<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 精彩辯論-----信耶穌不合科學
返回列表 回復 發帖
Originally posted by austin666 at 2005-4-5 12:13 AM:+ }0 K7 u( W6 l
我係一個連自己都吳信的人
& q3 X% d$ e; x* E! ~7 V又點會將自己交付俾上帝呢
( q9 q) @9 y8 |, ~道理我知道好多只係做吳到
/ f- o5 X  B2 i7 U8 Z0 t呢D就係做人的悲哀
1 {$ l7 y3 I% c5 W3 N* l) f
0 y5 h6 P3 {9 A3 F: YNobody says you have to do it to win salvation.....the notion of 'giving yourself to God' is the biggest cliche and Christian jargon of all time!
- O% t% ?/ l/ p, ~) Q# Z5 _' P  [5 E6 m, y' e
Nobody can give himself/herself to God....these are Puritian theologies...." f$ o8 X, [/ k: N

+ x' Q9 }- P% \mr. austin 666, our pneumatology is a bit off...but I admire your willingness to dialouge....1 q9 u* V5 u/ s- H: {7 C4 ~9 g
$ e5 d( o2 |; _) I1 ^9 w5 e
struggle with him and try to understand him.... that's my journey....may it be yours one day.
yes, of cos, we are limitation. and we cannot 'trust' or 'save' ourselves.....4 a3 }1 |' c* z0 B( V
cheer up.... and find the truth in HIM
We are blessed that we can watch sports, to do many things...
so be happy!
估唔到brightlee對足球咁熟識~~~連哲學都咁熟~~~~~~樣樣掂~~~~
我哲學就唔掂啦!! {1 l' b- W% m; J: r
我只不過微小的基督徒...................
4 X8 e4 M* ?$ [" M$ c! s真的!!這不是反話) B% q! I/ v/ I& `9 a" r: I" N3 R1 R
因為我是情感比理性強的人
% Q- {& T; j( Q/ `" Z  Q所以哲學是不成的
We are blessed that we can watch sports, to do many things...
so be happy!
建立在虚假,謊言上的教派,不信也沒損失,- a8 f5 T: c0 ?0 V4 C) h% r
以一本七拼八“揪”的故事,作為真理有欠理據,9 J2 ?# g% ~  f; g, s- P% ?
在只有二千年的歷史中,不斷引起戰爭,屠殺,酷刑,權力鬥爭,強奪金錢,奴第...等等罪行,到現在還進行著...
& H$ Y8 Q2 J' k# \1 [) e, c; A正是萬惡之源
Originally posted by DXneo at 2005-4-5 11:42 AM:
* B$ w4 x# n/ r8 s& h- r建立在虚假,謊言上的教派,不信也沒損失 ...
& y  \9 q3 `# `* n( R/ ?$ |: j+ t4 j; I$ b( t
What a statement we have here?$ a  A! }8 f0 Z# H# b- }  _2 h
' R5 t- a/ ^& J0 \- y) n' E
Just wondering, what do you know about the syntax of ancient Greek, Hebrew and the history of the canonization of the bible? . \2 v4 p3 W  ]7 ]! |4 i2 G2 I* |4 j; s

! @! {( I- p1 _$ V. y# mI do agree with the bloodshed part....and my respond that this was posted a page ago in this thread.
, c$ |' r6 J3 Q0 T
8 v$ l  P( F- E1 k- e: jLooking forward to see the support of your thesis. mr/ms Dxneo0 Z+ U4 ]* M5 x) d. R2 I

2 L4 c) p/ n4 `& S0 A3 r% h0 n1 s:cool:4 n! N) T0 B2 p$ g4 E9 [( b  g

7 V( {9 o% F, w6 L[ Last edited by Gretzky on 2005-4-5 at 02:15 PM ]
Originally posted by DXneo at 2005-4-6 09:42:
) c3 t/ ?% p" S3 o建立在虚假,謊言上的教派,不信也沒損失 ...
2 G- ^7 I* R6 z( a# u/ ^. G) H

8 `& \# Q, \0 Z, z7 m# u* [4 B0 X' p  O"不信也沒損失"( x9 T% z( D0 Z8 r' y6 o, T# z
Yes, we can't "control" the religions from others.....7 w) y# G" O# E1 X5 R3 |' ?
but if we look positively, we should find out the truth.. of GOD.......- @! A. A5 x- p/ I2 N( x& |
/ m* s. }4 {4 K$ D! ?8 |! U
it's starting because we have sins......! p0 h: _  R& X) {$ r* v" P' }
satan dislike the creation from GOD..... (men) so .... attack us . N& I1 \5 g. s; S4 n
our jealous, our selfish.. etc... to let us unlike charatertists GOD
We are blessed that we can watch sports, to do many things...
so be happy!
"他們都見證了一個人生命的轉變,就是一位年青人的心智從謊言和教條轉向對真相樸實的追求"
3 J3 _/ b5 K2 h" p只要把神和基督之名及不要問只要信的思想放在一邊,3 f3 F6 S9 _, L: m) ^
用一些“腦”來看一看書中人的所說所作所為,5 ]. O) r) u/ l. i7 @2 h" u2 x9 Z
這些只可說是故事,古猶太神話大全) k# ~- q' l+ @/ Z) }/ A; G
如果把神和基督之名代入中國神話,更加神乎其神啦,
6 K+ K( `* e! H- q8 C* ~而中國五千年歷史也沒有大洪水浸沒全國,書要多看一點其他的~~- h( d! h, e* C& K
6 ^  a5 Y+ \- G: G  ]! A1 a2 _  o
導人向善的道理可多多學習,無理的要求或信條不肖一看,
. |2 ?  c7 `8 Q0 b; `$ I" O" t好的宗教不必強迫人說認同,) ~& V8 _- a9 Z5 B
5 _! \5 z) T) Q- U  J
一直以宗教作“尋”略的西方國家,
% M" A: E5 M' @0 B' p改了方式但還離不開強列排他及非教友即罪(歒)人的作法" \( d0 S$ ~$ x' Z8 Z: u
美國的“布樹”更以救世信徒的姿態宣傳,開戰...
6 S" v2 R, x% K! H( t' n1 M4 o, i0 g- A; L/ }$ @, g2 b
宗教只是西方歷史上權力的道具
0 k8 m7 _# U" K, _% j6 R8 N2 p  I& V& ~9 J2 w6 _8 P
吹水吹太多了,我看不必要花時間找理據了,0 E, w- E3 V  ^6 Z  P
信是你的事,不信是我的事,我既有言論宗教自由,與你何干0 U8 H: J' a5 C& P6 g! U5 {

( W8 R  _3 q) R3 ^3 Q8 S以下是其他人的見解,$ }, e$ w. m! P5 V& [5 ?# }
看一下神的先知門徒在記錄他們偉大信仰的錯誤
) ^* K7 |' c6 ^) l1 }http://hk.geocities.com/hpkong98/buybo.htm
5 M- Q; w% d1 E, z1 p. }; t
; \' \5 u" b. ~: z- [9 O2 I) ?2 G[ Last edited by DXneo on 2005-4-6 at 02:17 PM ]
.............信耶穌..............只係心靈上既寄託............8 g9 e5 |1 ~( g! r! T/ i* a
( {; p0 l8 r) L; W) v3 `
信左,如果開心d,積極d,咪信囉! 0每個人有自己選擇!& I6 u$ V( [" G1 v# a7 ~" f6 V. f9 y

8 Q& i  C5 U( p7 u" b# W, m不過唔好吹噓到真係甘"神"!!!3 T2 c6 m7 e$ Q; q% S6 P
8 n0 z, Q8 g* x: v4 d8 g; A# |, s. N
我信"耶穌"真係出現過係世上...不過係1個自以為係"神之子"既宗教狂熱分子!!!$ X- ]& i4 E1 S/ z( {, k! y

% b* ~) G# M2 P# p同埋希牲左自己,成就左天主教成為地球最多人信既宗教!
Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-4-5 07:06 PM:5 J( Q# Y# T& o2 B$ c+ e
.............信耶穌... ...
. m$ a; x9 N% G" K9 w9 B& B$ r5 i
Regarding the resurrection....  y" G2 I1 E0 E3 y/ q) F+ U* W# d

) i7 C; O( q# O* BActually even the Roman government had refereces of the resurrection account of Jesus. The great historian Josephus did some sociological and religious studies in the 1st Century....) |6 }) s% Q+ a' ^
6 `; ?/ y+ T1 e* Q4 B' s
You don't have to believe...but take a look at the historical documents before putting some horrendous claims, please.
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 精彩辯論-----信耶穌不合科學

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。