奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:+ D0 k& ~! v1 i3 s5 z& B0 J+ }3 P
# F  w% J) f& l! G. J4 a
agree,
$ S4 N) `6 m8 U: _3 `2 D, [1 b$ y% x我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,) |# J2 y) D, W2 l' s$ A
但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,
/ L& N) u- R8 l) S" u期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

# @# T% q! k3 Z* f
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html  M3 ?7 [- M6 l
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地) i) d' _# a& d) R3 D6 h0 b: w; r, k
搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.3 L! X7 j( r$ G+ r7 z% h+ H- D7 B& ]
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:& e* l/ C6 O# D1 S5 b
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！
) l+ {7 u  c9 ?7 u9 x% Q4 m$ M0 w) d: g7 C6 T2 m
係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???, a& O) S0 k: r2 ]8 P: ?$ K  M

3 ]" J$ y9 c$ B! v. y% u- A為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

! C( s3 [# Q3 P7 m" r5 D0 M8 t6 T
0 t% q4 o5 y7 f8 w6 M絕對支持啦% Q* Q, ?9 i+ h5 Z& ^+ X
! \, E4 j- Z. W, c
有錯就認,打就企定
- \$ T- t# K9 i# ]  S* F! C9 I; O2 L$ M( v9 S& t& `* b
無錯當然要撐到底# k  e5 L6 w, ]" l# r5 d& h

% ^: i- M4 w8 g6 w5 e: [7 v# C但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩1 R7 W3 }$ _: ?% c
" B% J2 ]1 e% x) m+ f
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
2 x* e5 V) V, @$ Q9 U; z2 J/ U4 {# k# h3 o0 Z' {- d9 h
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力6 X8 {% O/ X4 v
+ f1 C7 y' o5 o. d/ W
我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
" C; I9 e; i8 _5 l# c- S, m; e/ {* q
唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?# e" E4 L* R: G7 N. L

) R: {2 \, u8 d' M+ ]我唔認為lor
4 u1 H( _# p5 v% M: q  o; b
5 u& {- I: z1 }1 @% ]7 L) V9 _唔係話要整死佢地
6 s3 L# H. ?1 `7 }9 m: B
6 ^! w( D2 Z5 }$ j! I而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用8 h( }" C9 e' }! w6 Z
! h4 f; Q& Q" E- T2 F% C  i
我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大* N/ ^: v$ T& f0 u0 Y) B
" _+ X% E" W3 Y$ ?( g0 s
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的! z& |& v( g; V' x% Z2 o" Y. R) S
  R- {- C1 K! P6 v" k' Z* U
唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由
+ I, j0 x* g' U( [! w: U6 D" e3 ]  @: A! Y5 @
大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句, R- h2 o  P+ P5 |- ?
"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"
7 P9 X8 f4 r# K& p
( Y# j( p5 M0 w0 I. T我們的大學生
, u5 B6 _! o; l) M7 c; @
, c* W; I1 H. |0 w" c" V) I, L( A9 i$ U9 m3 @

4 l* f; g  w$ s) y: a0 z& w  X! N2 |& W8 V/ @5 R+ h

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
3 ?* [8 I7 }$ o" }8 X8 {6 |  ^- S0 M0 d( U) @5 D
" Z4 }8 O* ], W& h' f* d3 `
有見地 !!!( i) V( z- Y" P/ }; D0 t1 ]# i
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html/ n; H4 j+ ~4 ?8 @6 Y

5 E; h$ q% X$ B4 ]3 S# DI think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers.
4 B* c5 @; R) d! yI never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
0 n: O. V8 R  I- VI pretty sad that about the University official.! C* `& ]# ]2 X$ U( d
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
3 a8 s: d/ D* w; r" ]' V
# d2 i( r2 C/ p6 M- }[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:
7 l: V: K1 M' o  M0 i2 i我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la1 a) g, O' ]! j# v/ Y9 [) ~) y4 z( E
* c, E  G/ j+ V* b( m9 k3 ^
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

4 u( d( f- {6 z0 P" ]

; q2 I+ c% w3 S兩者有何分別?
9 D9 }2 c' ?; z* \中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?