奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
0 |( @# M, i+ v$ W0 T
, W4 \$ [* E- w/ T* j9 oagree,' C& u- ^6 i) F, @$ A* |
我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,! R0 F) v% A8 F% @% B
但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,5 e- Z7 ~5 ~: |, J9 G
期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

  T2 I. @# b6 _! S  q5 d6 a
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
' Q; g- F! F" B9 j已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地7 q- A8 n5 t* p6 o& J: ]
搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.
. J' o  R* @% t/ B3 B$ d1 u6 EJust some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:+ \7 o5 S9 g- j: z( R( T/ k
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！ % P$ T2 z8 ~: y* ~
) b1 a+ B: q' n9 f3 @/ i! I
係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???: }- h; G" s" C) q# J0 t

  ^' T$ a8 }( M7 w* ?1 k. z為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

. l* {" s- Y5 F* l! _$ G5 H) Y: i1 ]4 Y% [
絕對支持啦
1 i( k( O: n8 D( {1 e  ?) z/ Y% ^1 w# m* s
有錯就認,打就企定
, K: `9 R% `; p
$ }4 [) ]) u9 _! g: h無錯當然要撐到底
+ x7 S5 }( V2 _4 p% \4 n' y' H1 \! R5 q. G; _5 h2 u
但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩4 p; v& T1 E. o8 g6 j6 e5 w( D
, J. J8 x8 c- i2 A
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
1 w# T+ o) }- c1 i+ U: J6 h3 Z% W
: E- o, {! |8 U* p一份公眾讀物係好有影響力& v# x- N/ H: t$ ~9 A; g$ h
( M- |7 Y' L0 e% z; L+ ~
我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生5 F& h" f) j& c7 {9 O

# }. \- W) Q9 \; y0 ]. v3 p唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
0 U: P4 J2 q  h8 f: G
0 r$ x) n5 T# u! |. o5 l我唔認為lor" k7 y$ K% Z' }- w* V0 A2 }: @

2 ?) b$ W; _4 _唔係話要整死佢地  I( o# I, o) z& c
3 H- q6 D5 S& L, Y" h
而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
+ b. K  D$ }6 ~1 [: y7 n2 A
$ E8 ]' s+ t/ v! z6 I; j6 [我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大
9 F# k$ n& D3 J
% R0 l7 K& S- _* m有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的
5 z' R4 w# L) i  g9 |( f
6 p" r! J* I) q* ^: e唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由7 S9 H7 f" u( I2 s: C( _

5 X* e$ ?- s7 L3 M& ?) y' p8 s; E# _* }大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句( k" L2 f# j: y* \( N
"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"
5 ]3 {% Z( {, b) p1 n8 w" a  F
我們的大學生3 _$ V7 w7 [( O9 {
) u- B* }! n1 g/ q/ i4 _6 q

8 A: c! U+ r- g8 A, S: @; Q! t  q) Y( I. l0 f( A7 W( U2 ~

) b. B. R% ^: o$ m- Q; C

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
/ g! z0 P& L0 R. X  v* R! U( B( Q( z2 ^& d
- _1 w6 M$ R+ b8 N2 @
有見地 !!!
* i1 ~4 k( }8 H' N7 R現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
0 T3 Y! Y' @% ?4 F
: @9 j5 q8 q' ~2 x% N, y' t" dI think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers.
% n: O: o$ R' R) G4 k: m# D- ^' ZI never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind. " f' H3 s0 N6 T9 y
I pretty sad that about the University official.
4 j6 ?% S, [- |4 G% v. GIt's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
2 e$ M- ]# f5 G
) r0 U. N  M& D[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:' M* }+ w; Z8 S( y: V# g" p
我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la: |% V* `: r" M3 J( `% p# r3 e3 {

) x  p( I8 n" o4 ~[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

; ^7 [! i) }. l( Q! S1 G
  Q) @4 t0 [; W, n
兩者有何分別?
! }7 q* W- E- u中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?