奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:2 D4 {1 A* u6 {' k8 w& H$ w. Z
/ K$ v9 p. T/ |% v) H1 B
agree,' D0 f+ Q0 J6 M% h  a' f5 V# z
我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
5 |# g0 A9 x8 N" q7 P& [* S% F但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,
" ]# F# ~% a" q# H) C; @5 j# p期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

1 r8 ?5 t+ M2 e7 a
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
- u* O% M6 }: e; U9 z已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地
" |$ _! ?. B$ e9 R9 ?- z% |1 w搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.- V2 I: o" Y' K- A2 E4 |
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:+ a: l- y2 u2 D) m, i3 e+ b! Q# K
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！ ' ?' L& n2 t2 u  y

$ J6 @! R! o/ v' x% C- |! a* I係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???
# e- ~9 h) b2 E; n7 K. ?  X" S- w: J; l3 q$ G
為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

$ r/ p/ W  A- w/ L& O
. @! u* u( I# X1 V8 q; C. Y絕對支持啦
2 A" i- ~) O1 b7 M
9 ~% f0 ~5 u2 k* M: h" x有錯就認,打就企定
! R* d+ I7 H( }) [3 O' N; p
7 Z3 Q, F" x" W( s/ d& |% b無錯當然要撐到底
+ H6 U" `  ?" h- D2 L2 W5 M$ o2 s
% }  f5 u3 U+ u6 R1 A但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩
+ m  c# F# O: {4 e- B7 U$ i; ~: w1 K: \) r" w; e5 v
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
. ^" h+ i7 Y; ^# W' m* @3 |. [+ c  f: p3 a( A
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力! ]& K9 N, O0 z+ u" v# j& [2 H

* [; w. ]9 a$ m, c1 e% o8 U我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生1 g  T: u4 i! j5 m

$ b1 [9 ?6 z1 |唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
1 f; C0 y, v3 h7 g- x% x9 Z
( W, C' m/ W! \0 `, _9 D" j我唔認為lor! H  t# I; X& C
7 S+ r; P/ l; O: V$ ?- Q) N+ G) ]
唔係話要整死佢地
$ }7 H" {, `! M' e6 H( I& Y; t) t4 |% E0 R9 c; N
而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用! A  b( C5 J5 g) _4 A: Y
# f1 K- ~' R# c! _# K
我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大+ z5 Z$ i$ ^$ `; ]) U1 x! t
2 C) Z" V+ R4 P4 ?
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的
" f3 e7 I( Q+ }4 v+ \4 Y5 L  B; K# C+ n' V& h8 P/ q$ J- S
唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由
) D$ H# m( s/ P. f2 Z7 t4 |- Y. W4 I# o% u" [) G9 g/ h
大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句3 z& O& k* n3 @/ w, b4 U: R' f
"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"" d4 Y& l9 e. p
# O# `$ c5 l# q6 e, `
我們的大學生
8 s6 ?/ a$ j" M0 ^+ j
7 Q/ Q' W$ w& I1 p+ d
$ X) s+ o6 t# q/ G2 p5 D" g- Y
2 P4 v! R, z1 H$ m0 B) D* C+ I8 C3 Q! \5 \  P8 W' T  O) v

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
9 l- A8 p. I9 A3 v8 `! _3 ]8 ~
( n" k/ K/ L6 g- ]; S( ?6 C4 r$ H$ ?" Z% L$ j
有見地 !!!( _0 x" O/ ]7 y# n, X5 Q" p# e
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html  M8 q' ~" b$ D

( d- Z9 v* J, aI think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers.
3 ~) T# H: `9 Y( x. d8 uI never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind. ( [2 i+ u( p2 h, A
I pretty sad that about the University official.
" x1 O1 D8 I3 j3 C2 }' \& ZIt's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
, o1 Y: T2 [. V* S2 C& v# J- D
  _0 c+ n1 k1 J: ?: {[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:7 L# j9 @1 s$ A; c/ f
我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la; l4 Q8 L  Q0 h8 u5 |+ C; |

! }8 Z) y/ X2 w( p[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

0 H) w* B6 x. t; a0 C: L0 a8 B0 V0 Q7 ]
兩者有何分別?+ }0 ?3 Q! I6 G4 A9 Z; \6 K* ~7 a, P
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?