奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
; ~3 F! |. H  a
7 V/ q  G4 r4 D' S2 Gagree,; Z& E. ]/ d$ y- U
我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,+ M' j$ R8 s' n$ K" n6 d
但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,
. K1 o' _# H0 {' v! T3 ^期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

5 X2 ]+ W) t9 @6 Dhttp://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html, A( f9 }) t/ `* y4 T) J
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地) v  o" X6 r) P: V; o5 z7 ]/ T4 s
搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.
* U* Z- _/ z! AJust some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:
  U  W  m. R: v& v$ c- [有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！ , u4 n9 q" ^+ V4 t

/ B% Y8 ^8 d9 J* L) ]) w: |" a係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???
! a% Z5 ~  a' w% C( a' K6 w2 i9 D; a( b1 [1 R! `+ }
為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

3 ^. W  V7 _5 d

3 C8 a3 m& u- m# d* ?: y絕對支持啦0 o: m3 w6 n3 e0 U9 k) {/ ^9 X
; p0 E- d1 U8 F* e; l: @9 o! O/ v
有錯就認,打就企定
7 X4 c: i, Z/ L/ D( X% n1 ?
$ }+ S( I& k& y8 d% ?! b無錯當然要撐到底$ l: f! B, q3 ^; o# [  |/ T
) o! [; v; W( I, C7 h" }
但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩
, g! g/ z0 E& {6 X( v  y0 s7 L. d* g; g
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得% Y1 Q# ]: n7 g; B9 U" |7 t

$ y- [" G* z3 M9 h5 ~一份公眾讀物係好有影響力
+ r' P- _7 ?! k, j7 ?; s! j& S
# _, K9 {/ r0 V" F2 T: C我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
# D2 A& L4 |1 [% ^5 Z5 Z5 W8 F+ _4 r6 A7 L
唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
7 G5 S  C& H$ m4 ~2 u2 ^# B' Y: X9 F
我唔認為lor
& ?% z6 W! z0 }" Q
. }, p& x" r% M9 A& ?) @唔係話要整死佢地9 ~* |( c8 h  g- R

  J$ i9 k5 u$ c9 d1 g5 j而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用% }) `* W% A* d/ |. r% m) F1 R

& f% d9 u3 j& h3 ]. ^# u( {我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大. `# X9 H1 g3 m
& R) X" D  `% w
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的- z2 \7 i  Z# A9 v' v
  g7 a6 q5 H" \
唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由9 M, n" Q. g2 m/ H5 D# n
& @" Z. ^% i) `9 l4 U
大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
* z" i: x, F8 G* l"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"
( H  P! Y  p7 x+ _* J% T  w$ X9 ~4 L6 N) R, y* n
我們的大學生  R3 o9 q1 _; c7 [8 P& N

- B1 e* Z; M% t1 A+ T! T6 i2 e% \1 n4 v" E* @/ y

* h; c; d1 [5 d$ ]( Y9 Z! o5 `( A' r& p% w8 i9 k

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
# W! ~+ A) Z4 Q
+ f/ E) C/ |" ]4 d( ]2 E0 `! P6 z0 |  x$ s
有見地 !!!
! T2 k9 T& c/ c4 n9 t% Y& N% v現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html* N0 A' C* Q4 W$ G' Q1 s! ~
% U$ \8 o5 B) k
I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. , U) T8 B, `& m8 s+ r7 b) ~! q9 i
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
! D- D5 x' U; K. S; |3 q$ _/ UI pretty sad that about the University official.- N* b8 W( A; s. A. X% a5 U
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
2 ~; D; h1 m5 O1 Q- o4 F( \# w6 N) o; Z- y6 q5 |5 }  _- ~
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:
+ t3 H5 w6 \/ @9 }  O& R* Z我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la, F0 j) z- I1 c8 m, W& j

# d" x+ t$ t: F; l3 W[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

, u* w8 O2 e1 T' X8 f+ ~" c
$ z; b) g6 N- |; ~+ t' q兩者有何分別?: r7 j3 {. z0 C3 u
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?