奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
2 R( g: |& o9 @* S# `% f6 c. c7 b7 w0 M1 s. W+ w& k
agree,
! ?2 K& S! x! C# ]我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
$ ]9 s* x  w3 u. V) k  O7 d$ E- e) y但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,
1 U' r$ k% t) K0 P期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

; ?& n3 }* d+ D# F1 @
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html2 {; B3 `; _3 Z
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地
0 a5 j0 \/ a. i# V( {搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.
- w) y7 Y4 k+ `( UJust some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:
9 [% t- z7 C& H有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！ 3 |4 u6 h7 g) e0 E$ _

% B5 m3 i: c6 X6 h+ W0 F+ o. W係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???' s  v% Z+ W, L0 j# F

6 [; V$ S+ Y9 K7 @- Q: [# t5 e8 H為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

! g6 v) D, y- Q2 K3 @: s9 d! a* B( a8 i- r+ J; g
絕對支持啦
* @' z4 O$ h! Z' S
2 w2 Q$ w" D; k# i4 s有錯就認,打就企定: a/ p4 }$ D+ p* X$ J' A

" y$ z, ?  L9 k  d- E無錯當然要撐到底4 y& r7 \8 z& I2 z/ @4 h6 |7 n# z

" r+ o/ F% Y* e7 @, T- X但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩
( ^  t4 C* `. z, ?& M7 f
3 t1 v4 \: P# ~在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
; c4 E6 c  G0 n2 A/ C; @$ S  n1 a9 X) z2 ?0 ~, e& U' A
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力+ J- J) K+ w- F, E; D2 }5 I& U, c
7 }+ W8 n& r; [  X  J! D
我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生, i& M, a4 O7 j" p5 V( k4 Y2 p
& @4 W! s5 w0 E/ i+ G
唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?$ S( M7 a! [  E# o* H& l7 b' L4 \' u

: M9 B  I4 C: a8 Y1 z! c6 L我唔認為lor, b+ Z$ U+ x' C" H, C2 t) a/ C: v/ u

1 h& P# v5 c2 N$ L# k, W8 ]' ^唔係話要整死佢地- p5 S4 I6 A3 ~& Y- y8 @; J, g+ J
; X8 \& Y* J* d! g; w5 b) [
而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用) R* L% ]$ B3 X/ b+ v. ]

9 r+ R1 X, B: r0 Q7 d2 h# V! n我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大6 }/ |! S  I7 W3 `1 x5 A

* x4 c! Z% i0 l( U  N. o" L有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的
8 O$ I8 d9 O! o7 P) t5 h
/ f$ S. h* f  _( [9 F: V  Q唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由( w, O9 b; x& R! {. \( V& h

# m9 U" m& e; A大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句; G5 ?: D, b$ ~. c+ I- X% Z$ r
"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"' N3 }7 C! j. r  X: @/ ]$ L$ ~

) Y/ y7 h0 X, _4 v7 g我們的大學生
, c$ n, y! \0 a! {4 Q4 w: G- C# P( N/ M- H8 y

% u; K- q, n, V, L: I) d4 m4 N# w1 D( s2 U3 Z  u: G
1 t' |% I  V9 u( }; ?6 J8 O0 B5 i6 ]/ d

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
, k6 ?3 V6 ~) k9 W; Q$ p" Z2 U6 e( D2 q/ f! T$ J  P# q
( Q( u4 d9 D# R2 v
有見地 !!!6 U' X, Z8 d) C
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html% O: C2 M& x7 F6 M5 P5 q2 X
0 J8 s2 J( h% L: }' u) D; V' q
I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers.
% c* C( ?8 }, D. |' Z5 ]I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind. - |& @, t7 b' I1 W2 b" q0 \
I pretty sad that about the University official.
6 w; G) V) L3 L2 E8 o% \It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la& e$ q( o5 u2 q

7 x" I: a4 ^) h( X& m- z1 I% A[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:) Q7 Q1 ~& d$ ~2 b9 Z
我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la! r# e' n3 X) n
1 f3 N4 V( ~. @( V( ~2 ?
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

5 l& M: Q& E7 S3 Z; p7 m0 ~% Q2 J+ E  I& R0 J. Q, z  Y5 ?
兩者有何分別?) a, K- u9 d' W1 ]4 i1 `
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?