奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:# E5 G+ l- \+ ^5 e2 J* K8 R
) K* F  {3 v0 S( S9 ?: J
agree,2 p  S$ m! @1 z7 _1 b3 C
我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,1 g% |1 y0 `# g. y% j$ U
但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,! N% @9 d( L) }5 [# R! i
期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

4 L! O/ ~( K6 t7 Q8 V) c" p& _
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html  p5 ]2 D9 B& L: t
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地0 s/ g8 Z0 h; Y% N) [' o  P
搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.
* L; o9 o  u+ EJust some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:1 X! C5 p% n  l8 q9 `9 ?# `
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！ 9 V; K" T/ Y/ B9 }% m3 h! L

3 K0 Q  P. z) s4 B' H0 b4 w係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???
1 o* F, A& J# a7 n  e* `3 v) H' ^$ L/ I5 f% L* |
為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

% T' ^9 _* O3 e5 B& {: d3 |' C" u# S; y4 B' l4 U5 _
絕對支持啦* w. D" g7 X! ^3 i) A
) |4 b: v* r, S8 @2 ~& {
有錯就認,打就企定
* m% ?% r. _% Q- o4 I- u9 a# p: k4 u: n
無錯當然要撐到底  h, T: z8 _# m1 C+ P7 c

4 }: b: g3 Y9 S4 Z; Y/ f* X* e但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩6 Q9 J$ c# G4 [/ U8 l9 p
1 N3 P; l2 i- Q1 I% i
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
* l# e# Y0 r5 {/ r7 `5 ^
! V* `% V+ V2 F% X一份公眾讀物係好有影響力
! W) D2 r8 T( q2 }# K
0 I5 r6 T8 y! n0 h# T! n. o& t* k: r* p我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
% t& b# t" D; k% F% ]3 Q3 |+ J6 L  Z
唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?( T" P9 [) L4 a0 ~: x+ R5 t

+ F, x+ b  q( E4 C3 l% f我唔認為lor
1 j, Z4 R7 R1 ?& [4 f9 m+ P5 D/ r5 p) O0 D, w: s
唔係話要整死佢地
2 g0 r2 n& b; `5 N" l7 Y* K# ~7 _3 Q# c1 |/ D
而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
! O0 X% t, Q3 e" K( s
7 |% \/ z; k/ P& H& L我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大! z" y- W% z: ^* r# h; [
# q/ Z# ^5 \) B, p
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的
& W* Z, F, J' q6 F' f1 a# I
% m/ `6 O$ b( t唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由
, C; l: V/ r) a7 S& N' {
; R8 U0 y) S" y: q: d7 ~0 w大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
, U* ~3 w2 A* A: g"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"1 j/ K7 W6 F7 `5 k! a0 b3 D
8 l" }+ ]. |& T& ^* X
我們的大學生# ~* _9 {) c9 c& P: P- ]
0 U! t& @: \: W+ G0 j, R6 ~
9 m) Z  {" k) s: ]* e

8 g/ I7 t5 u" |4 y( a4 W) }, u& C  H5 P1 e8 l" L) I

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
1 P1 K, V" X7 @- Z7 c7 z& V7 i( J, [# j( N# N2 l9 l

  R8 y/ T, P8 _4 @- M7 \) d有見地 !!!1 E; l% D2 C- m6 [9 ]# `
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html4 S/ p( K# g" K( M. v
3 U' X- B( f4 k8 d! B) L
I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. 9 v  M! `# D  R
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
* J) C, h) {9 ^& T" mI pretty sad that about the University official.* M: c1 q4 N7 z; L3 h
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
" Q5 s3 H8 R$ C( D5 g# K6 M& ]2 h5 f
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:  }1 [! f. Y3 `& u
我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
/ ]4 z7 o; {5 G- v" k' M0 G: |3 q, A1 ]0 j# q$ J7 Z5 ?: l
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

9 J. }( `6 F6 f7 r6 |' ^" j' X
" A# w+ w# Z6 n" v兩者有何分別?1 ], c8 ?' C8 e7 u( Z' e
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?