" K0 `( \: c& N! W1 P( ^
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
  r  g* A- V, U8 Q1 |. CI pretty sad that about the University official., ?6 a" w; k0 U6 [3 S% D% L
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
$ I4 |2 ]# C8 Z( L# b& ]% e% @
% Y( _0 y- b# @) X. T& J. A[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:; B6 n# ?; {0 R
我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
! @' U) n' \9 b: O6 {; e# ~0 R: ?! ?6 G1 G
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

  X0 d- w: a" }. H

4 D% M5 X5 R% D  p9 z兩者有何分別?8 y+ ^$ ?/ m3 w. `7 q( u/ b
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?