奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:* r% \' n9 O: f) b* ?) z9 U8 x; {

) |$ Y) j) {/ {' h: i5 k# dagree,) z1 A" l8 O( j& \5 J, C; c$ L
我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
2 @/ H0 s! f7 y2 A5 s6 ?) a* k9 L. ^, h但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,2 _  D1 U: h( d% |# p, M% M8 l
期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

% ^6 T# R' h8 d) J/ Q3 e0 l
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
# S2 L: @2 m$ s8 Y* J' J$ D已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地
) E' T2 c7 O' S& F1 Q2 N搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.6 G% c3 b0 J2 o- v+ o* @$ ?
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:
* w% C8 i: V" y: P7 P' O有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！
  A6 \8 E- \. W0 a2 m& g: c: j3 a+ X6 w6 h2 N$ p; V% ~9 f
係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???$ {. b6 m" Z' k5 I. H5 P1 W, o
4 N3 e" e! p1 G3 h; `& @+ b
為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

9 s/ A8 [; \, |; o( r. Q6 L
7 o2 \% |3 s, g5 W; q3 S0 B絕對支持啦) P; u+ [5 L3 S3 q! x: \
! N6 ?" z2 b% J, l/ k
有錯就認,打就企定
/ O5 L( F7 z1 M1 F! x: v3 n1 n5 w: ~6 d( d  i; |5 P# w  c" J8 l
無錯當然要撐到底9 V5 O. Z- w& u# Y

  s- a% ]  [7 p- q. V# N; Q但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩* _, h6 q/ {& T

! g5 X, m0 c+ H/ Q; o3 ~在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
/ U5 v' ?1 X* |' x0 r% W- f
4 G( n" A' ]) U5 O* Y  B8 i一份公眾讀物係好有影響力
! Q( J+ {7 g$ T  ~. T% P1 J2 t6 e, M5 ~
我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生8 O/ W' G5 Z2 H/ h, h# S
9 B0 M3 j1 R/ b+ _1 Q
唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?3 d+ h* t* a/ Z! L: w; G
4 e; w* S) P" P" W' `6 @5 U8 B2 I# _
我唔認為lor
! w0 z# ?6 _9 B1 R# L% y% b6 Q3 ?
/ L4 T/ b5 t  v% w唔係話要整死佢地
9 F8 [4 ~2 L, Q" G, {* `# O% L
6 J' ]/ o: f# o: E* P3 L" g" Y而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用/ W9 h  A- ]1 L  q

" C* j" o3 V) _& o. M% e' L我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大/ |  ?# T8 N" g3 `! j+ y4 a8 t

2 P" M) f" o' t有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的4 w' g6 q) a" E/ L( m

* D) i* p0 k# g( K5 R! h; z( l唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由
$ C* ?0 |  G0 Y: M- \8 D8 g  d1 E$ y7 c
大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句7 {- u& \# J0 j9 g$ c
"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"
  q' l) w# N6 y# B! f4 G* I, V  U2 K* M( F5 ?% U( R7 o
我們的大學生, U$ L6 V9 u- o9 m
' v+ X# i& t+ n  [& {
& p  R5 F& z# z) }

: k+ Z" w' J* V1 \8 e4 i/ W2 i& ~2 v8 b' m# C6 `* |

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:) V2 _% w2 U# h+ Z! v0 M
) `( ~: n% P5 N1 a$ m
: P6 z% \( j8 z( d
有見地 !!!3 d. P5 ^' ?: T- D/ z
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html, g1 k0 g+ O  B! c2 L+ v9 [1 L
1 ^$ k) b$ U2 @8 v. z
I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. 1 [- W9 M% @! J: L! @- M
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind. + r8 r" V2 _' p6 N( `, @, k
I pretty sad that about the University official.
" Q& {9 e+ Q9 K( S% |It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
2 I4 A; J' M: c/ n7 B- O* p7 `! |- |' q& Q
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:1 E9 p4 i3 l; U1 e
我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la3 Q1 K# y. z8 b0 [* Z* w# q4 R

& d5 P9 e" U! U/ \[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

  m: U7 ~/ I; w# W/ S& V) u4 _! S+ F* ^
! F( C7 L# K0 }. G& t
兩者有何分別?
9 z6 ^* |' J* I3 z+ l# |中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?