奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:- ^  h6 E9 |2 u* u
) W. B- n' q, b2 W# H  q/ L0 |
agree,
. R4 e/ W0 Q. m* ~# b* J& C8 H我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
* o+ Z: @9 s$ \但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,7 r+ _% V9 Q, I5 d" x
期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

7 l, L+ T! S1 {0 I6 n
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
6 _: R' b; N& y已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地
) T' E. [, R3 f( o0 X* U搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.$ U& U) U' Q" T9 w
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:
' S4 T# q& E9 k2 |$ |1 e有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！
- z. o5 i  R/ B/ L% u! |
9 u0 E* a2 K# W/ `" w, {係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???9 j' K( ?: @3 h( X+ ^

) G& s- z7 Q5 K9 d; M; n3 Z7 R為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

" }- t1 u2 ~! s! D
/ A8 h9 z1 S+ S3 _' J絕對支持啦
( Q& G: E) p8 k3 z9 I3 k
0 W8 _4 ]) C, L/ `' u, ~有錯就認,打就企定# i- t' A4 C9 I$ W) d0 E
5 B: Q, b8 x# p' ~3 m2 y: m( `4 P
無錯當然要撐到底
$ S7 W7 U. @7 ~7 k" B5 t' @8 m/ f8 }. Y$ S  G
但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩% b- G0 D5 w- W$ z& ^1 s) y
5 F+ W& F4 d- I* K- _# g
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得( T$ m- J2 M# K; x/ S% \
/ Q+ j9 E6 f3 S4 d1 G
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力% ^7 e8 M5 }: H% J9 `5 p: y: k% P

7 I; B9 k4 s& S; E* b4 \6 J/ T我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生) |+ s7 W7 v& o/ o- z" ?" t

# f9 F* g- K4 Q* r唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?, r6 R9 `( ?  t% o

* N2 L: H. Z7 y) H: m/ @) N我唔認為lor' X4 M. X; ]6 h1 U. E
% X+ v- l! |. a. ], G
唔係話要整死佢地8 R, a$ c! e% u/ ^

% H6 K/ A7 b" i( `& v( f( t而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
9 e$ c# ]9 J) F! B3 @. E. A$ y: ]0 g0 J$ T5 e( B: j. K
我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大( Y/ X6 y1 I; d& b: _+ Z8 I" a

. H- A- `+ n, ~1 z有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的% v4 O9 j9 P, p& x% Y9 z% h

* \4 Q/ p/ R% O3 T唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由( x& B2 m+ e# K/ d# t) `2 V

/ ^. M4 ~/ |$ Q# y; ^大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
, s8 I! @4 [6 S# q7 _8 D"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"
+ q$ f' c, Q4 Q
2 m# W  X2 }7 b我們的大學生) j( ]* ]. M5 U' q* \
+ Q+ o, }' k- {# v& p- c  L0 {
5 X" M+ [( n2 L( ]9 m: L; ^
3 J8 K& ~7 a1 v

& {! r- R; P- B4 @& }( x

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
* X/ z( R  \# w. g. B. u/ e( d' ?1 j% m2 W1 o' t- C; k
! U! l/ ^) }$ W8 M+ k
有見地 !!!2 P; @" w* z) @4 w+ z
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
  u( W- x1 n+ @8 s2 Y6 {
7 c; A, X& C% a+ Q: C& uI think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers.
+ f) u& r$ L# I8 l/ EI never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
- I- U+ K. S$ t' T; XI pretty sad that about the University official.
" i9 R1 U% u9 p$ lIt's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
$ l: i7 r, [2 _% \( i) I5 [5 G
0 i/ v5 y. Q4 G9 U& n1 Q9 g; H[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:, w5 F* C1 O% q6 @
我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
  x7 v* z# u3 o4 L2 a" G$ s5 k! H  |4 e1 n4 Q
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

( k: B' d/ y* r5 ]+ D/ p/ V) q4 r5 p* \1 R7 L2 d& N
兩者有何分別?
, U8 z! n- {$ i% E* V  `中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?