奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
$ d5 q. s% s7 [
" _4 ~3 K" @6 B2 W, H' vagree,1 `9 B/ y+ u9 ~7 H
我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
5 H# v7 A( H" p! E9 E5 |; K但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,7 t4 @' w, s& r
期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

$ o: g. `4 ^# H* }2 \  G
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
5 B3 Q  E+ n/ E. \已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地
+ s4 p3 |# s" W  D% F9 G( I% X# D搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.& S% Z* z7 y" ^8 d( B9 y
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:
* T" a/ p" |# t- c0 s3 S9 o& `有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！
2 i. r, Q1 s: q" b* a% M& L0 O1 C7 A
係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???
2 ~: I" k) t+ B& F& |( o* N
5 O+ {- m5 k1 S9 ^) b) C1 \, D為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

  b- K- Z, g  R; l. a) _/ ]1 ]
3 x% P0 M) v/ \0 o1 V# r  V% b
絕對支持啦+ v! ?# w6 q' Z- x* g; |+ \( k
" |/ T. V8 S3 Q# y( F2 H8 D
有錯就認,打就企定
- i8 G, {6 U9 Z3 W4 R( q5 Q0 F) |) r/ D: }- @# L, _* [& @: R
無錯當然要撐到底
( h' _2 w2 Y$ m& n
! e8 e6 a* w& w4 [/ R6 M; K8 ~$ C0 `/ E但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩" M1 C  _8 L0 W3 o6 P, E
' i* {- x4 S0 q7 g/ q
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
( F1 B  R- Y) x# M% d# Q2 z  ?9 U& Y1 [* v$ l/ k! X/ m
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力
* {$ C' v) k4 O4 I1 f! m  j: `7 F
" d+ h1 r% u" ~" p我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
7 q7 R1 S/ E) X. h' ~" x2 ~3 l: L
唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?  e, X9 L9 h1 `( z+ e) v. O! H

( u2 ?" I2 [6 J, \. K我唔認為lor
! V$ i* l- I+ P6 n! e% m# h, I4 q- c9 K
唔係話要整死佢地
% ^5 }1 }0 b9 G/ k9 ]5 P. Z
; \* f) a. n; |" {6 y5 R而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
# G2 ~; Y- }  }# P; @8 ], [+ `7 y
. X: Y/ c& `' F: c. M7 I, C我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大6 e& g8 E. X) L( I+ s

0 Q, }6 t2 G( G( ]有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的
; n' L% b) m! z0 Q! s& a/ l
$ I/ D  K8 x: S4 c3 Y  H' `1 r唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由0 ~2 h8 _7 n- T  f$ f# k8 Y
4 t: O" D& x( F# l, I7 ^# F
大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句9 w2 H. K6 x0 M! m; Z0 g. ?/ B' }
"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"
! w1 Q- ^4 S+ q3 Z7 V& x$ \5 F1 X% M+ u6 D. a6 ~7 G  n* Z
我們的大學生# S2 ]$ N6 O5 o; `5 Q7 D+ N, u# P

) F! K* t$ x2 Y  U1 ]7 l
( M# ?- {& t& x, X0 G! E" ]
+ ]5 F6 s! z* z* d) O% ~
6 }2 U( l6 E. ~

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:2 q7 v- f9 |* U- j# S9 z
, F' a4 |5 z$ ~! p2 v6 U# @& _

6 y. s0 t! W7 K. P有見地 !!!' K% A* c6 I3 `0 d
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html* d  E- p9 g# o2 U4 N1 Q3 J3 `
8 j- B! X6 c( c+ O; C' D! j$ E
I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers.
; }3 ~( P$ q1 ]$ U  f. x; NI never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind. $ w: A& z$ k7 W" I# y! T: r8 W/ N
I pretty sad that about the University official.: x; l- |2 p1 z/ f7 L: q% g
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la" B. ^% w- G+ C' i8 |0 _+ X

% O! m  e9 ?5 v8 l% y: U3 n[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:: F8 m  k7 P3 |- s; D0 _
我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
, |. T* c1 Z2 f  r) J7 S. ~, s6 x+ u) w
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

# p! c+ ~; K- V  `

8 S. ?+ w' T. }. Q+ S) |3 n4 ]兩者有何分別?5 S* g; L* t, l, `3 b
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?