奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:' A  Y+ t: @+ O/ m+ E8 Z% E8 b' {
; n( o7 q# T8 z
agree,5 E( o# {0 S2 N, v6 C( }
我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
/ C+ S! z9 \; n但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,
. K) R0 O0 p# A0 _. `% W9 _2 r期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

: h# N% T) i, U% h1 S' E$ qhttp://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html: B, l* |: U( X- z2 x, \
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地% f1 F5 M9 Z1 ?% H4 D
搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.
/ M, z3 }; @  T2 Y5 A+ NJust some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:
+ u6 ]7 ~9 Y5 G' [有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！
( \1 {1 [, \. N* ?1 z6 s8 s, W: M
係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???
4 R' y( C% E- A2 l
- t0 t. I  j% A9 Q1 n) M為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

9 X# z3 l$ L$ i9 S& L6 a7 ]$ j3 u6 u2 n% `& }2 t2 z
絕對支持啦/ f" k3 @+ @7 i% W
0 {  K0 h' e: J
有錯就認,打就企定
7 d+ f  R$ g, W- ^* |4 c* `3 q
( x* `% {5 ]% K$ n1 _* w無錯當然要撐到底, n3 t8 z  n9 U9 e
' U+ ]' x# ~5 E# X7 G
但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩( r$ Q: v! d4 j

5 C3 R3 N! O2 p! K在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得5 M) g, L8 x" P% W* h3 A, {
4 }, S9 g; s1 J0 F4 N: u) x
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力6 O, n2 w% g4 I
; z! O& @  H/ R- j3 }
我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
( J1 k' M# L; w$ q# n& s& }8 ]% ~/ d9 q. \# h! e2 Y
唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
5 F$ z, h9 ?* ~" W  i0 e; c5 D9 F; V# G' O
我唔認為lor
8 t. r' P- F& d$ g- o9 F% H' Y6 }! k& p% m) {. w
唔係話要整死佢地  Q3 W% i+ c1 p* G7 D

$ \# `- u) M, n5 L而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
0 k( x8 C# j6 f  U0 }
# T0 b$ @% E$ S/ P8 Q/ q我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大& b0 }& p+ p, t. N- R
% c0 ]7 e+ v/ G7 K% m
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的- U+ U! C2 a& O3 ?# g" y% Z0 P

1 @6 E6 {; C% z' C9 }唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由
2 c# v  I* ~4 z9 Z. h- z6 n$ E- k. q& O; G( ?1 Z
大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句: u" ]% b# L5 J2 v* T
"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"
5 g, e3 D+ l/ d3 O7 _$ L2 l
: _) s$ a8 A9 e7 r$ d" U& K我們的大學生6 }! b0 {: K# C! |
9 H' w  e& l& e+ [

6 G* z# v6 @8 p, p: a+ Y% E- F$ X9 o* C

8 o3 J5 k, K/ k' g5 e

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
- q% A6 F# B# L) m. j% @, v
/ z4 {: ~) i6 X; k7 r
( o. d, ]4 f/ a8 j0 s# d) Z% A有見地 !!!
5 S! I! F2 B' E' L& ]7 M現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html" Y+ @2 y* Y1 r: S" k1 \* T

$ X+ t+ L7 x# w) r2 G) V/ tI think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers.
" ~0 E4 m, f3 T9 W! ]I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind. ( ~. D/ y8 b: I9 a8 R' s, j
I pretty sad that about the University official.
# {' H% [: O2 N0 Q( EIt's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la* {) E& S) y2 @! s
6 W1 j) |. @8 V" c' F  ]
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:
1 S5 u- x5 z5 ^我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la0 k, D! h# Y5 A8 _5 ]" {: T) B) Z

0 B8 E7 W/ H/ d' _' m[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

( V/ M$ p0 g4 a- {; l8 K9 W1 y3 Z$ S4 k' h7 \4 c# l
兩者有何分別?
0 z7 R8 X& ]- m% w7 a4 Q中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?