奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:+ \3 T) [- T( E% X* ^
% r, R( f* l$ h! A
agree,
" c& P2 v* ^/ R1 y我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,/ h- x: E1 a$ `1 H, y& T
但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,% j, V2 F/ N/ _# w: k9 N5 o3 w
期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

2 D# a' o8 r9 r) Y: c/ j0 u: t2 {http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
7 ?) e% |% L( A* }6 ]5 c已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地" u# m% G3 S% B. Y4 {. s! }
搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.. g5 j4 D% I9 W4 Z2 N
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:
% r' K$ T9 E' @! N* I; D) i有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！
2 L  T/ Z* X/ b" o8 z& a- r5 x3 D
係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???
7 G. ^& |: w9 o* ^9 u/ |$ h: c) q) Z, ]7 o6 W. p) R' G5 o
為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

: I# {7 U0 F/ u! w* B3 A6 l
( k' L2 l) L6 }1 i- w
絕對支持啦
. T8 r- Z# c  O8 B/ z& D; Y# s  ~" J! [* Q' U7 M: i; R. Y1 [" _
有錯就認,打就企定
; I* U5 m5 }1 U, D! i5 s' i
  v+ R' G% M6 I: n無錯當然要撐到底' D9 D' Y$ ]8 \- v4 p( i

( R% M7 y/ T8 f+ }, z5 _3 R% B但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩! t( }' _: U* \- e# Z; K% ^

- M, n0 l/ X; i在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
) S+ l$ q( W7 t' \; N- ^
8 O- ^% b0 Z: Z. r一份公眾讀物係好有影響力: [1 D- L& _+ a, \* f
, P  j: X3 m! }
我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
4 u5 N  q2 m- L* n2 l  T) ~/ o6 n
唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
: j9 W9 H7 i3 L9 S2 J. A
& `7 O3 j* t6 ^0 U/ x我唔認為lor; N7 k: y- n6 I1 w0 b: J* e

( b. A$ P& {6 z' M/ Z# e- j唔係話要整死佢地
7 q0 b( x$ A% M
& w% a+ w9 p! Z: D$ v+ t2 O而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用5 T6 @; G4 N! y; Q

$ t# c8 f- {. M+ s$ o我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大" b4 x  d) n" ^/ N& v' h/ N" g. e

$ _7 B, f# Y4 _8 g有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的
. E( ]: F7 y5 K3 t9 Q  Q( o1 U' y! ?4 U1 _2 D4 L7 j
唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由
% k7 Y& E1 m/ f5 G; Z/ I( l0 N& J
大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
5 S8 ?6 x( W, t"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"
4 i" L  F- b+ {+ M. E8 h
: K" i9 Q, l% t! g" c: X, _我們的大學生, Y# \) j* H9 q% |- t

4 b! \" e2 W+ C6 z# e0 J$ h
) W4 S0 Y' o4 N$ F' |; W' P
( C- A/ X  m% f" M( H( c( x- j8 e8 O, a$ q

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:' W3 h. ?. L: |: J1 G4 W
6 }$ ~) b# F7 S
8 d% t6 t- o, D! C+ i0 c: f6 ]% b5 ^- C
有見地 !!!
; h9 I& h& Z% j5 z現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
4 w1 K" g6 d" s; W1 W
1 n3 [% N+ R7 W5 W5 @/ B/ W2 aI think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers.
# P- Q% W& p* R3 [9 m9 [5 uI never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind. + z( u8 _6 ^: ?* X( z8 J
I pretty sad that about the University official.
+ c' _4 P$ U# ~3 aIt's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
- S$ c4 \+ \. C* F7 Q  }3 T0 R: @4 r$ I& d
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:
& j  a$ X( h4 h5 y6 a2 j/ p我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la6 K& n4 |% W; A) e8 H
1 y* Z! i/ j; W8 s
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

; J3 B; H  u! T- J2 x
: U* o# \6 L" y; c兩者有何分別?3 X  {# S8 ~2 D  n/ Y) }2 F
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?