奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
7 @+ _% \& b* g9 j
0 o7 ]( H! f# [7 Sagree,
4 q8 x" K1 L$ ?, o我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,6 U1 L( G: N: z( A
但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科," f% ~9 j; w' q; u+ r  d0 c0 l* s
期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

7 _+ K" l9 M  X! D+ k8 Rhttp://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html( ?6 d. ?5 c! K( K6 I& K
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地' N9 N3 ]6 s0 G$ p7 a
搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.
" Y' e% S  o% P& t( q, B" @, r$ tJust some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:% z- j) d( a( {3 V: R5 U* i) N
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！
4 |( D5 M0 l+ `& M" `1 y( c" L  u+ {
係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???
2 e* g2 L1 j. I
: i$ g. ]0 u# \! g) s# x* O為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

- v' r: \& S, P

" G( d: m/ i3 U+ _7 g絕對支持啦
) L" d' `$ x4 z# l6 ^3 J2 \5 f* t% O! P* E* n3 s
有錯就認,打就企定
. u" v  Z% L4 T' B3 i' G" n  T4 X! c/ q8 S; t' ~$ k
無錯當然要撐到底
6 X& O7 V6 \: N( d) N) m% ?. n, O
2 `7 O$ w# K) `但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩( u$ V' l" \1 _% f- j

1 _* o9 z/ D) |" _4 \1 N3 E在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得% x, t* n: o3 C- f, S/ V8 J
( }/ ], f9 V; ~
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力7 v1 |, l0 J( i9 h% v8 h+ G
. b# t5 s8 f8 q/ n
我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
, p! C% {- D3 Z" o$ p4 g* y' |3 t7 \
唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?3 y: A/ b/ G) |
) g5 p9 |( G' \
我唔認為lor
3 v, i" @& T* e# D' F2 z+ b! p' [4 {" S% R: [5 J$ {. e5 b
唔係話要整死佢地( r0 i2 z0 Q& ^" I/ f! `7 W: \2 a" h
( |) {7 T5 y2 O# w% W- L- [
而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用" x% s5 [2 x& q7 a! X1 r
: i2 F9 o9 m/ S% ^! o1 w
我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大
% [- @3 C9 f) ?5 s4 k2 v) o6 {" F6 Z! E; b
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的5 K0 I# h" x1 m" c( o, l% H! K
  y# ?1 l! F: h8 p0 D% c
唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由
" h1 i7 o8 Y! f' ]$ X
1 b  s$ b" M. E+ X: e( c  Z3 u$ Y大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
+ I- D* q( X, N" |"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"- |& s$ o" V2 y

- J4 k, D! q0 y我們的大學生
$ y7 s( ]- ?$ B) T  b2 G7 f7 ]) H- l, c) U- E- R

3 n! ?, Q, ^8 V7 R4 L; N7 ~: B$ K* K5 G" T
) }2 h8 D# f& R8 [, g0 t- {

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:1 K# b0 l! K) M9 J2 I
% @' Z! O6 p4 g& g7 E

; C" [' @& {& }( z/ i! D有見地 !!!2 O3 L  f* V. Y; L( N( q% i. F. t
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
% o, A6 T" K1 P+ ^3 G% ^
. x6 V  z+ F( F  A+ M3 S! E& aI think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers.
# M% a  t1 ^$ o$ H; PI never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
. e3 e+ [$ T7 K1 K. eI pretty sad that about the University official.
. U) b8 w/ c( B8 `- g8 JIt's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la  U2 n- M) z) X: Q* x" o: a& D5 }

) k& ^  x7 Z- U" }' o[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:# m" k3 j" Q, [- z& \
我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la# F1 L: A  C" W" u; K* B( t
5 k1 p9 P" x$ c/ s  B9 i
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

/ T+ y, V9 Q6 [* Y4 ~! O
0 x0 W, {8 @# o+ f3 F. Q兩者有何分別?/ y# u" V8 X2 v; P: _% e
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?