奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
+ z! w6 }# H* D2 f5 s) p1 V
1 N" x2 @; Q# M2 b& f+ e  `agree,( E. v0 F/ e# Y5 [, d9 L( h/ L
我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
' f$ \8 m0 Q+ R7 \* S, X但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,  C" [$ R4 g( ?1 |' U. P# L' V8 ?$ j
期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

% ~! x% f8 Y3 S5 G" x5 L% ]
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
! }: C6 [$ `1 W1 K已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地
1 l$ r" Z9 V- {- t7 G0 a搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.2 l7 r2 f4 W1 T) T: O
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:2 U1 l7 u4 T6 M; O1 C$ A
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！
+ s& @5 q9 {, y3 w6 f) J% h3 z  o, j# f
係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???/ |8 @9 d# v" Y

+ C/ ^0 L) t: j- D$ t" f* e為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

+ A4 G* ]  y, q7 C  Q* t

5 z( x( l$ y# `( Z2 V3 _絕對支持啦8 g7 L1 A3 v- }! \5 t  H  n4 t
3 m, O* A5 G+ q1 T8 S9 d
有錯就認,打就企定
' X& j  M& i  ], e' W8 S$ ~8 I
4 w1 q# L+ S& I/ k無錯當然要撐到底9 E6 `" }" U, t* y  x& U* x

2 N# N: R# e) ~4 N# u+ Q但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩
1 Y: o8 X+ {7 ?* A+ b' N' A4 f
6 k; f! Q+ G% T0 f. B  Q- o0 Z在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
1 L1 E" p% b- l4 p' Y. h# ?
* \$ h# {- x! K, u7 b一份公眾讀物係好有影響力, X4 X( N0 a3 A3 f+ h. k: s

# u4 J7 P  ~5 R& y/ X我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生5 A+ C" u) g4 c7 E
8 b0 I3 T" Y3 W8 N
唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?  V0 t' s* i* |
% I1 f0 q& E4 b7 @0 H  M/ l1 i
我唔認為lor5 x7 @$ W2 o  k" ], E8 E/ ~6 S

' {, D0 [9 {0 j3 O3 T. V4 ]唔係話要整死佢地' R) [2 c5 g/ m* G

4 v0 U7 U6 d0 u; w1 J. i; ]而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
: @3 l' y. @& ^, A, ]' U" d% o) ^8 a7 W# n: M5 H, @1 C) S
我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大; G1 T9 i$ i( _1 q

9 a) J) F7 M% V- ^) z有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的
! l8 f1 {1 D% Q* z; C- O' R* |$ ]$ W( s! e
唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由8 K) h7 C. w& S% e
3 U( F1 ?2 W; {7 o  @1 d; z/ h/ z
大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句- v# }  w+ b! p; r2 t
"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"7 j, l& e! s% p& j8 t# }7 {2 |& \

/ c- y( }& P4 r我們的大學生
  ^8 Z0 o9 y2 _4 K0 x$ s/ Y* S/ @8 g8 U' R; D$ S! ^/ g

( ~+ t- @4 x- q
( B4 o% l; Z8 X* W  _' v4 v: w# i' q+ H% h0 W4 R

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:$ _  k: b5 T* |- T

2 |5 q: C7 W) W1 O* `
" k/ X+ F' }7 ~3 A0 |% L  o  L8 X+ Q有見地 !!!$ W* y# c3 a  L( W* l
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
* i' }# a, H% F+ u2 q! ]; T
6 e8 D* T/ N5 t' g7 c; A8 B( C" g+ v' z6 cI think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. " D2 [5 A6 B9 m! V  X( j
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind. : t* t/ F+ L3 v1 r7 u1 Y
I pretty sad that about the University official.9 G3 i' o+ A1 ]% U( O/ @  p( K
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la( o& L# J* s/ X! G
0 M4 r- M2 t' P9 ]8 e6 g5 g
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:
( U# s" J  ~& |" ~! u' g我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
: c1 ]6 N7 ^' \/ Y9 `  x) T$ ~! X( C% k: x" M; ~/ d
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

* T! T9 U4 t' C, D3 h
4 \5 A& g. c, ?& }( [1 ^
兩者有何分別?
3 [7 x7 X; G9 P, {" l/ n中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?