<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 精彩辯論-----信耶穌不合科學
返回列表 回復 發帖
Originally posted by austin666 at 2005-4-5 12:13 AM:
+ \+ t. V# o7 F* t, ?/ q* i/ W我係一個連自己都吳信的人" J0 m" V$ Z' e7 ?7 c
又點會將自己交付俾上帝呢1 P$ q: j! H$ B
道理我知道好多只係做吳到  t8 p5 l$ L6 k6 Q0 Z3 s
呢D就係做人的悲哀
* g+ A8 q* l: F
% R: i' `4 F# G% T) b- A1 FNobody says you have to do it to win salvation.....the notion of 'giving yourself to God' is the biggest cliche and Christian jargon of all time!/ ~1 q& W# `/ l% g! ?
: o8 G3 c! g/ c1 z) y" ?! N1 u- `  I
Nobody can give himself/herself to God....these are Puritian theologies....) W+ i* o1 r4 `- y/ w* [3 n; a1 }
$ J3 {8 M& w/ Z& e( A
mr. austin 666, our pneumatology is a bit off...but I admire your willingness to dialouge....3 Z5 Q* Q1 f+ S- K1 S/ x$ C

0 k5 M6 ?$ O9 \% C8 `9 ustruggle with him and try to understand him.... that's my journey....may it be yours one day.
yes, of cos, we are limitation. and we cannot 'trust' or 'save' ourselves.....
9 L9 e3 D! R( r5 C! t3 H5 _  |1 q# rcheer up.... and find the truth in HIM
We are blessed that we can watch sports, to do many things...
so be happy!
估唔到brightlee對足球咁熟識~~~連哲學都咁熟~~~~~~樣樣掂~~~~
我哲學就唔掂啦!8 q* }! r, G. \
我只不過微小的基督徒...................) g* s1 A- R" [2 J" \1 D* c  X
真的!!這不是反話+ y5 r- g1 c) |% }. G: t4 M7 B
因為我是情感比理性強的人, J% m  a5 F1 P+ w
所以哲學是不成的
We are blessed that we can watch sports, to do many things...
so be happy!
建立在虚假,謊言上的教派,不信也沒損失,9 i+ m0 b- F* Z) P9 Z9 _8 p6 j
以一本七拼八“揪”的故事,作為真理有欠理據,
' t9 N( o0 W' L在只有二千年的歷史中,不斷引起戰爭,屠殺,酷刑,權力鬥爭,強奪金錢,奴第...等等罪行,到現在還進行著...
" k* G1 s' L4 q4 |( A" R2 ^正是萬惡之源
Originally posted by DXneo at 2005-4-5 11:42 AM:
1 h7 V" b  A6 \- U! v2 }* I; c建立在虚假,謊言上的教派,不信也沒損失 ...
/ S0 ^! }3 j! f! `/ @6 \2 N

  ?' _6 A/ c  Q. F9 G( EWhat a statement we have here?: W$ c: Q" p% b( j" y/ u$ v; D/ I/ A! W

7 k0 K8 M7 K! Q# a4 G6 Q* W0 J+ MJust wondering, what do you know about the syntax of ancient Greek, Hebrew and the history of the canonization of the bible?
( d; s+ Q9 E1 C- X$ {$ b# J/ ?6 c1 m8 r1 v3 {; y7 @5 a4 [
I do agree with the bloodshed part....and my respond that this was posted a page ago in this thread.
4 D; g& l! M! Y$ Z4 c7 _" N$ T9 I# ]' Z2 @/ r, D4 B  e
Looking forward to see the support of your thesis. mr/ms Dxneo+ v( V) V8 M5 _. \

% Y3 f7 _# M5 H: A+ `/ h( B8 j7 Z" L:cool:
" |4 ]9 ~! O) D1 s2 j
$ ]& d/ V" u  \# c2 k* u3 ?[ Last edited by Gretzky on 2005-4-5 at 02:15 PM ]
Originally posted by DXneo at 2005-4-6 09:42:; X" j" l- O+ `# ]5 W% X1 [8 N  W+ y
建立在虚假,謊言上的教派,不信也沒損失 ...
1 C. K, g2 W% W5 H
- @2 O, b# c/ @; p4 i6 o
"不信也沒損失"
* K' d5 {3 p6 {: W' B# t' F6 LYes, we can't "control" the religions from others.....
. l2 E1 r! ^/ f7 C# dbut if we look positively, we should find out the truth.. of GOD.......
5 \! a) k8 B/ ]1 X+ v* i
& R. Q- b" W) p4 i0 U8 s& mit's starting because we have sins......" R  h9 G9 o/ \- |3 O
satan dislike the creation from GOD..... (men) so .... attack us 6 W0 P/ h: O0 P" N& w7 ^7 v. C
our jealous, our selfish.. etc... to let us unlike charatertists GOD
We are blessed that we can watch sports, to do many things...
so be happy!
"他們都見證了一個人生命的轉變,就是一位年青人的心智從謊言和教條轉向對真相樸實的追求"4 Y! O/ |8 w3 R
只要把神和基督之名及不要問只要信的思想放在一邊,! T0 ]" I/ W8 }  c
用一些“腦”來看一看書中人的所說所作所為,/ k6 o  Q- ]9 P) A  U' G$ b- o4 b! q) }
這些只可說是故事,古猶太神話大全
# ?% ~( Y: n$ K  u* L6 r8 F2 v如果把神和基督之名代入中國神話,更加神乎其神啦,8 k" T. R5 r( o
而中國五千年歷史也沒有大洪水浸沒全國,書要多看一點其他的~~; B2 Z2 U% c( z8 {  r: Y0 G

% y8 d# p; Y* q2 }5 w( m3 Q) [導人向善的道理可多多學習,無理的要求或信條不肖一看,) n0 w) q) O/ e+ P$ u2 }
好的宗教不必強迫人說認同,
1 |2 \8 W: P% \" D7 Y3 n* T" U- H+ v; W2 G/ x
一直以宗教作“尋”略的西方國家,/ k! j8 M  F0 y3 B4 a: u9 V8 T
改了方式但還離不開強列排他及非教友即罪(歒)人的作法; Z% X( d2 F! a0 X  u6 l
美國的“布樹”更以救世信徒的姿態宣傳,開戰...
' F# [$ a/ g# t  ?+ l4 I/ f1 w* n- O) C9 U8 G7 h; A
宗教只是西方歷史上權力的道具
2 ^0 `& S. x( p! U5 q7 u7 i
4 Y; D& \" t9 F/ t0 F- ^+ L吹水吹太多了,我看不必要花時間找理據了,( C$ s8 |' j" Q4 F+ }
信是你的事,不信是我的事,我既有言論宗教自由,與你何干
6 @# {; H' s" w1 n- r) n- a$ h' X
以下是其他人的見解,
7 n5 V3 ?* y7 ^" C7 W4 u7 p! Z6 }看一下神的先知門徒在記錄他們偉大信仰的錯誤6 {) [4 R* w# c0 s, z
http://hk.geocities.com/hpkong98/buybo.htm1 z. n% w% H* \( U1 c
7 g3 b$ e* G' [6 `6 a" f
[ Last edited by DXneo on 2005-4-6 at 02:17 PM ]
.............信耶穌..............只係心靈上既寄託............7 X, w9 g: F, U0 C  F0 j

. Q* ]; g6 G* e2 o: C信左,如果開心d,積極d,咪信囉! 0每個人有自己選擇!
+ r! d5 _& F; o( P- n, z( i1 C
. M4 ^9 t* M4 W不過唔好吹噓到真係甘"神"!!!7 F' f! p( q: T# A3 L
7 v/ r) v0 l3 _/ }" o
我信"耶穌"真係出現過係世上...不過係1個自以為係"神之子"既宗教狂熱分子!!!
9 n  F" d! c/ W+ ~
5 a& u. l4 b2 C( ~! j, X  s3 L同埋希牲左自己,成就左天主教成為地球最多人信既宗教!
Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-4-5 07:06 PM:5 M4 F% `4 Y0 u' I
.............信耶穌... ...
8 {* e  Y5 n1 j+ v. l- g4 d4 R6 m
Regarding the resurrection....
5 P9 m, {5 Q* C8 c$ b; I
4 p9 }+ U1 F- yActually even the Roman government had refereces of the resurrection account of Jesus. The great historian Josephus did some sociological and religious studies in the 1st Century....
" a5 k; G8 O7 c* d2 [7 K2 e
. H0 i$ y6 R! j& c' R) vYou don't have to believe...but take a look at the historical documents before putting some horrendous claims, please.
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 精彩辯論-----信耶穌不合科學

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。