奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:# ~# V% U" Q: X- E- I
  z3 n( A; I3 U9 N! D, {
agree,* ]! E* n! f/ ?( `8 X! u# p
我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
; u" X9 S3 Q# F& l( y( X5 M* z/ n但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,. R6 p' ^7 L3 j, }, N2 F! H/ r' q
期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

$ U  z5 a% X) k! G2 j
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html% }3 R. X9 |/ d! l. a0 z! E
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地' z. l+ Y( X$ |; C; {$ I
搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.1 N. W3 z# o3 ~  t
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:, V  P" Q& }1 P* ]
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！ ( |7 B' O' r8 E* E
- G6 F( D. g0 _. c: \" H6 X0 I
係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???
8 I) W1 {) E, M" l- ?. }  r  s9 X
為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

' X2 u5 y0 H0 i/ f9 J: X  J! T0 U% n$ X
絕對支持啦& u: P7 e! g- Z; Y5 p8 h6 [! z

! P& V+ A- ]' ~* y! u有錯就認,打就企定
& o/ p' O% N$ H1 Z% i* o. ^: ~7 m& ~0 I+ U( O; i# _( P
無錯當然要撐到底
( w& H" r6 U, J* O# \
' c) t* i" d% b3 r& G) o; }  L但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩
+ p$ V6 |0 d7 C; P0 F
; k% {* t$ x: y; f" Z, k在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
, `+ W$ ?. ~* |- J% I
- |' o1 N8 l9 ^, J% P$ o一份公眾讀物係好有影響力3 w# f. F) E  z  \9 o# V0 M2 s; c

5 P) n+ U, A' M- C# F2 X6 u, i我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
! P! [6 N; w1 U0 o1 N
* u& p- R9 e+ G, [5 N唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?$ X' y# Z/ [( H- X% d- Z& ]( u

% J4 j! R) F6 J我唔認為lor
" u' H9 q/ e/ y0 y% d& s; H- r6 T% |# M& D3 G. f' U/ i9 {: p
唔係話要整死佢地0 N7 \4 {% Q* E* `% f$ u
4 {# o4 N% m4 e8 i& R1 e( \2 |( f% K
而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用% [6 d! p& R( G, j6 V; w7 J
& o# s  @2 T( j9 b% T. h
我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大5 q5 k3 e( h; i5 t3 i5 ]* F
5 ~3 R* R% Z  T1 t4 U% L
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的5 W9 l# o. V3 F' d5 B0 O

4 |/ A. X. x/ x7 u5 J0 j唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由3 ^  @% {4 Y3 G  W

( x1 j; C: O; \4 ?* R! W" \( g大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
2 w% u, H0 v+ |# h! [7 F"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"; j9 e  P6 T3 D2 X2 b. u

- H& d$ D) O/ E+ w8 d6 \, R, x8 c我們的大學生
. c3 ]9 |  D' r. E- W; k0 u' ~# k3 C' ]  J( ~
0 P( w" a- E3 e$ f( R2 E% ?; b

! r/ [6 R  H8 T8 W) ?, E# _+ z) i& h- F/ h

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:" Y$ x; Q# j" q  D: y
# g& S5 r# R# d3 S# J" N$ h$ V
( M4 q$ Z% I7 O% G1 p
有見地 !!!" p# J# ?! C1 g! u9 j7 `
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
! q" b9 y9 J) o5 @/ y  |5 g; Y& s: @/ S3 ^% B8 W7 J, ]+ V
I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers.
1 l3 g1 t: d9 n+ Q& G* pI never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
! G. J, R9 n$ d$ ?3 q- J+ b0 LI pretty sad that about the University official.) w+ {! A7 h% S% @8 P5 U
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
" e8 `; X6 B# u
7 J  x3 g, e  F8 M/ [4 _, W; H. B1 ^[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:
+ P3 a& D% J7 V; k! |1 u我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
1 G" f2 f9 b" ?! k& A( k2 _
9 o. C! E9 X& }4 ^" q  e[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

% u- v, N3 L  d0 h) U
4 ~8 c4 U: t' B+ r: y3 M兩者有何分別?) D9 p  c, v6 e/ D3 [
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?