奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:& ~6 S+ x0 E$ J: G

* V7 h" q- _' Y) d: ^+ W% Uagree,7 P7 J2 r; _+ }" C+ \
我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
  a7 P. t- Z# V  N. m但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,
; D( K" M. O* ]8 M期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

: ]& W- {, W" a5 W6 e' b# ?
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
% b& B" t" \- L5 @2 L! \; ^& `已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地
+ |( g- K! d+ L; F* g2 K搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.
3 J7 c  X$ s: i* v; DJust some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:
1 s3 V( G5 c8 i7 p8 O' _9 t2 g$ h有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！
- q5 Z+ s2 f9 H, }
6 c) l( T3 v; h/ g$ k! S係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???
- V% Q- ]( w0 N" t( T0 x" b' [; N2 d) I) Z2 j
為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

1 G& w+ J& C& [0 w) ?+ n5 v
: G% C7 {+ N( \
絕對支持啦+ w5 @, b3 _; p7 P& G

# M* `6 E9 R5 S: _; `0 T7 K有錯就認,打就企定
9 L; i# i# u- [8 {2 @- t4 V; H$ b  ~& f3 g: R/ c! t) J2 a
無錯當然要撐到底
  F+ K7 e! e& ~0 w* S  n( \4 q
* m! u. F& w6 u但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩
9 W) w% K- W# H* X: y% k- C* m0 h8 s
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
8 l' y" \4 r9 w3 o+ c$ g; W0 D/ M' g; o2 ?" f7 ^! m0 Z3 s+ W  E
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力
, j* b* T2 [6 b  o3 b+ Z: q* |+ _. X! \
我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
0 Q: C0 L! _# S( F. f/ p0 e* }% N8 {/ f& _% b
唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
/ x. G3 x; T4 D# x# @* h& L& k, L2 G
我唔認為lor# l, }8 l# D1 b. N3 ?

3 w5 J1 c  B9 z0 v) Z: \8 {$ H唔係話要整死佢地( b9 A0 c, G- G0 i; ]3 p# f
' t7 `2 @" }  b, {9 D; l4 t
而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用. o! y' E4 n" a6 Y: B2 }) o

! M& F( i. A# ^0 E" `9 e: Q我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大
$ y- W# `. i0 q' X) M. _8 P1 ?. i
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的
# Q, j( X% P! C2 d  S% Q, D
9 i. f6 o% X; u1 u$ N" I: G" e唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由( O( ?0 Y. f7 x$ ^" m
7 B/ D5 W( X( }& r  G' o
大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
) M8 d  I4 `4 |5 ?* n"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非") c& c1 N, u7 n

3 L/ ?$ b9 a3 V我們的大學生
$ q  a: s& j) [- t( C% I3 ?1 K, z3 k) n

5 g8 P+ W* y* \7 j* |0 z" `5 W
. S) K7 B) F; c. R" d! u' J
6 a6 p& R0 p% n' Y# W% [* f. F

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:/ l$ k% j5 D2 P
( r$ I$ v0 |% f" g( t! Z/ F
4 A  l, T* r$ t& j
有見地 !!!9 _) R( l) n. q7 o# u3 k0 l9 }
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
8 E: }  h4 ?0 X+ h
. ^& m( H4 x9 g. u0 LI think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. 6 x! L0 _& h0 t
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind. & Z7 n8 [" ]$ L3 @. N
I pretty sad that about the University official.9 _7 G  I& D7 i7 T2 [' l
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la8 M$ f4 l+ L! {% e+ M( |

+ E, m+ o4 q* }" l5 L. ~[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:
3 [7 p5 i+ Q4 I  c% o8 {2 Y% S我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
- q% e& y/ q9 @6 a7 _# n' ~( ~9 R: d
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

% a$ b! I. s8 e& w9 B
. ]! i" C6 Z* Q- ?0 _; G$ N% V. `
兩者有何分別?
5 a  m2 \# Z: l, b' F* a; {- P中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?