奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
0 G( Q4 g! o$ o9 T
8 [) O( T5 A  }$ e: J3 Zagree,& _; C; E) I7 R
我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,7 P9 u- X# G9 T0 V2 N! ?
但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,% s. ~1 w5 d8 O; G* Q
期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

7 E2 p/ a( y. \1 Q) W7 Q1 f/ Ghttp://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
! N( |# S0 w) s; b4 ], v# u- f  t9 A* ^6 L已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地4 `4 s* `( d) }2 [0 {  x6 J
搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.2 l3 M/ R7 [  r+ t  c5 O0 y' \
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:
8 e* E5 n  X; e( u: a1 J有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！
( S$ P+ V+ @( v+ K% p
* p: {. J1 x& M7 o9 M; \+ m; k( C5 x係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???" G8 x* }% W4 s; Q% l; s8 j

! x- w, Z4 C$ B& n1 ]3 T為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

; ^3 n) l; \4 ?4 `8 i
1 ^! c+ a$ ?, z" Z
絕對支持啦
4 g* k3 R3 ~+ B" \% P
- C0 S! N4 _4 t( M5 z; o有錯就認,打就企定
& H8 ^% L1 @! t4 {! R$ t4 A3 `" r) o
7 D: o5 ^7 Z6 \8 h$ C* Q  c: ]/ z無錯當然要撐到底) C# l/ }! \# B; T* Z2 i
" T3 c0 ?2 `- o! o7 ?
但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩
  _6 q+ r+ V. y! Q% D5 d' p; I3 y4 D0 U+ r
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
0 |1 }* M6 ?9 [/ l0 ^$ |" j' a: }1 |- n( n/ D- c4 {
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力
' O8 ?" h+ C) V3 c- @/ ?6 A: p0 ]$ T) U6 |! T; @/ A
我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
- b* a- l& o! ~5 n2 s+ T1 G" N2 q
唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?6 L/ i) y, S* C3 B0 k' E
& c( _* R! Z7 A4 C5 [4 l
我唔認為lor
) T0 @: C+ I9 p9 ]  l' i- L+ b/ p/ x& c  n
唔係話要整死佢地- B8 f% G: t9 X5 r+ S" |; k9 m

' i( [5 A/ T5 a而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
5 M1 u8 A5 |% _" b' I+ S. ?- g  A
我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大
+ ]  F9 n) N! }* ]" S& u" n, \; d5 }# s$ C) A2 w5 q) w, r
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的& y6 w# @/ n- b: a) M9 T
1 G7 I# r; c! y3 V/ h8 Y: s
唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由
9 L  d% G% Q5 I2 p. ?: j; _( w! l  p2 j# `
大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句" w# l/ N* U) p6 i0 u; T3 y
"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"! `8 H" s$ F' d, e, o8 ^0 `/ \9 J

( c+ ]% m3 [  U- J$ O5 j: T# ^我們的大學生
2 ]! h9 ~( M. I7 Y9 F6 r0 N2 U  H) W2 \* u1 F
2 L6 H" X) F$ j# c3 W
. x6 q# {' `) L! S. Y: J# A

0 n+ Q' k" |. K# Z

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
8 I' m5 a! p0 N& T; |" Y- F: ?8 z% e2 P7 j; C- m$ L
  P, E9 u' N8 |. z  L( S* _
有見地 !!!; _9 P; J; G! M( X1 g; i) D
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
$ l! ~6 R& U$ c, s" [1 A" c/ V- J  M. F4 P
I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. ' t- U" T( E9 v$ T- P, Y" e; F
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind. 1 B0 P" |8 b7 z4 T* s
I pretty sad that about the University official.
2 M0 v0 O5 M5 H% C3 P) \7 @It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
& _9 U9 O+ H+ u
( _- d5 v: b) @. _+ g! M[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:4 @+ e% O) f- ^1 v3 |
我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
  {  H1 q* k" C4 R8 L& z- U0 }, x7 x9 [  C
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

; ~1 U. E2 M# h& C" i. @" E0 m' X- x; y
兩者有何分別?
+ `. b. P- X- Q5 c$ N) ?0 g中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?