奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
! n. l% I( g" b2 ^! b1 T  C3 M& P6 w5 ~) j: ]  @
agree,
; J- h, C) }: E" E我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
0 U% k* \% S) N7 b- e但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,& @' n$ j* J  O. k9 _+ A* y1 H6 s/ T
期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

/ t* v8 o* q0 [3 ^& Y$ g! t) ~! |
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html  W5 T- s3 R& P1 I, D
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地
! {2 Y: u9 P% |7 B" X! A搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.
+ ]7 o! z3 x0 @  a( M2 R. P( b! u$ yJust some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:
. y2 G! [" Y  w0 k3 [" s有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！
( v* l8 b# L$ {: p
; t9 \) d$ l- J5 N1 |" N係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???
; `; |! F$ h7 u* [+ D) e& ?0 w/ s* E. l$ q& O/ t/ P9 N
為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

7 p+ t$ {3 M  S1 o% X! @% B
, N* q5 S; S. R2 U! X: j4 P2 o絕對支持啦
) b9 a7 `/ Z: ]# h4 P  X; O/ r0 I6 C$ A' f
有錯就認,打就企定$ b1 d: r$ @; ]5 [& p1 B

7 P& z  V$ l/ P. g( D9 l無錯當然要撐到底
  f4 C' O, G, I1 [& o4 a5 s
0 h1 V8 }6 i; V: M- X3 j3 C" I但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩7 B$ O! {$ n$ _, j

9 ~, b+ F- `2 ]( ?4 L- Q+ `在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
5 R/ ~" V+ N& d- N
, N" \! n7 ?! y# q一份公眾讀物係好有影響力# y0 ?6 d+ z. z( V: z  m
5 g9 G" w8 S) i& c  Q9 j
我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生0 n; ?( I4 k. [  A+ ~4 h

1 V) p) c+ f2 t( h7 y# M- _0 ?2 a唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
" ]) Q# l# `/ B
/ E2 I: u: z* P' f我唔認為lor5 N6 n; w' d1 l1 s2 w) M
$ f' s- i8 ?3 {
唔係話要整死佢地' o( F0 D8 V& ]! X- Q

7 b$ a/ y/ _! S8 b6 h而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
5 B  n+ ^% N* k) Y9 _
6 w. w* l4 n. l( x我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大
% s  x0 E: ]" T5 t& z5 o* F2 e% |/ `# e) }0 x% y5 G8 `2 E( `- T7 A
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的
' O1 ?5 t/ Q5 m
& p6 l( n( x/ \( U: g唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由' c* L9 B) o; s6 Q; ?: V

% k, r  ~3 r4 ?: Z大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句; A8 ?1 x) _" Y# M* j: \
"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"6 I  k! q# @6 j  U, t

( i' z( I: o4 _4 T; \我們的大學生
) N3 a4 i5 F  `9 ~2 w7 K/ x  Q$ ?  C  c2 {

, S9 q% K1 G, ^/ F1 Q( e3 r
2 P3 A0 f$ K3 C
& E; f  H7 L1 c  [

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
* Z0 T- r& n: i' s8 A9 Y5 d5 N1 E' n$ V$ }6 `6 D3 D
2 b6 u5 _* ~4 E7 o
有見地 !!!
! F* u8 F5 L' H$ g現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html: g$ ~4 A) A# Z

3 p' n4 q1 x( d0 DI think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. # t; I1 f+ J- h" a% }7 ?
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind. 6 n, M  A  P% `7 a
I pretty sad that about the University official.: ]. P5 z* @+ ?+ U
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
* A. Y9 g7 m5 ?5 a, W; D& u. s, W3 S' v" A( a& t+ y( i
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:
6 A+ P7 e! {; N* \: |8 T) t我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
4 s/ ]% Z% H: n* i( M6 g
. l) e2 v7 B7 B- W6 o[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

* u1 [! [$ l5 Z7 D: j( m- |+ t2 M7 U4 R+ Z5 |' K- ], x5 C0 y" A
兩者有何分別?2 [' }: ~( R# D; a
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?