奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:' q) m; v! w. u) j
" m/ h! s2 D/ r* e9 k6 _
agree,
7 E1 r  P7 ]0 m3 j3 S) k; j我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
- v6 r; D$ @5 P* C但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,
; D3 X# f- l$ x期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

9 A# R- s& C; B
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html, n! h4 g8 ]8 ?! D: C; n+ P+ O
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地% f( r4 U1 v# q- C. O" d' |
搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.2 ]( h, C5 e9 X# i7 A1 I
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:
6 ?6 p1 v- V4 U% H4 F4 D% C有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！
2 r& w) D8 [7 k' @0 M* L
: V* B, ~* p/ C  l係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???
% _- Z& f3 i: O' ~& C; ~
. O! }. Y2 e5 \7 e4 J- f, v. @為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

; l6 a! N* G/ |; X: C. e
) }- I" {0 c, X絕對支持啦- o2 V. |1 p/ f' h' a6 p
9 s$ R7 T8 F4 [; [, r
有錯就認,打就企定
" t" e. c5 t; X4 ^1 A! I& o1 y2 q1 ^) G0 [/ V: Z
無錯當然要撐到底1 M7 k9 L, p; R) g+ {
/ J+ d: g- s; d/ {6 i4 x
但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩
/ v' `: _  j) K! [& A2 P3 t$ H5 O# L# L  Z" |
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得; C/ K  n2 B! Y/ i$ ]/ z2 s& f

* O/ `! e/ N4 i+ K一份公眾讀物係好有影響力
2 o3 v/ G( |% [( G" T2 X" D, h; L" C1 u& z
我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
8 _8 Y' `) `4 E2 q% t' \3 [7 T  u3 y% V  a
唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
' j- l! e( ?, I. q+ t, P$ H. P
0 ^1 T7 w5 J% Y- T* P5 y我唔認為lor
0 e8 k. E$ Q1 _- Q" F/ s0 b
/ Q- }, }& N7 v. `唔係話要整死佢地
: J& a0 X4 P3 Z1 a3 `) p9 [& j1 ?  h9 Z. a; X2 ~
而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用* A5 x$ N0 p4 B2 n; R$ E
' B+ r) n! `7 [$ |' o* ?0 M# e: ~
我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大
/ c" S- ~7 e  ?6 Z0 X- u' N" l( D: k& O# E6 x, Q
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的* g$ Y' ~" `1 S. y8 s/ M) E5 F

. u. f- v) q* }( f6 c唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由
1 N0 G6 A1 |! c5 {$ J7 S3 r0 S) v& X
大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句; N1 c& S4 x# Q9 T5 K
"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"
; w0 N$ l2 ~: m9 O4 Q+ T  [
0 w1 L6 m- C& G7 ]* [/ Z( [5 Q我們的大學生
* b/ ?1 `. j/ Q) T9 P
* V8 M) `6 I+ Q& f* D; K- N, O; X7 b! s! ]2 x1 V/ H7 A

, E8 C2 B& ~7 [: P" x" L; R
! |1 a3 x1 C$ w' W, z

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:0 o. [3 N  ?) s  o

) z9 l; a0 D( E- u4 ^. h  E1 Z+ Q5 D1 `' F0 ^
有見地 !!!3 w5 X9 c% C& r8 T& D
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html$ \* k3 f/ a! M3 j" I& e" \

' r, [5 n5 f% F5 S, r6 U( mI think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers.
. f5 N8 M2 x: o7 p. L- g) |9 d4 gI never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind. 3 c' h4 X5 ?* ]+ n. u( A, k9 L& ^/ y
I pretty sad that about the University official.7 n3 R& B$ B* Q6 f4 M5 o/ U
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
: l, Q5 t. d0 H0 l4 E* c* F( q0 E. K& d4 d
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:
7 q+ D( w% c. w- I9 j我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la* K7 w, T& Q5 P& e
0 m  [& `2 y3 |, b$ m: Y4 Y3 ~
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

, f% n! L; P0 D5 o% \" B1 x
; H8 u- @$ ?) h: L) |兩者有何分別?; U2 K8 l  I& ~$ f
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?