奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
- C( D) k+ X: L. x- A" r7 o1 S- b. G, U; Z: j+ x% g
agree,1 [4 T3 \1 W; |: u3 J9 V' {
我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
% v: J' U8 N3 D# J但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,: _4 ^* ~; D; O% m1 m) y
期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

$ t$ C7 ]! u5 {8 A2 a, \1 ?
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
$ J! d% G, T8 @6 t! J已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地
, n/ j' l2 C6 x! O  B搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.
1 p6 d7 Y% A0 C& l) x  MJust some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:1 a' m/ p9 i1 A1 P  _
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！ & d" ^  r) v9 N) ]3 H! u; S
; ?" J0 D) k1 f4 F7 o
係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???
' G* e' L4 n4 D- _% ]# T5 I5 l$ s: Q4 E5 K9 X
為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

: Y: J- [; p( m: F: B. n

: w; J" f1 T6 ?8 g: b絕對支持啦
! Y* s# Q$ [) Q8 O  Z' t
4 r1 Y7 O7 P2 H7 M3 B有錯就認,打就企定
, g1 |- H3 ]0 g
, F! |1 G# K7 p: G* @0 H無錯當然要撐到底+ x+ c# r7 R7 O; y+ y" a) \7 h( y
7 g2 A/ r3 Y$ A
但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩
; L( V: l# x  {
4 `, o, a' |3 X3 N" g在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
- c$ c& b8 ?% L5 j3 S+ H+ d/ t
0 `: y1 R2 Y/ _/ J' [/ E一份公眾讀物係好有影響力4 y) ]  A* B) I" W) T9 J4 k

6 V4 @2 `, W7 S2 ~  T我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生4 y! r* h/ [; ~1 ]) U
4 {' p2 [- j$ M" H( L
唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?1 \( y- \7 l/ _  Y$ i. U' q! x
9 f, q* {  H. D/ M/ f; `5 p
我唔認為lor8 v8 y5 K3 R; y& W6 M# L' A/ u
5 n" }$ B7 L8 [! J
唔係話要整死佢地
2 p1 z( r. \+ P5 I7 r0 ?+ E4 f6 g1 w( G( U
而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
2 t' \+ W/ r8 ^. n: a. ]5 B& p1 V. f# Z) @, {; E9 h
我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大( d# l# K0 Z4 O1 `( C
# Z2 ]; C/ T7 k0 k" z# G, V
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的
$ d9 M" n8 I6 V: x' p
$ e0 U* [/ U7 ^4 Q/ \唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由
0 }5 w0 j6 f& m6 `
9 ~5 w) v. v+ Q大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句, O& L% @2 P8 `9 q: _! U
"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"1 T+ @# C3 N1 X! p5 {& q* m
; n) l3 \0 N' B
我們的大學生
, p" n% a2 u1 \* `- E% c
& A) D. o& p! u) ~; i$ g
6 e. y. x; ]; j/ K& n& h/ }0 L: b, t1 \6 |5 K, {- l

# A8 Y% S9 m/ C! c

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
+ e2 k/ G6 A( e" i* J  M
& w4 }- \% ?! Y; b' T0 \) M
1 x1 d: c: N9 b+ H; W有見地 !!!2 o" f+ Q/ F" N- X! E5 I# p; L8 H
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html$ v- M4 e3 G( G9 x" ~1 \2 u
. S  d: K7 r( X6 Y
I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. 1 Y8 i4 }3 X" k- ?& j& }
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind. : \7 J; ]) E0 C( j' B; w' X
I pretty sad that about the University official.
' S9 M0 t' i2 t: I& m4 y0 mIt's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
5 D1 u9 i0 T9 Y! v' a9 o6 x) b# X
& Z! L$ U7 ?3 w( b[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:0 r: k9 X% H& T1 f: B) Q
我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
* A  z; z' Y/ z3 m( I3 x0 O
! ]( G: Y0 D) a( t  D1 Q[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

2 F$ E8 c7 }$ f- H4 `9 w) ^, e
: I& c8 K# f4 w
兩者有何分別?
% j* {) P& W( U中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?