奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:2 W: O# b- j0 t7 y, J; l
) P( F& p# |7 }6 P( j& I
agree,. d; \9 w8 n& L1 M  ^/ i
我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,8 H; r& O! o/ J; ^
但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,
2 P. W- s/ n8 Q" y3 c/ ?+ ~期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

" z1 N8 |2 L4 }& ~1 G5 F
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
& @7 l% y+ K6 A$ b5 ^% g! o已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地
7 _8 z5 q3 z' u* q; ^3 s' j9 i搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.5 W* p$ W% A+ ^7 n; Q2 f" i
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:
1 @- G5 v( P" `0 H1 f% b8 ]1 V有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！
* J" f. {- D* R' `/ {. Q
8 i) X) J6 m5 S2 u, n0 Y6 V係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???" U6 `& H6 K9 d" z8 }) [& V0 [  N9 n0 [
- Y' R; v: k7 G- n4 l& ^8 b
為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

/ p$ ^4 Q. }1 k8 J& L* i. Q
1 R( Y0 }9 o4 E' z. S絕對支持啦7 f7 c4 L1 d8 D9 P8 E6 U* P
4 x: T: ^$ B" E
有錯就認,打就企定
" r, L- X- ^! t  q+ {1 c( N" {5 M  S; ^
無錯當然要撐到底
3 W& n( z/ e% t: z) R$ ]
1 y- y- Q& B7 U4 Y- K; {但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩3 @& R$ U( K: w9 {1 N( @* X# D4 D

( I, q: f8 x4 }2 G在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
9 v0 W) A0 Q! v8 ~- R& c+ f/ K3 s3 s% E. X2 k  K4 U
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力
- Z/ @9 j" c% _+ b/ l, J: ^* G. m/ c# y4 s
我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
5 _; Q  x0 g6 d3 z: y6 \: |1 h! \9 X8 t) `8 S" Q8 U: Z
唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
, L6 V) Y9 b5 p3 s
7 F- Q6 y$ A: e0 t: `& [我唔認為lor
) N+ D2 S3 ?; B
: M3 ^& q+ E  _* C: A, C  Y唔係話要整死佢地
/ {: d9 u9 F+ z3 `, O+ u, a6 t4 r, B0 L* ?( O- e! B: q" D
而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用  u2 p$ G4 T; P1 n& [  ?! O8 f
/ O0 O" Q3 H  l5 Y
我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大7 `/ j4 C1 s7 K

% M3 ]( ]8 f: ^  I4 D有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的
1 E- M3 f& ]3 U2 M* a$ z
" T, E( q' k: `唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由
4 @- d6 Q2 u4 D
8 J# @# s2 B( p1 A, }0 E9 V" Y大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
2 m5 P/ t/ \3 e, V7 J/ I% h"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"
- v( }% w8 H7 V# C6 {4 u! F9 q* o% @; F6 C
我們的大學生
* |- E% G  n0 a
1 Y4 e2 K0 a7 E- n0 L  g- [' U" A" |& Z$ d3 ~

6 q# m) k$ l3 D, [/ n3 s8 B* ~* F! @( y4 t* z# ?6 s

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:$ O7 F3 g* n# {4 ^* o0 b5 |7 @
6 {0 G: ^6 X. H$ o- p" _

# u8 H, ~5 k% F1 c; P有見地 !!!
2 F% M9 ?, o9 Q' i# O# l* k( l現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html, C& a' t' [4 {$ E* I

6 l) y: Q! K. H: r+ mI think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. % p8 J; c* }0 c, L( r5 G
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind. 1 ?6 l4 W" K* a
I pretty sad that about the University official.
& k4 W1 ?! \1 ?0 J% p* W) y& _It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
, f; g8 h% v' ^* y: n! e; r) Z5 f8 F  P3 v* ~" H
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:
8 J, z0 N5 n! [& M& s: ?我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
1 Z- x+ D( b  T7 ]8 Y, h2 _+ y  Q- d" f) n
9 n# V7 t& |, b  J' `; K* k[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

8 q) z( x- y6 f; L% }

4 F0 G( A9 M; r+ [兩者有何分別?$ h. M( u# H9 ~  h
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?