奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
  G) N. C5 E7 M& B0 t! V# y' |6 Q# M/ w% D3 N
agree,
' {6 Q' h1 \: Y1 Z* [我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,1 ^' y- e$ x) O% V
但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,
. O/ A% D( N+ X. U9 L( k期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

' v( o: }' m% N3 P1 N
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
" U6 I% f* I' r9 c$ E已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地/ D. g8 x; Z5 l& y/ ]
搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.
' z! a* r$ l- J1 cJust some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:
  Z- b+ v8 c- t* h7 {有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！
7 m  |" T, x7 A) d$ o& T
" l' K+ W% h2 L! a. l! T  p係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???% f7 @0 L( ]$ P) E

6 f: A9 V& b8 b& X為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

* m' S+ [+ L% V% ^5 v8 H9 o
4 ^6 {0 S7 U% m) p# m  H1 w# ^- ~  D
絕對支持啦" i3 v  k9 O' G3 y9 O; D" g
6 p9 e2 ~/ j& i/ H8 G  H9 S
有錯就認,打就企定) i9 v1 @( y1 }& H% S/ t8 _2 {

  D7 L2 m7 V3 |" y8 L無錯當然要撐到底* k% L& \# q$ o

8 g+ J+ I' s) u# C( l但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩
, L; N! h" D# ^# X, u, [( r+ h5 j- @% Q' @
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得& i3 `, ^8 H- f- X3 b
- X; H) C& H' p7 O
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力" W: m7 y! w, Q$ A

1 D1 U( {: G* ~# u) Z6 r' l我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生, G, G4 y/ J8 M7 V' Q$ n

/ W, l( |, ]0 P  ?& F) r  z& J( |唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
6 S  Y. [! I' z9 y/ c8 j% Y6 B) v1 _0 V- t5 K
我唔認為lor0 N2 {% l+ d$ I/ U! [; n3 k

' G6 N+ Z2 k% m/ Y唔係話要整死佢地
! v* K, h' n' P6 x0 J( a. q2 d3 s/ m; a
而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用. v4 O3 ^- n* q' s; \) h
+ R  U" u3 [( Y6 ~: |+ p* e
我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大
$ w4 a: L8 S9 @0 a: u/ i5 c& f1 i" J8 \: u, [  U+ |# d
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的! p  c/ M$ e" g
2 {( C' ^5 `# `1 W
唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由
5 O% p! Z. o- K' U3 x" @! H9 M' j5 j& N
大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句$ x7 G# M* j  o8 o& F$ N( i
"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"
7 j, d! j1 K2 t* O/ N. U" F) O. ~/ P9 H+ Z
我們的大學生$ q0 w* J% c1 Y$ B) d: Y2 s
& z1 c  x: |6 s( ?1 r; R! u
  T5 W% I! I2 V0 Y

6 q- L; A9 ?+ ^% |) r3 f/ D
& N. B6 A5 u. ?: d

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
* U0 A' o% L5 O) u% w, I3 l7 `+ q% \% x

. A& Q8 J* `$ T& ~* ?有見地 !!!
& g9 n( @. `* K: W0 {" S現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html! i$ p$ N- M; b( G" ]
2 n& b/ M. W, a' B% S& y* ~7 ^
I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. 2 J2 G; O6 l9 A; f; W
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
% k; c0 _/ ?" o# R; ~& a9 fI pretty sad that about the University official.# I4 w# |- ]) h" L
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la! t) @* U6 \! R% B3 A) r9 |
+ j/ g2 X6 [8 Z5 p7 j) u
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:- b( r2 l& R' G+ j) t7 r! }4 O
我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
9 r3 S+ f2 Q0 u& v: I; G- f( x$ j6 e: E8 d+ D
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

: X- D! w' k* ?7 m( v8 ?, U

; Z2 e  r; p  `3 a/ t+ Z6 n兩者有何分別?( R7 T' x& C7 D3 J* t4 F
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?