奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
) j7 Q8 m* t  d# i
7 X7 }  F# L) d9 hagree,
5 e, h" B% N- e  Y$ Y我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,) v+ c  z6 x4 k# F  x* |1 ?
但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,
- q# d% h' U  G5 Q# Y期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

  n; J% M# S2 \" C2 L! S
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
  i, \/ B6 D5 H$ w' h& X6 L已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地4 N' r: z. q4 @  |
搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.& ?9 z* U. p+ N* S) p7 `0 o
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:
5 A, |% i3 C- `有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！ 7 H6 B4 `& z3 L
  Z$ g- Y( V# M& L' S8 u
係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???- ]7 t1 Q# h5 `0 V& E" v
0 C/ J' _. o+ O% e" ~
為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

. n! b; N% L4 E2 Y0 ~, J  A
8 g/ d$ D# f4 }7 `' H. V# X  I絕對支持啦
* ~+ {+ ]. E4 D4 B- {9 G+ j9 t( e; ]0 w
有錯就認,打就企定( r: [8 \4 k: a. T! ~; r
  i! g/ i) V6 ~' ?7 b
無錯當然要撐到底
# J3 ]  m$ |4 D1 V9 d# V; S! i4 @) C" _( h
但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩% A! u% I7 D( h% a: q; z& g

# g: H& t0 r3 S0 v; @在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得0 `/ [9 c  }- |/ |# a' e7 t4 z

1 T9 _( V% [2 T" T2 j- E( f一份公眾讀物係好有影響力
1 k: k: z' s" D* ?& t7 s( |+ N% h+ ]6 k, T
我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
: E# s0 K) D: f. m1 s; D! ~, v
2 p1 T+ ?7 g' K" z唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?9 E% A2 o6 D+ _

4 U4 h# R9 r6 Q# T, {2 g! e  d1 h我唔認為lor3 W9 G7 ]& M" g2 |( r, c

+ W# E. p) P" o. V0 _* p唔係話要整死佢地
, Q3 B2 {2 C! D  _3 I7 p, r
$ G! W! L, Y2 W; F& o而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
, a2 a+ p2 b3 l0 Y; N1 z- K! k
; ?; J5 A) G! W' d4 N我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大
9 M* V5 l! _  `4 i& F. Y5 V9 q; A5 z: _- Q& F& F1 u! J, V# _
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的  [$ P+ L0 q1 s

4 ^4 X$ y4 N, t' j% S# {/ m唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由7 t. ]+ x2 |- b  n) x: z

" E5 I$ c) ^4 u- R/ u# h; z- ^大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句  O4 H' \9 n! |8 \% I
"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"
; ?% U6 N: N: Y( c7 p; O& C' u8 e' {/ y: m( i, P  a" U. g
我們的大學生7 B' a7 \7 o# g' T4 E2 R+ Y

9 x" W* J; Z) T/ B9 a4 \0 k7 h5 T$ Z! N) l6 S
% h# J0 j  q$ M% I; \1 y

( J" F8 l% i0 ^3 N$ }9 ]8 ?! r+ s7 P

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:/ |: _; u- D% Y5 o) }
. s! t6 i; @/ }' C7 ?

# c+ |+ q! _, L0 g3 A+ I有見地 !!!$ x8 J( `! M4 x+ n8 v6 ^( d! R
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
. p, a% w, g5 g4 [
( Y% p% n$ J' q5 m8 L  XI think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. & k2 X: ]0 O0 U- @1 D+ i/ |
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
( F/ G8 D0 |# ?3 f* Z/ h0 SI pretty sad that about the University official.
2 e) C8 \; n! i# c3 ^# }It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
" w$ s! V, O* }1 ~  ?& r/ K, s( y( E" o7 z: S9 b
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:3 K& r+ \" e2 Z. K8 u
我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
5 F/ S2 Q; S4 f& ^, {% j
' A; l5 \9 Q+ @& f; M( _( d, v[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

4 g1 w1 V$ D$ [# V+ H) M& ?; C% t
兩者有何分別?3 E/ J: l6 Y5 w; u2 l$ ^6 E/ W
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?