奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
) I3 `. Z  @) `$ Z1 O" t' `
& g; S( {& n3 R0 }! a/ b1 w7 sagree,
% o- l1 j; T6 Z; N我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
8 S6 d  ^$ u3 ^) S' |: x但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,
0 v6 t+ K3 t, |; v, `期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

7 l: F8 w9 y& C% l) N$ }
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
4 Q# m' i/ a1 t% R- b+ w已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地
6 N" M7 X& |% h2 K$ U7 u搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.
! B' o7 V3 C# h; ~  FJust some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:* O+ Q8 i, z4 S9 N0 z1 \2 w3 F
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！ 1 ]  i; _1 a! X2 {

) `3 e& H& H; E6 S) _9 b係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???2 c  N1 M( ?% [% d) a$ K  g& f  d& c

$ {4 h" {/ O* s* o: J( D8 |1 W為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

+ E2 c/ b. C2 J# x

1 K' e  x2 q  P& y/ h' u' B) h絕對支持啦# H7 G4 i+ S. b" C% t8 o
& a) t. Q: v: S) r  d
有錯就認,打就企定: T9 _% P% D: S: ^
" K9 H; R' ~. y& x- I; S
無錯當然要撐到底
( p& _% d. @% b2 g+ a8 b0 ^( V$ t# k8 o1 V& N. m; U- |+ t
但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩
8 E- Q7 b& C7 f6 \1 N8 I5 [6 i4 J' ]
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得2 E; [9 I+ c2 j- @+ j$ h( E
( i3 f+ W; t: q
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力& N/ t* O  R& e7 c
( h. `) M0 P" C. }* R3 a
我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生1 Y5 w7 C' `8 x/ X* }

4 _7 i- i5 R% _- Q7 }唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?2 i- Z7 @/ e3 i& W& ]$ _4 Y
8 F. ^( F' m* C
我唔認為lor
2 p" t- i- D& N: \6 s$ Q& z* Q, ?5 e  U2 [
唔係話要整死佢地4 X% z) |' }! I( k- e

5 S. h- E# D+ e9 s/ ~而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
/ l! P+ c' V! L4 O9 ^- i
0 V# Z8 c  a* Y, t2 W+ c6 K我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大" {! h: A# D3 W+ P
2 j, x% y) A' @. L
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的
- @% d8 X- R7 c( E) \0 D3 Z+ F; S& k% u' e- _3 b' h
唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由8 @! C4 B# y* B8 B
* q4 k* m4 l# v/ ~/ k
大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句+ \7 V9 ]/ T5 s! ~9 d) l6 _" Y
"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"
" c! r' z' {7 w: D' G+ N
- E4 J* `, N8 G我們的大學生5 X% J0 S5 ^; w0 y7 l
- y9 @+ a$ R: w) h" v  X

3 g# F/ {9 j1 ?& K/ W% r& Z8 W& x6 u  R$ k, L% m; ^4 L
. F9 ~! t% G: y. W7 L

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
6 r! t$ V, g& q1 Q8 L6 n$ N% I
& O0 ^9 A" F3 ~3 n' m1 D, \9 t. U/ }& E0 ?0 G
有見地 !!!# r& y7 Z) d+ i0 G) Q6 j+ K( v
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html! V" l) W9 \; ?$ `# e* j

: U8 ?- |' y1 ~/ W" d& SI think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers.
, l% f' ^* c% \* lI never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
- F% w! c* [: [5 qI pretty sad that about the University official.3 S; r# @+ A' z! O7 U& E$ \
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la: s2 p* A$ T7 f! @! ^& Y( v

5 H! u* s! p: z0 ^6 _[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:$ T8 J! r- w. G5 c" Q0 U" {
我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la  F: o1 t/ A, @. N1 M6 D" g# {
6 [. F6 e9 G4 A. {9 i1 J6 Y/ i
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

1 M- a8 X7 S7 f) X3 p+ C% a, e! d8 @9 j5 f3 a! r7 C
兩者有何分別?
, Y3 K  p6 m) Y, W中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?