奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:" B; B) u4 b2 u$ x! X: w+ d9 Z2 g

& M% {1 x1 j" r8 Z! qagree,& ], o9 x" K- ]
我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,& `: M* D/ y9 l
但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,% l2 ?% v' c2 o! `# h( T, Z
期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

& h+ g- W6 t, y( Y: k# G! z& Khttp://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
# Q/ }- D7 s1 N# @$ }+ k已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地& e% ?8 Z' ?1 E! S
搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.( n' x9 U. o  k! H- v
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:& E* J1 O, _! H3 L6 f
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！ % O4 z& P- y7 M& l! R# S

3 W$ x6 m( ~# ~0 I! @係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???
* N* z2 \" c7 L2 {$ |; w
$ \3 @/ z- G& c( Q7 p. c; `為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

8 y% o! U% R/ @) ]2 M# y( z0 B( x2 i* _* P* T; N( {
絕對支持啦8 I5 Y* v$ j* @. F' ~! K" H

" B  l( d5 `2 T9 }8 k有錯就認,打就企定' `! I9 g9 l, m
, m5 D4 d) w% ]5 }; Z
無錯當然要撐到底- K/ U) j8 c8 {3 |
0 ?& Q' l6 p6 t5 U6 C$ L' a, Y* p! n
但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩6 b6 E' D, B9 d- k$ J8 \  c
/ ~2 e" ?) `% @8 k6 E
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得! D  g. g, t$ F0 ?* L* d1 D& M* H
, g* B7 _# F% A1 A
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力1 [7 B1 N# `' ?5 q# f* ]6 I

  K3 T. X7 n5 A- g' t  G我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生3 b* b4 x% G8 i; \0 k. R! [/ c9 o

# L+ D7 o! B3 Q6 ]/ m. y; S唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
6 g6 L0 `. t3 W2 O$ g( E' _; R4 l9 Y2 k, ?' |# u* B, `0 A
我唔認為lor6 T0 {8 m0 {! o

4 a5 J/ Y3 G6 C8 V/ `- n唔係話要整死佢地# U. ^- q: x* B6 S" h6 P

8 y2 l) a- J  Y; \而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用. ~" a. U- Q! K# k3 o. |

7 h- _6 `) G5 E6 V) Z6 J我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大6 g5 w! p2 P) F

+ }. C9 b+ g) V! }; L% v2 O( D  A有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的
# \$ z( p& c9 C) F& X3 U0 J2 B
' U& F  q% {% {唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由2 N/ F7 O* N; E8 Y- S/ X6 {

8 y# w3 y+ E- p. a7 \3 e大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句& C& E5 c3 j# d! o
"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"
- a$ `" c: Y/ @# a: T, t
- a+ q6 w# F7 `我們的大學生
) [, j  L& Q) x9 v5 W6 I0 K" ?

7 j4 u$ l! w% Q5 [# w7 ~
& d3 Z- l: ]: G& [" x9 G1 o5 S9 p7 h# V. m2 T3 y- \" \1 x$ p+ p

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
+ R8 ~# h& {0 Q; v% m7 ~# Y7 U' m$ U1 S- N4 y& k  h
$ w2 X: Q8 C+ X
有見地 !!!7 j5 n7 v+ m: x# J- {5 X! l
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html5 t  N1 S4 V8 _

( T$ O; [! s1 ~% i" NI think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers.
' A# Z* q+ e+ a* J' j0 }3 }I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind. : f; V% l( Y8 v) ?
I pretty sad that about the University official.8 d3 e  M. i, s
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la; m0 b4 m% P8 I$ v/ D& R/ f) [& z. J

! J  ]( L5 a  p; {* n6 e, i. i[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:0 E) |6 K) b2 ^+ U  R
我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la6 d! O* g3 y5 S2 S% y% h- H& W

* e0 ?2 @; ]6 \! M. c[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

" |! ^" r5 M" c& F$ r

9 N$ e% `  x% n. E兩者有何分別?* x  l3 H( `2 e& ]$ [
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?