奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
' `( V8 l- i8 l* i+ O# N( t: f/ `) E7 k. j/ \5 K6 C
agree,
8 L4 D7 x0 `7 d9 b/ R我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
3 _/ R; S; T" X8 P, e1 z但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,
; h( }- I% T, j  N8 R期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

. g9 ~$ P: g$ y. V: z# \6 ihttp://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html5 D) M8 Y/ O) \! S* e8 e9 ^
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地: `- s, u' k$ N1 |) M
搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.
. Z' O4 R1 L0 A# T3 b5 |/ A4 S( RJust some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:
3 f! o- Y) j8 u' M5 _& m有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！ 6 c* s. j  {( {0 u8 r# X: T

: K: V5 k# j6 A係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???+ t- e/ E' K2 n  h1 _

; q0 b$ B0 p' R' C為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

, A8 b+ G; Q0 i/ g9 l
+ s  C- S" h8 o7 Z8 L0 R5 E
絕對支持啦
5 P, X2 r+ ]$ ~% a# }. i( _+ `5 n0 Y( w1 Y( @+ t8 f9 Z# W" I
有錯就認,打就企定
4 a( d% ?# Z7 e! J) {" W( _8 X9 E* c$ O( H& }9 {6 E1 O
無錯當然要撐到底' d( b9 X6 L( Z$ d( c9 \
/ e# u0 L" X  i- J. j6 ]( d
但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩' C# D3 m5 d3 f( W4 U# b

7 [$ `! m' }, W$ \6 b. S$ y4 {在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
( x+ U: h* m0 U  \1 X1 {6 S) m" S& l
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力  [& p6 v" S- V8 I- w* Q! H

( u; g1 A; ^5 K3 p8 l我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
+ G& H) L: f8 d/ {3 y: o. w2 {$ e' H: D, L  o! [. n1 t
唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
! g. P7 d' g3 Q# H# b4 `2 D
: O; G: {8 q2 c, O: {% `! q我唔認為lor$ j3 T' T6 u, ^4 h0 w+ `+ o' e
4 ]$ X# F3 ~1 H+ [4 ?
唔係話要整死佢地6 |# F# Q' @. p' g; g* ~2 M

; k. W8 C& }2 W7 Y2 {! |而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
% L# ^" m7 V) h5 U% ]
6 }! j. i- S# p) b: @  V我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大& ^) U4 j& S* B2 I  r6 c! O

6 I" w2 M: Z$ K3 _9 j2 `0 [; M有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的: K; z; R& O% R# h/ w( p, u
4 h4 O# h' P  z8 T* R9 U1 R8 \7 e9 ]
唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由( n; `4 J/ j; c+ o2 i/ k1 W
+ k2 L2 ]! S0 y9 C6 s) x* ^
大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
# H; {4 T8 Y9 K. R# j9 f"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"' U; _8 n5 H  U/ `# P' }4 v" H

$ A5 d% L; e$ s1 y% w我們的大學生
3 h: P4 ^0 t( S" a" ~- d) y1 }/ Z7 W* ?4 h) s

8 O* z. T5 u5 w! t9 r/ d$ w6 K
: ~8 E9 E1 N* u# C- _4 A* s4 t
6 p& m6 g, N0 y. F

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
- ]) |1 v* o5 S! N  l/ e
- p! r- [. W( v& t. g0 b# x. K! u! O. {* C- [. f8 A9 ]1 f2 S
有見地 !!!
# p4 f, u! _& s" }現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
6 U5 ^6 o# b! x' x" X
$ ~2 N5 @2 m: W2 |I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. ) [+ _" a) q" Z5 O$ _, G
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
/ K- l3 N: a% N( C& K8 t4 {I pretty sad that about the University official.
# |: k4 h6 V9 Z$ X, KIt's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la$ H$ N0 j* J  _6 \$ n0 z2 P
% T/ R1 y! \% W# V8 _  G
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:1 M) y& a6 R7 L/ f8 H; K+ E
我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la; T+ [3 e# Y9 \5 T4 I

3 J1 G- t4 a6 V( N+ ?+ X8 l[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

/ z3 H6 Q( Q% J
' W, h2 `' a) U) ], s5 |$ ?3 u2 }
兩者有何分別?
% r9 a4 M4 j3 {7 T. N' A+ f9 `中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?