奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
. j" G9 ]) c) z
% i, X+ W# h2 \+ T3 e/ kagree,
6 B! q; }8 |' N1 U2 L" A我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,6 H0 |/ k& F, x$ s: I$ A  @9 @1 b
但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,+ P9 h5 W% {; K: b% N  t# M* z) i
期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

# c4 d( H8 E7 Thttp://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
  i* l4 O3 m3 L9 x) ]已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地
* e4 ?2 x4 G9 x# F, e. g! ^" J搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.
; p0 l5 G+ ~8 w$ j  iJust some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:
; N) x' S( }$ b; L0 L' u/ ?5 ]有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！
( m) j, a/ Z, h+ O# v, q, `. c9 V3 A8 Z9 M
係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???
  w1 ?& s% }! l" h
0 b: e/ i1 S& s2 t; I為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

+ t% F1 B& W" U8 _9 O7 e
1 m' \/ s2 V9 X3 ?絕對支持啦* A5 [& |' z9 ?4 D, h! N+ I
0 n1 A5 L4 m' r" g) W8 k6 Z
有錯就認,打就企定+ ?  w5 Y7 q6 u* v& D- P' |5 x

9 Z( b2 D# q7 U) n9 s: \4 z無錯當然要撐到底  O) K( C3 A' M6 V- q8 P2 K; w0 p
; r: i, U# t! g9 C0 N, B
但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩
* M2 K$ w7 e" o; p0 \. r. A$ V5 ~6 T5 Y
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
8 n( l& C- W# O8 C: u4 R! v
2 y* X, [7 S! }" _0 i2 e一份公眾讀物係好有影響力" n$ i5 s& Z* D" e' E6 Q
4 L- h3 ]3 H! I6 ~
我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生6 ]& ^* {8 R3 z

4 _6 ?) Z$ y! D! @, p0 {唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
+ l: K/ {: ?* }' Q  y5 `2 }
2 b' B0 }/ F, w0 b我唔認為lor% M% \. L, Q5 [* d5 f; _% o  e
- x; L5 _6 g7 {( N
唔係話要整死佢地
+ u: g+ |& g6 b; V* C
; Z3 a, K: U, ?6 P而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
8 r% {$ e0 D  y7 }; N3 ]7 i& I: o' \  O( [
我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大2 V& j# N$ q1 \* F) Z4 t  n
4 k: w( {3 `* j. Q
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的2 e9 C; m' B1 V4 B5 K: F
, L3 _' {4 U5 w& c( V6 ?8 S
唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由
. [9 m( ]+ g# B. ^! ?% q% D$ v1 c
, A: M4 W; c& U+ A8 ^3 A大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
6 L" T* Z0 [0 Q! }  ?" @"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"( o+ K3 y) f1 @6 ~% D1 u. Q

; p7 R2 U7 Y" `  A! x5 \我們的大學生. P5 ?4 A" Q" _  V# M- D- v

; c" W1 q2 N( O
! K* L! U- n  j7 ], e( k" L2 a! r) L% a# p: \% v( N3 X* `% I: g
. \2 l7 s6 l- e2 E) ^. ^

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:+ d2 C; h& l0 {5 S' g8 l1 d
# U! c+ J3 U. v
% T: ?7 A. {# i
有見地 !!!
6 c" z0 p9 q( L: G# b+ [# q5 D1 E現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
% H) t' x1 j  w- F: j5 o$ R2 Y4 k7 s$ J9 v4 ]& o! w. c
I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. ) R! I9 @7 U- Q# o7 Q$ m
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind. / K, H6 c6 P9 T' F0 G
I pretty sad that about the University official.; l  N$ R, j( t
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
1 r+ F, x" K% r" `4 i  m$ T; M
8 ~8 E) p( ]7 d$ l4 S/ \* l, |[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:
7 W8 p7 Q8 Z9 L我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
. d6 B: ^, V  D, m: S0 l: j( J& {
$ P( T* Q6 x0 ~5 y9 W& v8 R[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

* o8 D8 g) V6 g. k

% Q$ Q  m- a4 a& z1 j# s兩者有何分別?' C: l' V* K' l3 o
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?