奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
3 Z! F& r5 g5 k- Z0 P/ e' O9 W" \0 J/ e
agree,
4 f$ i5 U! T0 \1 c: k; a" x+ z/ i我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,( ~7 [4 E# r! f3 y) M% N6 V2 p
但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,
; ~- D4 H, V2 E* m5 Y& o5 m3 u0 W; i期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

( H" {9 x. D7 u1 f8 g. y" j5 B# ^/ ]+ |http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
' k! Q5 q) J4 j' w! k' B3 ]已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地
4 ?# x! j1 E; S搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.
+ K9 X2 o- E/ v& W% o( \6 D7 Q" ?Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:* `2 h$ {5 b# `" X/ `
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！ 8 l/ p  p' x0 K) f- ^

1 t3 C. k2 \6 d& _係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???
) n& b$ j! C7 d. q' K
. W& }/ I( a5 x6 v為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

+ w# r9 n  X8 T8 l* G7 N( ^! H4 N8 [5 w* P8 U4 t! L% {
絕對支持啦- N; ~6 n0 V) |; i* e
+ B6 Z% C+ [7 o5 G3 J
有錯就認,打就企定& x& @$ a3 ^6 N7 h' C) {* S7 u

* Q6 X! s! l+ b" t4 x+ f無錯當然要撐到底2 G& q- e8 \5 n) C  W) d3 p
  _( C. x4 e/ `, \/ d  |
但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩# j) Z' @+ P' U: D; {/ e
$ W. Z' y1 h. P# b
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得; X4 W- X, H- v) K6 l+ C) e
1 N. E4 R' Z1 ^3 Q0 Z8 t7 g  B5 B
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力
$ j4 P5 X; F7 d( w% b
+ U: m% K# {3 u/ I/ m* A3 m我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
, H/ h9 L, z! ~) y/ j" p7 C+ x% k) {3 q& \
唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?4 `2 Z0 h. ^- V& v8 R

; A) z1 g0 f9 O我唔認為lor. L, Q' f6 k( B4 h4 J( e  G

0 p/ u" `7 ^0 b# A& g唔係話要整死佢地* K7 |0 K  k8 T, Y1 Q4 f

+ [) D7 d# F! m) a9 p% |1 r: x而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用. `8 G* Y+ R) f  @% t! V1 ?) t* d
2 N  m, [! S' T1 e1 v
我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大
' X% Q3 l  ~  }( G8 l/ |
8 q, e& x& l5 y9 h. f: U有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的( I( w4 e+ M# v" }2 a4 ]! t& A# |% F" I
  q. p1 n6 R. A6 O- V6 ?8 u  T
唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由4 {- M$ O& i  V& i  a7 B

- q8 d( i8 _0 ~! i2 g: P& |+ v大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
  G8 u# Z1 q& q7 [/ J"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"+ Q- T. u+ ?; T5 w. V) K

- s; k+ v: w8 r# W6 V7 q# a  r9 W5 K我們的大學生
; ^7 K0 |3 |* [# o4 \* G9 Z3 m* J0 o: G% X% H. F) Y* D
! L" b9 ?# x& Y! {5 c

' `! i8 R0 O- }" V3 n* \: {* ^' ^2 j

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
1 N* Q: J; L2 Q1 Q4 Y# _
, L1 E. e# i0 K/ I! j) s) ?( D
* H8 h* J( A0 z# {有見地 !!!
9 C2 M' ?5 h' M8 d7 f( W現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
. M! F9 f' r! F+ H& J6 x
' Y/ N% h: X' Y1 T( O3 |I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. 0 b/ w$ n, i: b# V
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
1 S8 {% M/ M) ]8 ~2 ?I pretty sad that about the University official.: J+ m4 @6 P# F0 m2 d4 Z& r
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la0 e  }; v8 V! e8 c9 W
0 J# `+ h5 s. E& i+ `" |
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:$ ?) ?, t! x6 S5 ], j
我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la9 o$ L% x* k/ g8 a) f

' K) Z' K( K* r  S5 ?[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

. ~6 T6 J1 U! _9 Y' \8 v/ @1 H; a! R6 y/ c( r
兩者有何分別?
4 z" @& m& j1 v& f0 u中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?