奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
7 ~0 P* i0 E5 Q& A' g4 b6 b4 n$ W6 {) E8 }4 k
agree,# |$ h0 e, S  @5 q9 l) J4 g7 D
我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,- G3 q2 N" A) p
但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,
5 ]6 w+ D0 K, I  i期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

' P5 M# [( K: r+ q7 _- P
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html9 `" D0 t  [& v+ B7 W" m) m& m
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地+ D; M+ {. Y% d, Z7 k2 j, t9 ^  s
搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.( q' |0 H% A6 N4 j* i" C& H4 i
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:
* }0 k/ X1 o" g有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！ # p9 R) `1 a: l2 O% L4 s
+ r% G7 N; A3 c# N2 R4 L. {/ z
係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???
% y7 r/ m9 n& w  V2 d3 v* W# _5 t- E: g, D. v
為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

. O- Z' H( |' E# _0 h2 y
$ X: P1 e7 S, I. K( s
絕對支持啦
( k. y. N5 P: X, d& U* Y. A
% j0 d- @* R& l* G6 M) z1 J有錯就認,打就企定: P# y5 n$ Q4 R; {" I5 h1 @
# o) d3 s8 ]8 z+ ]3 C! O- x
無錯當然要撐到底5 B( g( d4 w2 R; E- u2 [
/ K( A: G: B7 A6 f2 t
但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩
. U1 d" p  P' O8 q9 N7 q6 P! X* [
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得# J6 n" k1 W2 Q( r4 H4 x+ t1 m/ O$ t

' ^9 c" p: W, Y1 h& h一份公眾讀物係好有影響力5 W6 |1 v1 v7 m  K* C+ x6 z
, X( Q" |- g# Y# t
我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
+ v  f8 \/ k% r, t7 w; M
) |3 `# P5 G$ d3 N2 s唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
. C9 Z- g4 M/ t1 g1 Z6 O8 C5 Q) I
: d9 |& b- T1 {  H我唔認為lor# U5 a  z! Y* D% Z# t3 p+ a

( B2 p* Z6 x3 [唔係話要整死佢地7 t& V+ T. L% n: Z  X  d' p) R3 C: o
- J+ r1 G$ M) R3 G, a' Z
而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
# F4 `2 i2 x( `5 l, F, P
- b& q( a3 p1 C' b1 v4 e我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大0 M1 o9 z# z0 p

* ^8 a% q9 L' h8 \* Z有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的1 d0 U7 o+ i: o: r

6 G% u7 p" R( E5 L1 v9 l唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由' U  ^2 e. a+ T) G) q/ B( z) s

' b) a: g7 t+ p+ j% V$ W: `0 h大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
" Y) j) q  I- m6 A# f7 R- b8 p0 Z' K. d  X"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"
# n9 O: g& H1 O* R# k
, ^. d  F1 m8 X我們的大學生  e) I* O& Y5 O* X

+ E: n) r% A/ m- s7 H. c! L# K/ W+ r! I; S
; T/ z: t+ r" l/ R

- N0 P3 W, n1 n6 I% Z

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
; Y- F+ p4 H" K) v& Q: m
/ r5 T% Q. L6 p2 n6 F/ j5 o  s* a- X
有見地 !!!
$ o' n) H$ P3 c2 F3 U$ J現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html# {; R4 @6 C. a6 h3 V1 U
6 `4 ~; r  T8 z1 z- o; r' }
I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. . y" v5 T4 W! [( W8 l
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind. 0 }5 u/ p' r6 _% S% g% h/ V! p
I pretty sad that about the University official.( z* }  _3 o! J; G- n
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la" p0 j; E2 B5 B. X  Z, o
6 p1 j0 d% {. a8 _+ v7 @1 G
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:
+ M! u. X, T: P我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la' {( ], |4 [9 ?% G/ @* F
3 ^6 O* Z0 v/ I5 g. j
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

/ l# ?) |; t' L* a
" \* l, n/ P4 j兩者有何分別?3 w1 t2 r8 n. [6 U- {; |
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?