奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
: U* G1 Y, ]6 V/ D3 D( d. `) Y
agree,
) o/ v3 e# m: Q! a' l3 B" g我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,, \: W' m$ `6 ^/ b. X4 V
但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,
5 |; g1 c7 H% x! i9 u& V% q" n4 o期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

5 ^$ L; s0 Q* `& n9 }( Mhttp://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html( i7 M& V- }- O9 \
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地  T. B# N" `6 o1 C: Y0 I2 \
搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.9 R; I8 s+ W+ c1 I7 m) E5 R! d& H4 F# S
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:
# T6 @4 ]+ w8 w; f0 W& x8 B有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！
' ~8 F$ i$ G3 D9 o
4 c' k; b2 _7 f4 b% u3 a, v係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???
8 ^1 |3 i, y( g: V4 V2 w! y
; D4 c2 K, h9 p1 }! F為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

* @# P- L+ ?5 B- q: K1 c& ^3 D
1 s1 L; Z  p# H1 C3 B" q8 m
絕對支持啦
& Z8 p" s2 ^8 h; V& d. \( u0 g" N8 K) x9 O, Z4 g( o
有錯就認,打就企定
# d5 U$ T# `1 n8 P
# i: {# s; R1 r- I6 |- I2 }無錯當然要撐到底  U7 x6 n  k" ]* I- T6 I
  L* j2 _2 Z% o% J9 ?! N% Z; [+ i
但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩
7 H( m' j& Z0 k$ }4 e" ~9 F+ k; Z% Z2 _7 Y; Z& {
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得% B$ G1 w4 V. F- k3 B: I
7 L$ L0 W& X. I3 n) t
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力; v" T! H; G; \  d4 I. U
) i+ o5 p) }9 \2 x
我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生" ^- `/ K- n5 u

+ j8 l3 {2 I" D唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?0 n$ ]2 ?+ s2 _- y) `1 S' M
" `( T0 Z$ }; _( z& y: ~
我唔認為lor! a) X. F" @; Z8 ?
$ `! N: M. D  [) z: W2 C: u
唔係話要整死佢地
5 K+ ^3 H4 P( D8 Z& R" i
2 @" U) ]( K# w2 |! V. ^7 F" v而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用0 S3 m# g/ B$ z$ J# E
& F# B( Y" h( X! W+ a$ B: e
我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大
# ?6 t/ T7 y" c
; ]( u2 f0 ~3 w有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的
9 j3 `3 M; a! g: `; Y' ]- G' v. R
5 k# I/ q2 H* U2 h0 }% [, Q唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由1 [9 C: ^9 G% @) y
5 e9 W& w6 A9 U' Y/ j9 }6 ?9 X
大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句; G( I; o+ C9 y. Y) q4 c# F
"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"' t% H% h2 L1 G! J& ]: q/ `

" z( ]$ W, b( T$ t* h; z. K我們的大學生: o5 U/ l1 p) m7 G  U6 P$ D
9 D; a9 g# M  R$ x  _) [
# Q- I1 ^; R: K6 B( y
) ?6 ~7 q* N/ P/ f+ x0 q
* l( }0 g, [, _7 R  G7 W$ x* E

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:9 h2 N9 o  H3 i6 r8 s1 K
. Y7 a: M  k2 }/ t' S7 \* E& _

4 B) g& Y; |. V7 e有見地 !!!* o  I. D9 E% u" K
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html+ n) f( W' M0 h# j8 P! K
6 z; i: e$ B+ o5 t9 Y
I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. $ r3 Z& X# K* x# b! y% Z4 z2 N
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind. 1 B: `' I- s7 q' W4 l; R4 p3 h' ]
I pretty sad that about the University official.1 [; I9 W# }" h# [" s! ~4 r
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la2 N2 V& c( H' v! ~( P3 D! |2 ^
0 `, t$ k# r2 S* E; `/ M. u" g
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:
1 U7 n( H5 z4 I我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
# ^( ~' R- y& t  b" J  Y
! Y5 C4 p! i: t6 @; I5 I; C! N! {[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

0 _$ V7 L6 O. c. }2 U" S* [" K
) s9 c6 b5 o1 Y9 l" Y兩者有何分別?' _, B6 L, [2 s+ P7 ]% K% M1 N1 j0 z
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?